We may earn a commission from links on this page.

The U.S. power grid is suffering more outages than ever—about 45% of utility customers experienced one in the first half of 2025—and the resultant blackouts are lasting longer. As our aging electrical grid struggles to keep up with increasing air conditioner use due to a hotter planet, not to mention artificial intelligence’s insatiable thirst for power, the problem will likely get worse: The U.S. Department of Energy estimates the risk of power outages will increase a mere 100 times over the next few years.

If you’re looking to stave off the worst of the fallout from our shaky power grid, you might be looking to purchase a backup generator (not to be confused with a rechargeable power station) to ensure you can ride out an outage in relative comfort. But you really shouldn’t just roll up to the hardware store and buy whatever generator is on sale. Choosing the right generator for your home and your circumstances is essential. Here are the factors to consider.

How much power does your backup generator need to supply?

The first step in determining the right generator for your home is to determine how much power you’re going to need. This requires three data points: How long you’ll need generator power, how many things you’ll want to run off the generator during a power outage, and the wattage those appliances and systems will need.

• Duration. You can’t predict the future, but you can glean some information from your neighbors (or your own memory) about past power outages. Did they last for several uncomfortable days, or were they relatively brief? If the latter, you might not need a lot of backup power, unless you want to be prepared for any eventuality.

• Number of appliances. Think about what you’ll need to run off a generator. Will it be just a few lights and some phone chargers, or will you want to keep the heat on, run the refrigerator, and run a sump pump during a storm? Everything you add to the list will increase the capacity of the generator you’ll need.

• Wattage. Once you know all the things you’ll need to run, you’ll need to add up the wattage a generator will have to produce. Most appliances will have that information on a label somewhere; if not, the information’s usually in a user manual or online. If the label only provides amps, you can usually multiply that number by 120 (the standard voltage in most homes) to get a rough idea.

  Add all those watts up, and you have a baseline of your power needs during a blackout. Some appliances, like a sump pump, will pull more power when they start up (called starting watts) before settling into a lower power draw (running watts), so it’s a good idea to multiply your baseline by 1.5 to ensure you have enough capacity for surges when the pump or fridge compressor cycles on and off.

  For example, let’s say I want to run my fridge (600 watts), a sump pump (1,000 watts), my computer, and a few lights (400 watts combined). That’s a baseline of 2,000 watts, so I probably want a generator capable of producing at least 3,000 watts of power.

Should you choose a portable, inverter, or standby backup generator?

Next, you need to consider what kind of generator you’re looking for: A standby generator, a portable generator, or an inverter generator.

• Standby generators are the most expensive, but also the most comprehensive solution. These are typically fueled by natural gas directly from your home’s supply line (though you can buy models that use propane), and are designed to turn on whenever there’s a power loss. They’re big generators that are capable of running the whole house, often generating as much as 20,000 watts. They’re ideal if you anticipate frequent and lengthy power outages, or if you just want the peace of mind of knowing that you’ll enjoy uninterrupted power even if a storm knocks out your whole neighborhood. Typical cost: $8,000 to $16,000, usually requiring professional installation, and you’ll need outdoor space where it can sit.

• Portable generators are the most common and typically the most affordable. They have wheels and are designed to be moved around as needed, and range from as little as 1,000 watts of output to behemoths that can generate 20,000 watts (though the word “portable” starts to get a bit squishy with a generator that large—this model, for example, weighs 557 pounds). These are ideal for most people who just want a power option, and for folks who might use a generator at other times, like camping trips or when doing DIY projects around the house. Typical cost: Anywhere from $300 to about $4,000, depending on the specifications.

• Inverter generators are similar to portable generators, but run much more efficiently and quietly because they don’t run flat-out like most portable generators, they throttle up and down depending on the draw. They use less fuel and run longer, and are also usually mounted on wheels for portability—and their quieter operation also generates less interference for electronics like computers and routers. Many can produce enough power to run an entire house (typically around 5,000 watts), but they’re also typically much more expensive for the power they deliver. If you have the extra cash, an inverter is probably your best bet. Typical cost: About $350 to $4,500, depending on specifications.

• Power stations. Although sometimes referred to as “solar generators” because they can charge using solar power, these aren’t really generators—they’re large batteries that store power for later use. You can buy portable power stations that generate sufficient wattage for a whole house, and you can have larger systems installed that can take you off the grid entirely. They tend to be more expensive to purchase but cheaper to re-charge. But their main limitation is time: Once a power station is drained, it can be difficult (and slow) to recharge them using solar power alone.

What fuel will your backup generator use?

Another consideration for portable and inverter generators is the fuel type. As noted, large standby generators will usually run off of natural gas or propane. Smaller portable and inverter generators offer a few more options:

• Gasoline is the most common fuel type for portable and inverter generators. Gas is usually easy to buy, but gasoline goes bad, so you can’t just leave it in the tank or have a bunch stored in the garage indefinitely. You’ll have to drain the fuel tank when you’re not using the generator regularly, and make sure you stock up on fuel (or know how to siphon it from your car) when you think the power might go out.

• Propane. You can buy generators that hook up to a standard propane tank. Propane can be stored much longer than gasoline, and you don’t have to worry about draining a tank. But propane can be more challenging to acquire, depending on where you live. If your house already uses propane and you have a large tank on the property that gets refilled regularly, this might be the perfect choice.

• Diesel. Diesel generators usually require less maintenance because of their simpler design and the self-lubricating properties of the fuel. As a result, these generators can last longer than other models and require less attention. On the other hand, diesel fuel generates a lot of smoke and bad odors, and might not be convenient if you don’t live near a source.

• Dual and tri-fuel. If you want as many options as possible, you can buy dual fuel generators that can run on either gas or propane, or tri-fuel generators that can also use natural gas. These generators tend to be more expensive, of course.

Other backup generator features to consider

Finally, a few things you might want to pay extra for:

• Electric start. Most generators use the old-school pull-cord to start the engine. If you have trouble getting those going or have a physical limitation that makes that difficult, you can find models with a car-style push-button starter that can make life a lot easier. Keep in mind this will require a battery to be hooked up to your generator.

• Automatic shutdown. Generators are engines, and as such they generate pollution—you should never run a generator inside the house, or even too close to the house. Having a generator with a carbon monoxide detector that shuts down if it detects too much exhaust is an extra safety feature you might want to consider. Generators typically use oil for lubrication, too, so having a low-oil detection feature that shuts the generator down before it can damage itself is another feature you might want.

• Receptacles (aka spots to plug things in). All the wattage in the world won’t do you much good if you don’t have enough receptacles to plug into, so make sure you do a count before you buy.

The Sundance documentary Ghost in the Machine boldly declares that the pursuit of artificial intelligence, and Silicon Valley itself, is rooted in eugenics. 

Director Valerie Veatch makes the case that the rise of techno-fascism from the likes of Elon Musk and Peter Thiel is a feature, not a bug. That may sound hyperbolic, but Ghost in the Machine, which is built around interviews with philosophers, AI researchers, historians and computer scientists, leaves little room for doubt.

If you’ve been following the meteoric rise of AI, or Silicon Valley in general, Veatch’s methodical deconstruction of the technology doesn’t really unearth anything new. The film begins with the utter failure of Microsoft’s Tay chatbot, which wasted no time in becoming a Hitler-loving white supremacist. It retreads the environmental impacts of AI datacenters, as well as the ways tech companies have relied on low-wage workers from Africa and elsewhere to improve their algorithms. 

But even I was surprised to learn that we can trace the impact of eugenics in tech all the way back to Karl Pearson, the mathematician who pioneered the field of statistics, and who also spent his life trying to quantify the differences between races. (Guess who he believed was superior.) His legacy was continued by William Shockley, a co-creator of the transistor, an avowed white supremacist who spent his later years espousing (now debunked) theories around IQ and racial differences.

Valerie Veatch for “Ghost in the Machine”

As a Stanford engineering professor, Shockley fostered a culture of prioritizing white men over women and minorities, which ultimately shaped the way Silicon Valley looks today. His line of thinking could have had an influence on John McCarthy, the Stanford researcher who coined the term “artificial intelligence” in 1955,  

With roots like that, Elon Musk — known to spout bigotry online,  foster a reportedly racist work environment at Tesla and  throw the occasionaly few Nazi salute — looks less like an anomaly than part of a pattern. Ghost in the Machine asks a simple question: How can we trust men like this (and it’s almost always men that look like Musk) with our future?

Through its many interviews, which include the likes of AI researcher Dr. Emily Bender, historian Becca Lewis and media theorist Douglass Rushkoff, Ghost in the Machine paints the rise of AI as a fascistic project that aims to demean humans and establish the techno-elite as our de facto rulers. Given how much our lives are already dominated by gadgets and social networks from companies that have pioneered addictive engagement over user safety, it’s easy to imagine history repeating itself with AI. 

Ghost in the Machine doesn’t leave any room for considering potential benefits around AI, which could lead proponents of the technology to dismiss it as a hit-job. But we’re currently at the apex of the AI hype cycle, after Big Tech has invested hundreds of billions of dollars on this technology, and after it has spent years shoving it down our throats without proving why it’s actually useful to many people. AI should be able to withstand a bit of criticism.

Ghost in the Machine is available to view at the Sundance Film Festival’s website and streaming apps from today through the end of Sunday, February 1st.  

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/sundance-doc-ghost-in-the-machine-draws-a-damning-line-between-ai-and-eugenics-180613367.html?src=rss

An anonymous reader shares a report: A hacking of the Nobel organization’s computer systems is the most likely cause of last year’s leak of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Corina Machado’s name, according to the results of an investigation [non-paywalled source]. An individual or a state actor may have illegally gained access in a cyber breach, the Norwegian Nobel Institute said on Friday after concluding an internal investigation assisted by security authorities.

The leak had triggered an unusual betting surge on Machado at the Polymarket platform hours before she was unveiled as the award recipient in October. The Venezuelan opposition leader hadn’t previously been considered a favorite for the 2025 prize.

“We still think that the digital domain is the main suspect,” said Kristian Berg Harpviken, director of the Oslo-based institute, an administrative arm of the Nobel Committee that awards the prize. The institute has decided against filing for a police investigation given “the absence of a clear theory,” he said in an interview in Oslo.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Like many other companies during Super Bowl season, Sonos is discounting its home theater gear. Today, you can save $130 on the Beam (Gen 2) soundbar, bringing its price down to $369. You’ll also find deals on the flagship Arc Ultra Soundbar, Sonos subwoofers, and more.

The Sonos Beam is the company’s sub-$500 soundbar. Engadget’s pick for the best midrange model, the compact speaker has impressive sound for its size. Part of that is its Dolby Atmos support. Although the soundbar lacks upward-firing speakers, it uses software tricks to compensate. Audio timing and frequency adjustments make sound seem to come from the side or slightly above.

One of the biggest drawbacks is that the Beam only has one HDMI port. Regardless, that compromise may be easier to accept at Beam’s current $369 than at its usual $499.

Several more home theater speakers are included in Sonos’s sale. If you have a loftier budget for a soundbar, there’s the Arc Ultra. Typically $1,099, it’s now $899. The company’s pair of subwoofers is included as well. You can get the Sub Mini for $399 (down from $499) or the Sub 4 for $759 (from $899).

Although they aren’t explicitly sold as home theater products, the Era 100 ($179) and Era 300 ($379) are also included in the sale. The portable Move 2 isn’t discounted individually, but you will find it in a couple of bundles. You can check out the sale page for the complete list.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/sonos-home-theater-gear-is-up-to-20-percent-off-ahead-of-super-bowl-lx-174053619.html?src=rss

https://enterprise.shutterstock.com/image-photo/openai-logo-displayed-on-smartphone-screen-2520388517

or

https://enterprise.shutterstock.com/image-photo/chatgpt-logo-displayed-on-smartphone-screen-2520385879

Last August, ChatGPT developers OpenAI unceremoniously killed the fan favorite GPT-4o model, before giving in to complaints and bringing it back a week later. Now, the company’s taking a second swing at getting its users to move on. In a new post to its website, OpenAI announced that it’s retiring GPT-4o again.

The model’s set to disappear from ChatGPT’s model picker on Feb. 13, alongside other older models like GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-Mini. And OpenAI is clearly nervous about the decision.

“While the announcement applies to several older models,” OpenAI wrote, “GPT-4o deserves special context.”

According to the company, it has taken user outcry over the initial deprecation of 4o to heart while developing its newest models, GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2, and has built these models with the idea of maintaining the features fans liked best about the old model. The company says that now “only 0.1% of users” opt for GPT-4o on a daily basis.

As such, the company wants to focus on “improving the models most people use today,” which apparently means removing older ones. “We know that losing access to GPT-4o will feel frustrating for some users, and we didn’t make this decision lightly,” the post reads.

What’s the big deal with GPT-4o?

So, what’s with OpenAI treating its users so gingerly, especially when GPT-4o is a few generations behind, and there are newer models that supposedly do everything it does, but better?

Well, when GPT-4o was first deprecated, people weren’t happy. Users called its successor, GPT-5, “an unmitigated disaster,” and accused OpenAI of pulling “the biggest bait-and-switch in AI history.“

Some criticized the model’s usefulness, saying it got answers wrong and broke code, but what maybe stuck out the most was people calling out its more concise tone.

GPT-4o has been called “sycophantic” by critics, something the company addressed and said it wanted to pull back on in future updates. But I guess one person’s “yes man” is another person’s “active listener.” When the company initially pulled GPT-4o, users complained that its replacement was cold and felt less like a “friend.” Even OpenAI acknowledged this, saying in today’s post that users “preferred GPT-4o’s conversational style and warmth.”

In short, in the words of 4o-supporters themselves, they were “grieving” the model.

Is GPT-5.2 a good replacement for 4o?

That said, with so many users now seeming to have moved on from 4o, OpenAI’s decision does seem understandable on the surface. Personally, one of the things that drives me away from AI is how much reassuring filler text seems to fluff up most answers (“you’re absolutely right” and such), seemingly just to make me feel good about myself. More concise, to-the-point responses would be a little less off-putting for me.

To try to split the difference, OpenAI reworked its Personalization feature in GPT-5.1, so users can simply choose how the chatbot will treat them. There are options for more professional responses, more nerdy ones, more efficient ones, and for those who want that active listener style, more friendly ones.

Going by OpenAI’s numbers, that seems to have been enough for most people, but there are still some calling foul at the company’s new announcement.

GPT-4o loyalists are still out there

In a Reddit thread responding to OpenAI’s new posts, users doubted that the 0.1% number for 4o was accurate, saying that prompts have been “rerouting to 5.2 no matter what” and that “something somewhere in their calculations doesn’t add up.” Others pointed out that free users can’t use GPT-4o and that it’s not enabled by default, which will naturally juice the numbers against it.

As such, calls to cancel ChatGPT subscriptions are once again circulating amongst 4o’s more dedicated fans. In a popular thread on the OpenAI subreddit, one user called 4o “OpenAI’s most advanced and beloved model,” and praised its “personality, warmth, and consistency,” saying that its fans have built long-term project and “emotional support routines” around it, and that suddenly losing it without even the option for a legacy mode “feels abrupt and deeply disappointing.”

“This isn’t about resisting innovation,” the post writes. “It’s about respecting bonds users have formed with specific models.”

Whether the fan outcry will work again remains to be seen. However, as ChatGPT chief Nick Turley has previously looked at those kinds of bonds with skepticism, and because keeping old models in operating condition probably takes developer resources away from making new ones, I wouldn’t count on it.

A new study [PDF] examining the United States between 1850 and 1920 found that expanded market access — driven largely by railroad expansion — made Americans more trusting of strangers and more outward-looking, but weakened family-based care for the vulnerable.

Researchers Max Posch of the University of Exeter and Itzchak Tzachi Raz of Hebrew University compared places and people gaining different levels of commercial connectivity. In better-connected regions, Americans became more likely to marry outside their local communities, and parents more likely to pick nationally common names for children. Trust toward others rose, as measured through language in local newspapers.

The researchers used multiple tests to rule out the possibility that these shifts simply reflected places getting richer. The cultural changes were concentrated among migrants in trade-exposed industries; workers in construction and entertainment showed no effect. But market access also meant orphans, the disabled, and the elderly became less likely to be cared for by relatives at home.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

When talking about the best VPNs, I frequently warn about the dangers of trusting free VPNs without verifying them. Although there are a few free VPNs worth recommending, many other free providers are ineffective, malicious or looking to profit off their users (or sometimes all three). Even the best free VPNs work a lot better once you subscribe and access their full service.

This can be frustrating if you want to enjoy the benefits of a VPN but don’t have the budget for yet another subscription. To help you out, I put together a list of the best paid VPN services you can get cheaply. Every name on the list comes with my full recommendation — I’ll never recommend a VPN that doesn’t protect you, no matter how affordable.

Before I get started, I want to define “cheap,” since VPNs often bamboozle the customer with muddled pricing schemes. Most providers have long-term subscription plans with big discounts, and many of them compensate by making their monthly plans more expensive. On this list, I’ll recommend services with cheap subscriptions for both the short and long term, plus one favorite that balances both.

Best cheap VPNs for 2026

Other VPNs we tested with good deals

A couple of VPNs have decent pricing options attached to worthy services but weren’t quite strong enough to make the list. Both these services get my hearty recommendation; they’re just hard to justify as “cheap.”

ExpressVPN

ExpressVPN recently switched to a multi-tier pricing model. The Basic pricing tier gets you complete VPN service but doesn’t include the full set of features. The best price on that is $78.18 for 28 months, which works out to $2.79 per month. Although that sounds great, it’s more expensive than both Surfshark and CyberGhost at the same duration and renews at the even higher price of $99.95 per year ($8.33 per month).

Still, as I wrote in my full ExpressVPN review, it’s an outstanding service overall. Thanks to its sensible app layouts and focus on doing simple tasks well, I find it especially good for introducing beginners to what a VPN can do.

NordVPN

NordVPN is another provider that I gave a relatively positive review. I really like its boundary-pushing features, especially the various types of highly specialized servers. Its pricing isn’t bad, exactly, but even the Basic level is more expensive than just about everyone else at every duration. NordVPN’s fast download speeds and wide server network make it worthwhile for lots of users, but it’s hard to recommend to people on a budget.

What to look for in a good cheap VPN

Looking for an affordable VPN is the same as looking for any kind of VPN; it just requires more care. The worst VPNs usually present themselves as free, but there’s also a fair number of mediocre options that think low prices have to mean a mediocre service. If you want to use a VPN but don’t have much extra cash, take some additional care in a few areas of your search.

First, don’t subscribe to a VPN — or even download any of its apps — if you haven’t verified its security. To do that, start by checking what experts have to say about it. If a VPN is truly unsafe, chances are high that somebody has already sounded the alarm. You can also check the list of protocols the VPN offers. If it’s anything other than OpenVPN, WireGuard or IKEv2, do a deep dive to make sure it’s using worthwhile encryption.

If you’ve verified that the VPN isn’t a virus, check to see if it has a free trial or a guaranteed money-back period. This will give you some risk-free time to do hands-on tests. Our article on how we test VPNs includes several tests you can run on your own computer, phone or tablet. Check the VPN’s speed, make sure it has the server locations you need and look for anything that might be leaking your real IP address.

Read the VPN’s privacy policy and make sure you’re comfortable with how much information it saves. Some VPNs emphasize privacy more than others. Finally, before your free trial or refund period expires, make sure to double-check on the pricing structure of the VPN you’re choosing — it’s possible that it will only be cheap for the first subscription period.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/vpn/best-cheap-vpn-170000957.html?src=rss

Apple’s call-screening feature, introduced in iOS 26 last year, was designed to combat the more than 2 billion robocalls placed to Americans every month, but as WSJ is reporting, it is now creating friction for the rich and powerful who find themselves subjected to automated interrogation when dialing from unrecognized numbers.

The feature uses an automated voice to ask unknown callers for their names and reasons for calling, transcribes the responses, and lets recipients decide whether to answer — essentially giving everyone a pocket-sized executive assistant.

Venture capitalist Bradley Tusk said his first reaction when encountering call screening is irritation, though he understands the necessity given the spam problem. Ben Schaechter, who runs cloud-cost management company Vantage, said the feature “dramatically changed my life” after his personal number ended up in founding paperwork and attracted endless sales calls.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Fallout’s second season is coming to a close, and it’s been well worth the wait. But if a reluctance to add yet another subscription to your streaming rotation means you haven’t watched Amazon’s surprisingly excellent adaptation yet, you might be interested to know that the company is currently releasing season one for free on the Prime Video YouTube channel.

Whether driven by Amazon wanting even more people to watch what has become one of its biggest TV success stories, or a move that speaks to how few people are actually signed up for Prime Video, it’s good news for anyone who hasn’t seen the show yet. Fallout’s first season did a great job of taking everything that’s great about the long-running post-apocalyptic RPG series and weaving it into a wildly entertaining live-action show, elevated by excellent performances from Ella Purnell as a hopelessly naive but endearingly optimistic vault-dweller, and Walton Goggins as the Ghoul.

Amazon is currently adding a new episode each day ahead of next week’s season two finale, presumably hoping a whole new set of fans hop straight into that once they’re done. But here’s the catch: you only have until February 11 to watch the whole lot. After that, the show will be for Prime Video subscribers only once again.

And that isn’t the the only Fallout freebie up for grabs right now. Between now and February 5, Bethesda’s MMORPG, Fallout 76, is free-to-play on Xbox and PC, while PlayStation players have until February 4. Fallout 76 first launched in 2018, and as a fully multiplayer-focused game it represented a new direction for the series. It was, to put it bluntly, a bit of a mess for quite a while, but Bethesda has never abandoned the title or its player-base, and if you have Fallout on the brain, this is the perfect opportunity to see how it’s looking in 2026.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/streaming/the-first-season-of-amazons-fallout-show-is-now-free-on-youtube-162920615.html?src=rss