Target Just Announced Its Early Black Friday Sale

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Target has joined Walmart and Best Buy in unveiling its Black Friday sale plans. Target will be holding multiple sale events leading up to Black Friday across departments, including clothes, toys, electronics, and more. Here’s everything you need to know about the upcoming sales.

What sales will Target have for Black Friday?

Target says it will have week-long deals every Sunday starting Nov. 2 through Dec. 24. It’ll also have “Deal of the Day” sales with items going up to 50% off. Then, there will be an official Early Black Friday Sale followed by an actual Black Friday sale. If you happen to buy something from Nov. 1 through Dec. 24 that drops in price later, Target will match the price for you and refund you the difference.

When will Target’s Black Friday sales be?

Here are all the sales Target will have:

  • Deal of the Day: From Nov. 1 through Dec. 24.

  • Week-long deals: Every Sunday from Nov. 2 through Dec. 24.

  • Early Black Friday Sale: A three-day event from Nov. 6 to 8.

  • Black Friday Sale: Black Friday starts online Thursday, Nov. 27, and in stores Friday, Nov. 28.

  • Holiday Price Match Guarantee: From Nov. 1 through Dec. 24.

What deals will Target have for Black Friday?

Target will have deals on gifts, holiday decor, toys, clothing, kitchen essentials, and more. Here are some deals Target has already publicized:

  • 40% off pajamas for all.

  • 40% off women and kids’ sweaters, sweatshirts, and sweatpants.

  • 40% off select holiday decor and lights.

  • 40% off select LEGO.

  • 40% off Cat & Jack toddler tees, shorts, and dresses.

  • 40% off Champion.

  • 40% off holiday sheets.

  • Up to 50% off small appliances and floorcare, including Ninja.

  • Up to 50% off select toys, including Barbie, FAO Schwarz, and Hot Wheels.

  • 30% off women’s and men’s Levi’s clothing.

Do you need to be a member to shop Target’s Black Friday sale?

You will need to be a Circle member to take part in the sale, but unlike a Prime membership, Target Circle is free. You can sign up for an account on the Target app or Target.com.

You can also pay for a Target Circle 360 membership, which grants you early access to the sale as well as other perks, like same-day delivery. If you’re a government assistance recipient or a student, you can save 50% on the one-year Circle 360 subscription; otherwise, it starts at $10.99 per month. But again, a paid membership isn’t necessary to get all the best deals.

What are other retailers doing for Black Friday?

  • Best Buy’s sales run from Oct. 31 until Dec. 24. It’s an especially good option if you’re a My Best Buy “Plus” or “Total” member.

  • Walmart is having deals from November 14 to December 1.

  • Amazon hasn’t announced its sales plans yet, but it should do so soon.

Disney+ begins rolling out HDR10+ support

Disney+ is making its first foray into HDR10+ content, but access to this content will be limited at the start. About 1,000 shows from Hulu will be available with this HDR standard, although other programming under the Disney umbrella will add support at an unspecified later date. Samsung, which is a major player behind this standard for high dynamic range video, announced the news. Disney+ will first offer the HDR10+ content on Samsung Crystal UHD TVs and above for models dating back to 2018, as well as select on Samsung Smart Monitors. 

HDR10+ builds on the HDR10 tech for image quality. It’s an alternative to Dolby Vision, and both technologies offer viewers a wider range of contrast, brightness and colors on a scene-by-scene basis. (Assuming you have a screen that supports it, of course.) 

Netflix announced the addition of HDR10+ support in March, but a handful of platforms have supported the standard for much longer.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/streaming/disney-begins-rolling-out-hdr10-support-190000237.html?src=rss

International Criminal Court To Ditch Microsoft Office For European Open Source Alternative

An anonymous reader shares a report: The International Criminal Court will switch its internal work environment away from Microsoft Office to Open Desk, a European open source alternative, the institution confirmed to Euractiv. The switch comes amid rising concerns about public bodies being reliant on US tech companies to run their services, which have stepped up sharply since the start of US President Donald Trump’s second administration.

For the ICC, such concerns are not abstract: Trump has repeatedly lashed out at the court and slapped sanctions on its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan. Earlier this year, the AP also reported that Microsoft had cancelled Khan’s email account, a claim the company denies. “We value our relationship with the ICC as a customer and are convinced that nothing impedes our ability to continue providing services to the ICC in the future,” a Microsoft spokesperson told Euractiv.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

AMD Just Referenced Zen 6 Ryzen Medusa CPUs For The First Time

AMD Just Referenced Zen 6 Ryzen Medusa CPUs For The First Time
AMD is on a mission: replace its proprietary AGESA firmware for its Ryzen and EPYC processors with openSIL, which stands for Open-Source Silicon Initialization Library. The move to openSIL will improve security and scalability while improving customization and control for AMD’s customers, including end users. However, that’s not what we’re

NASA’s supersonic jet completes its first flight in California

Nearly a decade after NASA partnered with Lockheed Martin to build the X-59, the supersonic jet has completed its first flight in California, according to a press release spotted by Gizmodo. The X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology (Quesst) aircraft is designed to reach supersonic speeds without the “sonic boom,” and now with this latest test flight complete, NASA and Lockheed plan to conduct future tests to measure the X-59’s “sound signature and conduct community acceptance testing.”

The flight on Tuesday was between US Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, California and NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California. “The X-59 performed exactly as planned,” Lockheed Martin says, “verifying initial flying qualities and air data performance on the way to a safe landing at its new home.”

The ultimate goal for the X-59 project is to open up the possibility for commercial supersonic flights in the future. Traveling at supersonic speeds, faster than Mach 1 or around 768 miles per hour, could dramatically shorten trips transporting people and cargo. And if the Quesst design NASA and Lockheed Martin have come up with works, which includes tweaks like placing the jet engine on top of the plane and using an extremely pointy nose, it should also be much quieter. “People below would hear sonic ‘thumps’ rather than booms, if they hear anything at all,” NASA explained in a 2023 blog post.

A ban on supersonic flights over the United States went into effect on April 27, 1973, in response to concerns of property damage and noise pollution. The ban stayed in place for decades until President Donald Trump ordered the Federal Aviation Administration to remove the ban in June 2025 as part of an executive order. Now there’s a new urgency to NASA and Lockheed Martin’s work with the X-59, and an opportunity to apply what they learn to “inform the establishment of new data-driven acceptable noise thresholds related to supersonic commercial flight over land.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/nasas-supersonic-jet-completes-its-first-flight-in-california-183500716.html?src=rss

These Surprisingly Decent Wireless Earbuds Are Less Than $20 Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

If you don’t need luxury earbuds and are simply looking for wireless sound with solid performance, the JLab Go Air Pop Bluetooth Earbuds are a great option. Right now, they are on sale for $17.49 (originally $29.38), making them a great option for everyday buds that you can toss in a bag with your other daily essentials. At this price point, you might even want to grab a backup pair in case you misplace them.

While these earbuds don’t have active noise cancellation (ANC), they have moderate noise isolation and minimal sound leakage for the price, blocking out a fair amount of background noise. And while there isn’t a dedicated companion app, these earbuds do have several EQ presets that allow you to customize the sound output. Battery life lasts around nine hours, but the charging case can provide an additional three charges.

Design-wise, this PCMag review notes that they’re small but secure, and an IP44 rating means that they can withstand a sweaty workout and a quick wipedown with a damp washcloth. The outer panels of the earbuds have touch-sensitive controls, but according to the review, they may take multiple taps to register input.  

Ultimately, if you need comfortable and budget-friendly wireless earbuds that perform well for workouts and everyday use (and if you don’t mind touch controls that can sometimes be a little finicky), the JLab Go Air Pop Bluetooth Earbuds offer strong value, especially at over 40% off.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now


Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Plus



$29.99

(List Price $49.99)


Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 with Ring Chime Pro



$149.99

(List Price $259.99)

Deals are selected by our commerce team

Oakley Meta Vanguard review: Sporty to a fault

By now, I have a well-established routine when I set up a new pair of Meta smart glasses. I connect my Instagram, WhatsApp and Spotify accounts. I complete the slightly convoluted steps in my Bluetooth settings to make sure Meta AI can announce incoming phone calls and text messages. I tweak the video settings to the highest quality available, and change the voice of Meta AI to “English (UK)” so it can talk to me in the voice of Judi Dench. 

But with the $499 Oakley Meta Vanguard glasses, there’s also a new step: deciding what the customizable “action button” should do. The action button isn’t even my favorite part of using the glasses, but it’s a sign of just how different these shades are from the rest of Meta’s lineup. 

While the second-gen Ray-Ban and Oakley HSTN glasses iterated on the same formula Meta has used for the last few years, the Vanguard glasses are refreshingly different. They aren’t really meant to be everyday sunglasses (unless you’re really committed to your athletic pursuits) but they are in many ways more capable than Meta’s other smart glasses. The speakers are louder, the camera has new abilities and they integrate directly with Strava and Garmin. And while these won’t replace my go-to sunglasses, there’s more than enough to make them part of my fitness routine.

New look, new setup

The sunglasses were very clearly made with athletes in mind. The Oakley Meta Vanguard glasses are the type of shades a lot of people probably think of when they hear “Oakley sunglasses.” The wraparound frames with colorful, reflective lenses are the style of glasses you might associate with a high school track coach, or your neighbor who is really serious about cycling.

The pair I tested had black frames and Oakley’s orange “Prizm 24K” lenses, which aren’t polarized but are favored by a lot of athletes for their ability to dial up the contrast of your surroundings. I was able to comfortably wear my pair in bright, sunny conditions and also in more overcast lower light. I also appreciate that the lenses are swappable, so you can switch them out for a dedicated low-light or different-colored lens depending on your conditions. (Extra lenses cost $85 each and will be available to purchase separately soon, according to Meta.) These glasses don’t, however, support prescription lenses of any kind. 

I wouldn't wear these as everyday sunglasses, but I don't mind the look for a trail run.
I wouldn’t wear these as everyday sunglasses, but I don’t mind the look for a trail run.
Karissa Bell for Engadget

I realize this style of sunglasses won’t be appealing to everyone, but the frame shape does enable a slightly different setup than what we’ve seen with any of Meta’s other smart glasses. Most noticeably, the camera is in the center of the glasses, just above the nosebridge. The LED that lights up when the camera is on is also in the center, near the top of the frames. 

As with Meta’s other smart glasses, you can control volume and music playback via a touchpad on the right side of the glasses, but the capture button to take photos and videos is now on the underside of the glasses rather than on top. This is meant to make it a bit easier to reach if you’re wearing a hat or helmet, though I found it took me a few tries to get used to the new placement. Behind the capture button is the previously mentioned “action button,” which can be customized to trigger specific functions via the Meta AI app. 

The capture button (left) and the action button (right) are both on the underside of the frames rather than on top.
The capture button (left) and the action button (right) are both on the underside of the frames rather than on top.
Karissa Bell for Engadget

I haven’t yet figured out what the best use for the action button is, though I’ve tried out a few different setups. On one hike, I set it up to automatically call my husband, kind of like a speed dial. During a bike ride, I had it set to record a hyperlapse video. I’ve also tried it out as a shortcut for launching a specific Spotify playlist or as a general trigger for Meta AI. With all of these, I appreciated that the action button allowed me to do something without saying the “Hey Meta,” command. Repeating “hey Meta” to my glasses in public has always felt a bit cringey, so it was nice to have a much more subtle cue available. 

Did I mention it’s for athletes?

The Vanguard’s athlete-focused features go beyond the sportier frames. The shades come with new integrations for two of the most popular run and bike-tracking platforms: Garmin and Strava. If you have a supported Garmin watch or bike computer, you can set up the glasses to automatically capture video clips based on metrics from your activity, like hitting a particular heart rate zone or other milestone. You can also ask Meta AI directly to tell you about stats from your Garmin watch, like “hey Meta, what’s my pace.” 

I don’t have a Garmin watch, though I did briefly test out some of these features during my hands-on at Meta Connect. I suspect a lot of runners and cyclists may still find it easier to simply glance at their watch to see stats, but having it all available via voice commands doesn’t seem like a bad thing either.

Strava’s integration isn’t quite as deep. If you’re tracking a run, hike or ride while wearing the glasses, you can overlay your stats directly onto photos and videos from your activity. This includes metrics like distance and elevation, as well as heart rate if you’re also wearing an Apple Watch or other tracker that’s connected to the Strava app. Here’s what it looks like with a photo from a recent bike ride. 

You can overlay your Strava stats onto the photos and videos you record.
You can overlay your Strava stats onto the photos and videos you record.
Karissa Bell for Engadget

I typically don’t share stats from runs or bike rides (usually because they aren’t that impressive) but it’s a bit more appealing that just sharing a straight Strava screenshot. Another neat feature is that if you share a video, you can watch the stats change in real time alongside your recording. That level of detail isn’t particularly interesting for a mostly flat bike ride on a city street, but I can see how it would be a lot more compelling on a more technical trail ride or in a race. 

My only complaint, really, is that Meta has limited these kinds of features to Garmin and Strava’s platforms so far. I’d love to have support for my favorite ski-tracking app, Slopes, and I’m sure there are plenty of people who’d be happy to have an integration with their running or workout-tracking app of choice. Meta has announced some plans to bring more third-party apps onto its smart glasses platform so there might be hope here. 

There are other improvements, though, that will be appealing to even casual athletes. The speakers are a lot louder to account for potentially noisy conditions like a congested roadway or high-wind environment. I never had to crank the volume up anywhere near the max during my bike rides or runs, but I can say the speakers were loud and clear enough that I was able to comfortably listen to a podcast with the glasses laying next to me on the couch at full volume.

The new centered camera placement is meant to make it harder for a hat or helmet to interfere with your shots, which has been a consistent issue for me with Meta’s other smart glasses. The new position didn’t totally solve this — I still found that my bike helmet made it into the top of my pics — but at least it’s easier to crop out now that my headgear is centered over the top of my image rather than awkwardly sticking out on one side.

The 12MP ultra-wide camera also comes with new video stabilization settings that make it feel a bit more like a replacement for an action cam. The glasses are set to automatically select a level of stabilization based on your motion, but you can also manually choose between low, medium or high stabilization (stabilization is locked at “medium” if you opt to record in 3K). I’ve mostly left it with the default settings and have been impressed with the results. 

The LED light is also a bit more subtle than on Meta's other smart glasses.
The LED light is also a bit more subtle than on Meta’s other smart glasses.
Karissa Bell for Engadget

The Vanguard glasses are also Meta’s first smart glasses that can record hyperlapse and slow-motion video. Hyperlapse should be familiar to Instagram users who used the now-defunct app of the same name to record timelapse clips. Now, you can say “Hey Meta, start a hyperlapse” and the glasses will record a similar sped-up clip. My hyperlapse clips ended up looking a bit jittery, though, compared to the timelapse shots I’m used to getting with my GoPro.  And unfortunately, there’s no way to adjust the cadence of the video like you used to be able to with the dedicated app. 

My slow-motion clips, on the other hand, came out better. It’s not something I’d expect to use very often during a bike ride or trail run, but the POV angle is great for recording clips of pets or kids. Meta is also planning to bring support for hyperlapse and slow-motion videos to the rest of its glasses lineup, though, so you don’t need to get these particular shades to take advantage of the feature.

The other major improvement is battery life. The Vanguard glasses have a notably better battery life compared with the second-gen Ray-Ban glasses or the HSTN frames (probably because the bigger frames allow for a larger battery). According to Meta, the Vanguard glasses can go nine hours on a charge with “typical use” or six hours with continuous audio playback. I was actually able to get a little over six hours of audio on a single charge, so they should hold up pretty well if you’re running marathons or competing in longer races. As usual, exact battery life can vary a lot depending on how much you’re using more resource-intensive features like video recording or Meta AI.

The bigger frames and charging case give the glasses a battery life boost.
The bigger frames and charging case give the glasses a battery life boost.
Karissa Bell for Engadget

I’m especially looking forward to seeing how these glasses will hold up during a day of snowboarding. Meta previously told me that the battery has been optimized for a wider spectrum of temperatures so hopefully the battery won’t drain as quickly on the mountain as Meta’s other glasses. And with increased water resistance — the shades have an IP67 rating —  I wouldn’t worry about dropping them in the snow. 

Should you buy these?

While Meta and EssilorLuxottica have gotten very good at making smart glasses (sorry Mark Zuckerberg, I won’t call them “AI glasses,”) they are still somewhat of a niche product. And the ultra-sporty Oakley Vanguard glasses are even more niche. At $499, these are also more expensive than other models.

That, understandably, may feel too steep for a pair of sunglasses you’re likely only going to wear during specific activities. But if you’re a dedicated cyclist, runner, hiker or [insert outdoor activity of your choice], there’s a lot to like. The camera makes a lot more sense for action cam-like POV footage, and better video stabilization means you’re more likely to get shots you actually want to share. Ready-made Garmin and Strava integrations are practically begging for you to brag about your latest PR or race time, which will certainly appeal to many.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/wearables/oakley-meta-vanguard-review-sporty-to-a-fault-183000829.html?src=rss

ChatGPT maker reportedly eyes $1 trillion IPO despite major quarterly losses

On Tuesday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Reuters during a livestream that going public “is the most likely path for us, given the capital needs that we’ll have.” Now sources familiar with the matter say the ChatGPT maker is preparing for an initial public offering that could value the company at up to $1 trillion, with filings possible as early as the second half of 2026. However, news of the potential IPO comes as the company faces mounting losses that may have reached as much as $11.5 billion in the most recent quarter, according to one estimate.

Going public could give OpenAI more efficient access to capital and enable larger acquisitions using public stock, helping finance Altman’s plans to spend trillions of dollars on AI infrastructure, according to people familiar with the company’s thinking who spoke with Reuters. Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar has reportedly told some associates the company targets a 2027 IPO listing, while some financial advisors predict 2026 could be possible.

Three people with knowledge of the plans told Reuters that OpenAI has discussed raising $60 billion at the low end in preliminary talks. That figure refers to how much money the company would raise by selling shares to investors, not the total worth of the company. If OpenAI sold that amount of stock while keeping most shares private, the entire company could be valued at $1 trillion or more. The final figures and timing will likely change based on business growth and market conditions.

Read full article

Comments

Thief’s VR revival arrives in December

Much like Half-Life: Alyx, Thief’s long-awaited return is a VR exclusive. The game was announced in June, but now we know when it will arrive. You can play the pioneering stealth franchise’s new chapter, Thief VR: Legacy of Shadow, on December 4.

Thief VR takes place about halfway between the events of the original trilogy and Thief (2014). You play as Magpie, a cunning thief (duh), who discovers a legendary eye artifact with a mysterious connection to the past. You’re operating in a city that’s under the grip of Baron Ulysses Northcrest, “a tyrant who crushes rebellion before it can take root.” That all sounds like an ideal backdrop for sneaking around and stealing shit.

Publisher Vertigo Games offered a glimpse at Meta Quest gameplay, which you can watch below. Thief VR will also be available on PS VR and SteamVR when it arrives on December 4. The title has a $30 list price on Steam and Meta, but can be pre-ordered now for $27. The PlayStation Store version doesn’t yet have pricing or reservation info.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/thiefs-vr-revival-arrives-in-december-181506849.html?src=rss

Take-Two CEO Proclaims That AI Can’t Make Games Like Grand Theft Auto

Take-Two CEO Proclaims That AI Can't Make Games Like Grand Theft Auto
Discussion surrounding the use of AI in game development is once again at the forefront, after EA recently announced its partnership with Stability AI. Those who work in the industry at a variety of levels have chimed in on the matter, and that now includes Strauss Zelnick, CEO of Take-Two Interactive, one of the biggest game publishers in

The Most Popular Running Shoes at the NYC Marathon (and What I’ll Be Wearing Instead)

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

If you’re looking for your next pair of running shoes, why not look for guidance from the runners logging more miles than the rest of us? After all, finding the perfect running shoes is about much more than style or brand preference—the right shoes are essential for performance, comfort, and injury prevention.

But with countless options available for both men and women, choosing the perfect pair can feel overwhelming. That’s where data from Strava comes in: Thanks to thousands of runners logging their gear into the app, we know what some of the most popular shoes that real runners trust to carry them all 26.2 miles.

The most popular running shoes, according to Strava

Strava has this data from runners who log the shoes they use for each. (Quick aside: If you aren’t a Strava user, I recommend a spreadsheet like this to keep track of all your juicy data). Not everyone uses Strava’s gear-tracking feature, but for those who do, it’s a great way to keep tabs on mileage per shoe. Most experts suggest swapping shoes every 300 to 500 miles, so it can be a handy reminder of when it’s time for a new pair…unless you’re my colleague Beth Skwarecki, who recently put over 1,000 miles on a pair of cheap running shoes (things turned out just fine).

According to Strava’s tracking data from last year’s race, the three most popular shoes worn by NYC Marathon runners were:

If you ask me, the top choice is particularly intriguing. While the running world has been dominated by carbon-plated super shoes promising faster times and better energy return, the most popular shoe at NYC was the Nike Flyknit—a traditional trainer without the high-tech features that define modern racing shoes.

The Vaporfly and Endorphin Pro, on the other hand, uphold the carbon-plated trend that’s been all the rage in the running scene. These shoes promise improved speed and reduced fatigue, though they come with steep price tags ($200 to $270) and shorter lifespans of just 150-250 miles.

My personal choice: Saucony Endorphin Speed 5

While many runners opted for full-on racing shoes or traditional trainers, I’ll be wearing the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 for the marathon this Sunday. For me, the Speed 5 occupies a sweet spot between everyday trainer and race-day weapon. It features Saucony’s responsive cushioning and a nylon plate (rather than carbon), making it versatile enough for training runs but still peppy enough for race day.

Unlike the racing shoes that dominated the Strava data, I prefer a shoe that offers:

  • Better durability: lasting 300+ miles compared to 150-250 for most super shoes.

  • More versatility: comfortable enough for daily training, responsive enough for racing.

  • Lower price point: typically $160-170 vs. $225-270 for top-tier racers.

  • Reduced injury risk: the less aggressive plate and moderate cushioning are easier on the legs.

For runners like me, who want performance without the commitment (and cost) of dedicated racing shoes, the Endorphin Speed line has become a go-to option. It’s proof that you don’t need the most expensive super shoe to have a great race.

If none of this data is helpful to you, here’s my guide to finding the perfect pair of running shoes, no matter what kind of runner you are. The beauty of running is that there’s no single right answer. Whether you’re in traditional trainers, cutting-edge carbon racers, or something in between, the best shoe is the one that works for your feet and your goals. See you at the finish line.

TypeScript Overtakes Python and JavaScript To Claim Top Spot on GitHub

TypeScript overtook Python and JavaScript in August 2025 to become the most used language on GitHub. The shift marked the most significant language change in more than a decade. The language grew by over 1 million contributors in 2025, a 66% increase year over year, and finished August with 2,636,006 monthly contributors.

Nearly every major frontend framework now scaffolds projects in TypeScript by default. Next.js 15, Astro 3, SvelteKit 2, Qwik, SolidStart, Angular 18, and Remix all generate TypeScript codebases when developers create new projects. Type systems reduce ambiguity and catch errors from large language models before production. A 2025 academic study found 94% of LLM-generated compilation errors were type-check failures. Tooling like Vite, ts-node, Bun, and I.D.E. autoconfig hide boilerplate setup. Among new repositories created in the past twelve months, TypeScript accounted for 5,394,256 projects. That represented a 78% increase from the prior year.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Paramount’s Call of Duty movie taps the writers of Yellowstone and Friday Night Lights

We learned last month that Call of Duty would be making the leap to the big screen with a planned motion picture project. Today, Deadline reported that two of the main creative forces behind the movie will be Taylor Sheridan and Peter Berg. 

Sheridan and Berg previously both worked on the 2016 film Hell or High Water and 2017’s Wind River. Berg was a producer on those projects, but he’s perhaps better known as a writer for the football drama Friday Night Lights. Sheridan’s most recent endeavor was TV series Yellowstone, and he also worked on Lioness, Mayor of Kingstown and Tulsa King. For Paramount’s Call of Duty adaptation, both will produce and co-write, while Berg is currently on board to direct.

Since the writers and director have only just been locked down, there still hasn’t been any public discussion of what era of the lucrative CoD franchise the movie will tackle. Based on the duo’s past work, something contemporary seems most likely, but it may be awhile before we have any confirmation of the story or casting.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/paramounts-call-of-duty-movie-taps-the-writers-of-yellowstone-and-friday-night-lights-175331091.html?src=rss

Nintendo’s Patent Lawsuit Against Palword Dealt A Rare Fatal Blow

Nintendo's Patent Lawsuit Against Palword Dealt A Rare Fatal Blow
Nintendo’s ongoing patent lawsuit case against Palworld developers Pocketpair has hit a surprising speedbump, though the battle is far from over. For those unaware, Nintendo is suing Pocketpair for patent infringement in Japanese court, and two of the three patents it is claiming have been violated relate to game mechanics that revolve around

Dyson Black Friday deals include more than $290 off cordless vacuums

Dyson is holding an early Black Friday sale on vacuums and related products. Sure, Black Friday isn’t for another month, but who are we to turn down a fantastic deal? To that end, the Dyson V8 Absolute cordless vacuum is on sale for just $300, which is a discount of $290. That’s nearly half off.

Dyson devices are all over our list of the best cordless vacuums, and for good reason. The company makes effective products. The V8 Absolute has been designed to clean all floor types, in addition to upholstery. It’s also been engineered to squeeze into tight spots, which is great for hitting those oft-neglected parts of the home.

The suction power is on point and the battery lasts for 40 minutes before requiring a charge. That’s just enough time to vacuum a standard-sized home if you don’t stop for too many breaks. This model also comes with a HEPA filter.

The V8 is getting a bit long-in-the-tooth. If you want a newer model, the V11 Extra is on sale for $400, which is a discount of $260. This one boosts the suction power and increases the battery life to 60 minutes.

The early Black Friday sale isn’t just for cordless vacuums. The 360 Vis Nav robot vacuum is on sale right now for $500, which is a massive discount of $500. This is one of our favorite robot vacuums, primarily because of its incredible suction power.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/dyson-black-friday-deals-include-more-than-290-off-cordless-vacuums-173533972.html?src=rss

I Asked People the Real Reasons They Post Their Workouts Online

I run marathons. I post about running marathons. But you won’t see my sweaty face mid-stride, my pace per mile, or the unglamorous truth of what 26.2 miles does to a body. No shots of my form breaking down at mile 20, no documentation of the new insecurities that crop up when you realize your running gait is asymmetrical or your breathing sounds like a dying dog. I share the accomplishment—the medal, the bib number, maybe a scenic shot from the course—but I carefully curate out the messy reality.

Is this humility? Self-protection? Or am I just bragging with plausible deniability, performing health while refusing to actually perform it? After all, isn’t social media fundamentally a bragging platform, a highlight reel we all tacitly agree to maintain? But then why does hitting “post” feel like walking a tightrope between inspiration and judgment, between pride and shame? And why am I so acutely aware that in 2025, as thinness resurges as the aesthetic ideal and fatphobia floods our feeds with renewed vigor, any post about fitness exists in a minefield of interpretation? Social media may not be “the real world,” but when it comes to our mental health and how we perceive our bodies, it’s very much a real world—one with real consequences.

I put out a call on Instagram asking people about their relationship with posting workout data and fitness content. The response was overwhelming: well over a hundred replies, from fitness influencers building their brands, to private account holders who rarely post, and everyone in between. People were bursting to talk about this, which suggests we’re all grappling with the same question: When does sharing our health journey become performing it—and what do we lose in translation?

The performance of health on social media

“Social media didn’t create this—it just amplified what was already there in fitness culture,” says Echo Wang, founder at Yoga Kawa. “It’s become a place to gain clout and sell an image, so it’s no surprise that wellness and gym culture thrive there. People have always wanted to look a certain way, which social media has just made public and constant.”

What’s shifted isn’t necessarily the desire for fitness or even the vanity that sometimes drives it—it’s the volume and velocity. Wang says that what’s really worrying “is how body image expectations keep getting more extreme. The duality of social media is that you have access to an infinite amount of knowledge and community, but at the same time, you are swimming in comparison and misinformation. The flood of conflicting advice keeps the industry spinning because everyone’s searching for that quick fix or magic formula.”

This sense of being pulled in contradictory directions was a major theme in my inbox. “I feel like I’m non-consensually being pulled in a million different directions regarding what I should be doing to benefit the most from working out,” says Polina Jewel. “I’m thinking about reps, calorie deficits, and creatine, when the only way for me to feel better about exercising (read: being in my body) is turning inward and listening to what feels good, and using that information to better myself.”

Even when you’re performing for no one but yourself, you internally negotiate the relationship between what you see in the mirror and what you feel in your body. Social media isn’t designed to cater to such a delicate, fraught balancing act. These platforms designed to share information have created such an overwhelming cacophony that the only escape is to tune it all out and listen to your own body. 

The true cost of “public accountability”

Ryan Nilsen sums up what many seemed to feel, saying that “public accountability helped me start a routine right off the bat for going to the gym, but never helped performance. I feel like I need to trick myself sometimes when developing a new routine.”

Dr. Simon Faynboym, a psychiatrist at Neuro Wellness Spa, outlines both sides of the public accountability equation: “Posting your workouts can feel like you have your own cheer team; likes, leaderboards, and streaks make effort visible and give you quick hits of social reward. That public accountability can help people show up more consistently, especially if you thrive on competition, enjoy friendly challenges, or find it motivating to see progress over time.”

But he quickly identifies the pitfall: “On the flip side, it’s easy to chase vanity metrics like pace or the amount of steps at the expense of recovery and/or sleep. Constant benchmarking can create fitness performance anxiety, where the fear of looking slow, running less, cycling lower distance, or lifting less pushes people to overtrain or to curate only ‘good’ workouts.”

One Instagram response about step tracking perfectly captured this sort of performance anxiety: “I’ve had a 10,000 step streak going since last year. I’ve been updating my friends online regularly, so I feel determined to push the streak to at least 365 days, but at some point within the past few months it became less about keeping myself fit and more about hitting the number even when I should probably rest.” I’d be remiss not to mention that there’s nothing special about taking 10,000 steps each day in the first place. But the reasoning behind these goals gets lost in the pursuit of posting about achieving them. And when metrics inevitably don’t align with expectations, people feel like failures.What started as a tool for accountability morphed into an obligation, potentially at the expense of the very health it was meant to promote.

Sara Lebow also voiced this contradiction behind the “public accountability” defense. She says, “most of what people are doing online is pseudoscience wellness, or a form of optimization that can only be described as an obsession with control, one that’s bleeding into every part of our lives from work to dating. I want to work out and not track everything in this world. And yet, I weigh myself and then feel insecure, because that is what we do.”

The illusion of effortlessness

If you’ve ever been served a “candid” photo of a fitness influencer, it probably hasn’t made you feel great about your own body. But isn’t it oh-so inspiring? #Bodygoals, right?

Matthew Singer, a yoga teacher, says most “fitspo” (fitness inspiration) “is as helpful for fitness as previous winning lottery numbers are for winning millions. Fitspo cannot take into account genetics, job and family circumstances, health history, or any of the other countless factors that influence health outcomes.”

This gets at a fundamental problem: fitness inspiration content presents results without context, and bodies without the invisible scaffolding that created them. Similarly, actor Sean O’Connor says, “you have to remember that everything through the lens of a camera from a phone or otherwise is relatively propped up and fabricated, in the same way food commercials never use actual food.” The same mechanics apply to fitness influencers, O’Connor argues: “Even the selfie cam with no additional filters/digital trickery is a lens that doesn’t exist in reality. Simply turning on a ring light illuminates your face in a way that would never happen organically out in the world.”

But it’s not just about angles and lighting. O’Connor describes the invisible infrastructure that makes aspirational bodies possible: “All these public figures have teams of people helping look effortless. They have nutritionists, private chefs, personal trainers, state of the art equipment at their homes and some even have a team of PR people helping them manage an eating disorder, scheduling out how to give them the bare minimum of nutrition to keep them relatively functional, not unlike a warden at a prison labor camp.”

The class dimension is impossible to ignore: “These people don’t have to work, commute, rush through lunch breaks, have to cook their own food or pack lunches so they won’t be subject to the ever-declining quality of fast casual restaurant food. There is absolutely no reason to make yourself feel bad for comparing yourselves to wealthy public facing rich people with every resource imaginable at their disposal.”

O’Connor reframes what fitness actually is: “Fitness is less about looking perfect and is more about taking small steps to achieve and maintain longevity to live a long and healthy life. Anyone trying to sell you a quick fix is lying. Fitness is a marathon. And it takes a ton of frustratingly small steps to see what you want to see in the mirror. Don’t let the smoke and mirrors of social media dent the resolve of a slow and steady approach. Your body will thank you. (And so will your bank account because we live in a deeply stupid propaganda-riddled society where the healthcare system is run like a casino).”

Mason Boudrye, who describes himself as “someone known to post gratuitous thirst traps,” offers perhaps the most layered perspective on the pressure to perform fitness online. “I think the first thing to consider is how many of the men literally flexing their physique online are enhanced using steroids/tren/testosterone etc.,” he says. “Removing those from the equation, the next thing to consider is that for many creating this content is their job, so they’re dedicating hours a day to achieving their aesthetic, which isn’t remotely practical or realistic for most people.”

Boudrye also describes the dark side to achieving the perfect thirst trap: “Body dysmorphia, disordered eating, and exercise bulimia,” that last one describing when “bulking” is actually binging and “cutting” is unhealthy restriction. “This is certainly true for me, and I know it’s common, even if people don’t admit that the obsessive tracking and strict adherence to diet qualifies as disordered eating.”

But even with that self-awareness, Boudrye acknowledges the mental toll: “I have bad days where I am terrible to myself for failing to exercise, which sometimes transforms into resentment and indignation at the belief that people feel entitled to my body. This all might feel disingenuous considering my literal naked body is being liked and shared thousands of times as we speak. There’s so many levels and elements to it.” When you feel pressured to always perform a version of perfection—something unsustainable even to you—there’s naturally going to be shame on the days where you just can’t sustain it.

It’s so much more than metrics

Take it from me: Fitness is boring, incremental, unsexy work that happens outside the frame of social media entirely. The performance of fitness—the ring-lit selfie, the carefully pumped muscle, the optimized angle—bears almost no relationship to the actual practice of maintaining a healthy body over time. But that doesn’t get likes.

Instead, another recurring theme was the observation that social media fitness culture has become almost entirely divorced from actual health. Especially when it comes to viral fitness content, the need for perfect aesthetics gets absurd. “The need to go viral causes these influencers to be absolutely out-of-pocket,” says Andrew Barlow. “On the male side, I see extreme workouts including once a guy doing decline sit-ups while lifting a literal bench. From women influencers, it’s hyper-sexualized, where their target demographic doesn’t even seem to be women looking to be fit. Both of these are obviously issues in our culture in general, but exacerbated by the algorithm and chase of likes.”

Echo Wang frames this disconnect in terms of what gets lost: “From a wellness point of view, that incessant chatter is what causes anxiety and burnout. The pressure to show that you are ‘healthy’ enough, ‘fit’ enough, or ‘disciplined’ enough is very tiring. When everything is about data, validation, and aesthetics, you lose the connection with your body.” This goes for aesthetic-based apps like Instagram, but also ostensibly fitness-based ones too, like Strava with its leaderboards. Because when I post my runs on Strava, I keep all my data private—I’m too self-conscious to reveal what an utterly average runner I am, and I know plenty of runners who share my shame-based privacy. So, if you’re anything less than perfect, why post at all?

Who is this performance really for?

Perhaps the most revealing question is: Who is the intended audience for fitness posts? The responses suggest even the posters themselves aren’t always sure.

Claire Lower, former Lifehacker writer and powerlifting enthusiast, offers a perspective rooted in genuine love for her sport: “I like lifting, I look forward to it. I go to the gym whether I post or not. It has nothing to do with accountability—that’s why I pay my trainer. Posting is a good way for me to document for myself and track my progress. But if you look at any video of a woman powerlifting, a man has something to say about her form; I don’t want to reach a wider audience.” Here, posting serves a documentary function—a digital training log—but Lower deliberately limits her audience to avoid unsolicited feedback and mansplaining that plague women in fitness spaces online. Good on her.

Chika takes a different approach, posting strategically with a specific political intent: “I post heavy lifts intentionally because it’s really important to me that people see women lifting over 200 pounds, especially as there’s this move to thinness. Granted, health/fitness is very low on the list of my online presence, and some of that is probably because I don’t have the body of a traditional ‘fitness girl’, and so I fear if I posted regularly about working out, people would assume I’m on a ‘fitness journey,’ instead of just doing what I always do.” Plus, I know firsthand that Chika is correct in saying that fitness content “is guaranteed to get a good response, so I often do it intentionally when I want to promote something else on my story.”

For others, the audience becomes an unwelcome source of anxiety. Shenuque Tissera says, “I feel like there’s some really great representations of fitness for the sake of health, but a lot of the content and performance of fitness online has made me feel bad. I definitely now feel a bit compelled to work out because of online health performance even though I started working out for my own needs and health concerns. And while I used to not judge myself over the regular fluctuations of my own body, I find myself doing way more negative talk about my body that gets heightened with social media.”

Maya Almogy describes the comparison trap succinctly: “When I see other people post, all that functions as a reminder that I personally didn’t run today. Even if I did run that day, and I saw a post that someone ran more? Now I get an overwhelming sense of inadequacy.”

The fatphobia factor

The resurgence of thinness as the beauty ideal emerged as a particularly concerning theme. Jo Wild articulates the cognitive dissonance many feel: “I’ve recently seen a rebirth of fatphobia being seen as ‘cool’ that really disgusts me, and honestly makes me embarrassed to intentionally change my body in any way. I worry that the reason I want to be strong is that secretly I want to be skinny, and I don’t want people to know that secretly I want to be skinny. At the same time, I don’t fit into my favorite pants anymore, so maybe I only exercise in the hope that one day the button will close again. But I keep most of my gym time and dance classes off of socials, because I don’t like to think I’m contributing to a ‘health craze’ that’s really just fatphobia in a poor disguise.”

This represents a new layer of anxiety, not just about whether you’re fit enough, but about whether your pursuit of fitness makes you complicit in a larger cultural problem. It’s performance anxiety about the performance of fitness itself.

Alex Phipps, a fitness instructor, gave me an interesting counterpoint about online fitness classes: “People who normally didn’t work out or like working out really got into it way more than they did in person, and a lot of them told me that they felt that they couldn’t work out any other way, because they were terrified of being perceived by other ‘conventional’ fitness people. But online, they felt free to try and actually push themselves. The idea of strength as opposed to thinness being the goal is what has always motivated me, and it’s what I’d try to cultivate in my students.”

This suggests that for some, the digital space actually provides more freedom from judgment than physical gyms—though this creates its own irony given how much anxiety others experience from posting workouts online.

Finding balance

Faynboym offers practical advice for navigating this landscape: “The best fix is to occasionally hide or de-emphasize numbers that trigger you, share selectively, set goals you control, think of long-term progress, and post about rest days and form wins as often as you feel. Ultimately, use the crowd for support and let the metrics follow your body’s needs, not the other way around.”

But one of my favorite assessments comes from Dorian Debose, who posts fitness progress as part of adult content: “I think the vast majority of people are happy to see you make an effort. They understand it’s a process and they’re accepting of your faults. I project my own insecurities out onto them. I think for me, that’s like shadow boxing.” In other words, much of the performance anxiety around posting fitness content isn’t about what the audience actually thinks. It’s about what we fear they think, which is often just a projection of our own harshest self-judgments.

The overwhelming message from these responses is that fitness culture on social media exists in a state of productive tension: It can inspire and support, but it can just as easily trigger comparison, anxiety, and a disconnection. 

The question isn’t whether to post or not to post—it’s whether we can find a way to engage with these platforms that keeps the focus on our actual bodies and health, rather than the performance of health for an audience that may be more imagined than real.

And maybe that starts with posting the sweaty face after all. Or not posting at all. Or posting only on days when it feels like record-keeping, rather than performance. The answer, frustrating or freeing as it may seem, is there is no answer to how you should post. Like with posting pictures of your kids, or your political opinions, or that perfectly curated gym selfie you snuck in the locker room: It’s your choice. There’s private physical experience, and there’s how we package that up for a wider audience. It’s an ongoing negotiation, and you need to be honest with yourself if you’re getting a raw deal.

Fractal Design Scape review: A stellar debut

Unless you’re a PC nerd like me, chances are you’re not familiar with Fractal Design. The company has made a name for itself in recent years by designing some of the best cases you can buy for a DIY build. In a space known for its gaudy aesthetics, Fractal’s products stand out for their simplicity. Now the company is entering the crowded audio space with the $200 Scape, a gaming headset that not only looks sophisticated, but also sounds surprisingly great too.  

Design

The Fractal Scape features an attractive mix of materials.
The Fractal Scape features an attractive mix of materials.
Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

I mentioned the design of the Scape first, and for good reason. It shows attention to detail, with a lot of thoughtful flourishes. The best of those is the dock that comes included with the headset. It charges the Scape inductively, so there’s no need to align any charging pins, and it cleverly houses the headset’s 2.4GHz wireless transmitter. When connected to your main PC, the dongle can sit inside the dock, ready to go when you want to use it with your PlayStation 5, PS4, Nintendo Switch or another PC or Mac (sorry, Microsoft fans, there’s no Xbox support). The base also has wire channels to make cable management easy.     

Those same thoughtful design touches extend to the headset itself. On the back are four buttons, a dial and a toggle that cover nearly every function of the Scape. You can adjust the volume, mute the built-in mic, switch between 2.4GHz and Bluetooth connectivity, power the headset on or off, turn the RGB lighting on or off and switch between three EQ presets. What’s more, all of the controls feel distinct and are easy to use. There’s also a USB-C connection for wired audio and a three-pole headphone jack for the detachable microphone. 

The headset is primarily made of plastic, with a touch of brushed metal. Fractal offers the Scape in two colors — the aptly named light and dark — and despite the company’s choice of materials, the headset feels undoubtedly premium. Tilt adjustment is limited — it’s not possible to lay the ear pads flat on a table, for example — but the headband offers a fair amount of resistance, adding to the high-end feel.  

That said, the Scape could be more comfortable. Clamping force feels just about right, but there’s not enough padding along the top of the headband. I found I could wear the headphones for a few hours, but I eventually had to take them off to relieve the pressure that had built up on the top of my head. I’m also not a fan of the fabric Fractal used for both the headband and ear pads. It feels scratchy and it’s not great at dissipating heat. Thankfully, the high-density memory foam beneath is plush and the pads were deep and wide enough to comfortably accommodate my ears. 

Fractal has made it easy to swap the ear pads if needed; they come right off with just a small amount of force. For the time being, the company isn’t selling replacements, but a spokesperson told me Fractal will send customers who need new pads a set for free. You just need to contact their support team.           

Sound quality

The Scape comes with a set of custom-tuned drivers.
The Scape comes with a set of custom-tuned drivers.
Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

Out of the box, the Scape’s dynamic drivers are tuned to a soft v-shaped curve, with an emphasis on accuracy over character. Bass frequencies are punchy without being bloated, and there’s nice detail to mid-focused instruments like guitars. To my ear, the one issue with the Scape’s default tuning were the upper mids and treble frequencies. They weren’t shouty to the point of being sibilant, but there was definitely a harshness to the vocals of singers like Jeff Buckley and Caroline Polachek who are known for their falsetto. Thankfully, this was easy to fix with the Scape’s built-in EQ settings.  

I’ll have more to say in the software section of this review, but Fractal’s Adjust app allows you to make parametric EQ adjustments. This is different to most gaming headsets, which often limit people to restrictive fixed-band tweaks. Even when I used just five potential points of customization, I found I had a great deal of control over the tonality of the Scape. 

Overall, for casual music listening these are excellent headphones capable of covering many different genres. When it comes to gaming, they’re great too — with some caveats. For singleplayer games, the default tunings are an excellent match. Playing Ghost of Tsushima, the Scape did a great job of reproducing the game’s immersive sound design, allowing me to soak in all the little audio details Sucker Punch packed into its rendition of 13th century Japan. The soundstaging isn’t as expansive and lush as I’m used to with my Sennheiser HD 600, but for a pair of closed-back headphones, it’s above average.  

When it comes to competitive first-person shooters, some tweaks are required. I found all the default presets produced too much bass to easily isolate sound cues in games like Valorant. Again, Fractal’s software made this simple to fix; however, the Scape can only store three presets. Some gaming headsets, particularly those from Steelseries, come with tunings for hundreds of different games. For the ultra-competitive gamer, this can be useful since every game has a different sound engine. I’m not one of those people, so I found the Scape had just the right amount of customization.   

A closeup of the Scape's volume dial.
A closeup of the Scape’s volume dial.
Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

One feature you won’t find on these headphones is active noise cancellation (ANC). Don’t get me wrong, ANC is great, but I also didn’t feel like the Scape was a worse product without it. My girlfriend is a Pelton fanatic and she does all of her daily classes without wearing headphones in our small apartment. In that situation, the Scape’s passive noise isolation was enough to block the loud music coming from those workouts.    

That said, the one area where the Scape could have been better is Bluetooth connectivity. It’s a 5.3 headset, but codec support is limited to SBC and AAC. If you’ve ever tried a pair of wireless headphones only to be disappointed by how they sounded, SBC was probably to blame. When I used the Scape over Bluetooth, there was a subtle difference, but in a beat ’em up like Absolum, the game’s excellent sound design was less effective because it sounded more compressed, with more lag between what was happening on-screen and the effects that followed.      

I would have liked to see Fractal support more modern codecs like aptX Adaptive, but given that you need a dongle like the Creative BT-W6 to get access to those protocols on PCs and consoles, I can’t fault the company for its decision. Also missing from the Bluetooth equation is multipoint support, meaning I wasn’t able to connect the Scape to my PC or Switch and my iPhone at the same time.  

The Scape’s detachable microphone is fine but uninspiring. In listening back to a chat I had with some friends over Discord, I found the Scape compressed my voice to the point where there wasn’t a lot of life or nuance to it. The optional noise cancellation algorithm does a good job of filtering out nearby commotion, but does so at the expense of adding more compression. You can flip the microphone to mute yourself, and if you’re feeling lazy, the Scape also has a built-in mic — though it sounds about as good as you might imagine. Still, it’s handy in a pinch.         

Software 

Fractal's Adjust app is web-based and easy to use.
Fractal’s Adjust app is web-based and easy to use.
Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

I mentioned Fractal’s Adjust software, but what I didn’t note is that it’s not an app you need to install on your computer. Instead, it’s a website you can access through any Chrome-based browser. It’s a small thing, but one I really appreciate. I can’t count how many times I’ve had to troubleshoot issues with Windows that were caused by a conflict created by Logitech G Hub or NZXT Cam. 

The web-based software itself is simple, with two pages, named Lighting and Audio, encompassing all the options you can tweak. The Scape comes with 10 lighting themes out of the box, and like the headset itself, these presets are understated and classy. Naturally, you can also create your own lighting schemes, and the tool for doing so is fairly robust. 

A closeup of the Fractal Scape's EQ button
A closeup of the Fractal Scape’s EQ button
Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

When it comes to the EQ adjustments you can make with the Adjust app, the one thing I’ll add here is any presets you save are stored on the Scape, so they’re available everywhere you want to use the headset. That was great because it meant I didn’t need to Alt-Tab out of a game to switch the headset to a more competitive tuning.   

The one area where Fractal’s software feels lacking is when it comes to microphone controls. It’s possible to adjust sidetone (the volume of your mic input as heard through the headset) and enable microphone noise cancellation, but that’s it. It’d be nice if it was possible to configure those settings for the two mics independently of one another, but the software doesn’t support that right now.  

Battery life

According to Fractal, the Scape can go up to 40 hours on a single charge with RGB lighting off. With the feature turned on, battery life drops to about 26 hours. I’ll be honest, I had a tough time putting those claims to the test because of how easy it is to charge the headset. As best as I can tell, those estimates are accurate. I managed to get three days of battery life from the Scape with the RGB lights turned on and about eight hours of use each day. 

One nice touch: when you tap the power button, the RGB lights will briefly illuminate to indicate how much battery life the Scape has left. Those same lights will turn off when you place the headset to charge so that they’re not distracting.  

The competition

With the Scape, Fractal has entered a crowded market. That said, the Scape is competitive with some of the best gaming headsets you can buy right now. At $200, it’s $100 cheaper than the Audeze Maxwell, Engadget’s pick for the best premium gaming headset. The Scape doesn’t sound as good as the Maxwell or offer LDAC support for Bluetooth connectivity, but it’s lighter and charging is easier thanks to the included charging base. If you ask me, the Scape also looks a lot better too. 

If you can’t live without ANC, your best bet is Razer’s BlackShark V3 Pro, but it costs $50 more and doesn’t sound as good as the Scape. You also need to put up with Razer’s annoying Synapse software. For the best mic on a gaming headset, my longstanding recommendation has been the $199 Drop PC38X. It also has one of the best default tunings for competitive gaming. However, it’s a wired headset, and Drop doesn’t offer a wireless option.    

Wrap-up

The charging station also houses the Scape's 2.4GHz transmitter.
The charging station also houses the Scape’s 2.4GHz transmitter.
Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

If you can’t tell by now, I think the Fractal Scape is a great gaming headset. There are models like the Audeze Maxwell that beat it in one or two categories, but for $200 the Scape is an excellent all-around package. Nitpicks about comfort aside, the Scape sounds and looks great. It’s also a tremendous first effort by Fractal, and I can’t wait to see what the company does next in the audio space and beyond. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/fractal-design-scape-review-a-stellar-debut-173000007.html?src=rss