Illinois lawmakers plan to introduce a climate change superfund bill in the state legislature this session, the latest in a growing number of states seeking to make fossil fuel companies pay up for the fast-growing financial fallout of climate change.

As the costs of global warming rise—in the form of home insurance premiums, utility bills, health expenses, and record-breaking damages from extreme weather—local advocates are increasingly pushing states to require that fossil fuel companies contribute to climate “superfunds” that would support mitigation and adaptation.

Illinois State Rep. Robyn Gabel, who will introduce the bill in the House, said she is motivated by the growing threat of flooding and heat waves in the state.

Read full article

Comments

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The JBL Flip 7 is currently $84.95 at Woot, down from its usual $149.95. That undercuts the previous low of $99.95 and, according to price trackers, makes this the cheapest it has ever been. This deal runs for the next two days or until it’s sold out, whichever comes first. Prime members get free standard shipping, while non-members pay $6.

JBL Flip 7 speaker

$84.95
at Woot

$149.95
Save $65.00

$84.95
at Woot

$149.95
Save $65.00

The Flip line has always been about portable, durable speakers that are easy to toss in a bag and good enough for everyday listening, and the Flip 7 sticks to that formula. It doesn’t look all that different from its predecessor, with the same compact, water-bottle shape, but the build quality has been beefed up. You now get a tougher rubber bumper system that can survive a one-meter drop onto concrete, and the IP68 rating makes it completely dust-proof and safe to dunk in water. The old loop has also been replaced with a built-in carabiner, which feels like a small but meaningful fix if you’re outdoorsy. JBL’s added flexibility under the hood, too. You get Bluetooth 5.4, Auracast support, and USB-C audio input (if you don’t want to rely solely on Bluetooth) for high-res streaming. That said, there’s no microphone for calls and no auxiliary input, and Bluetooth is limited to the basic SBC codec. 

Sound-wise, the Flip 7 holds up well for a portable speaker this size, with a 25W woofer and 10W tweeter delivering surprisingly full audio. It won’t blow out a backyard party, and if you push the volume past 70%, it gets noticeably sharp, as highlighted by this PCMag review. You’ll want to stick to moderate volume or pair it with another speaker for a more balanced, less fatiguing listening experience. Battery life is rated at 14 hours, or up to 16 with Playtime Boost enabled (though you’ll lose some bass in exchange for the extra juice). For anyone after a rugged, great-sounding, truly portable speaker at a steep discount, this is a tough package to beat.

Android smartphone maker Nothing won’t release a Phone 4 this year, the company’s founder and chief executive said, and that the 2025 Phone 3 will remain the brand’s flagship device throughout 2026.

“We’re not just going to churn out a new flagship every year for the sake of it, we want every upgrade to feel significant,” Carl Pei said in a video. “Just because the rest of the industry does things a certain way it doesn’t mean we will do the same.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Google has agreed to a preliminary $135 million settlement in a class action lawsuit brought by Android users who accused it of harvesting their data without consent. The suit alleged that since November 12, 2017, Google has been illegally collecting cellular data from phones purchased through carriers, even when apps were closed or location features were disabled.

As reported by Reuters, the affected users believed Google using their data for marketing and product development meant it was guilty of “conversion.” In US law, conversion occurs when one party takes the property of another with “the intent to deprive them of it” or “exert property rights over it.”

Subject to approval from a judge, a settlement of $135 million was filed in a San Jose federal court earlier this week. The payout would be one of, if not the largest ever in a case of this nature, according to Glen Summers, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.

Each user involved in the lawsuit would be entitled to up to $100 from Google, which denies any wrongdoing and has agreed to seek consent during the setup process of a new phone from now on. A toggle will be added to enable users to easily disable data transfer, while the Alphabet-owned company will also adjust its terms of service accordingly. A trial is scheduled for August 5.

This is the second settlement this week for Google. On January 26, the company also agreed to a $68 million settlement regarding claims that Google Assistant had been spying on users after being triggered by what it had misheard as wake words. Again, Google denied any wrongdoing in the class action suit.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/google-will-pay-135-million-to-settle-illegal-data-collection-lawsuit-133012112.html?src=rss

As scammers continue to find ways to impersonate known brands, users should remain wary of spam-like emails—even if they appear to come from a legitimate company address.

Ars Technica has identified a scheme that abuses a Microsoft subscription feature to send phishing emails from no-reply-powerbi@microsoft.com, a real address that the company advises users to add to their allow lists.

How the Microsoft Power BI scam works

Users targeted with this scam have received emails from an address connected to Microsoft Power BI, a business analytics platform. The messages include (fake) billing receipts with large purchase amounts from services like PayPal, Norton LifeLock, and Microsoft 365 and a phone number to call to dispute the transaction.

Scammers on the other end of the line may try to convince you to install a remote access application that allows device takeover or will otherwise extract personal information. As with any phishing scam, engaging in any way—calling the number, responding to the email, or clicking links—could put your data and your device at risk.

The emails themselves are full of typos and grammar errors and urgent calls to action that are, in most cases, completely unrelated to Microsoft itself. Many users would spot these red flags and know to simply delete the message. However, threat actors capitalize on the trust users have in the brands they’re exploiting along with scare tactics to trap some people in the scheme.

This is also far from the first phishing scheme of its kind: Threat actors have sent malicious emails from legitimate PayPal and Google addresses (to name just two) by exploiting similar loopholes. In the case of PayPal, fraudulent purchase notifications sent from service[at]paypal[dot]com abused the platform’s subscription billing feature. With Google, scammers registered google.com subdomains via Google Sites and linked them with Google Accounts.

It’s the year 2026 and the hottest game in my living room is Fruit Ninja. No, I’m not in the midst of an ill-advised retro mobile gaming kick. Instead, my family and I have been jumping around and slicing flying fruit in our living room using the Nex Playground. It’s a tiny gaming system built entirely around Kinect-like games. With its camera and onboard computer vision processing, the $249 Nex Playground can track up to four players as effectively as Microsoft’s clunky old Xbox motion tracker. Simply put, the dream of the Kinect, as well as Nintendo’s Wii, lives on in the Nex Playground.

I’ll admit, I was skeptical about Nex making a dent in the console arena. It’s tough for new companies with no hardware experience to steal any limelight away from entrenched competitors like Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft. But the Nex Playground’s simplicity, accurate motion tracking and library of kid-friendly titles (including the likes of Peppa Pig and Bluey) has made it a hit among families. The company says it sold 650,000 units last year, which might not sound like much, but it was enough to beat the beleagured Xbox last November.

Honestly, I’m just happy it gets my kids off the couch. I do my best to limit screen time with them, but as someone who has fond memories planted in front of my TV playing endless hours of SNES games, I also leave some room for my kids to explore tech and media on their own. I love the way Minecraft’s near-limitless creative potential has unleashed my daughter’s imagination, but I also want her to move more, especially in these winter months when we can’t easily go outside. 

Even though the Nex Playground is another screen-based activity, the sheer variety of games to play keeps my kids entertained and it helps them break a sweat. The console’s version of Fruit Ninja is similar to that game’s VR forays, where you have to stand up and make an effort to swipe your arms. You’re not just dragging your fingers across a screen. Go Keeper gamifies the role of a soccer goalkeeper, which leads to my kids jumping all over our family room to block and catch stray balls. And we all love having mini-dance parties with Starri, which has you swinging your arms and dodging obstacles, similar to VR titles like Beat Saber and Synth Riders.

In addition to those three games, the Nex Playground comes with Party Fowl, a collection of mini games, as well as its own spin on Whack-a-mole. If you want more games, you have to subscribe to the Nex Play Pass for $89 a year or $49 for three months. The company also offers a $29 Sports Pack at Target stores, which includes tennis, basketball and bowling games. Beyond those options, though, there’s no other way to add new titles to the Playground. You can’t buy anything individually, and since the entire platform is digital, there’s also no market for cheap used games like you’d find for consoles.

Nex’s subscription model is undoubtedly the Playground’s biggest flaw, especially given the system’s $249 price. Instead of being an expensive console that you buy once (like an Xbox), and then occasionally purchase new titles for, the Playground is an ongoing commitment constantly calling for your wallet. To the company’s credit, the device doesn’t feature any ads or in-app purchases.

Nex

“Ultimately, we would like to establish that long-term relationship … we want to serve your family consistently with new content, and new updates all year round,” Nex CEO David Lee said in an interview on the Engadget Podcast. He noted that the company added twenty new games to its subscription over the last two years, as well as 40 game updates over the last year. Similar to Xbox’s Game Pass, the goal is to maintain the Nex Play Pass’s value over time. 

You could argue the Nex Play Pass’s steep price isn’t as bad as the $15 to $30 per child that indoor activity centers charge. Those godforsaken places only distract kids for a few hours at a time, and visiting one also comes with the risk of contracting exotic childhood illnesses. Theoretically, the Nex Playground could be something you turn to whenever you need to work out restless energy from your kids. And if that means parents could get a bit more sleep on the weekend, or just a few minutes to themselves for a cup of coffee, all of a sudden $89 a year doesn’t seem so bad.

I’m also impressed by the Nex Playground’s hardware and software, both of which are far more polished than I’d expect from a new hardware company. The device itself is a pastel-colored plastic box with a camera on the front (and a cute lens cover). You just have to plug it into power and an HDMI port, slap some batteries in the remote (which looks like an elongated Roku remote) and connect to Wi-Fi. It took a few minutes for the Playground to update the first time I turned it on, and I also had to create a Nex account using my phone. 

Once that initial setup phase was over, it took another five minutes to download the initial batch of five games to the Playground via my gigabit connection. That timing entirely depends on your internet setup — I’ve seen reports of it taking up to 30 minutes to install the Nex’s core games. I was also able to download the entire Play Pass library of titles in 35 minutes, but it could take a few hours on slower connections. Thankfully, those downloads happen in the background, so you can play other titles while waiting for new ones to install. 

Another plus? Once you’ve downloaded the games, you can play them entirely offline. That makes it easier to grab the Playground and bring it on vacation, or to a friend’s house, than it is to travel with other consoles. As long as you can reach a TV’s inputs, have nearby power and clear out around six feet of space, you can play the Playground.

Nex

Nex’s long experience developing motion-tracked games and experiences is a major reason why the Playground is so successful. The company previously created Homecourt, an app for tracking your basketball skills, as well as Active Arcade, a collection of Playground-like minigames for iOS devices. Lee admitted that it’s tough to get parents to use their phones for things like Active Arcade. That led him to develop the Playground as a closed ecosystem, where the company could build a suite of games around a device where it could control every aspect of the hardware. 

Now that Nex Playground features games from well-known kids brands like Peppa Pig, it’s clear that Lee’s intuition has paid off. While I have some concerns about the company’s subscription model, Nex has accomplished a rare feat: It developed a simple box that makes it easy for your entire family to jump into genuinely innovative games and experiences. You don’t need to set up a clunky console or any additional accessories. Just plug in the Nex Playground, and you too could be hand-slicing virtual fruit on your TV in no time.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/the-nex-playground-is-everything-xbox-kinect-wanted-to-be-133000397.html?src=rss

If you’ve been scrolling through your fitness algorithm lately, you might see content creators in their “soft cardio” era. This trend sounds a lot like last year’s “cozy cardio,” although the way I see it used is slightly different. Where “cozy” cardio is a little more about tricking yourself into working out by establishing a comfortable, maybe even luxurious ambience, “soft” cardio has a greater emphasis on the “low effort” of it all. Whatever the wording, this type of workout is simply the latest iteration of bigger trend toward low-effort cardio, promising all the benefits of exercise without the sweat, strain, or stress. But here’s the thing: While soft cardio might be great for getting you off the couch, it’s not quite delivering what traditional cardio does.

Let’s be clear: I’m not here to bash soft cardio. Movement is movement, and anything that gets people more active is a win in my book. But if you’re hoping to reap the cardiovascular benefits that come with actual cardio exercise, we need to have an honest conversation about what soft cardio can—and can’t—do for your body.

What is soft cardio?

Soft cardio is essentially low-intensity exercise performed at a relaxed, comfortable pace. Think leisurely walks, gentle dancing in your living room, slow cycling, or easy stretching routines. The emphasis is on making movement feel enjoyable and stress-free rather than challenging or demanding. Naturally, this should resonate with people who feel intimidated by traditional exercise, or who are recovering from injury, or who simply want to incorporate more gentle movement into their daily routines. These are all valid reasons to embrace this type of activity. Soft cardio designed to spare your body from repetitive impact and intense exertion, which sounds wonderful—and in many ways, it is.

What makes cardio, well, cardio?

“Cardio” may not have a precise definition, but just looking at the name, it’s safe to say it usually refers to the realm of cardiovascular exercise. That means it’s supposed to challenge your heart and lungs, elevating your heart rate to a level where your cardiovascular system actually has to work harder than usual. This is what creates the adaptations that improve your heart health, increase your endurance, and boost your overall fitness.

If your soft cardio session doesn’t meaningfully elevate your heart rate—if you could easily hold a conversation throughout without any change in breathing at all—then your cardiovascular system isn’t being challenged enough to create those training adaptations. You’re moving, which is great, but you’re not getting the cardiovascular conditioning that comes with true cardio exercise.

Soft cardio versus actual cardio

Here are some examples of soft, cozy, or low-impact cardio:

• A 30-minute stroll through the neighborhood at a comfortable pace

• Gentle yoga or stretching routines

• Slow dancing or swaying to music

• Easy cycling on flat terrain where you never feel breathless

• Light household chores done at a relaxed pace

All of these movements reduce sedentary time, are gentle on joints, have a low barrier to entry, are sustainable for many people, and would probably improve your mood. Soft cardio has it’s place, but it’s minimal cardiovascular conditioning, with limited calorie burn, and it won’t significantly improve aerobic capacity.

Here are some examples of what it might look like to tip into actual cardio:

• Brisk walking where your breathing becomes noticeably heavier

• Jogging or running at any pace

• Swimming laps with sustained effort

• Cycling at a pace that makes conversation difficult

• Dance cardio classes with energetic movement

• Jump rope, rowing, or elliptical training

These examples could strengthen your cardiovascular system, improve aerobic capacity, increase calorie burn, reduce risk of heart disease, and overall enhance endurance. Of course, this comes with higher impact on joints, more effort and motivation, and can feel intimidating for beginners.

Finding a balance between soft cardio and regular cardio

The good news is that you don’t have to choose between soft cardio and real cardio—you can incorporate both into your routine based on your goals and current fitness level. If your primary goal is simply to move more and sit less, soft cardio is perfect. It’s infinitely better than remaining sedentary, and for many people, it’s a sustainable way to maintain an active lifestyle. The gentle nature of soft cardio also makes it ideal for active recovery days, when you want to move without taxing your body.

However, if you’re looking to improve your cardiovascular fitness, increase your endurance, or achieve more significant health benefits, you’ll need to include actual cardio workouts that challenge your heart and lungs. This doesn’t mean every workout needs to be intense—even moderate-intensity cardio, where you can still talk but your breathing is elevated, provides substantial cardiovascular benefits.

The bottom line

Soft cardio has its place, and I genuinely appreciate that it’s helping people embrace movement without feeling overwhelmed or intimidated. It’s particularly valuable for keeping your heart slightly elevated without putting stress on your joints or muscles, which is especially important for those recovering from injury or managing chronic conditions. But let’s call it what it is: light physical activity or gentle movement, not cardiovascular exercise in the traditional sense. If you want the cardiovascular adaptations that come with cardio—the improved heart health, increased lung capacity, and enhanced endurance—you need to include workouts that challenge your cardiovascular system.

For beginners, use soft cardio as a gateway to building more challenging workouts into your routine. Start with gentle movement to establish the habit of being active, then gradually increase the intensity as your fitness improves. You might begin with soft cardio walks and slowly pick up the pace over time, or add short intervals of brisker walking to your leisurely strolls.

The trend isn’t bad. But understanding the difference between moving your body and training your cardiovascular system will help you set realistic expectations and design a fitness routine that actually meets your goals.

Brandon Sanderson, a popular author of high-fantasy and science fiction books, has signed a deal with Apple TV to adapt his works set in the Cosmere fictional universe into films and TV shows. Sanderson said last year at Celsius 232, Spain’s annual sci-fi and fantasy convention, that his ultimate dream project is a “really good Mistborn film.” Apple TV is making that come true: Some of the first projects to come out of the deal are feature film adaptations of the Mistborn books and a TV show based on series.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Sanderson’s deal with the streaming service is unprecedented, because he will have major creative control over the adaptations. He will write, produce and consult for the projects under development, and he will have the power to sign off on various aspects of the adaptations. That’s a level of control other famous authors such as George R. R. Martin don’t enjoy. In fact, Martin recently talked about how House of the Dragon’s showrunner, Ryan Condal, has stopped taking his notes and suggestions into account.

Sanderson’s Cosmere universe encompasses dozens of books set in various but interconnected worlds and timelines. They’re all bound by a single creation myth, which explains where the universe’s different types of magic come from. Apple TV has yet to announce timelines and release dates for the projects based on Sanderson’s work, but The Stormlight Archive TV adaptation already has a producer (Blue Marble) attached to it.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/streaming/apple-tv-signs-tv-and-movie-deal-for-brandon-sandersons-fantasy-books-130000797.html?src=rss

Virtual private networks (VPNs) have been household technology for a while now, but there’s still a lot of uncertainty around them. This is partly due to the fact that they can conceal online activity that local or national governments deem illegal — up to and including, say, circumventing ID checks for age verification. Consumers aren’t helped by the sheer amount of duds sold in app stores right next to the best VPNs, especially when they’re purposefully exploiting moments that have people rushing to shore up their online anonymity. If you’ve almost decided to start using a VPN, you may be wondering if the services you’re looking at are actually safe.

Unfortunately, the answer is a hard “it depends.” VPNs are technology that can work well or poorly, just like they can be used for good or evil. There’s nothing intrinsically dangerous about using a VPN — whether or not one is safe comes down to who built it and how they’re running it. The good news is that there are easy ways to tell whether you’re using one of the good ones.

The question “Are VPNs really safe?” can also mean something else — “Is using a VPN enough to keep me safe online?” I’ll get into that too, but to spoil the ending: VPNs are important security tools, but they aren’t enough to protect against all digital threats by themselves. Also, to be clear, I’m talking here about commercial VPNs like Proton VPN and ExpressVPN, not commercial VPNs like NordLayer or Cisco AnyConnect.

What makes a VPN unsafe?

There are two main things that can make me call a VPN unsafe: negligence and malice. A negligent VPN doesn’t protect against the dangers it’s supposed to ward off, leaving you more exposed than if you weren’t using a VPN at all. A malicious VPN is designed to make you less safe so the people behind it can profit.

Some ways a negligent VPN might endanger its users:

• Using outdated protocols with cracked encryption, like PPTP, or homebrewed protocols with insufficient security. A weakly secured protocol might expose your search activity.

• Allowing leaks by using public DNS servers rather than setting up their own system to resolve requests. This risks revealing what websites the VPN’s users are visiting.

• Leaking the user’s real location by failing to block or properly manage IPv6.

• Leaving its servers in the hands of unvetted third parties, who might let them get hacked.

• Failing to include a kill switch, which puts users at risk of connecting to false servers.

Some ways a VPN can be malicious:

• Making its money from in-app ads, especially if those ads contain trackers.

• Harvesting the user’s residential IP address and selling it as a proxy.

• Tracking the user’s activity and selling it to advertisers.

• Planting malware on the user’s device.

I want to stress again that none of these risks are inherent to how a VPN works. VPNs aren’t required to be dangerous in any way. There are plenty of good ones, which makes it all the more important to pick the bad ones out of the lineup. In the next section, I’ll discuss how to do that.

How to tell if a VPN is safe

The process of checking up on a VPN starts before you buy it. Before you consider downloading any VPN app, do your research and learn as much as you can. Read review sites like Engadget, but also try to get reports from regular users on social media and app stores. Be suspicious of five-star reviews that are light on specifics — the more positive reviews from actual users, the better.

While researching, look for any cases in which the VPN failed in its mission to protect customers. Did it ever turn information over to police, despite having a no-logs policy? Were any of its servers ever breached by hackers in ways that put other users in danger? Is it cagey about key information, like where it’s based or who its parent company is?

You can also close-read the VPN’s privacy policy, like I do in my VPN reviews. A privacy policy is a legal document that can invite lawsuits if the provider ignores it outright, so most companies prefer to plant vague loopholes instead. Read the policy and decide for yourself if it makes any unacceptable exceptions to “no logs ever.”

If the answer to all those questions is no, your next step is to download the VPN and test it. Every worthwhile VPN has a guaranteed refund within a certain period, so you can use that time to test the factors below. If you like the results, you can subscribe for longer; if not, you can cancel and get your money back. Here’s what to look for during the refund period:

• Check which VPN protocols are available. The best expert-verified protocols are OpenVPN, IKEv2 and WireGuard. If the VPN uses a protocol other than these three, make sure it’s using an unbreakable encryption cipher like AES-256 or ChaCha20.

• Test for leaks. You can run a simple leak test using a website like ipleak.net or whatismyipaddress.com. Just check your normal IP address, connect to a VPN server, then check again. If the IP address you see is the same as before, the VPN is leaking.

• Find the kill switch. A kill switch prevents you from accessing the internet while you’re not connected to its associated VPN. This is critical to prevent certain types of hack that rely on fake servers to work. Most top VPNs have a kill switch or a similar feature with a different name (such as Windscribe’s Firewall).

• See if the apps are open-source. A VPN making its services available for viewing on Github states powerfully that it has nothing to hide. Anonymity is an inalienable right for individuals, but VPN apps aren’t people — the more transparent the code, the better.

• Test its other security features. If the VPN has a blocker for ads, malware or trackers, see if it prevents banner ads from loading. Try connecting to a test malware site like www.ianfette.org or httpforever.com and check if the VPN blocks it.

There’s one more factor that generally denotes a safe VPN: paid subscriptions. I’m not going to claim that all free VPNs are dangerous, but if a service claims to be always free with no need whatsoever to pay, you have to ask how it makes money. VPNs that don’t charge for subscriptions usually turn their users into the product, selling their data to advertisers or for use as residential proxies.

Is a VPN enough to keep you safe online?

Another way in which VPNs aren’t totally safe is that they aren’t, by themselves, a total solution for cybersecurity. A VPN does one specific task: it replaces your IP address with an anonymous server and encrypts communication with that server so your real device can’t be seen. This means you won’t reveal your identity or location in the normal course of using the internet.

However, if you reveal information another way, then all bets are off. If you click a sketchy link that downloads malware onto your computer, that malware doesn’t care that your IP address is concealed — it’s already where it needs to be. Similarly, if you leak critical information in a social post, or privately give it up to a phishing scammer, a VPN won’t help.

I put together a list of 12 cybersecurity habits that’ll keep you safe from nearly all threats online. Getting a VPN is one of them, but there are 11 others, including strengthening your passwords, immediately installing updates and conditioning yourself to spot social engineering hacks. Don’t fall into the trap of thinking you’re untouchable just because you use a VPN.

The safest VPNs

It can be a lot of work to figure out whether a VPN is safe and trustworthy. If you just want to pick one you can use without having to open a federal case, check out my best VPN roundup or best free VPN list — or just use one of the suggestions in this section.

Proton VPN, my favorite VPN, is majority-owned by the nonprofit Proton foundation, has open-sourced its entire product family and has never suffered a serious hack or breach. Despite some controversy around its parent company, ExpressVPN remains secure; its servers have been confiscated at least once and found to hold no information.

NordVPN suffered a hack in 2018 and learned the right lessons from it, doubling down on security at its server locations. Similarly, Surfshark was criticized for using a weak authentication method and deprecated it entirely in 2022. Often, a VPN responding correctly to a security breach looks better than one which has never been attacked at all — sometimes strength can only be known in adversity.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/vpn/are-vpns-really-safe-the-security-factors-to-consider-before-using-one-130000539.html?src=rss

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Forbes: Gatik, a Silicon Valley startup developing self-driving delivery trucks, says its commercial operations are about to scale up dramatically, from fewer than a dozen driverless units running in multiple U.S. states now to hundreds of box trucks by the end of the year. CEO Gautam Narang said it’s also booked contracts with retailers worth at least $600 million for its automated fleet. “We have 10 fully driverless, revenue-generating trucks on public roads. Very soon, in the coming weeks, we expect that increase to 60 trucks,” he told Forbes. “We expect to end the year with hundreds of driverless trucks — revenue-generating — deployed across multiple markets in the U.S.”

Though the Mountain View, California-based company hasn’t raised as much funding as rivals, including Aurora, Kodiak and Canada’s Waabi, Gatik said it’s actually scaling up faster than any other robot truck developer. Unlike those companies, it focuses on smaller freight delivery vehicles, rather than full-size semis, supplied by truckmaker Isuzu that operate mainly between warehouses and supermarkets and other large stores. The company’s focus has been on so-called middle-mile trucking, which, like long-haul routes, has a severe shortage of human drivers, according to Narang. Currently, its trucks are on the road in Texas, Arkansas, Arizona, Nebraska and Ontario, Canada.

The company has been generating revenue since shortly after its founding in 2017, hauling loads for customers like Walmart in trucks with human safety drivers at the wheel. Beginning late last year, it began shifting to fully driverless units and is getting more trucks from Isuzu built specifically to incorporate its tech, Narang said. “The hardware that we are using, this is our latest generation, has been designed to enable driver-out across thousands of trucks.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.