The New York Times reports on results from a rigorous five-year study in Trondheim, Norway that raises the question: If you increase your heart rate, will your life span follow?

The study, one of the largest and longest-term experimental examinations to date of exercise and mortality, shows that older men and women who exercise in almost any fashion are relatively unlikely to die prematurely. But if some of that exercise is intense, the study also finds, the risk of early mortality declines even more, and the quality of people’s lives climbs…

Their first step was to invite every septuagenarian in Trondheim to participate… More than 1,500 of the Norwegian men and women accepted… All agreed to start and continue to exercise more regularly during the upcoming five years… The first group, as a control, agreed to follow standard activity guidelines and walk or otherwise remain in motion for half an hour most days. (The scientists did not feel they could ethically ask their control group to be sedentary for five years.) Another group began exercising moderately for longer sessions of 50 minutes twice a week. And the third group started a program of twice-weekly high-intensity interval training, or HIIT, during which they cycled or jogged at a strenuous pace for four minutes, followed by four minutes of rest, with that sequence repeated four times… During that time, the scientists noted that quite a few of the participants in the control had dabbled with interval-training classes at local gyms, on their own initiative and apparently for fun…

After five years, the researchers checked death registries and found that about 4.6 per cent of all of the original volunteers had passed away during the study, a lower number than in the wider Norwegian population of 70-year-olds, indicating these active older people were, on the whole, living longer than others of their age. But they also found interesting, if slight, distinctions between the groups. The men and women in the high-intensity-intervals group were about 2 per cent less likely to have died than those in the control group, and 3 per cent less likely to die than anyone in the longer, moderate-exercise group. People in the moderate group were, in fact, more likely to have passed away than people in the control group.

The men and women in the interval group also were more fit now and reported greater gains in their quality of life than the other volunteers….

Dorthe Stensvold, a researcher at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology who led the new study, believes the study’s message can be broadly applicable to almost all of us.. “Adding life to years, not only years to life, is an important aspect of healthy ageing, and the higher fitness and health-related quality of life from high-intensity interval training in this study is an important finding.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – The Secret to Longevity? 4-Minute Bursts of Intense Exercise May Help

With 25 days until Joe Biden becomes America’s next president, Politico writes that throughout the US government, “From lawmakers on Capitol Hill to antitrust enforcers at the Federal Trade Commission, Washington is training its sights on the world’s largest social network like never before.”

Biden’s antitrust enforcers will take ownership of a lawsuit the FTC filed this month threatening to dismantle the sprawling company. And his staff will negotiate legislative proposals with congressional leaders who have hammered Facebook for mishandling its users’ personal data and spreading hate speech and dangerous falsehoods. It’s a historic moment of legislative and regulatory upheaval with profound consequences for Facebook and its Silicon Valley brethren.

The Trump era opened the floodgates for Facebook detractors, who accused the world’s largest social network of silencing conservatives on one side, and abetting disinformation about the U.S. election on the other. Now, under Biden, the company’s critics see a prime opportunity to finally tame Facebook — for the sake of election integrity, privacy and fair play in the digital era… “It’s just not a great business strategy to piss off the incoming president,” said Sally Hubbard, the director of enforcement strategy at the Open Markets Institute, which has advocated for antitrust enforcement against Facebook, Google and other big tech firms. She and other tech critics are putting pressure on Biden to take a different approach than past administrations, and they already have several allies advising the transition as it prepares to take over next month…

The now-president-elect has called for the internet industry’s sacred legal liability protections to be revoked, specifically citing Facebook’s handling of election-related misinformation. He turned heads in January when he said bluntly, “I’ve never been a fan of Facebook,” a company whose digital reach helped propel the Obama-Biden ticket to the White House in past elections… “[I]t’s certainly possible that skepticism about Facebook from the Biden team could result in a greater likelihood of antitrust scrutiny by the Justice Department and the FTC,” said Matt Perault, a former Facebook public policy director who now leads Duke University’s Center on Science and Technology Policy. “And it’s possible that a Biden White House could use their bully pulpit to try to force changes that they can’t achieve through executive action or legislation….”

Republicans, too, have gripes about Facebook’s handling of political speech, with some saying its lack of meaningful competition gives it the leverage to censor users’ political views. After the FTC and state attorneys general announced their Facebook lawsuits this month, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle expressed support… But bipartisan frustration with tech has yet to mean lawmakers will set aside partisan differences. Both sides have been frustrated with how Facebook, Twitter and Google-owned YouTube police political content, for instance, but Democrats want more moderation and Republicans have called for less…

Even with such divisions, the general animosity toward Facebook could help the anti-Facebook advocates to gain traction with the new administration. And they’re pushing their agenda hard ahead of the inauguration.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Will America’s Next President Break Up Facebook?

As 2020 came to a close, the city of Helsinki, Finland tried offering “City as a Service” to attract new workers to its growing technology hub.
“We will provide selected applicants with a free 90-day relocation package for the entire family,” explained the web site for the program (which is now no longer accepting applications). “We’ll arrange your housing, daycare, schooling, everything you need — the real deal, just like a Finn.” They’d pick you up at the airport, and then offer orientation services, “relocation consultation,” and regular get-togethers, even offering in-person introductions to Helsinki-area technology hubs and business networks. (And of course, they’d arrange all the necessary documentation for a 90-day stay and permanent residency applications.) “Are you a 90 Day Finn…?” asked the site. “This is your call for a 90-day audition in Helsinki, featuring an unseen level of work-life balance!”

So what happened? The program “received 5,300 applications from across the world in just a month,” reports the India Times, citing an article in the Guardian:

The report adds that about 30 per cent of the applications came from the US and Canada. The remaining applications, ‘evenly spread,’ included 50 Britons and one application from Vanuatu. Johanna Huurre from Helsinki Business Hub, an agency that came up with the campaign, told The Guardian, “800 were entrepreneurs seeking to launch startups, 60 were investors, and the remainder were job hunting.”

“It’s been a great campaign to showcase Finland,” said Joonas Halla, of Business Finland. “What’s good is the practical approach. The tech sector here is really thriving — by one estimate it should create 50,000 new jobs in 2021. We need the talent.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – What Happened When Finland Tried to Lure the World’s Remote Tech Workers?

The New York Times reports:
Ever since the race to develop a coronavirus vaccine began last spring, upbeat announcements were stalked by ominous polls: No matter how encouraging the news, growing numbers of people said they would refuse to get the shot… But over the past few weeks, as the vaccine went from a hypothetical to a reality, something happened. Fresh surveys show attitudes shifting and a clear majority of Americans now eager to get vaccinated. In polls by Gallup, the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Pew Research Center, the portion of people saying they are now likely or certain to take the vaccine has grown from about 50 per cent this summer to more than 60 per cent, and in one poll 73 per cent — a figure that approaches what some public health experts say would be sufficient for herd immunity…

[T]he attitude improvement is striking. A similar shift on another heated pandemic issue was reflected in a different Kaiser poll this month. It found that nearly 75 per cent of Americans are now wearing masks when they leave their homes.

The change reflects a constellation of recent events: the uncoupling of the vaccine from Election Day; clinical trial results showing about 95 per cent efficacy and relatively modest side effects for the vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna; and the alarming surge in new coronavirus infections and deaths… The lure of the vaccines’ modest quantities also can’t be underestimated as a driver of desire, somewhat like the must-have frenzy generated by a limited-edition Christmas gift, according to public opinion experts… A barrage of feel-good media coverage, including rapt attention given to leading scientists and politicians when they get jabbed and joyous scrums surrounding local health care workers who become the first to be vaccinated, has amplified the excitement, public opinion experts say.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Many Formerly-Skeptical Americans are Now Eager to Get Covid-19 Vaccines

Long-term Slashdot reader couchslug believes that “Howls of anguish from betrayed CentOS 8 users highlight the value of its long support cycles…” Earlier this month it was announced that at the end of 2021, the community-supported rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, CentOS 8, “will no longer be maintained,” though CentOS 7 “will stick around in a supported maintenance state until 2024.”

This leads Slashdot reader couchslug to an interesting question. “Should competitors like Ubuntu and SUSE offer truly long-term-support versions to seize that (obviously large and thus important to widespread adoption) user base?”

As distros become more refined, how important are changes vs. stability for users running tens, thousands and hundreds of thousands of servers, or who just want stability and security over change for its own sake…? Why do you think distro leadership are so eager for distro life cycles? Boredom, progress or what mix of both?

What sayeth the hive mind and what distros do you use to achieve your goals?

The original submission argues that “Distro-hopping is fun but people with work to do and a fixed task set have different needs.” But what do Slashdot’s readers thinks? Leave your own thoughts in the comments.

And how long do you think a vendor should support a distro?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Ask Slashdot: How Long Should a Vendor Support a Distro?