schwit1 shares this angry commentary from a CNET senior editor:

Maybe you’re delivering a presentation to a huge audience. Maybe you’re taking an online test. Maybe you just need to get some work done on a tight deadline.

Windows doesn’t care.

Windows will take control of your computer, force-feed it updates, and flip the reset switch automatically — and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it, once it gets started. If you haven’t saved your work, it’s gone. Your browser tabs are toast. And don’t expect to use your computer again soon; depending on the speed of your drive and the size of the update, it could be anywhere from 10 minutes to well over an hour before your PC is ready for work. As far as I’m concerned, it’s the single worst thing about Windows. It’s only gotten worse in Windows 10. And when I poked around Microsoft, the overarching message I received was that Microsoft has no interest in fixing it.
The editor recalls rebooting his Windows laptop while listening to a speech by Steve Jobs in 2010. (The reboot locked his computer for 20 minutes while updates were installed, “the first of three occasions that a forced Windows update would totally destroy my workflow at a critical moment.”) He shares stories from other frustrated Windows users, urges readers to send him more anecdotes, and argues that Microsoft has even begun “actively getting rid of ways to keep users from disabling automatic updates.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – CNET Editor Rails Against Non-Consensual Windows Updates

Long-time Slashdot reader Kernel Kurtz writes
: January 28 is supposed to be Data Privacy Day, so it seems fitting in an alternative sort of way that U.S. President Trump just signed an executive order that eliminates Privacy Act protections for foreigners. As a non-American, I find it curious that the person who says he wants to bring jobs to America is simply confirming the post-Snowden belief that America is not a safe place to do business.
The Privacy Act has been in place since 1974. But now section 14 of Trump’s “Enhancing Public Safety” executive order directs federal agencies to “ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information” to the extent consistent with applicable law.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Trump’s Executive Order Eliminates Privacy Act Protections For Foreigners

An anonymous reader writes:

During the interview process for a technology job, I was asked to fill out an application which included questions about my compensation history. When I asked why, I was told that it was part of the background check and wouldn’t be used to determine the size of the offer… What is the risk for the employer of not knowing that info? Is this standard procedure or part of a trend at technology companies?
The original submission asks if this is ever a legitimate question — or more to the point, “Is it anything more than an attempt to gain negotiating leverage?” So leave your best answers in the comments. When you’re interviewing for a new IT job, should you tell future employers your salary history?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Ask Slashdot: Should You Tell Future Employers Your Salary History?

In 1993 a Stratus server was booted up by an IT application architect — and it’s still running.
An anonymous reader writes:
“It never shut down on its own because of a fault it couldn’t handle,” says Phil Hogan, who’s maintained the server for 24 years. That’s what happens when you include redundant components. “Over the years, disk drives, power supplies and some other components have been replaced but Hogan estimates that close to 80% of the system is original,” according to Computerworld.
There’s no service contract — he maintains the server with third-party vendors rather than going back to the manufacturer, who says they “probably” still have the parts in stock. And while he believes the server’s proprietary operating system hasn’t been updated in 15 years, Hogan says “It’s been extremely stable.”
The server will finally be retired in April, and while the manufacturer says there’s some more Stratus servers that have been running for at least 20 years — this one seems to be the oldest.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Server Runs Continuously For 24 Years

Here’s the problem. “You could download Comma.ai’s new open-source Python code from Github, grab the necessary hardware, and follow the company’s instructions to add semi-autonomous capabilities to specific Acura and Honda model cars (with more vehicles to follow),” writes IEEE Spectrum. But then who’s legally responsible if there’s an accident?

Long-time Slashdot reader Registered Coward v2 writes:
While many legal experts agree OSS is “buyer beware” and that Comma.ai and its CEO Georg Hotz would not be liable, it’s a gray area in the law. The software is release under the MIT OSS license and the Read Me contains the disclaimer “This is alpha-quality software for research purposes only… You are responsible for complying with local laws and regulatons.” The U.S. Supreme Court, in a series of court cases in the 1990s, ruled open source code as free speech protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The question is does that release the author(s) from liability. The EU has no EU wide rules on liability in such cases. One open question is even if the person who used the software could not sue, a third party injured by it might be able to since they are not a party to the license agreement.

An EFF attorney told HotHardware “Prosecutors and plaintiffs often urge courts to disregard traditional First Amendment protections in the case of software.” But not everyone agrees. “Most legal experts that spoke with IEEE Spectrum — and Hotz himself — believe that if you use the company’s code and something goes wrong, then it isn’t liable for damages. You are.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Who’s Responsible For Accidents Caused By Open Source Self-Driving Car Software?