BROOMFIELD, Colorado—One of NASA’s oldest astronomy missions, the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, has been out of action for more than a month as scientists await the arrival of a pioneering robotic rescue mission.

The 21-year-old spacecraft is falling out of orbit, and NASA officials believe it’s worth saving—for the right price. Swift is not a flagship astronomy mission like Hubble or Webb, so there’s no talk of sending astronauts or spending hundreds of millions of dollars on a rescue expedition. Hubble was upgraded by five space shuttle missions, and billionaire and commercial astronaut Jared Isaacman—now NASA’s administrator—proposed a privately funded mission to service Hubble in 2022, but the agency rejected the idea.

Swift may be a more suitable target for a first-of-a-kind commercial rescue mission. It has cost roughly $500 million (adjusted for inflation) to build, launch, and operate, but it is significantly less expensive than Hubble, so the consequences of a botched rescue would be far less severe. Last September, NASA awarded a company named Katalyst Space Technologies a $30 million contract to rapidly build and launch a commercial satellite to stabilize Swift’s orbit and extend its mission.

Read full article

Comments

Will there be an AI-optimized programming language at the expense of human readability? There’s now been experiments with minimizing tokens for “LLM efficiency, without any concern for how it would serve human developers.”

This new article asks if AI will force source code to evolve — or make it extinct, noting that Stephen Cass, the special projects editor at IEEE Spectrum, has even been asking the ultimate question about our future. “Could we get our AIs to go straight from prompt to an intermediate language that could be fed into the interpreter or compiler of our choice? Do we need high-level languages at all in that future?”

Cass acknowledged the obvious downsides. (“True, this would turn programs into inscrutable black boxes, but they could still be divided into modular testable units for sanity and quality checks.”) But “instead of trying to read or maintain source code, programmers would just tweak their prompts and generate software afresh.” This leads to some mind-boggling hypotheticals, like “What’s the role of the programmer in a future without source code?” Cass asked the question and announced “an emergency interactive session” in October to discuss whether AI is signaling the end of distinct programming languages as we know them.
In that webinar, Cass said he believes programmers in this future would still suggest interfaces, select algorithms, and make other architecture design choices. And obviously the resulting code would need to pass tests, Cass said, and “has to be able to explain what it’s doing.” But what kind of abstractions could go away? And then “What happens when we really let AIs off the hook on this?” Cass asked — when we “stop bothering” to have them code in high-level languages. (Since, after all, high-level languages “are a tool for human beings.”) “What if we let the machines go directly into creating intermediate code?” (Cass thinks the machine-language level would be too far down the stack, “because you do want a compile layer too for different architecture….”)

In this future, the question might become ‘What if you make fewer mistakes, but they’re different mistakes?'” Cass said he’s keeping an eye out for research papers on designing languages for AI, although he agreed that it’s not a “tomorrow” thing — since, after all, we’re still digesting “vibe coding” right now. But “I can see this becoming an area of active research.”

The article also quotes Andrea Griffiths, a senior developer advocate at GitHub and a writer for the newsletter Main Branch, who’s seen the attempts at an “AI-first” languages, but nothing yet with meaningful adoption. So maybe AI coding agents will just make it easier to use our existing languages — especially typed languages with built-in safety advantages.

And Scott Hanselman’s podcast recently dubbed Chris Lattner’s Mojo “a programming language for an AI world,” just in the way it’s designed to harness the computing power of today’s multi-core chips.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader shared this report from Tom’s Hardware:

GrapheneOS, the privacy-focused Android fork, said in a post on X on Friday that it will not comply with emerging laws requiring operating systems to collect user age data at setup. “GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification or an account,” the project stated. “If GrapheneOS devices can’t be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it.”

The statement came after Brazil’s Digital ECA (Law 15.211) took effect on March 17, imposing fines of up to R$50 million (roughly $9.5 million) per violation on operating system providers that fail to implement age verification…

Motorola and GrapheneOS announced a long-term partnership at MWC on March 2, to bring to bring the hardened OS to future Motorola hardware, ending GrapheneOS’s long-standing exclusivity to Google Pixel devices. A GrapheneOS-powered Motorola phone is expected in 2027. If Motorola sells devices with GrapheneOS pre-installed, those devices would need to comply with local regulations in every market where they ship, or Motorola may need to restrict sales geographically.

Or, “People can buy the devices without GrapheneOS and install it themselves in any region where that’s an issue,” according to a post on the GrapheneOS BlueSky account. “Motorola devices with GrapheneOS preinstalled is something we want but it doesn’t have to happen right away and doesn’t need to happen everywhere for the partnership to be highly successful. Pixels are sold in 33 countries which doesn’t include many countries outside North America and Europe.”

Tom’s Hardware also notes that GrapheneOS “isn’t the first and won’t be the last company to outright refuse compliance with incoming age verification laws.”

“The developers of open-source calculator firmware DB48X issued a legal notice recently, stating that their software ‘does not, cannot and will not implement age verification,’ while MidnightBSD updated its license to ban users in Brazil.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Yes, Microsoft announced it’s fixing common Windows 11 complaints. But what about getting rid of that requirement to have a Microsoft account before installing Windows 11? While Microsoft didn’t mention that at all, the senior editor at the blog Windows Central reports there’s “a number of people” internally pushing at Microsoft to relax that requirement:

Microsoft Vice President and overall developer legend Scott Hanselman has posted on X in response to someone asking him about possibly relaxing the Microsoft account requirements, saying “Ya I hate that. Working on it….” [Hanselman made that remark Friday, to his 328,200 followers.]
The blog notes “It would be very easy for Microsoft to remove this requirement from a technical perspective, it’s just whether or not the company can agree to make the change that needs to be decided.”

Elsewhere on X someone told Hanselman they wanted to see Windows “cut out the borderline malware tactics we’ve seen in recent years to push things like Edge, Bing, ads into the start menu, etc.” Hanselman’s reply? “Yes a calmer and more chill OS with fewer upsells is a goal.”

Q: When will we see first changes? for now it’s just words…
Hanselman: This month and every month this year.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Walmart is “rolling out digital price tags to replace the old paper ones,” reports CNBC, planning to implement them in all U.S. stores by the end of the year:

Amanda Bailey, a team leader in electronics who works at a Walmart in West Chester, Ohio, estimates that the digital shelf labels — known as DSLs — have cut the time she used to spend on pricing duties by 75%, time that has freed her up to help customers. She also said the DSLs are a game-changer because Walmart’s Spark delivery drivers looking for an item will see a flashing DSL so they can more easily find the product…

Sean Turner, chief technology officer of Swiftly, a retail technology and media platform serving the grocery industry, said that while it makes sense that people are raising questions about dynamic pricing, the real issue is store-level efficiency. “Digital shelf labels solve some very real operational headaches. They cut down on manual price changes, reduce checkout discrepancies, and make it easier to keep in-store and digital promotions aligned,” Turner said. All of that can mean fewer surprises at the register for shoppers and better-tailored promotions. “For consumers, the biggest benefit is accuracy and consistency,” Benedict said. “Shoppers want to know the price they see is the price they pay. Digital labels can also make it easier for stores to mark down perishable items in real time, which can lower food waste and create savings opportunities.”
A Walmart spokeswoman promised CNBC that “the price you see is the same for everyone in any given store.” But the article also notes that several U.S. states “are looking to ban dynamic pricing. Pennsylvania became one of the latest states to introduce a bill outlawing the practice, following New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act, which became law in November.”

And at the federal level, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján recently introduced the “Stop Price Gouging in Grocery Stores” act, which would ban digital labels in any grocery store over 10,000 square feet, while Congresswoman Val Hoyle is sponsoring similar legislation in the House. “There needs to be laws and enforcement to protect consumers,” Hoyle tells CNBC, “and until then, I’d like to see them banned outright.”

CNBC adds that “While there is no reported use of digital shelf labeling being tied to surge pricing yet,” in Hoyle’s view “it’s only a matter of time.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Back in November, Google made a stunning announcement: Quick Share was suddenly compatible with Apple’s AirDrop. At the time, the compatibility was limited to the Pixel 10, but no matter: Google had just made history, transforming the sharing features from platform-specific to cross-platform.

While AirDrop and Quick Share have long been the most convenient ways to share large files between devices, it only worked if you and your friend were on the same OS. That limitation introduces some inconvenient friction, but, as support cross-platform expands, that friction is easing up. Google first announced plans for greater AirDrop compatibility in Quick Share last month, when Android Vice President of Engineering Eric Kay noted, “[i]n 2026, we’re going to be expanding [Airdrop support] to a lot more devices.”

While there’s no official timeline on which devices will gain support and when, Nothing has said it is “exploring” adding it, while Qualcomm “can’t wait” to add the feature to its Snapdragon chips. However, we do now know one Android device that will support AirDrop very soon: the Samsung Galaxy S26.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1,299.99
at Amazon

$1,299.99
at Amazon

AirDrop support comes to the Galaxy S26 series

Samsung made the news official on March 22 (technically Monday, March 23 in Korea). At launch, AirDrop support will only work on the Galaxy S26 series, including the Galaxy S26, Galaxy S26 Plus, and Galaxy S26 Ultra. That’s a bummer for Galaxy S25 users and earlier, but it is possible Samsung will expand support in time. After all, Google started rolling out AirDrop support for Pixel 9 devices late last month.

If you do have a Galaxy S26 device, this feature is live right now—if you live in Korea. Samsung says the feature will be rolling out to the U.S. later this week, but as of this writing, the update is only available to Galaxy users in Korea. (I’ll update this piece when Samsung releases the update for those of us in the U.S.)

How to enable AirDrop support in Quick Share on Galaxy

Credit: Images courtesy of Samsung

If you have an S26, and the update has rolled out to you, you just need to head to Settings > Software update (or System updates), then hit “Download and install,” “Check for system updates,” or “Check for software updates,” depending on your device.

Then, once your phone has the update, you’ll need to manually enable AirDrop support for Quick Share—it won’t just appear on your phone. To do so, head to Settings > Connected devices > Quick Share, then toggle on the new “Share with Apple devices” option.

If you tap the option itself, you’ll find a full description of the feature, which you may or may not already know: The recipient needs to have their iPhone’s AirDrop settings set to “Everyone,” and when you want to receive a file, you need to open Quick Share on your end. Samsung says your phone may temporarily disconnect from wifi when looking for or sharing to other iPhones.

A man crossing the street one San Francisco night spotted a self-driving car — and decided to confront its passenger, 37-year-old tech worker Doug Fulop. The New York Times reports the man yelled that “he wanted to kill Fulop and the other two passengers for giving money to a robot.”
A taxi driver would have simply driven away. But Fulop’s vehicle had no driver — it was a self-driving Waymo… Self-driving cars are designed to stop moving if a person is nearby. People can take advantage of that function to harass and threaten their passengers…. It was unsettling to be trapped inside a Waymo during an attack, Fulop said. “If he had kept hammering on one window instead of alternating, I’m sure he would have eventually broken through,” he said. The attacker did not appear to be on drugs or otherwise impaired, but seemed to be overtaken by extreme anger at the self-driving car, Fulop said.

It did not seem safe to get out and run, he added, since the man was trying to open the locked doors and said he wanted to kill the passengers. They called 911 and Waymo’s support line, Fulop said. Waymo told them that it would not manually direct the car away if someone was standing nearby, and that the passengers would be OK with the doors locked. The car’s software does not allow riders to jump into the driver’s seat and take over during an incident. The attack lasted around six minutes. By then, bystanders had begun cheering on the man, Fulop said. That distracted the man, who moved far enough away from the car that it could finally drive away…

Fulop said he had stopped using Waymo for a time after the January attack and would avoid the service at night unless the company changed its policy of not intervening when a hostile person threatened riders. “As passengers, we deserve more safety than that if someone is trying to attack us,” he said. “This can’t be the policy to be trapped there.”
The article remembers other incidents — including a 2024 video showing three women screaming as their autonomous taxi is spray-painted by vandals. And technology author/speaker Anders Sorman-Nilsson says in Los Angeles five men on e-bikes surrounded his Waymo and forced it to stop. The author felt safe inside the vehicle, according to the times, which adds “He felt reassured knowing that Waymo’s many exterior cameras were recording the men. After around five minutes, he said, they gave up and rode away.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

“Billionaire Elon Musk has announced plans to build a $20 billion chip plant in Austin, Texas” reports a local news station:

Musk announced on Saturday night during a livestream on his social media platform X that the plant, called “Terafab,” will be built near Tesla’s campus and gigafactory in eastern Travis County. The long-anticipated project is a joint venture between Musk-owned properties Tesla, SpaceX and xAI… The Terafab plant is expected to begin production in 2027.

Musk “has said the semiconductor industry is moving too slow to keep up with the supply of chips he expects to need,” writes Bloomberg — quoting Musk as saying “We either build the Terafab or we don’t have the chips, and we need the chips, so we build the Terafab.”

Musk detailed some specific plans, including producing chips that can support 100 to 200 gigawatts a year of computing power on Earth, and chips that can support a terawatt in space, but gave no timelines for the facility or its output… The facility is expected to make two types of chips, one of which will be optimized for edge and inference, primarily for his vehicle, robotaxi and Optimus humanoid robots. The other will be a high-power chip, designed for space that could be used by SpaceX and xAI… Musk said he expects xAI to use the vast majority of the chips.

During the presentation, Musk also unveiled a speculative rendering of a future “mini” AI data center satellite, one piece of a much larger satellite system that he wants SpaceX to build to do complex computing in space. In January, SpaceX requested a license from the Federal Communications Commission to launch one million data center satellites into orbit around Earth. Musk said that the mini satellite he revealed would have the capacity for 100 kilowatts of power. “We expect future satellites to probably go to the megawatt range,” Musk said.

Raising money to build and launch AI data centers in space is one of the driving forces behind SpaceX’s planned IPO later this year. SpaceX is expected to raise as much as $50 billion in a record-setting IPO this summer which could value it at more than $1.75 trillion, Bloomberg News reported earlier.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.