To comply with Australia’s under-16 social media ban, Meta said on Medium that it has shut down nearly 550,00 accounts. That number includes 330,000 Instagram, 173,000 Facebook and 40,000 Threads accounts deemed to belong to children. “Ongoing compliance with the law will be a multi-layered process that we will continue to refine, though our concerns about determining age online without an industry standard remain,” the company wrote. 

Australia’s minimum age social media ban, the first of its kind in the world for a democracy, went into effect on December 10. The ten platforms affected, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, X, Reddit and Twitch, must bar underage users or face a fine of up to $AUD 49.5 million ($33 million). Platforms are using a variety of means to determine age, including age inference based on activity and selfies.

Some of those platforms aren’t taking the ban lying down. Reddit, which launched a lawsuit against the Australian government, argued that it shouldn’t have been included in the ban since it isn’t a social media site, while adding that it comes with some “serious privacy and political expression issues” for users.

Meta also expressed its opposition to the ban, citing a number of factors. It says taking social media out of the hands of teens can isolate them from getting support from online communities, and that the ban is only driving them to “less regulated parts of the internet.” It also sites inconsistent age verification methods and a lack of interest in compliance from teens and parents. 

However, the fact that Meta has removed almost 550,000 accounts just a month after the ban took affect shows that it is also affecting the company’s bottom line. And Meta doesn’t have a sterling record when it comes to teen safety, having previously downplayed the frequency of harm to children. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/meta-closes-550000-accounts-to-comply-with-australias-kids-social-media-ban-130041356.html?src=rss

A year ago the Steam Survey showed a 2.29% marketshare for Linux. Last May it reached 2.69%, its highest level since 2018. November saw another all-time high of 3.2%.

But December brought a surprise, reports Phoronix:
Back on the 1st Valve published the Steam Survey results for December 2025 and they put the Linux gaming marketshare at 3.19%, a 0.01% dip from November. But now the December results have been revised… [and] put the Linux marketshare at 3.58%, a 0.38% increase over November. Valve didn’t publish any explanation for the revision but occasionally they do put out monthly revised data. This is easily an all-time high… both in percentage terms and surely in absolute terms too.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Malaysia and Indonesia are the first countries to block Grok, claiming that X’s chatbot does not have sufficient safeguards in place to prevent explicit AI-generated deepfakes of women and children from being created and disseminated on X. Indonesia temporarily blocked access to Grok on Saturday, as did Malaysia on Sunday, the Associated Press reports. Meanwhile, UK media regulator Ofcom has opened a formal investigation into X under the Online Safety Act.

“The government sees non-consensual sexual deepfakes as a serious violation of human rights, dignity and the safety of citizens in the digital space,” Indonesia’s Communication and Digital Affairs Minister Meutya Hafid said in a statement. Officials in the country said initial findings showed that Grok lacks effective controls to prevent users from creating and sharing sexually explicit deepfakes based on photos of Indonesian residents. The country’s director general of digital space supervision, Alexander Sabar, said generating deepfakes can violate individuals’ image and privacy rights when photos are shared or manipulated without consent, adding that they can lead to reputational, social and psychological harm.

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission cited “repeated misuse” of Grok to generate explicit and non-consensual deepfakes, some of which involved women and children. The regulator said Grok will remain blocked in the country until X Corp and parent xAI establish strong enough safeguards.

Ofcom’s investigation will focus on whether X has “has complied with its duties to protect people in the UK from content that is illegal in the UK.” That includes whether X is taking appropriate measures to prevent its UK users from seeing “priority” illegal content, such as CSAM and non-consensual intimate images; if the platform is removing illegal content quickly after becoming aware of it; and whether X carried out an updated risk assessment before making “any significant changes” to the platform. The probe will also consider whether X assessed the risk that its platform poses to UK children and if it has ”highly effective age assurance to protect UK children from seeing pornography.”

The regulator said it contacted X on January 5 and received a response by its January 9 deadline. Ofcom is conducting an “expedited assessment of available evidence as a matter of urgency” and added that it has asked xAI for “urgent clarification” on the steps the company is taking to protect UK users.

“Reports of Grok being used to create and share illegal non-consensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material on X have been deeply concerning,” an Ofcom spokesperson said. “Platforms must protect people in the UK from content that’s illegal in the UK, and we won’t hesitate to investigate where we suspect companies are failing in their duties, especially where there’s a risk of harm to children. We’ll progress this investigation as a matter of the highest priority, while ensuring we follow due process. As the UK’s independent online safety enforcement agency, it’s important we make sure our investigations are legally robust and fairly decided.”

If Ofcom deems that a company has broken the law, it can “require platforms to take specific steps to come into compliance or to remedy harm caused by the breach.” The regulator can additionally impose fines of up to £18 million ($24.3 million) or 10 percent of “qualifying” worldwide revenue, whichever of the two figures is higher. It can also seek a court order to stop payment providers or advertisers from working with a platform, or to require internet service providers to block a site in the UK. The UK government has said it would back any action that Ofcom takes against X.

Reports over the weekend suggested that the UK had held discussions with allies over a coordinated response to Grok-generated deepfakes. Regulators elsewhere, including in India and the European Union, are also investigating X.

Last week, Grok started telling X users that its image generation and editing tools were being limited to paying subscribers. But as of Monday it was still possible for non-paying users to generate images through the Grok tab on the X website and app. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/malaysia-and-indonesia-are-the-first-to-block-grok-following-csam-scandal-120000534.html?src=rss

CES 2026 took place in Las Vegas last week, and as usual, we’re looking at the most interesting monitors from the show. Not every display is a monitor in the strictest sense, but they all provide a display for computers and have a unique twist that make them worth exploring.

Dell’s massive UltraSharp

Dell’s biggest UltraSharp has a 21:9 aspect ratio.
Credit:
Dell

It was a pretty safe bet that Dell would announce new UltraSharp monitors at CES. The displays are a solid recommendation for reliable USB-C monitors, including for Mac users and people needing something polished for professional or creative work. In recent years, UltraSharp monitors have also boasted more modern features, including integrated web cameras and IPS Black tech.

This year, the strategy was clear: Bigger is better.

Read full article

Comments

Ubisoft announced Wednesday it will close its studio in Halifax, Nova Scotia — two weeks after 74% of its staff voted to unionize.

This means laying off the 71 people at the studio, reports the gaming news site Aftermath:

[Communications Workers of America’s Canadian affiliate, CWA Canada] said in a statement to Aftermath the union will “pursue every legal recourse to ensure that the rights of these workers are respected and not infringed in any way.” The union said in a news release that it’s illegal in Canada for companies to close businesses because of unionization. That’s not necessarily what happened here, according to the news release, but the union is “demanding information from Ubisoft about the reason for the sudden decision to close.”

“We will be looking for Ubisoft to show us that this had nothing to do with the employees joining a union,” former Ubisoft Halifax programmer and bargaining committee member Jon Huffman said in a statement. “The workers, their families, the people of Nova Scotia, and all of us who love video games made in Canada, deserve nothing less….”

Before joining Ubisoft, the studio was best known for its work on the Rocksmith franchise; under Ubisoft, it focused squarely on mobile games.

Ubisoft Halifax was quickly removed from the Ubisoft website on Wednesday…

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader shared this report from It’s FOSS:

Jenny Guanni Qu, a researcher at [VC fund] Pebblebed, analyzed 125,183 bugs from 20 years of Linux kernel development history (on Git). The findings show that the average bug takes 2.1 years to find. [Though the median is 0.7 years, with the average possibly skewed by “outliers” discovered after years of hiding.] The longest-lived bug, a buffer overflow in networking code, went unnoticed for 20.7 years! [But 86.5% of bugs are found within five years.]
The research was carried out by relying on the Fixes: tag that is used in kernel development. Basically, when a commit fixes a bug, it includes a tag pointing to the commit that introduced the bug. Jenny wrote a tool that extracted these tags from the kernel’s git history going back to 2005. The tool finds all fixing commits, extracts the referenced commit hash, pulls dates from both commits, and calculates the time frame. As for the dataset, it includes over 125k records from Linux 6.19-rc3, covering bugs from April 2005 to January 2026. Out of these, 119,449 were unique fixing commits from 9,159 different authors, and only 158 bugs had CVE IDs assigned.
It took six hours to assemble the dataset, according to the blog post, which concludes that the percentage of bugs found within one year has improved dramatically, from 0% in 2010 to 69% by 2022. The blog post says this can likely be attributed to:

The Syzkaller fuzzer (released in 2015)
Dynamic memory error detectors like KASAN, KMSAN, KCSAN sanitizers
Better static analysis
More contributors reviewing code

But “We’re simultaneously catching new bugs faster AND slowly working through ~5,400 ancient bugs that have been hiding for over 5 years.”

They’ve also developed an AI model called VulnBERT that predicts whether a commit introduces a vulnerability, claiming that of all actual bug-introducing commits, it catches 92.2%. “The goal isn’t to replace human reviewers but to point them at the 10% of commits most likely to be problematic, so they can focus attention where it matters…”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.