Apple is looking to gain a foothold in the more budget-friendly end of the laptop market with the MacBook Neo. The system starts at $599, which is darn inexpensive for an Apple laptop — it even has the same starting price as the M4 iPad Air.

As such, the MacBook Neo should help Apple compete with cheap Windows laptops and Chromebooks. Pricing it at $499 for educational use won’t exactly hurt either.

Apple is really lowering the cost of entry for those looking to pick up a new MacBook here. The base MacBook Neo costs $500 less than the cheapest M5 MacBook Air, which is now officially Apple’s midrange laptop.

Of course, there are a lot of tradeoffs you’ll make by opting for a MacBook Neo instead of a MacBook Air. If you’re curious about all the differences between the Neo and the base 13.6-inch Air (and perhaps what you’ll be foregoing if go you with the cheaper option), we’ve got you covered.

MacBook Neo vs. MacBook Air exteriors

Apple

Let’s start with the things you’ll notice at first glance about the two laptop lines. The Neo has an arguably more eye-catching array of colorways with silver, blush (a light pink), citrus (light yellow) and indigo options. The Air comes in a more muted batch of sky blue, silver, starlight (a sort of champagne) and midnight (a very dark blue).

The weight of the two laptops is identical at 2.7 pounds and the differences in the dimensions are negligible. Blissfully, both laptops have a headphone jack. Please have the courage to keep those around in MacBooks, Apple.

Apple

Alas, the Neo does not have a MagSafe port, so you’ll need to use one of its two USB-C ports (it has one USB-C 2 port and a USB-C 3 port) for charging. The MBA has two Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C) ports to go with its MagSafe connector.

While we’re on the subject of charging, the MacBook Neo comes with a 20W power adapter. The MBA includes a 40W Dynamic Power Adapter with 60W Max, and it supports fast charging at up to 70W. 

The Neo has a 36.5-watt-hour lithium-ion battery, which Apple claims has enough juice for up to 11 hours of web browsing or 16 hours of video streaming on a single charge. As for the MBA, that has a 53.8-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery. Apple says you’ll be able to use that laptop for 15 hours of web browsing or 18 hours of streaming video before you need to recharge.

Back to the exterior of the laptops and in terms of audio, the Neo has a side-firing dual-speaker system with Spatial Audio and Dolby Atmos support. However, unlike with the MBA (which has four built-in speakers), there’s no mention of Spatial Audio support for AirPods. The MBA has one more microphone than the Neo as well, and both laptops support Voice Isolation and Wide Spectrum microphone modes.

MacBook Neo vs. MacBook Air opened up

Apple

If you were to place a MacBook Neo and MacBook Air side by side and open them up, you might spot that the former’s screen is a little smaller at 13 inches on the diagonal. While both have Liquid Retina displays with 500 nits of brightness, the Neo’s screen has a lower resolution of 2408 x 1506 vs. the MBA’s 2560 x 1664. The Air also has a P3 wide color gamut and support for Apple’s True Tone feature, which tweaks the screen’s color temperature to better fit your surroundings. The Neo has an sRGB display instead.

While the webcams in both laptops can capture 1080p video, the one in the Neo is lower-specced and has fewer features. It’s a 1080p FaceTime HD camera. The MBA has a 12MP camera that supports Center Stage, a feature that keeps you in the middle of the frame as you’re moving around. It also supports Desk View, which allows you to show your face and what’s on your desk simultaneously. 

The MacBook Neo has a Magic Keyboard and multi-touch trackpad (which we didn’t feel were super sturdy in our initial hands-on time). The MacBook Air, on the other hand, has a backlit Magic Keyboard and a Force Touch trackpad. It also supports Touch ID as standard.

If you want Touch ID on the MacBook Neo, though, you’ll need to pay extra. A version of the laptop with Touch ID costs $699. That upgrade (which is the only one available for the Neo as things stand) also doubles the internal storage to 512GB. And that feels like a smooth segue into comparing the internal specs of each machine.

MacBook Neo vs. MacBook Air on the inside

The M5 MacBook Air comes with 512GB of storage as standard and you can equip it with up to a 4TB SSD. The Neo tops out at 512GB.

It’s a little disappointing (though somewhat understandable given the surging costs of RAM) that the Neo only has 8GB of unified memory. That’s half of what you get in a MacBook Air as standard, and you can expand that laptop’s RAM to 32GB. Memory bandwidth is nearly three times faster on the MBA as well at 153GB/s, compared with 60GB/s on the Neo.

The chip that runs the Neo is significantly less powerful than the M5 you’ll find in the MacBook Air too. The Neo uses an A18 Pro, which is the chip that debuted in the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max. It has a 6-core CPU (two performance, four efficiency), 5-core GPU and 16-core Neural Engine. Measure that against the Air’s M5, the base version of which has a 10-core CPU (four super cores, six efficiency cores) and 8-core GPU, though that too has a 16-core Neural Engine.

We don’t yet have a direct comparison, such as Geekbench 6 scores, to directly measure the performance of each laptop. However, it’s already clear that the MacBook Neo won’t be nearly as powerful as the M5 MacBook Air. You probably won’t be doing heavy-duty video editing on a Neo. That said, Apple says that you will be able to use Apple Intelligence features on the laptop.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/macbook-neo-vs-m5-macbook-air-all-the-trade-offs-youll-make-to-save-500-less-190434959.html?src=rss

Archaeologists are keen to learn more about the specific diets and culinary practices of ancient populations around the globe. An interdisciplinary team of scientists analyzed the residues on prehistoric ceramic cooking pots and concluded that early Eastern European hunter-gatherer-fishers likely foraged for plants as well as hunted fish and other animals for their sustenance, according to a new paper published in the journal PLoS ONE. And they often combined ingredients for region-specific recipes.

This is a burgeoning area of archaeological research. For instance, back in 2020, we reported on researchers who spent an entire year analyzing the chemical residues of some 50 ceramic cooking pots. The aim was to gain new insights into ancient diets, and the authors actually cooked their own maize-based meals in replica pots to test their hypotheses. They found that the charred bits at the bottom of the pots provided evidence of the last meal cooked. But the patinas contained evidence of the remnants of prior meals that had built up over time. So it depends on which part of the pot you sample.

Most prior research has been typically useful primarily for identifying animal remains; it’s more challenging to identify the kinds of plants ancient peoples might have consumed. The authors of this latest paper combined several analytical techniques to study the residues of 58 pottery pieces dating between the 6th and 3rd millennium BCE. And they, too, conducted their own experiments, cooking various combinations of the ingredients in ceramic vessels over an open fire.

Read full article

Comments

One of the nicest things about Apple software, at least in theory, is its uncluttered design. That’s why many users (myself included) were annoyed when Safari’s Compact Tabs feature was dropped in macOS 26 or iPadOS 26. It was a great way to neaten up your browser bar, and people have been complaining about the missing feature ever since.

Happily, the complainers now have something to look forward to, as the upcoming ‌macOS Tahoe‌ 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4 releases will bring back the Compact Tab option, according to MacRumors. Their reporting shows a screenshot of the Safari settings on macOS, with “Separate” and “Compact” tab style both on offer.

Why I love Compact Tabs

Here’s why I’m jazzed about this feature’s return: Your browser’s tab bar, by default, sits right below the main toolbar (which contains your address bar as well as forward/back buttons and new tab buttons). Compact Tabs moves the tabs into the address bar, a space that is otherwise mostly blank. This cuts the amount of occupied space taken at the top of the browser in half. This isn’t a feature for everyone—people who routinely keep dozens of tabs open tend to like having more space to see which tab is which. But for those of us who like to keep things clean (like me) Compact Tabs was perfect.

And it will be perfect again. Apple hasn’t announced when the 26.4 update will ship to all macOS and iPadOS users, but based on based release cycles, it’s likely to come out in the next month or so. ANd if you don’t want to wait, you can try out the 26.4 beta now.

Credit: Justin Pot

The serious caveat here is that beta versions of software are, by definition, less stable than the release version, meaning you may have to put up with a few bugs that will annoy you or (at worst) leave your computer unusable.

All that aside, if you want to jump in, open System Settings on your device and head to General > Software Update. From here turn on beta updates—you should then be offered a beta version of 26.4. I don’t generally recommend risking using a beta operating system for a minor quality of life improvement (even though there are other cool features coming), but the full version shouldn’t be long in coming.

Microsoft spent much of the past week rejecting legitimate emails sent to Outlook.com, Live, and Hotmail accounts due to what appears to be overly aggressive IP reputation filtering or faulty blocklist rules. According to The Register, many senders received 550 errors claiming their networks were blocked, preventing delivery of invoices, notifications, and authentication emails. From the report: A block list is a good thing. It helps stem the flow of spam from networks or addresses associated with junk email. However, the confusing thing for our reader is that his company was not on Microsoft’s naughty step for email. A look at Microsoft’s Smart Network Data Service (SNDS) showed no issues with the IP. “We’re also a member of their JMRP (Junk Mail Reporting Program),” our reader added, “which is intended to inform us when people are reporting spam sent from our IPs – except, we never get any reports.”

The problem worsened in February. On Microsoft’s support forums, users began to complain about similar issues as the IP net presumably widened. One wrote: “We are currently experiencing a critical and recurring email delivery issue affecting recipients at outlook.com, live.com, hotmail.com, and msn.com,” and provided a copy of an error that suggested the mail server has been “temporarily rate limited due to IP reputation.” The user drily noted, “Although the error indicates rate limiting, in practice no emails are being delivered.”

A large number of users, ranging from the administrator of a server sending automated notifications on behalf of Estonian Public Libraries to an email provider for healthcare professionals, chimed in to confirm they too were having delivery problems and Microsoft support was not helpful. […] Unsurprisingly, our reader spoke on condition of anonymity – nobody wants to be the ISP that has to say, “Yeah, we can deliver your email anywhere but Outlook.com” to customers. We asked Microsoft to comment, but other than acknowledging our questions, the company did not respond further.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

During a brief hearing on Wednesday morning, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation spent only a few minutes “marking up” new legislation that provides guidance to NASA for its various initiatives, including the Artemis program to land humans on the Moon.

“Our bill authorizes critical funding for, and gives strategic direction to, the agency in line with the priorities of administrator Isaacman and the Trump administration,” said the committee’s chairman, Sen. Ted Cruz, (R-Texas).

The duration of the hearing, however, seems to be the inverse of its significance.

Read full article

Comments

NEW YORK CITY—Whether you’re talking about the iBook, MacBook, or MacBook Air, Apple’s most basic laptops have started at or within $100 of the $1,000 price point for over 20 years. Sure, the company had quietly been testing the waters with a Walmart-exclusive M1 MacBook Air configuration for several years, first at $699 and then at $599. But as far as what Apple would actively advertise and offer on its own site and in its own retail stores, we’ve never seen anything for substantially below $1,000.

The new MacBook Neo changes that. Apple has experimented with lower-cost products before, most notably with the $329 and $349 iPads and the old $429 iPhone SE. But this is the first time it has used that strategy for the Mac. The Neo starts at $599 for a version with 256GB of storage and no Touch ID sensor, and $699 for a version with Touch ID and 512GB of storage (each also available to educational customers for $100 less).

We had a chance to poke at a MacBook Neo for a while at Apple’s “special experience” event in New York this morning, and what I can tell you is that this does feel like an Apple laptop despite the lower starting price. It definitely has some spec sheet shortcomings, even compared to older M3 or M4 MacBook Airs that you still might be able to get at a discount from third-party retailers or Apple’s refurbished site—more on that in our full review next week. But it’s priced low enough to (1) appeal to people who might not have considered a Mac before, and (2) to make some of its borderline specs feel reasonable, and that’s enough to keep it interesting.

Read full article

Comments

Humble Games’ library has returned home, so to speak. Indie publisher Good Games Group (GGG), led by former Humble leaders, has acquired the full back catalog of over 50 Humble Games titles from Ziff Davis. Alongside the purchase, GGG has rebranded to Balor Games, positioning itself as a force in “triple-I” gaming.

“For the developers we have worked with over the years, this moment is a reunion,” Balor Games CEO Alan Patmore wrote in a statement. “[It has] the same leadership and the same commitment to thoughtful publishing remain in place. What changes is our scale and our focus. Balor Games is built for inventors and backed by believers. To that end, it exists to be a seal of quality for independent games.”

The Humble Games lineup includes (among others) Slay the Spire, A Hat in Time, SIGNALIS, Forager, Coral Island, Monaco and Wizard of Legend. Separate from the Humble transaction, Balor also bought the complete catalog of Firestoke Games (which shut down last August) and publishing rights to Fights in Tight Spaces. In total, the young studio now owns the publishing rights to over 60 indie titles.

Humble Games is separate from the Humble Bundle storefront. The latter is still owned by Ziff Davis.

Balor Games

The seemingly happy ending comes after quite the rocky road. In July 2024, Ziff Davis laid off all 36 employees of Humble Games. But later that year, Humble Games’ former leaders (Patmore and Mark Nash) formed GGG and cut a deal to help manage their old studio’s back catalog. Now, with Ziff Davis in a selling mood, that library is back in Patmore and Nash’s hands. Balor Games, it is.

The pair view the newly anointed Balor as a developer-friendly publishing house. As for its name, Balor is a supernatural being in Irish mythology. It’s sometimes depicted as having three eyes. Triple-eye, triple-I… Clever devils!

The triple-I moniker is a more recent addition to the gaming lexicon. It typically means something defined by indie creativity and passion — with a budget far less than AAA but more than a tiny two-person passion project. (Balor says it’s about “high-quality, impactful games.”) You wouldn’t be blamed for wondering how that’s different from AA. But the slant here is to define the genre less by budget and more by “indie” intangibles.

Nash detailed the company’s vision in an interview with GamesIndustry.biz (which, curiously, is a Ziff Davis property). “We felt that what’s becoming more and more critical is that as game development becomes more diverse, more complicated, and expectations continue to rise, we feel it’s important that a publisher can match the needs of each individual project,” Nash said. “We are spending a considerable amount of time with anyone we are partnering with, figuring out what they need specifically.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/humble-games-former-bosses-buy-the-studios-back-catalog-183831194.html?src=rss

Android users will soon be able to use tracking devices to coordinate lost luggage recovery directly with airlines. The feature, one of many announced as part of Google’s March Pixel Drop, generates a Find Hub link for compatible trackers that can be shared with airlines to help locate bags that have gone missing transit.

Apple rolled out a similar feature for AirTags in late 2024, called Share Item Location. iOS users can temporarily share the location of a Find My accessory with their airline to help find lost luggage. It’s important to note that AirTags (and other tracking tags, including those compatible with Android’s Find Hub) aren’t real-time trackers, as they generally rely on pinging other internet-connected devices nearby to share their whereabouts. Share Item Location for AirTags is currently supported by 36 airlines, including all major U.S. carriers.

How to use Android Find Hub to locate your lost luggage

To use this feature, you must already have a Find Hub-compatible tracker in your luggage. Select the tracking device in the Find Hub app, tap Share item location to generate an encrypted URL, and copy the link to paste into your airline’s lost luggage claim form on its mobile app or website.

The sharing link automatically expires after seven days (during which you will have hopefully recovered your luggage), though you can stop sharing at any time. Find Hub will also disable location sharing when your Android phone detects the tracker nearby.

At this time, 10 global airlines are working with Find Hub for baggage recovery:

• Ajet

• Air India

• China Airlines

• Lufthansa

• Austrian Airlines

• Brussels Airlines

• Swiss International Airlines

• Saudia Airlines

• Scandinavian Airlines

• Turkish Airlines

None of the major carriers in the U.S have signed on, though Google has said it plans to partner with more airlines, including Qantas, in the future.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: TikTok will not introduce end-to-end encryption (E2EE) — the controversial privacy feature used by nearly all its rivals — arguing it makes users less safe. E2EE means only the sender and recipient of a direct message can view its contents, making it the most secure form of communication available to the general public. Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and X have embraced it because they say their priority is maximizing user privacy.

But critics have said E2EE makes it harder to stop harmful content spreading online, because it means tech firms and law enforcement have no way of viewing any material sent in direct messages. The situation is made more complex because TikTok has long faced accusations that ties to the Chinese state may put users’ data at risk. TikTok has consistently denied this, but earlier this year the social media firm’s US operations were separated from its global business on the orders of US lawmakers.

TikTok told the BBC it believed end-to-end encryption prevented police and safety teams from being able to read direct messages if they needed to. It confirmed its approach to the BBC in a briefing about security at its London office, saying it wanted to protect users, especially young people from harm. It described this stance as a deliberate decision to set itself apart from rivals. “Grooming and harassment risks are very real in DMs [direct messages] so TikTok now can credibly argue that it’s prioritizing ‘proactive safety’ over ‘privacy absolutism’ which is a pretty powerful soundbite,” said social media industry analyst Matt Navarra. But Navarra said the move also “puts TikTok out of step with global privacy expectations” and might reinforce wariness for some about its ownership.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Over the past few years, Google’s A-series Pixel phones have consistently been some of the best midrange phones you can buy. But with the AI boom causing memory shortages and the price of consumer electronics to rise, including smartphones, affordable devices like the Pixel 10a are more important than ever. Thankfully, Google’s new phone still represents great value, even if it doesn’t come with many upgrades. 

Design and display 

Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

The story of the Pixel 10a is one of small changes, so let’s start with the outside. The phone is available in four colors: lavender (pictured), berry, fog and obsidian. Photos don’t do the lavender color justice. In person, the light refracts beautifully off the surface of the aluminum frame and composite back. The back of the phone also has a pleasing matte finish that made the 10a feel secure in my hand. Another nice touch is that Google shaved down the camera module further, so that the 10a can now lie completely flat. As before, the entire phone is rated IP68-certified against dust and water. For DIY enthusiasts, Google has said it redesigned the 10a’s internals to make it easier to repair. Hooray for that.    

Beyond those changes, the 10a has a brighter 120Hz P-OLED screen that offers up to 3,000 nits of brightness, up from 2,700 on the 9a. The display also offers better protection against scratches and drops thanks to Google’s decision to switch to Gorilla Glass 7i for the screen coating. Despite the minimal changes, there’s not much to complain about here. The 10a’s screen is fast, responsive and vibrant. The on-screen fingerprint sensor is also in an easy-to-reach spot toward the middle of the phone. After reviewing several big phones in recent months, it was also nice to go back to a handset with a sensible 6.3-inch footprint. 

Performance and battery

Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

I’ve been spoiled recently by phones like the OnePlus 15R, which offers a 7,400mAh battery and 55 watt charging out of the box. By that metric, the Pixel 10a, with its 5,100mAh battery, leaves something to be desired. Putting the phone through Engadget’s video rundown test, it ran for 28 hours before the battery died, which is exactly where the Pixel 9a landed last year. However, that score means the 10a is thoroughly middle of the pack when it comes to battery life. I can also see battery life becoming a concern as the phone ages. While that’s true of every phone, the 10a’s smaller battery makes that more of a pressing concern since you’ll be charging the phone more often and therefore degrading the battery faster. 

Google has improved wired charging speeds, with the new phone capable of charging at 30 watts, up from 23-watts with the 9a. You’ll need to provide a compatible power adapter though; the Pixel 10a doesn’t come with one inside the box. With a 30 watt charger, the 10a’s battery went from dead to about 50 percent in under 45 minutes. A full charge takes approximately an hour and 45 minutes. Again, not great, but serviceable. 

Another disappointment is that the Pixel 10a doesn’t support Google’s new Pixelsnap standard. Wireless charging is faster on the new phone (it’s now rated at 10 watts, up from five), but without a compatible third-party case, a charging puck won’t magnetically align with the back of the 10a. It’s not a dealbreaker, but Pixelsnap would have been a great addition.    

The 10a has the same chipset Google used on the Pixel 9a, the Tensor G4, and the company has once again gone with 8GB of RAM. Other midrange phones like Samsung Galaxy S25 FE offer faster chips, but they also cost more. Moreover, I didn’t feel like the 10a was worse for running on old silicon. The new 120Hz display does a lot to make the new phone feel snappy, and Google’s in-house Android skin feels responsive as ever. 

The 10a also does a commendable job of keeping heat in check. I sat down to play Diablo Immortal and even after an hour of playtime, the phone was still cool to the touch despite running the game at high settings and 60 frames per second.               

Cameras

Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

The 10a comes with the same camera package as its predecessor. On the back, you get a 48-megapixel main camera with an f/1.7 lens that offers optical image stabilization and phase detection autofocus. Complementing it is a 13MP ultrawide with a 120-degree field of view. For selfies, you get a 13MP camera with an f/2.2 lens. As ever, Google’s software is doing most of the heavy lifting here. That includes a pair of new features, Camera Coach and Auto Best Take, that debuted with the Pixel 10 series. 

Camera Coach, like the name suggests, uses AI to analyze the scene you’re about to capture, and offers tips on how to best compose and light the shot. It will also suggest the best camera mode for the job. While I can see how this tool could be useful, I found the fact it relies on a cloud model made it too slow for some situations. For example, when I used Camera Coach to help me snap a photo of my cat, a sassy tortoiseshell, she walked away by the time the 10a got a response from Google’s servers. In more static scenes, Camera Coach is more useful, but much of photography is about capturing a fleeting moment in time, so its utility is limited. 

Auto Best Take solves a problem I’m sure we’ve all experienced. You go to take a group portrait, and snap multiple frames to ensure everyone looks good, only to end up without a single usable shot. With Auto Best Take, Google promises to combine similar group photos so that everyone looks their best. This feature works as advertised. 

Outside of those features, the 10a offers a predictably great camera experience. The phone consistently produces photos that are sharp with great natural colors. That said, I did miss having a telephoto camera, as you can see from the photos I shot during a recent Cat Power concert in Toronto. Given the 10a only costs $500, it’s hard to fault Google for not including one.  

Software

Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

Out of the box, the 10a comes with Android 16. Like all of Google’s recent Pixel devices, the company has promised to support the 10a for an industry-leading seven years with software updates and security patches. The company’s pledge includes Pixel Drops, which often bring new software features. One feature Google has brought over from the more expensive Pixel 10 line is Satellite SOS, which allows you to call for help during emergencies, even when your phone can’t connect to a cellular network. Outside of a demo designed to make users  aware of the feature, I wasn’t able to test Satellite SOS (thankfully).   

Notably, the 10a is still missing Google’s Screenshots app. That’s unfortunate since it’s one of the more useful Pixel exclusives, making it easier to organize all your online clippings. Other AI features such as Gemini Live and Circle to Search are accounted for, and as useful ever.   

Wrap-up

Igor Bonifacic for Engadget

The Pixel 10a is a tricky phone to grade. On the one hand, part of me wants to dock points because Google has added so few updates. On the other, the 10a is still a great phone for $500, and at a time when consumer electronics are becoming more expensive by the day, the fact it hasn’t gone up in price is a small miracle. Even if Google is partly responsible for the current memory crunch, the company’s hardware division has delivered an affordable device that’s still worth recommending. The Pixel 10a is still the phone to beat in the $500 range.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/google-pixel-10a-review-small-changes-but-still-great-value-173026779.html?src=rss

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

The greatest regret of my life is choosing to take French in high school. Don’t get me wrong, I find French beautiful, and I was a dedicated A+ student. But as an adult, I’m constantly embarrassed by how little Spanish I know.

But even in adulthood, I knew it wasn’t too late for me to learn Spanish, so I did what literally everyone does: I downloaded Duolingo. It’s free, popular, and has a mascot with deeply threatening energy. What’s not to love?

Eventually, I reached a 300-day streak—nearly a full year of daily practice!—but when I tried to have an actual conversation in Spanish, I could not hold my own, to put it gently. I realized that Duolingo had gamified me into feeling like I was making progress, rewarding streaks and unlocking owl animations while carefully avoiding the part where I learned, you know, to speak and understand Spanish.

Duolingo is a game, but Babbel is a learning tool

With a trip to Mexico City approaching, I signed up for Babbel. I didn’t expect to be fluent, but I wanted to avoid being the most helpless monolingual American on the trip. And now that I’m on the other side of that vacation, I can say with confidence that every basic phrase I successfully attempted to speak was thanks to two things: 1) Babbel’s grammar lessons, and 2) the generous patience of every local willing to communicate with me.

A few months of daily Babbel lessons genuinely helped me navigate asking how much something costs, whether I could pay by card, and ordering at a restaurant. Crucially, I felt I was doing all of this not from a place of pure regurgitation, but from a place of actual language understanding. That’s a different feeling entirely.

Duolingo’s genius is its dopamine loop, but that’s its limitation too—a sustained streak, and not language acquisition, is the real product. Where Duolingo’s scenarios include sentences like “My fathers are young and pretty,” (a real example!), Babbel teaches you “Could I please have the check?”

Babbel is more structured. The grammar explanations are woven directly into lessons rather than siloed in a separate section you’ll never visit. The scenarios are grounded in reality. The whole thing feels less like Candy Crush and more like…a class. Which, it turns out, might be why classrooms were never designed to feel like Candy Crush.

Babbel versus Duolingo: Point by point

Here’s my breakdown of how the most important ways these apps compare.

Duolingo:

• Free (with ads for unhinged mobile games)

• Great for building daily habits

• Solid vocabulary exposure

• Gamified streaks and rewards

• Grammar depth is limited

• Designed to feel like progress, no matter what

Babbel:

• Paid subscription (around $15 per month, give or take)

• Structured, grammar-forward lessons

• Real-world conversational scenarios

• Cultural context built in

• Purposeful over playful

• Designed to build actual skills

Questions to consider before you try any language learning app

Before you start using Babbel (or flirting with the Duolingo Owl), it’s important to consider your actual goals. Whether you’re prepping for a trip, want to keep your brain sharp, or actually become fluent, no app comparison means anything without first understanding what you’re trying to achieve.

If your goal is casual learning or building a daily habit, Duolingo is genuinely a fine place to start. It’s perfectly good for vocabulary exposure and using the psychology of habit formation to keep you coming back. There’s real value in that! Just don’t confuse a 300-day streak with 300 days of progress.

If your goal is to actually speak another language—to survive a vacation, hold a conversation, order food with confidence—Babbel is the more honest tool. And hey, both apps use streak mechanics to use habit formation psychology, but Babbel also integrates grammar explanations into lessons, offers far more practical and applicable conversation scenarios, and wraps everything in cultural context that makes the language feel alive rather than abstract.

Any language app will have limits, but Babbel is worth the cost

A major caveat here is that no app will make you fluent. Native speakers don’t speak with the crisp, patient enunciation of a language app. Real people speak quickly, use slang, have regional accents, and might not be willing to wait patiently while you search for the right vocabulary. You’ll eventually hit a wall with any app.

Duolingo’s perpetual free tier is likely the decision-maker for most people. You’ll never be locked out of educational content for lack of a credit card. The cost of “free,” though, is a parade of deeply unhinged ads for other addictive phone games. A fair trade, perhaps, depending on your tolerance for chaos.

But if you’re self-motivated and serious (or even just serious enough to want to survive a vacation!), then Babbel is the structured, purposeful, real-world-ready choice. It might feel less like a game, but I suppose that’s the point. When I signed up, I caught a 50% deal: $8.95/month for 12 months. Babbel also offers a one-time lifetime access payment of $299.99, though at that investment level, you might as well hire a tutor? All in all, standard month-to-month pricing hovers around $15/month.