An anonymous reader quotes Bloomberg:
Songwriters will get a larger cut of revenue from streaming services after a court handed technology companies a big defeat. The Copyright Royalty Board ruled that songwriters will get at least a 15.1 percent share of streaming revenues over the next five years, from a previous 10.5 percent. That’s the largest rate increase in CRB history, according to a statement from the National Music Publishers’ Association. The decision is a major victory for songwriters, who have long complained they are insufficiently uncompensated by on-demand music services like Spotify and YouTube.
“The ratio of what labels are paid by the services versus what publishers are paid has significantly improved,” argues the NMPA, “resulting in the most favorable balance in the history of the industry.
“While an effective ratio of 3.82 to 1 is still not a fair split that we might achieve in a free market, it is the best songwriters have ever had under the compulsory license… The decision represents two years of advocacy regarding how unfairly songwriters are treated under current law and how crucial their contributions are to streaming services.”
Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress has introduced a bipartisan “Music Modernization Act” to overhaul the rate court, and to create a new governing agency to issue blanket licenses to streaming services and then collect and distribute the resulting roylaties.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Streaming Services Must Hike Songwriter Payments Nearly 50%, Court Rules

An anonymous reader quotes Quartz:
Consciousness permeates reality. Rather than being just a unique feature of human subjective experience, it’s the foundation of the universe, present in every particle and all physical matter. This sounds like easily-dismissible bunkum, but as traditional attempts to explain consciousness continue to fail, the “panpsychist” view is increasingly being taken seriously by credible philosophers, neuroscientists, and physicists, including figures such as neuroscientist Christof Koch and physicist Roger Penrose…
“Physical science tells us a lot less about the nature of matter than we tend to assume,” says Philip Goff, a philosophy professor at Central European University in Budapest, Hungary. “Arthur Eddington” — the English scientist who experimentally confirmed Einstein’s theory of general relativity in the early 20th century — “argued there’s a gap in our picture of the universe. We know what matter does but not what it is. We can put consciousness into this gap”…
An alternative panpsychist perspective holds that, rather than individual particles holding consciousness and coming together, the universe as a whole is conscious. This, says Goff, isn’t the same as believing the universe is a unified divine being; it’s more like seeing it as a “cosmic mess.” Nevertheless, it does reflect a perspective that the world is a top-down creation, where every individual thing is derived from the universe, rather than a bottom-up version where objects are built from the smallest particles. Goff believes quantum entanglement — the finding that certain particles behave as a single unified system even when they’re separated by such immense distances there can’t be a causal signal between them — suggests the universe functions as a fundamental whole rather than a collection of discrete parts. Such theories sound incredible, and perhaps they are. But then again, so is every other possible theory that explains consciousness.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Do Particles Have Consciousness?

An anonymous reader quotes the Guardian:
WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, has asked a UK court to drop the arrest warrant that prevents him from leaving the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been living for five and a half years. Assange, 46, skipped bail to enter the embassy in 2012 in order to avoid extradition to Sweden over allegations of sexual assault and rape, which he denies… Mark Summers QC told senior district judge Emma Arbuthnot at Westminster magistrates court on Friday that now that the Swedish case had been dropped the warrant had “lost its purpose and its function”. He said because Swedish extradition proceedings against Assange had come to an end, so had the life of the arrest warrant… Arbuthnot said she would give her judgment about the arrest warrant on 6 February.
Judge Arbuthnot said she’d rule only on the legal issue, though the court had also received evidence about medical problems which included “a terrible bad tooth, frozen shoulder and depression.”

Representing the Crown Prosecution Service, Aaron Watkins it would be absurd for defendants to be “rewarded with effective immunity” simply for having evaded proceedings for long enough.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Asks UK Judge to Drop His Arrest Warrant