Here Are All the New Features in iOS 18.4

The new iOS 18.4 beta is still missing an AI-overhauled Siri, on-screen awareness, and the app integrations feature we were promised all the way back in June at WWDC. If you’re waiting for those features, try your luck with iOS 18.5.

However, 18.4 isn’t an empty update. The first beta introduces Priority Notifications, and Apple Intelligence now supports more languages—which is great news for Apple users across the globe. In addition, Apple Intelligence is now accessible in the European Union for the first time. Here’s everything that’s new with iOS 18.4.

Priority Notifications

One of the new highlight features in iOS 18.4 is Priority Notifications. When enabled, your iPhone will use on-device intelligence to figure out which notifications are truly important, and will highlight them in a new Priority Notifications box at the top.

However, in this beta, it’s not enabled by default. Go to Settings > Notifications > Prioritize Notifications and then enable the feature.

Prioritize Notifications settings on iPhone.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Sketch style in Image Playground

Sketch style in Image Playground.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

When you’re creating an image in Image Playground, you’ll see a new style option called Sketch. This style makes it look like your AI-generated image was sketched on a paper. If that sounds familiar, that’s because we also saw this back at WWDC, but Apple only just added it to iOS with this update.

New Ambient Music feature in Control Center

Ambient Music in Control Center.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Apple already has a background sounds feature that generates nature sounds for ambient playback. However, in iOS 18.4, you’ll find a new Ambient Music section in Control Center. There are four options: Sleep, Chill, Productivity, and Wellbeing. Tap one, and it’ll play a corresponding playlist from Apple Music.

Customizing playlist in Ambient Music.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Apple has mapped a playlist to each button by default, but you’re not locked to any. If you go into the editing view and then tap on a control, you can choose a different playlist (Apple gives you four different options for each control), or you can choose any playlist from your own collection.

Apple Intelligence comes to the EU

Apple Intelligence now supports French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Spanish, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese (simplified), plus there’s now support for localized English language in both India and Singapore.

Recipes come to the News+ app

The News app has a new Apple News Food+ section for paying subscribers. Here, you can access tens of thousands of aesthetically pleasing recipes. There are also stories, restaurant reviews, and more.

The new Mail app comes to iPad and Mac

With iPadOS 18.4 beta and macOS 15.4 beta, the redesigned Mail app is coming to the iPad and the Mac. Once you update, you’ll get access to email categories and other AI features on your tablet and computer.

A much better Genmoji button

Genmoji button in Emoji keyboard.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

When I wrote about Genmoji, I was tempted to call it a hidden feature, because that’s what it felt like. Genmoji was just a multicolor smiley face tucked in the corner of the Emoji keyboard.

Apple seems to have learned its lesson: With 18.4, the new icon says “Gemoji” right next to the smiley face rainbow icon.

New Podcasts widgets

Podcasts widgets.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

The Podcasts app has two new widgets: one for Library, and for Shows. The Library widget can show you all saved episodes, downloaded episodes, or latest episodes. The Shows widget is for highlighting all episodes from a single show. You can choose a show, and then access all the latest episodes from the show from the Home Screen.

More choices for default apps

Apple’s selection of default apps options is growing. You can now set a different Translate app by default, and if you’re in the EU, there’s now support for choosing a default navigation app, too. (If you’re not in the EU, try using Map Redirect as a workaround.)

CarPlay changes

For some users, it looks like CarPlay is adding a third row of app icons on the Home screen.

Other small changes

Major app updates like iOS 18.4 typically include a number of smaller changes in addition to more notable ones. Here’s what else iOS 18.4 updates on your iPhone:

  • When you’re setting up a new device with iOS 18.4, you’ll be prompted to select an age range. You can choose between Child (12 or younger), Teen (13 to 17), and Adult (18 or older). Apple says that it will use this data only to help set up parental controls.

  • There are two new Shortcuts actions for the Messages app: Open Conversation, and Send Message.

  • When you go to edit your Albums, you’ll see a new List View option, hopefully making it easier to rearrange albums.

This Budget Motorola Phone (With Premium Touches) Is at Its Lowest Price Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

If you’re looking for a budget-friendly phone that gets the job done, the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024, Unlocked) is currently $179.99 (down from $299.99)—its lowest price ever, according to price-trackers. Available in midnight blue and pale lilac, this PCMag Editor’s Choice winner features a vegan leather finish, which while giving it a premium feel tends to attract dust and pet hair (so a case might be a smart investment). On the upside, the textured surface provides a secure grip, making accidental drops less likely. It also packs a side-mounted fingerprint scanner in the power button, a decent single speaker with Dolby Atmos support, and a 3.5mm headphone jack for those who prefer wired audio.

For an affordable device, it performs surprisingly well, thanks to its MediaTek Dimensity 7020 processor and 8GB of RAM. Everyday tasks feel smooth, and its 6.7-inch 120Hz display makes scrolling and animations feel more fluid than you’d expect at this price point. Additionally, its 128GB of storage (expandable up to 1TB via microSD), gives you plenty of space for apps and media. And with NFC support for mobile payments, it adds a small but significant convenience that’s often missing in budget phones. Battery life is another strong point, with a 5,000mAh capacity lasting well over 12 hours. And when it’s time to charge, 30W wired charging and 15W wireless charging ensure you’re not stuck waiting for too long.

Where the Moto G Power 5G (2024) starts to show its budget roots is in the camera department: Its 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization sounds promising, but the results can be inconsistent, with oversaturated colors and pixel blurring, notes this PCMag review. If capturing crisp, high-quality shots is a priority, the OnePlus Nord N30 5G ($299.99) might be a better option.

This App Lets You Create Automations Your Mac Usually Doesn’t Support

To create automations using Apple’s Shortcuts app on your Mac, you’re dependent on Apple’s support for various actions. While Shortcuts supports an array of useful actions, some aren’t in the app yet, such as clearing all notifications or quitting all apps. If you want to add a few more helpful actions to your Mac automations, consider Shortcutie ($6), a powerful extension for Shortcuts that lets you execute actions Apple doesn’t yet support.

Shortcutie itself has no interface. Once installed, all of its actions will appear in Apple’s Shortcuts app on your Mac. To access them, install the app, open Shortcuts, and select Shortcutie from the Apps tab in the right pane. The app requires Accessibility permissions to function, which is necessary because macOS’s strict sandboxing rules prevent apps from running many of the actions this app supports. (Note: only grant apps you trust, like Shortcutie, this permission.) Once you grant it access, you’ll find new, useful tools in Shortcuts, such as changing your default browser, clearing all notifications, hiding all windows, quitting all apps, and checking if your screen is being recorded, mirrored, or shared.

macOS supports all of these actions, but they aren’t available in Shortcuts, which prevents you from creating automation routines around these actions. Once you have Shortcutie, you can add these triggers to your shortcuts and execute complex automations that your Mac doesn’t otherwise support. Don’t forget that the Shortcuts app appears in the menu bar and you can run automations directly from the menu bar, too. That can make it much quicker and easier to run certain actions, such as the dreaded “clear all notifications.” When you combine this app with Shortery, which lets you run Mac automations based on various triggers, you can automate pretty much everything.

Actions from Shortcutie in the right pane of Apple's Shortcuts app for Mac.

Credit: Pranay Parab

Without Shortcutie, you can open the Notification Center and clear notifications, but macOS doesn’t always show the clear all button, forcing you to clear notifications one-by-one. With Shortcutie, I set up a simple automation, and in two clicks, I’m now able to clear all alerts. Similarly, quitting all apps is quite easy with the action added by this app. You normally don’t need to do this, but if your Mac has slowed down due to a memory leak or high ambient temperatures, Shortcutie’s quit all apps action offers a one-click method to reduce the burden on your computer. Here are some more useful actions from the app:

  • Empty Trash

  • Eject all disks

  • Clear recent lists (from menus)

  • Set grayscale mode

  • Show/hide desktop widgets

  • Get URL and title of the active browser tab

At the time of writing, Shortcutie supports 29 actions, and the developer, Sindre Sorhus, has promised to add more. The biggest concern is that Shortcutie relies on private APIs to access these actions and those can change at any point. The developer has promised to keep a tab on these changes and to support the app, but it does leave the app vulnerable to losing features. Regular updates should be able to fix any issues that may crop up in the future, but it’s something to keep in mind.

I’m not worried though, knowing the developer: Sorhus has created over 50 apps and utilities for Mac and iPhone (Lifehacker has covered many), so I expect he will continue to keep Shortcutie updated.

Why the iPhone 16e Uses a ‘Binned’ Chip (and What That Means)

When Apple announced the iPhone 16e on Wednesday, there was a lot of focus on the price tag ($599 is cheap for a new iPhone, but not that cheap), the lack of MagSafe support, and Apple’s decision to finally kill off the Home button.

But there’s an interesting discussion to be had surrounding the 16e’s processor, the A18 chip. At first glance, it seems like the same A18 chip found in the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus, and you’d be forgiven for assuming the iPhone 16e offers the same performance as its more expensive sibling devices. The thing is, these aren’t the same chips: The A18 in the iPhone 16e is “binned.”

What is a “binned” chip?

“Binned” chips aren’t just a thing with Apple products. All computer chip makers can bin their chips. It has to do with the manufacturing process: Chips are extremely complicated products, and they don’t all come out exactly the same. Samples are tested for quality assurance purposes, and the chips that aren’t quite up to snuff are separated from the ones that perform to standard. The former are then “binned,” and won’t be used as high-end chips, since they aren’t able to hit the performance levels manufacturers are looking for.

That doesn’t mean binned chips aren’t used at all, however. On the contrary, binned chips are often employed as mid- or lower-tier options. Manufacturers will often disable different “cores” of these chips to keep their performance in check. They’re still perfectly capable chips, especially when they have this ceiling in place. Intel does this with its line of chips, which is why you have different performance variants, like i5, i7, and i9. Apple does this, too: For the iPad mini 7, the company used binned A17 Pro chips. Now, Apple is using binned A18s for the iPhone 16e.

How the iPhone 16e uses binned A18s

So, Apple makes a batch of A18 chips, originally intended to ship with the iPhone 16 series. During testing, some of these A18 chips aren’t totally up to snuff, so they’re set aside and not used for iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus devices.

However, Apple has a new iPhone they want to sell for less than its flagship line—one that strips out “premium” features to keep costs down, but also offers incentives for users to actually buy their new iPhone over other options. It has some binned A18 chips lying around: Why not use those instead?

In this way, the iPhone 16e uses the “same” chip as you’d find in the iPhone 16 and 16 Plus—but with the caveat that it doesn’t perform as well, and thus can’t be pushed as far. Apple even disables one of the GPU cores to keep performance in check: The 16e’s CPU has the same six cores as the 16 and 16 Plus’ (two performance and four efficiency) and the NPU has the same 16 cores across all devices, but where the GPU in the 16 and 16 Plus has five cores, the GPU in the 16e only has four cores. That’s because these chips are binned.

Even though the iPhone 16e isn’t dropping until Feb. 28, there are already some early indicators of how it performs. MySmartPrice spotted the device on Geekbench, a notable benchmarking website, where the 16e scored a 24188 in graphics testing, or about 12.5% lower than the iPhone 16’s 27668 score. These are raw numbers, and we can’t really deduce what real-world use would look like between these two phones until reviewers get their hands on them.

However, based on these stats, my guess is the differences will be minimal. The CPUs and NPUs are the same, and the 16e’s GPU still has four cores, which means performance for most tasks on the iPhone is going to be high. Where the difference might show is in graphically demanding apps, such as AAA games. Developers could push the iPhone 16 a bit further than the iPhone 16e, because it has that extra GPU core. That will likely extend the longevity of those premium devices, too: As software advances and becomes more demanding, the extra GPU core on the iPhone 16 could help keep it running smoother for longer.

That said, it’s just one extra core. In all likelihood, the difference won’t be that great. I think Apple’s choice here was more about saving the company money than offering users a noticeably worse experience.

My Favorite Amazon Deal of the Day: The Blink Outdoor 4

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Whether you’re shopping for your very first security camera or already have a system at home you’re looking to grow, you might find something worthwhile in Amazon’s sale section on Ring and Blink cameras. As Amanda Blum, our smart-home tech reviewer at Lifehacker, mentioned in her review, the Blink Outdoor 4 is a worthwhile entry-level wireless security camera—and right now, you can get bundles for up to 50% off, with the five-camera bundle for $199.99 (originally $399.99). This is the lowest price I have seen for this particular bundle, after checking price-tracking tools.

Wireless smart security camera, two-year battery, 1080p HD day and infrared night live view, two-way
Blink Outdoor 4

Blink Outdoor 4 1080p Security Camera


$99.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime

Wireless smart security camera, two-year battery, 1080p HD day and infrared night live view, two-way
Blink Outdoor 4 (2-Pack)

Blink Outdoor 4 1080p Security Camera (2-Pack)


$119.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime
$179.99
Save $60.00

Wireless smart security camera, two-year battery, 1080p HD day and infrared night live view, two-way
Blink Outdoor 4 (3-Pack)

Blink Outdoor 4 1080p Security Camera (3-Pack)


$155.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime
$259.99
Save $104.00

Wire-free smart security camera, two-year battery life, two-way audio, HD live view, enhanced motion
Blink Outdoor 4 (4-Pack)

Blink Outdoor 4 1080p Security Camera (4-Pack)


$203.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime
$339.99
Save $136.00

Wire-free smart security camera, two-year battery life, two-way audio, HD live view, enhanced motion
Blink Outdoor 4 (5-Pack)

Blink Outdoor 4 1080p Wireless Security Camera (5-Pack)


$199.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime
$399.99
Save $200.00

Wire-free smart security camera, two-year battery life, two-way audio, HD live view, enhanced motion
Blink Outdoor 4 (6-Pack)

Blink Outdoor 4 (4th Gen) – Wire-free smart security camera, two-year battery life, two-way audio, HD live view, enhanced motion detection, Works with Alexa – 6 camera system


$239.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime
$479.99
Save $240.00

Wire-free smart security camera, two-year battery life, two-way audio, HD live view, enhanced motion
Blink Outdoor 4 (8-Pack)

Blink Outdoor 4 (4th Gen) – Wire-free smart security camera, two-year battery life, two-way audio, HD live view, enhanced motion detection, Works with Alexa – 8 camera system


$314.99
at Amazon

Amazon Prime
$629.99
Save $315.00

The Blink Outdoor 4 is a wireless camera, meaning you’ll be using 2 AA lithium batteries, which last for up to two years. The camera is also weather-resistant, has motion-activation alerts, a live-view mode (up to five minutes without a Blink subscription plan), shoots in 1080p, has two-way audio, and works great with the Alexa ecosystem. (Unfortunately, it is not compatible with Google or Apple Home Kit.) You’ll get a Sync Module 2 with your order, which gives you local storage for your videos with a USB stick for up to 10 cameras, meaning you don’t need to get the Blink subscription if you don’t want to. The camera offers a 143-degree diagonal view wherever you set it up, and an optional person-detection feature if you get the Blink subscription plan.

Keep in mind you will need a Blink subscription to use all of its features. The Blink subscription starts at $30 a year for the Blink Basic Plan. You can also get the Blink Plus Plan, which costs $100 a year and has more features, the most important of which is having an unlimited number of devices hooked up to your account.

Can You Really Save Money on Eggs by Raising Your Own Chickens?

As egg prices skyrocket, you too may be considering if it would be cheaper going straight to the source and raising your own flock. As the steward of four sweet but dimwitted backyard chickens, I’ll caution that it’s more expensive than you think—but with prices spiking as high as $1 per egg in some areas, it may be worth considering.

Each day, I reliably pull three or four gorgeously colored eggs out of my backyard chicken coop. “They’re free!” I think to myself. But these eggs are only “free” if one ignores the costs of feeding, sheltering, protecting, and entertaining a flock of tiny, feathered dinosaurs.

Now, most people with backyard birds aren’t going the cheap route. You can definitely spend a lot raising fancy chickens that lay fancifully colored eggs, residing in Pinterest-worthy chicken coops and feasting on organic feed. By those standards, it’s definitely cheaper to buy your eggs. But is it possible to save money raising chickens by going the cheap route, and populating a merely serviceable coop with a few hardy egg layers?

Whether or not you can save money farming your own eggs turns out to be a question of scale—and no matter how high egg prices go, it’s likely going to be cheaper to buy them in the store.  

My "free" eggs

Credit: Amanda Blum

Chickens aren’t expensive, but the accessories can be

Let’s start with the chickens themselves. You can purchase chickens as chicks just a few days old, and they are deceptively cheap. Your local farm store will likely have them in the spring and into the summer for $3 to $6 each, depending on the breed. These will be the pedestrian breeds of the birds—Rhode Island Reds, Brahmas, and White Leghorns—which is fine if your priority is a bird that will produce a lot of eggs and be weather-resilient. More exclusive breeds can go for as much as $25 per chick. 

Older birds cost more

You don’t have to start with chicks. Some places will sell you poulets—chickens that are at least 15 weeks old. While the purchase price is higher (depending on breed, they can go for $30 to $60), these chickens can go straight into a backyard coop and will begin laying within a month or two.  

Paying $30 for a chicken might seem expensive when you can get a chick for $a tenth of that, but there are some financial benefits to skipping the early stages of chicken rearing. You won’t have to buy a brooder, heater, chick waterer or feeder, (which will save you between $100 and $150, all told), and you won’t need to shelter the chicken inside. You can also skip out on buying chick food and chick grit. At 15 weeks, your chickens can eat layer (adult) feed, which isn’t cheaper, but at least none of it will go to waste when your chicks outgrow their chick feed. 

But skipping the chick phase means you miss the opportunity to bond with your chickens. Raising my chicks inside and exposing my dog to them while they were small led to them being able to cohabitate once the chickens were grown. If I’d dropped poulets into the backyard, I doubt I’d have a relationship with them, and I’m pretty sure my dog would have viewed them as mobile chicken nuggets. 

You can get lucky and find someone on Craigslist or in a neighborhood faming group who needs to rehome their chickens. Those chickens are often fully grown layers—and, even better, available for free. 

Your coop will be your biggest expense

Adult chickens start laying eggs around six months old, but before that, you’ll face a lot of one-time expenses, biggest among them a chicken coop. You can build a very simple coop yourself, but that’s a risk. Your birds will face backyard aggressors (racoons, dogs, cats, vermin, and other wildlife) and your coop needs to keep them out, and a basic DIY coop might not be up to the task.

Your coop’s design will also impact how easy it is to tend to your flock. It needs to be tall enough to walk into so you can collect eggs and clean the coop out without having to stoop. How you design your laying boxes can determine how clean and easy it is to pull your eggs every day. The coop will need winter insulation, even if you have hardy chickens. So even if you build a coop, at minimum it’s still going to cost you a few hundred dollars in wood, construction fabric, wire, and other materials. Pre-built coops, meanwhile run from hundreds of dollars to thousands

Your adult birds will need a waterer as well as a feeder. You’ll also likely want to buy them some toys like a swing or mirror, because even though they are dumb, they need mental stimulation too. You’ll even need to buy fake eggs so these bird brains know where to lay. All of that is going to cost you another $100 or so. 

Monthly costs can add up

Remember, chickens don’t start laying eggs for about six months, so you’ll spend at least that long paying out to support freeloading chickens. But once you’ve dispensed with the startup costs, you’ve got recurring monthly costs to deal with too—though at least the chickens should be producing eggs by that point. 

Each month, you’ll need to budget for food, grit, and oyster shells or another source of calcium. You’ll also need treats of some kind. On top of that, you’ll need material for the bedding in the coop, like pine shavings, hemp, or sand. A grown chicken eats about 1.5 lbs of food a week. They’ll grab grit as they need it, and chickens only need a quarter pound of it a month, but it adds up as your flock grows. Hens will eat as much calcium as they need, which means that if there isn’t enough calcium in your laying feed or treats, you’ll need a lot of crushed oyster shells. 

Don’t forget the “soft costs” of chicken raising

One of the reasons egg prices have skyrocketed is that the cost of all the inputs (from feed to grit) have gone up. The other reason is bird flu, which is now raging in every state in America. Your backyard flock is no less at risk than commercial birds, and ensuring your birds’ safety is going to take work. Recommended biosecurity measures include keeping wild birds out of the shared yard, keeping one pair of shoes exclusively for when you’re walking into a space you share with your birds, and ensuring that you watch for signs of sickness in your flock. If you’ve got cats, you may want to think twice about a backyard flock— bird flu can be transmitted to cats, and is almost always fatal.

All of the extra work to keep your birds safe comes at a cost of your time, and unlike a commercial egg production house, you won’t be routinely testing your eggs for bird flu, so you’ll need to make sure you always cook them thoroughly. 

Will your backyard flock save you money? (Probably not.)

So even if you keep things very lean, you’re looking at $500 to $800 of startup costs for your chickens. (For my own flock of four, I spent almost $2,200 for an insulated coop, some basic toys, and all their chick gear.) On a monthly basis, I spend $40 for food, another $65 on grubs, $15 on pine shavings, and $9 on oyster shells and grit. That’s $130 a month, which yields 90 to 120 eggs (chickens don’t always lay an egg every day, and are only active layers for a few years).

You don’t have to be a math whiz to see that at this scale scale, and considering the monthly expenses, you’ll never save money over buying from the store—even if you actually were buying 120 eggs a month at $1 each. 

Do the “chicken math”

This is why “chicken math” exists. This term describes the tendency of chicken owners to add more birds, with the idea that the more chickens they have, the cheaper their eggs will become.

Once you’ve got the startup costs covered, going from four to 10 chickens isn’t that much more expensive, and taking care of 10 chickens isn’t fundamentally different from taking care for four. I realize that you likely don’t need the eggs of 10 chickens (unless you do need 300 eggs a month?) but your per-egg production costs will go down as you scale up, which is why most backyard flock owners end up selling some of their eggs back to the farm store or to neighbors. 

Depending on your personal startup costs, your egg needs, and your willingness to set up shop as an egg salesperson, there is a break-even point here somewhere, but it’s unlikely you’ll reach it without significant effort.

Chickens are fun to raise even if they don’t save you money

But “free” eggs aren’t the only reason to start a backyard flock. Despite the mess my chickens cause in my yard, or the fact that they peck and scream at my bedroom window first thing in the morning, demanding grubs, I love the stupid birds. They have become my companions, and I enjoy the tasks of caring for them. They’ve  even taken to watching TV with me while perched on the rosebush outside the living room window—all four fuzzy butts lined up on the branch. Every time I get annoyed with them, I remember they do pay rent, after a fashion: Four pastel colored eggs, every day. 

Here’s When Gemini Advanced Is Worth the Monthly Fee

As with other AI bots like ChatGPT and Copilot, there are free and paid options for Google Gemini: For $20 a month, you can upgrade to a Google One AI Premium plan, which includes Gemini Advanced. Chances are you’re already signed up to a host of digital subscriptions, so is Gemini Advanced shelling out even more cash?

Here’s how the features on the free plan and the Google One AI Premium plan stack up against each other right now—bear in mind the paid plan includes some extras beyond the Gemini Advanced AI, which I’ve listed at the end. As a Google One AI Premium subscriber, I’ve talked a little bit about my experience of these features, too.

Comparable features

Google Gemini
You couldn’t create this image as a free Gemini user, because it’s got a person in it.
Credit: Lifehacker

Features that match across both the free and paid plans is probably a good start. All users, whether they subscribe to a paid plan or not, can make use of file uploads and analysis in their prompts, though Gemini Advanced users can work with larger files (uploads can go up to 1,500 pages if you’re paying).

Image generation is available for all Gemini users, though images including people are only available on Gemini Advanced. All users can have real-time chats with the AI through the Gemini Live interface, and all users can connect to other Google apps, including Google Maps and Google Flights.

The other basic AI capabilities—generating and rewriting code and text, looking up information online, offering advice on just about every topic imaginable, and coming up with new ideas and perspectives— are the same across the board. However, Gemini Advanced is smarter in all of these areas.

Better models

Google Gemini
The current model picker for Gemini Advanced users.
Credit: Lifehacker

With Gemini Advanced, you get access to the best AI models Google has to offer: These models do eventually travel down to the free tier, as new ones are released. It’s hard to quantify the difference, but Google says it’s top-tier models are “far more capable at highly complex tasks” such as coding, reasoning, and creative collaboration.

At the time I’m writing this, the best AI model available for free users is Flash 2.0, and the best Gemini Advanced AI model is 2.0 Pro Experimental. In the tests I’ve run with code and text generation, the advanced AI model is noticeably better in terms of detail and comprehensiveness—but the free AI model is perfectly fine.

The more demanding your needs, the better Gemini Advanced is going to be for you. If you’re working on thorny math problems or complex software coding, then the upgrade is probably worth it; if you’re sticking to making your emails sound less prolix, maybe not.

More AI features

Google Gemini
Deep Research is one of the extra tools paying users have access to.
Credit: Lifehacker

Another extra you get with Gemini Advanced is Deep Research, which essentially goes off and writes a comprehensive report on a topic of your choice, using resources found on the web. I asked the tool for a full breakdown of the features of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and what it means for the foldables market, which it returned in seven minutes.

The article that came out the other end was mostly accurate and well-written, if a bit generic. It hit all the key points that users would need to know, before listing website sources at the end, which is handy for fact-checking—as well as a reminder that AI doesn’t actually know anything, it just scoops up and sorts human knowledge.

Then there’s NotebookLM, the research-focused AI tool from Google that can make AI-hosted podcasts for you. You get more of NotebookLM across the board, if you’re on the Google One AI Premium plan: 20 audio podcasts per day rather than 3, 500 questions and answers per day rather than 50, 300 sources per notebook rather than 50, and 500 notebooks per user rather than 100.

Google Gemini
Gemini Advanced subscribers can also create their own custom Gems.
Credit: Gemini

After that there are the Gemini Gems, the customized AI bots you can create inside Gemini to concentrate on specific tasks. You can create Gems for coding, resume writing, or fitness coaching for example, load up documents for them to refer to and train from, and specify the tone and approach of their responses.

Certain other features are exclusive to Gemini Advanced right now, including the option to have Gemini remember certain pieces of information about you (like your job and interests), and the ability to access previous chats. It remains to be seen whether these more minor features will eventually make their way down to the free plan.

Finally, Gemini Advanced users can get the AI built right into Google’s online apps, including Google Docs and Gmail. This can be useful for analyzing files and messages, and composing new ones, but it’s something I tend to completely ignore because I can’t really find a use for it—your mileage may vary.

Is Google One AI Premium worth it?

Google Gemini
You can try Gemini Advanced for free for a month.
Credit: Google

I should also mention that Google One AI Premium is a Google One plan: You get 2TB of storage for Gmail, Google Photos, and Google Drive, which would set you back $10 a month separately. You’re essentially paying another $10 for Gemini Advanced, so your choice depends partly on whether or not you need any more Google storage.

If you spend a lot of time making serious use of AI or just playing around with it, then Gemini Advanced may well be worth it for you: The AI is better, you’ve got the tools like Deep Research and Gems to make use of, and you get AI piped into other Google apps too. For my job, it’s of course beneficial to be able to test out the latest models, and all the features Gemini has to offer (but not to churn out articles, of course).

If you’re not finding any practical applications of AI for yourself right now, then the free version of Google Gemini is perfectly fine: There’s still a lot you can do with it, and it still returns a high standard of responses across a full range of tasks. It’s also worth bearing in mind that you can try out Google One AI Premium free for a month, to see for yourself whether you can get enough value out of it.

Here’s All the Tech I Use to Grow a Better Garden

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Gardening season is approaching faster than it might seem, and like a lot of modern gardeners, I get an assist from technology every year. I use tech to help raise seeds into seedlings, plant them outside, produce a harvest, and still have a whole life outside of the garden. From weather stations and soil monitors to apps and calendars, here’s all the tech I’m dusting off right now to start getting ready.

A weather station

It begins with the basics. I have a Tempest weather station in my front yard, and a few smart temperature gauges in the backyard. Although you can easily pull weather information from a local weather station (you’d be surprised how many neighbors have them; locate them at Weather Underground), I still find it incredibly helpful to know the real microclimate of my yard. I know when rain, hail, snow is going to hit, and the actual temperature at any time, whether I’m at home or away. For outdoor temperature monitoring, I’ve yet to find sensors that are as hardy as the Aqara or Switchbot

Soil monitors

The temperature outside is important for planting, since you shouldn’t place plants outside until the overnight temps are stable above fifty degrees, but soil temperature is just as important. There’s never been great soil sensors before now, but this year I’m trying the ThirdReality Smart Soil Sensor in a few locations.  I’m also excited to try the new Moen soil sensors.

Not only are the sensors going to tell me when my soil is warm enough for planting, they can give important humidity data to my smart watering system—I’ve used a Hydrawise for three seasons and I’m incredibly happy with it. Hydrawise looks and acts like a normal drip or sprinkler control, but it has a wifi module that will connect to your phone and a local weather station and it uses the data to decide whether to water that day, and how much. It’s great to be able to control my drip system from my phone, and get detailed reports on how much water was used. 

Garden apps

That’s all helpful to know when to plant, but I start seeds inside, and I use a bucket of different tech tools to help. First, there’s the planning stage. You don’t start all your seeds at once, you seed so the seedlings they produce are ready at about the time they can go out into the ground outside. Keeping track of what to plant when can be overwhelming, so I use Seedtime to create a planting calendar—its app and desktop interface are incredibly helpful.. 

A seedsheet in excel, and the trays they represent
A seedsheet in excel, and the trays they represent
Credit: Amanda Blum

The seed trays themselves hold 50, 72, or 128 seedlings, and you don’t put a label marker into each cell, which would be time consuming. I use a method taught to me by Meg Cowden of Seed to Fork, and use Google Spreadsheets to keep track of what is in each tray. The trays are numbered and marked with a front and back, and the spreadsheet details what is in each cell of the tray. When I go to plant, I bring my phone with me, or sometimes I print out a sheet. 

Automations and controllers

I’ve discussed at some length how I plant seeds and what I use, but I rely on technology to ensure I’m keeping my seedlings on track. For instance, seedling heat mats ensure the soil in the trays is warm enough for seeds to germinate, but you need to control that heat because if the temperature gets too high, seeds get baked. I use an Inkbird controller to do so. It includes a probe to put into the soil, and then from your phone (or the controller), you specify a temperature range. The controller will turn the heat mat on and off to ensure it maintains the right temperature. 

I’ve also learned (the hard way) that too much humidity can lead to viruses and other problems in my seed-starting room, so with an Aqara temperature and humidity sensor, I use a Google Home automation to kick on the overhead fan when humidity gets too high. The fan’s air benefits the plants, too, which form stronger stems with a breeze. 

Calendars, voice assistants and reminders

Outside, the Monty compost monitor reminds me to turn over my compost occasionally when the worms aren’t doing their job. It sends notifications to update me on the status of my compost, which is quite helpful. Truly, reminders are the key to much of my garden success. I have an entire Google calendar that is solely for garden reminders, such as when to plant specific seeds outside, check on plants, or put trellises up. Those reminders stream to my Google Nest speakers and my voice assistant will speak up to let me know if I forgot something. Most importantly, the calendar can be repurposed year to year.

Security cameras

I’ve been surprised how much I engage my smart cameras around the yard; yes, they catch critters who can cause damage (I’m particularly aware of neighborhood cats setting up in my garden this year, due to their ability to transmit bird flu), but it’s even helpful during a storm to check on how some fragile plants are doing. I’m excited to test the new Petal cameras coming from Bird Buddy, which use solar power and are installed at plant level. They use AI to report how your plants are faring. I hope to use these to capture weekly updates of my yard from the camera’s positions. I use these photos in wintertime, to decide what to plant each year. 

Why Apple Turned Off Advanced Data Protection in the UK (and What It Means for Everyone)

If you want your iCloud data to be as well-protected as possible, you need to turn on Advanced Data Protection (ADP)— but that’s no longer going to be an option in the UK. Apple is pulling ADP from the country, reportedly following a request from the UK government for a backdoor into encrypted iCloud files, and the fallout is likely to have global consequences.

What is ADP?

ADP applies end-to-end encryption (the gold standard for data security) to just about everything you’ve got backed up in iCloud, making it virtually impossible for anyone else to access it. If ADP isn’t enabled, only certain types of data get this protection, such as passwords and payment info, Messages in iCloud, and your health data. It’s important to note that this data remains fully protected from everyone—even Apple and UK spies.

Without ADP, the rest of your iCloud backups (think iCloud Drive, Photos, and Notes, for example) are still protected, but with a lower level of encryption. That protection does a very good job at keeping out bad actors and preventing your data from being hacked, but it can still be accessed if required by Apple employees and—crucially for this current story—government and law enforcement agencies.

While Apple and the governments and security services of the world would tell you they have robust checks in place when it comes to who can get at encrypted data, the possibility for access is still there. With ADP (and other places where end-to-end encryption is deployed, like WhatsApp) that possibility goes away. Even if the FBI or MI5 demand files, they can’t be delivered.

Earlier this month, The Washington Post reported that UK officials had requested secret, backdoor access into Apple’s fully encrypted data files. The demand was apparently made under the auspices of the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016, which gives the country’s security services widespread access to user data in the name of investigating criminal activity: Fighting terrorism and stopping child abuse are two common reasons given for creating an encryption backdoor.

It’s a fight that’s been going on for years. Governments and law enforcement agencies want their own special keys to the locks protecting user data across the world, ostensibly to halt criminals in their tracks. Privacy campaigners and tech companies like Apple argue there’s no effective way of limiting a backdoor to just the “good guys” and not the “bad guys” (even if it was easy to distinguish between the two, which it isn’t).

Apple’s move in the UK—and the global implications

Advanced Data Protection
Users in the UK now see a message like this.
Credit: Lifehacker

Apple’s policy has long been that it will never offer backdoors to its encrypted data, so it would seem to have decided that its only other option is to pull ADP. Brits without ADP enabled can no longer turn it on, while those who do have the feature set up will have to eventually turn it off (though Apple hasn’t said when).

“Apple can no longer offer Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the United Kingdom to new users and current UK users will eventually need to disable this security feature,” Apple spokesperson Julien Trosdorf told The Verge. “We are gravely disappointed that the protections provided by ADP will not be available to our customers in the UK given the continuing rise of data breaches and other threats to customer privacy.”

As you would expect given the sensitive nature of the issue, government officials in the UK haven’t said anything about what’s been reported—and you’ll see Apple makes no direct reference to it either, because to publicize a demand made under the Investigatory Powers Act is itself a criminal offense.

As for other organizations, such as Google and Meta, we’re still in the dark. Presumably the UK government has made the same request, but details haven’t leaked out—and no one involved can talk about it. Google and Meta, like Apple, have repeatedly said they’re against encryption backdoors.

It’s a mess if you’re in the UK (like me), but it affects everyone: Given the rather blurry national borders we now have in the internet age, UK agencies would most likely have been able to access end-to-end encrypted data from users across the world through this backdoor, which for now looks off the table.

I’ve got ADP switched on, but unless the issue gets sorted out, I’ll have to turn it off soon—meaning some of my iCloud data is more vulnerable to snooping again. As is often the case, it’s ordinary users who end up losing out, while the debate on encryption backdoors rumbles on.

The Out-of-Touch Adults’ Guide to Kid Culture: What Is ‘Amialivecore’?

Dropping things on your foot and rating how much it hurts is a growing trend on TikTok. The meme’s popularity may be indicative of something deep and troubling in youth culture. So, maybe, is injecting butterflies and turning goth. You be the judge.

What is “Amialivecore?”

On his substack “The Trend Report,” Kyle Raymond Fitzpatrick pulled together a ton of disparate cultural expressions among online youth to identify a style he calls “Amialivecore.” Fitzpatrick posits that young people are subconsciously unsure if they are actually living human beings. I think he’s onto something.

My interpretation of the meaning of amialivecore: Since they were babies, young people’s experiences are almost entirely unreal. Everything is mediated. They have “experiences” in video games. They see the world through the vertical window of TikTok videos. They only see their friends in online posts. They build personal philosophies from memes. Meanwhile, the companies and algorithms behind the social media platforms and video games have gotten really good at dehumanization. They’ve identified, commodified, and shaped their dreams, desires, thoughts, and feelings so thoroughly, it’s impossible for young people to know how to live authentically. So they play-act and create content in place of living. For evidence, go to see a band kids like, and compare how many people have their phones out to shoot video and how many are dancing.

According to Fitzpatrick, seemingly unrelated things like the TikTok trend of dropping objects on your feet and rating how much they hurt, wearing visible tape on your face in public, and spending your time consciously trying to find a personal style illustrate young people attempting to “problem solve the question of if you are alive and if your body works and if you are indeed present in the present.”

Maybe eating butterflies and suddenly becoming goth are expressions of amialivecore, too.

Are teens injecting butterflies as part of an online challenge?

No.

I can’t find any evidence of an “online challenge” involving injecting yourself with a butterfly, but that’s what some sources claim inspired a Brazilian 14-year-old to crush a butterfly, mix it with water, and inject it into his leg. Things ended horribly for Davi Nunes Moreira: After a week suffering agonizing symptoms, he died in a hospital in Planalto, Brazil.

Medical professionals aren’t certain what caused the teen’s death specifically: It could have been an allergic reaction, an infection, an embolism, or the butterfly itself might have been toxic. Point is, it’s a bad idea to inject yourself with butterflies, but it’s also a bad idea to report on “online challenges” that almost definitely don’t exist. People have been killing themselves in stupid ways since people first came out.

What is the “accidentally became important at work” meme?

I’m fascinated by the meme-making generations getting older, confronting adult situations for the first time, and warning/informing each other through memes. That’s the vibe behind the “becoming important at work” memes that are flooding social media this week. The idea is to attach the phrase “accidentally became important at work” to an image expressing the realization of what happens when you’re “noticed” at work. Here are some examples:

What does “aura farming” mean?

In slang, the word “aura” describes a person who is mysterious and cool. It’s a positive thing. “Aura farming” on the other hand, is ambiguous. Depending on the context, it can refer to a person who does something cool without trying or someone who is trying too hard to appear cool. It’s all about context.

(For more slang definition to keep your vocab on fleek, check out my guide to Gen Z and Gen A slang.)

Goth is back (not that it ever really went anywhere)

Like the vampires that inspire it, goth never really dies; it just sleeps in its coffin until it’s time to claims new victims. Judging from TikTok, the dark aesthetic and gloomy vibe of the subculture is gaining ground with young people; maybe it’s based on the recent reboot of Nosferatu or maybe it’s just because goth fits the times.

While some goth markers that are perennial—black clothes, Joy Division, too much eyeliner—this generation’s expression of the vibe is different in key ways from their grandparents’ interpretation of it back in the early 1980s. Maybe it’s because I’m thinking about amIalivecore, but nu-goths seems like more of a pose than a lifestyle. The look bends more toward the theatrical and gaudy than past generations. Today’s goth feels more intentional and self-conscious, like the kids bought the clothes, watched some makeup tutorials, then said, “now I’m a goth!” Old goths tended to be pale, suicidal junkies that let other people call them “goth.”

Viral video of the week: baby at Benihana

Do you remember the first time you went to Benihana? The baby in this week’s viral video is too young to form lasting memories of his first trip to the Japanese chain with the theatrical food presentation, but it makes a huge impression anyway.

35 of the Horniest Erotic Thrillers Ever Made

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Whatever happened to the erotic thriller? There’s something of a bell curve to the distribution of the subgenre, rising with the relaxing of the production code in the late 1960s, topping out in the ‘80s with prestige fare like Fatal Attraction, and tailing off by the mid-2000s to the dominance of franchise culture. Today’s box office values big-budget, four-quadrant blockbusters, making marketing of films about adult sexuality nearly impossible.

Streaming has opened a window for movies that resemble the erotic thrillers of yore, but the kind they used to make—feature lurid hooks and big stars—remain decidedly absent from theaters. (Genre master Adrian Lyne even returned to the director’s chair for the Ben Affleck/Ana de Armas Hulu thriller Deep Water in 2022, which was a welcome—if largely critically reviled—throwback.) Sex on the big screen is creeping back in as the superhero tide recedes, but sex on the big screen is down by nearly half since 2000. Plenty will say that’s a good thing; those people are wrong.

Yes, there’s plenty to criticize, even in the best examples of the form. The sex is often more titillating than realistic; the movies have also almost always been written and directed by men and emphasized on male perspectives, and many of the women who starred in them didn’t have the best time of it (consider Sharon Stone’s oft-repeated accusations that an iconic nude scene in Basic Instinct involved a nasty bit of trickery from director Paul Verhoeven). It’s also very much the case that explicit imagery isn’t a requirement for eroticism, as some of these films will show—but we’re also not here to be prudish.

And yet, it remains curious the way sex seems to have largely vanished from mainstream, theatrically released films. So without further ado, let’s celebrate some of the best—or at least the most interesting—examples of a type of movie that they just don’t make anymore.


Dressed to Kill (1980)

Any erotic thriller worth its salt pays at least some tribute to Alfred Hitchcock, film noir, or both, and director Brian de Palma set the tone with Dressed to Kill, a juicy mystery involving a sex worker (Nancy Allen) who witnesses a murder and becomes both the prime suspect and the killer’s probable next victim. The style is absolutely delicious, and there’s a reason it started a new trend; the blend of classic tropes and overt sex is almost too hot to handle. Without spoiling too much, though, it very much comes from an era in film when queer representation was limited to absolutely batshit killers, and so loses some points for falling back on lazy (and overused, even in 1980) stereotypes. You can stream Dressed to Kill on Tubi and MGM+ or rent it from Prime Video.


After Dark, My Sweet (1990)

If it weren’t for the sweaty couplings between Jason Patric and Rachel Ward, the plot of After Dark, My Sweet would be perfectly befitting that of a classic noir. Patric plays an ex-boxer (and mental hospital escapee) who takes a job fixing up an old house for widow Ward although, naturally, there’s more to it—Uncle Bud (Bruce Dern), almost certainly not an uncle, shows up to embroil them all in a kidnapping scheme involving a rich man’s kid. Based on the Jim Thompson novel, and almost certainly the purest adaptation of that great crime writer’s work, there’s a visceral, believable sleaziness here that suits the material perfectly. You can stream After Dark, My Sweet on Tubi or rent it from Prime Video.


Dangerous Game (1993)

Provocative director Abel Ferrara is best known, perhaps, for Bad Lieutenant, while Madonna’s very brief erotic-thriller phase is typically seen to be represented by Body of Evidence. Dangerous Game, though, is better than both of them: brutal and immediate, with a couple of stunning lead performances from Harvey Keitel and Madonna. Keitel plays an indie director increasingly obsessed with the low-budget marital drama he’s filming, while Madonna plays a young actress whose confidence is slowly eroded by the role, and by the increasingly unhinged demands of her director. You can stream Dangerous Game on Prime Video and MGM+.


Body Double (1984)

Though it’s far less successful than his earlier Dressed to Kill, Brian de Palma’s Body Double is, in many ways, a better film, upping the sex and violence while also simplifying the plot and narrowing the focus. Craig Wasson plays Scully, a failed actor housesitting in the Hollywood Hills. Bored and looking through the house’s telescope, he spies a beautiful woman and then, of course, witnesses her murder. He winds up a suspect in the case, getting caught up in the world of Hollywood porn when he seeks the help of adult film actress Holly (played by Melanie Griffith in a career-making role) to solve it. There’s nothing particularly sympathetic about Scully—he’s alternately a dupe or a bad decision maker—and that’s as it should be. As with the best classic noir, we’re not cheering for Scully; we’re witnessing his long fall. You can stream Body Double on Tubi and The Criterion Channel or rent it from Prime Video.


Eyes Wide Shut (1999)

As an erotic thriller, Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut is a bit of a bait-and-switch, but just a bit. Teasers promised nothing less than a look inside the bedroom of then-power couple Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise, with Kubrick doing for cinematic fucking what he’d done for space travel or spooky hotels. And he does, just not in the way we expected: Bill Harford (Cruise) goes on a long night’s journey involving murders and sex clubs full of R-rated kink, discovering the dangers of raw titillation and the dehumanizing nature of sexual obsession. For his last film, Kubrick created an erotic thriller that challenges expectations of the genre. You can stream Eyes Wide Shut on The Criterion Channel or rent it from Apple TV+.


Angel Heart (1987)

Mickey Rourke plays private dick Harry Angel, under contract from Robert De Niro’s Louis Cypher to track down an iconic singer who has disappeared. Not only do Angel’s leads keep turning up dead, but he crosses paths with Epiphany Proudfoot (Lisa Bonet), daughter of the singer, with whom he has enjoys some memorably rough sex. There’s a ton of style and eroticism on display, as well as a questionable voodoo aesthetic, but the film is memorable for its blend of tones and for the performances, particularly those of Bonet and Rourke. You can rent Angel Heart from Prime Video.


9 1/2 Weeks (1986)

The movie that helped to propel director Adrian Lyne (Fatal Attraction, Indecent Proposal, Unfaithful, and 2022’s Deep Water) to fame was also co-written by Zalman King of Red Shoe Diaries fame. In that, it represents a team-up of erotic thriller royalty that’s still mostly effective because of the performances from an early-career Mickey Rourke and Kim Basinger. Very much the Fifty Shades of Grey of its era (except with actual heat), Rourke plays a Wall Street trader who leads Basinger’s art gallery assistant down an increasingly kinky road.

Rourke, by then at a much different place in his career, starred in a direct-to-video sequel in 1997, but kept away from 1998’s similarly low-rent prequel. Which is all to say that you could spend a fair bit of time in the steamy 9 1/2 Weeks-verse if you are so inclined. You can rent 9 1/2 Weeks from Prime Video.


Fatal Attraction (1987)

Elements of Fatal Attraction aren’t nearly as appealing today as they were three decades ago, but it remains a taut, suspenseful thriller that brought its adult sexuality (including a memorably awkward bit involving the kitchen sink) all the way to the Oscars; though it didn’t win anything, the movie was nominated in all the top categories. Glenn Close (as femme fatale Alex) is clearly having the time of her life playing an unhinged woman who absolutely loses her shit over married Dan (Michael Douglas). The setup has a strong whiff of “women, amirite?,” but the screenplay is smart enough to recognize that Dan isn’t the hero either, and the two generate real heat. You can stream Fatal Attraction on Paramount+ or rent it from Prime Video.


Trois (2000)

What we think of as the erotic thriller genre is overwhelmingly white. Major studios, who had already shown little interest in making films about and marketed for Black people, were clearly even less interested in dealing with sexuality among POC characters. That reticence is a big part of the reason Trois stands out, even though it doesn’t subvert genre tropes in any other way. But it’s also a juicy drama in its own right, about a man who talks his wife into joining him in a threesome, only to discover their choice of a third wasn’t smart. It did respectable business as an independent film, and very well among Black audiences. It spawned two less successful, but generally sweatier, sequels. You can stream Trois on Tubi and Prime Video.


No Way Out (1987)

There’s a lot of Hitchcock in the more overtly sexual thrillers of the ‘80s and ‘90s, reflecting the full expression of the master’s more subdued eroticism (Hitchcock himself seemed eager, at the end of his career, to explore filmmaking with more freedom in movies like Frenzy). Neo-noir No Way Out certainly doesn’t hit the heights of the films that inspired it, but does make a lot out of a twisty-turny plot involving a love triangle between Kevin Costner, Sean Young, and Gene Hackman(!) and a murder for which Costner is the chief investigator—and also the prime suspect. It’s not the hottest movie of the era, but there’s real chemistry at work, as Costner’s all-American charm plays well against Young at her early-career peak—and before Hollywood misogyny shoved her aside. You can stream No Way Out on Tubi and MGM+ or rent it from Prime Video.


Bad Influence (1990)

The female characters in this Curtis Hanson film are almost entirely incidental, if you couldn’t tell from the poster, which features Rob Lowe, James Spader, and a nondescript woman whose face we don’t see. Nebbishy Michael (James Spader) starts palling around with more experienced Alex (Rob Lowe), going on adventures involving sex, drugs, and light crime. Which is all fine and fun, until Michael realizes thrill-loving Alex is 100% going to get him killed. The movie loses points for a lack of substantive female presence (and for being a creepy choice for a comeback following Lowe’s teenage sex tape scandal), but stands out by focusing its sexual chemistry around the two mismatched leading men. You can stream Bad Influence on Pluto TV.


Basic Instinct (1992)

A genuine pop-culture phenomenon as much for its controversies as for its quality, Basic Instinct nabbed a couple of Academy Award nominations as well as plenty of appreciation for Sharon Stone’s career-making performance. Director Paul Verhoeven (Showgirls) knows all about elevating lurid material to the level of art, or at least camp, so the movie works even though its central mystery doesn’t make much sense. Michael Douglas plays a police detective investigating a murder who gets caught up in a torrid, occasionally kinky affair with the prime suspect Catherine Tramell (Stone). The bisexual serial killer angle was already a tired trope by the time of the movie’s release, but there’s no question that Catherine Tramell is a memorable (and, I suppose, sex-positive) villain. Stone participated in the big budget, entirely forgettable 2006 sequel. You can stream Basic Instinct on Paramount+ and Pluto TV or rent it from Prime Video.


Knife + Heart (2018)

There are layers upon layers in director Yann Gonzalez’s slick and stylish slasher set in the world of ‘70s gay porn. Anne Parèze (Vanessa Paradis) runs a production company that makes the exploitation movies Knife + Heart centers on, but the series of murders that occurs on set barely draws the attention of the local police, who aren’t terribly torn up about the deaths of gay porn actors. Anne decides that her next film will be about the murders themselves, unfolding a movie-within-a-movie that only draws the attention of the killer (and his spiked dildo). The movie celebrates giallo, with plenty of deep cuts for fans of classic Italian horror, and ‘70s sleaze more generally. You can stream Knife + Heart on Shudder, Tubi, and AMC+ or rent it from Prime Video.


In the Realm of the Senses (1976)

Typically, the erotic thriller tends toward noir and neo-noir sensibilities—but I’m including this Japanese classic of sex, obsession, and severed members because the true-crime inspired story set in the 1930s has all the ingredients even if the setting is a bit further afield than usual. Nagisa Ōshima’s provocative psychosexual story blends a fair bit of un-simulated sex with hints of horror in its tale of love and murder, based on the true story of geisha, sex worker, and unlikely folk hero Sada Abe (flawlessly played by Eiko Matsuda). It’s a beautifully hypnotic and appropriately titled film that culminates in a genuinely shocking act of violence. The original X rating was updated to an NC-17 in 1991. You can stream In the Realm of the Senses on The Criterion Channel.


Single White Female (1992)

The elevator pitch is solid enough that the term “single white female” remains in the pop culture lexicon—Allie (Bridget Fonda), searching for a roommate, takes in Hedy (Jennifer Jason Leigh), who becomes so obsessed with her new landlord that she wants to become her. On those terms, it’s effective, though it’s a bit more troubling than you might remember: Hedy was the latest and possibly greatest in a long line of unhinged, murderous lesbians (a gay sex scene is shot like we’re suddenly in a horror movie). The movie also suggests, as so many movies still do, that female friends are always one step away from killing each other. Still, it’s stylishly made, surprisingly funny, and features two great central performances. You can rent Single White Female from Apple TV+.


The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)

There’s nothing at all explicit here, but that’s not a particular requirement: This one’s all sublimated longing in the sweaty Mediterranean, this adaption bringing the subtext (barely) of Patricia Highsmith’s novel to the fore like no adaptation before or since. Sociopathic con artist Tom Ripley (Matt Damon) develops an obsession with Jude Law’s Dickie Greenleaf, wanting to be with him every bit as much as he wants to be him. The resulting relationship is far less than healthy, particularly for Dickie. You can stream The Talented Mr. Ripley on Paramount+ or rent it from Prime Video.


Cruising (1980)

There was a lot of controversy surrounding Cruising when it was first released back in 1980: what was, perhaps, an earnest attempt on William Friedkin’s part to explore S&M and leather culture in an era just before the HIV/AIDS crisis comes across as entirely unhinged—which is, frankly, part of its charm. Al Pacino plays Detective Steve Burns, assigned to go undercover and hunt down whoever is killing gay men in this New York subculture. There are things that the movie gets right, but we’re also meant to share Burns’ fascination and occasional horror with this secret world (which emotion is he feeling during a fisting scene?). Viewed as a giallo-esque murder mystery, nonsensical twists included, it’s a bit of fun with an impressive array of male nudity. You can rent Cruising from Prime Video.


Indecent Proposal (1993)

Another one that found a weird place in the early ‘90s pop-culture zeitgeist, this Adrian Lyne drama asks what would happen if Robert Redford made a play for your spouse, backing up his offer to the tune of a cool $1 million. In a 2022 world of greater fluidity in relationships, the answer would be either more or less complicated; in 1993 it was scandalous. You can stream Indecent Proposal on Paramount+ or rent it from Prime Video.


Lust, Caution (2007)

Based, very roughly, on a true story, Ang Lee’s film finds a group of Chinese students from the University of Hong Kong who plot to kill a special agent in Hong Kong of 1938. Tang Wei stars as the young woman assigned to get close to their prey as part of a honey trap but who, you might not be surprised to learn, develops both emotional and sexual feelings for her quarry (Tony Leung Chiu-wai). When the plan fails, the two are reunited a few years after the war and continue their dance despite very different circumstances. Though the film is a spy thriller, in a sense, the tone is languid and sweaty, the focus always on these two characters and their passionate, dangerous affair. You can rent Lust, Caution from Apple TV.


Mulholland Drive (2001)

Mulholland Drive follows “Rita” (Laura Herring), an actress who suffers from amnesia following a Los Angeles car crash, and who stumbles into a wholesome mid-western transplant (Naomi Watts) setting out to become a star. The two try to uncover Rita’s true identity, before engaging in some undeniably hot sex. The moment of intimacy becomes a turning point in the film, after which the walls of reality break down and we enter a world that’s more explicitly noir and that borders on horror. You can stream Mulholland Drive on The Criterion Channel or rent it from Prime Video.


The Last Seduction (1994)

Linda Fiorentino plays one of the all-time great femmes fatale in this film about a woman looking to get out of her unhappy marriage. First convincing her husband (Bill Pullman) to sell cocaine (as one does), she creates sort of a pyramid scheme of seductions, with the goal of eventually circling back around to someone murdering her husband. Fiorentino’s character is so good, and so well-written, that we’re rooting for her the whole time. You can stream The Last Seduction on Prime Video, Peacock, Tubi, Pluto TV, and The Criterion Channel.


Bound (1996)

The movie that introduced the world to the Wachowskis came along at exactly the right moment: Independent films were starting to have an impact on mainstream audiences and queer content was beginning to nudge its way into movies made for wide release. It doesn’t hurt that Bound is an incredibly sexy—and clever—Billy Wilder-inspired neo-noir. Gina Gershon and Jennifer Tilly are one of cinema’s all-time power couples; where the erotic thriller genre would tend toward lesbian exploitation, the presence of feminist sex educator Susie Bright and the two not-yet-out trans women behind the camera dodge those tropes almost entirely. You can stream Bound on Pluto TV or rent it from Prime Video.


Love Lies Bleeding (2024)

Kristen Stewart plays tough gym manager Lou, daughter of a (very small town) local crime lord who runs, guns, and dumps bodies in a local ravine. Into town one day comes bodybuilder Jackie (Katy O’Brian), just stopping over until she meets Lou, the two forming an explosive couple who alternate between doing steroids and fucking as the plot draws them further into a high-stakes, high-intensity world of sweaty neo-noir. You can stream Love Lies Bleeding on Max or rent it from Prime Video.


Body Heat (1981)

Kathleen Turner stars in Lawrence Kasdan’s essential neo-noir as a top-tier femme fatale—matching the energy of Barbara Stanwyck in Double Indemnity, on which this is loosely based, but wearing a lot less clothing. She plays the wife of a wealthy businessman who entangles William Hurt in a plot (involving Mickey Rourke) to murder her husband and run away together (he thinks). The sex here is all part of the game that she’s playing with William Hurt, even as he thinks that he’s the one toying with her. You can rent Body Heat from Prime Video.


Color of Night (1994)

I’m not here to make the case that Color of Night is a brilliant bit of filmmaking. It’s pretty silly, honestly, but it’s never less than entertaining, playing like a burlesque on the erotic thriller genre (I think unintentionally?), including some memorably risqué sex scenes. Bruce Willis plays Dr. Bill Capa, who witnesses a bloody tragedy after which he can no longer see the color red. A trip to LA to get away from it all proves to be a bad idea after he’s dragged into the mystery of his friend’s murder and begins an affair with the mysterious Rose (Jane March). The impressive supporting cast includes Rubén Blades, Lesley Ann Warren, and Scott Bakula. You can rent Color of Night from Prime Video.


Obsessed (2009)

As I think we’ve established by this point, there are erotic thrillers that serve as legitimate cinema and others that function very ably as guilty pleasures. While the very best can do both, there’s something to be said for a movie that’s both horny and a little goofy. That’s Obsessed, which finds a successful Black couple absolutely terrorized by an unhinged and desperately horny white lady (Ali Larter) from work. One reason this works—maybe the only reason—is in the wild lead casting of Beyoncé and Idris Elba. Not to spoil too much, but a climactic fight between Beyoncé and Larter’s character won the MTV Award for Best Fight. You can stream Obsessed on Netflix or rent it from Prime Video.


Vertigo (1958)

Alfred Hitchcock inspired much of the erotic thriller genre, even if he mostly worked in an era requiring a bit more subtlety—of which he was not a huge fan, pushing those boundaries as hard as possible at every opportunity. Vertigo, while being in no way explicit, is among his most erotic films—and most disturbing. James Stewart plays Scottie Ferguson, a retired cop hired to follow the wife of an old friend, fearing for her mental state. Scottie falls for Madeleine (Kim Novak) before she falls to her death. When the now clinically depressed Scottie meets her lookalike, his obsession leads her to remake the woman in the perfect image of Madeleine. You can stream Vertigo on The Criterion Channel or rent it from Prime Video.


Dead Ringers (1988)

David Cronenberg followed up The Fly with this similarly disturbing bit of psychological fuckery. Jeremy Irons plays both twin gynecologists Beverly and Elliot Mantle, the more outgoing Elliot seducing women and passing them off to shy Beverly. It all works well (for the creepy brothers), until Beverly develops feelings for Claire (Geneviève Bujold), throwing a wrench in the brothers’ relationship. Other films of the era might have played this for titillation, but David Cronenberg is fully aware of how unnerving the whole thing is, allowing the movie to slide into something very like horror before the final act. You can stream Dead Ringers on Prime Video, Peacock, and Pluto TV.


The Handmaiden (2016)

Best known for stylish, over-the-top violent thrillers like Oldboy and Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, director Park Chan-wook turned his talent for beautiful excess to the genre in question, crafting one of the best, and perviest, examples of the form. Set in Korea under Japanese occupation in the 1930s, the film follows thief Sookee (Kim Tae-ri) as she plots to swindle a wealthy heiress (Kim Min-hee) by becoming her handmaiden, but complications ensue once she develops feelings for her mark. Twist follows twist as sex and romance lead to violence and betrayal—which is all exactly what we sat down for. You can stream The Handmaiden on Prime Video.


Wild Things (1998)

Depending on the viewer, Wild Things is either complete trash or a glorious ode to trash (not the only film on this list to blur that line, obviously). The plot kicks off with an uncomfortable bit about a false rape allegation, but continues on with a seemingly endless string of turnabouts and red herrings involving a trio comprised of Matt Dillon, Neve Campbell, and Denise Richards. Hardly a scene goes by during which there isn’t some new revelation, building out a love triangle that becomes a love quadrangle (at least) with the addition of Kevin Bacon, who offers up some memorable, and rare-for-the-genre, male nudity. You can rent Wild Things from Prime Video.


Cruel Intentions (1999)

“Adultness” is almost a defining quality of erotic films, which is why Cruel Intentions plays almost as much as an underage parody of the genre as it does a thriller in its own right. It’s also a teenage take on the French novel Les Liaisons dangereuses, already adapted as Dangerous Liaisons and Valmont—which is all to say there’s a lot to unpack here. Or perhaps you’re better just enjoying this cult classic as the juicy, intentionally trashy bit of fun that it is. Reese Witherspoon plays Annette, who intends to stay “pure” until her marriage, which, good luck in the face of the horny, scheming pair played by Sarah Michelle Gellar and Ryan Phillippe. You can rent Cruel Intentions from Prime Video.


Unfaithful (2002)

Just as director Adrian Lyne ushered in the genre’s golden age, he popped by to see it off with Unfaithful, a thriller with a setup that’s made clear from the title: Diane Lane plays a bored wife to Richard Gere, by chance meeting a man who she winds up having an affair with. Annnnndddd cue the inevitable murder. It’s middling on the whole, but worth it for Lane’s Academy Award-nominated performance. You can rent Unfaithful from Prime Video.


Stranger By the Lake (2013)

Erotic thrillers peaked in the ‘90s, and had largely died out (beyond the direct-to-video market) around the turn of the century, so much so that this 2013 French film plays like an homage to an older form, in much the same way that some of the better thrillers of the ‘80s paid tribute to film noir. Here, Pierre Deladonchamps plays Franck, a regular visitor to a nude beach and the surrounding woods, both popular cruising spots. Franck begins a passionate relationship (meaning: lots of sex in the woods) with Michel (Christophe Paou), who Franck later spots drowning someone in the lake. As the investigation into that event heats up, Franck finds himself struggling to give up a good thing, even in the face of murder. As with the lead in any good erotic thrillers, the better the sex, the more Franck will risk. You can rent Stranger by the Lake from Prime Video.


Deep Water (2022)

Adrian Lyne (9½ Weeks, Fatal Attraction, and Indecent Proposal) returned to the director’s chair after an absence of two decades for this Hulu original. Ben Affleck is probably a rough equivalent in star power and sex appeal to the male leads of yore, and Ana de Armas is a good choice as a co-lead, even if the casting does remind us that age gaps in these movies will always favor the idea of an older man with a significantly younger woman. Here, Affleck’s Vic agrees to overlook his wife’s string of affairs in order to preserve his marriage, but then becomes the prime suspect when her lovers start turning up dead. It’s a solid setup (taken from a Patricia Highsmith novel) that doesn’t quite connect, but still serves as a reminder that there’s a bit of life in a time-honored genre. You can stream Deep Water on Hulu.


Saltburn (2023)

Yes, it plays a bit like The Talented Mr. Ripley sans subtext—but maybe we’re past subtext at this point. Scholarship kid Oliver Quick (Barry Keoghan) weasels his way into the life of the popular, handsome, and impressively wealthy Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver is there to take everything he can, but he’s also genuinely obsessed with Felix, building to romantic moments in a bathtub, and over an open grave. If Oliver can’t have Felix and his lavish life and palatial estate, he’ll take the second one, thanks. You can stream Saltburn on Prime Video.

Here’s How Four Major Newsrooms Are Using AI

AI is everywhere these days, but when you see an article online from what has historically been a trusted source, it’s reasonable to think an AI wasn’t involved. At major newsrooms across the country, though, that reality is increasingly becoming less clear cut.

While not every use of AI in the newsroom is as blatant as an AI just drafting a post onto a blank page (although that happens too,) it’s important to know just how the sausage is being made when it comes to the information that’s shaping your worldviews.

Here are just a few news outlets that have started openly using AI in their processes, so you can stay informed about where exactly the information you’re reading is coming from.

The New York Times

Earlier this week, Semafor published an article about new AI tools that New York Times management is reportedly encouraging staffers to try. While the publication’s legal arm is currently embroiled in a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, it appears the site’s editorial and product wings are ready to embrace AI in the newsroom, at least going by communication from the top.

According to Semafor’s writeup, NYT management is now supplying AI training to its journalists, debuting an internal AI tool called “Echo,” and approving usage of external AI tools including Google’s Vertex AI, a few Amazon AI products, and ironically, Microsoft’s Copilot and a non-ChatGPT tool from OpenAI.

Not all of these will be used for the website’s articles—the New York Times is bigger than what you see on its front page—but Semafor did say that journalists are being encouraged to “use these AI tools” for tasks like mild content revisions or coming up with questions to ask during interviews.

“Generative AI can assist our journalists in uncovering the truth and helping more people understand the world,” read the company’s editorial guidelines on AI, which are public on its site. “We view the technology not as some magical solution but as a powerful tool.”

To that end, there are seemingly still some guardrails still in place. Semafor says the NYT has warned staff not to use AI to draft or significantly revise articles, and has noted that AI use could potentially infringe on copyright or unintentionally expose sources.

Still, with internal communication suggesting writers use AI to come up with headlines and draft social copy, it’s worth keeping hallucination in mind the next time you see a suspicious-seeming NYT story going viral on social media.

For the journalists’ part, Semafor reports that some remain skeptical, worrying that AI in the newsroom could inspire “laziness” and reduce accuracy or creativity.

Quartz

First off, a disclaimer. Quartz is currently owned by G/O Media, which also owned Lifehacker prior to its sale to Ziff Davis in 2023.

With that said, G/O Media has since then become a major proponent of AI in the newsroom, with business news outlet Quartz being its biggest experiment in this.

Scroll through Quartz’ bylines for a bit and you’ll find posts attributed to the Quartz Intelligence Newsroom, which seems to be dropping any of the restraints adopted by the New York Times. Here, the AI “writer” has been quietly generating earning reports for months and has recently started spitting out more general blogs as well. These include stories about potential Bitcoin value or how to delete your Meta-owned social media accounts, but as you might expect, there are issues to be aware of with each.

To Quartz’ credit, it does not hide that these stories are AI-generated and the AI cites its sources, but it doesn’t appear as if there’s human oversight addressing any problems that might arise from this.

For instance, the Quartz article on how to delete your Meta-owned social media accounts seems to be a simple regurgitation of a TechCrunch story (which did not give permission to be summarized, for what it’s worth), but with clear instructions swapped for what the cribbed TechCrunch writer calls “vague” gestures in the right direction. Speaking about other stories written by the Quartz AI, the same writer also said “my editor would never let me publish something so sloppy.”

With that, it’s very likely you might find this story hoping for useful advice, only to leave disappointed and more confused than when you came. But the chances of that only get higher if you land on another story with a less reliable source than TechCrunch.

As noted by Futurism, the Intelligence Newsroom has frequently cited a site called Devdiscourse, which itself has all the appearances of an AI content farm. When robots are citing robots, I do have to ask: why not just go to ChatGPT and prompt it yourself? Even if I accept AI news as worthwhile, it’s unclear to me what G/O’s efforts are adding here.

G/O is slapping a disclaimer on all AI-generated Quartz stories that says it’s in the “first phase of an experimental new version of reporting,” but with AI efforts at the company going back to 2023, it’s unclear if it’ll ever figure out what that experiment is supposed to yield.

In the meantime, keep an eye out on all Quartz bylines, and if you sniff AI, maybe consider giving the sources the bot is blending up for you a read instead. It seems like once you click that attractive headline, you’re basically playing a game of roulette.

AP

If the New York Times is just starting to dip its toes into AI, and Quartz has done a full-on cannonball, then the AP’s use of AI seems to be somewhere in between. On its site, the agency proudly declares that it uses AI for translation, transcription, headlines, research, and even some automated articles, but general blogs are still left to human hands.

“Our goal is to give people a good way to understand how we can do a little experimentation but also be safe,” said AP’s Vice President of News Standards and Inclusion, Amanda Barret, in 2023, when the group first issued its guidelines on artificial intelligence.

Where this will most likely affect you is in the site’s use of Wordsmith, an AI program that specializes in summarizing content like sports scores, weather reports, and, as with Quartz, earnings. AP has been using a version of this program since 2014, so it’s not exactly new, but it’s worth being aware that stories on these topics without a specific author attached likely came from a bot. But aside from these stories, AP’s only other clear use of directly AI-written content was an experiment with reporting public safety incidents in a specific Minnesota newspaper.

Otherwise, the only time you’re likely to see direct AI content on an AP story is its story summarizing pilot: for instance, AI might put a blurb under election day stories to say which offices are up for grabs.

Again, headlines and research are still admittedly AI-assisted, so it’s important to be extra careful when something doesn’t pass your sniff test, but it seems like humans are still taking the forefront here, at least for now.

The Washington Post

The Washington Post’s use of AI is unique, in that it doesn’t directly impact the content. Rather, it’s more of an enhanced search engine for readers who go looking for it. The bot, called “Ask the Post AI,” takes questions, spits out a brief AI-generated response trained on Washington Post content, and then lists relevant articles below in a Google-like manner.

“Answers are AI-generated from published reporting,” warns the bot when you ask a question. “Please verify by consulting the provided articles.”

Responses seem to aim for a measured tone, leaning on quotes from noteworthy sources in matters of opinion, and when I asked the bot about President Trump’s evolving stance on TikTok or Elon Musk’s history with Tesla, I got truthful responses back, although the former was a paragraph long while the latter was only a sentence long. I suppose how detailed your responses are depends on how much the paper has covered a specific topic.

Washington Post hasn’t been clear about which AI tech powers Ask the Post AI, but in general, it won’t bother you unless you go looking for it. Based on the prevalent warnings about its use, it seems to be intended more as a place to start research than as a direct news replacement.

How Apple Watch, Fitbit, Garmin, Oura, and Whoop Compare on Measuring HRV

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate (RHR) are the metrics that most wearables’ “recovery” numbers are based on. I wore five devices to bed for two weeks to see how their readings compared. Those devices were an Apple Watch Series 10, a Fitbit Charge 6, a Garmin Forerunner 265S, an Oura Ring 4, and a Whoop 4.0.

Why these five? Well, they’re the major brands that people tend to gravitate toward when they want to track sleep, and for each I chose the best (in my opinion) of each company’s current offerings. I had most of them on hand due to testing them for recent or upcoming reviews. The Apple Watch Series 10 is the one our Associate Tech Editor Michelle Ehrhardt crowned the best Apple Watch for most people. The Charge 6 is Fitbit’s standout no-nonsense fitness tracker (sorry to Fitbit smartwatch lovers, but there are better smartwatches out there.) The fourth-generation Oura ring is the company’s newest and best, and Whoop’s 4.0 strap is the current hardware for its subscription-based recovery and activity tracking service (which beat Oura in our head-to-head comparison). Garmin makes a multitude of watches that can track your sleep, but the one that I tested here is my personal device, a Forerunner 265S—which is, in my opinion, one of the best running watches out there.

As I’ve discussed before, the numbers we get from our smartwatches fall into a few different categories. Many are scores or icons that we can’t really verify with other devices—what does it mean to have a “sleep score” of 87, anyway? Others are measurements, and we can compare those from device to device, since they should all be measuring the same thing. Different devices may use different sensors to pick up the data and different algorithms to process and display it, but we’d expect to see similar numbers from all of the devices tested. Our HRV and resting heart rate numbers fall into this latter category, so let’s see how well the devices match.

What is HRV, anyway? 

HRV, or heart rate variability, is a measure of how steady your heartbeat is. Not how fast or how slow, but how different of a time frame passes between beats. The differences are only measurable with precise equipment, but here’s the basic idea: If your heart goes “beat…beat..beat………..beat….beat..beat…….beat,” you have a high HRV (high variability), and that’s a good thing. On the other hand, if your heart goes “beat….beat….beat…beat…..beat,” that’s a low HRV. We tend to have a low HRV when we’re stressed or fatigued, and a high HRV when we’re either not stressed, or recovering well from our stressors. 

This may seem counterintuitive, because most of us think of an ideal heartbeat as being steady and regular, but subtle variations from one beat to another are healthy and normal. Our heart takes its orders on how fast to beat from two different parts of our nervous system (sympathetic and parasympathetic). It’s thought that a high HRV indicates that the two systems are both active—balancing each other out, in a sense.

Your HRV will change from day to day, and that’s where these devices come in. You’ll often see a change in your HRV numbers right after a hard workout or stressful work day, giving you an early heads up about what your body is dealing with. This information, used wisely, can help to guide your choices about how to manage your workout schedule, your stress, and your health-related habits.

What counts as a “good” HRV depends on your own history; it’s not worth comparing yourself to others. (I don’t mean that in a feel-good kind of way, but literally, scientifically: your HRV only makes sense when compared to itself.) Whoop reports that the middle 50% of 20-year-olds have an HRV between about 60 and 105, with numbers declining as we get older. If you’re 60, according to that data set, you’re likely to have HRV numbers somewhere between 30 and 50. 

How does HRV differ from resting heart rate (RHR)?

Your resting heart rate is also a number that reflects stress on your body, including fatigue and illness. Unlike HRV, where higher is “better,” a higher resting heart rate means you’re more stressed, and a lower one is a sign that you’re well recovered. 

Resting heart rate can also change over time as you become more fit. Athletes tend to have lower RHR numbers, and people who take up an exercise habit often find that their RHR declines a bit over time. (That said, RHR isn’t a direct measure of cardio fitness; there seems to be a significant genetic component as well. Take me as an example: my RHR is always pretty low, even when my cardio fitness is crap. If I’m doing a lot of endurance training, it will drop by two to three points, but no more.) 

Most healthy adults have a resting heart rate of between 55 and 85 beats per minute (some sources give 60 to 100 as the typical range). It’s important to note that these numbers usually assume that you’re sitting quietly in a doctor’s office. When you’re asleep in your own bed, your heart rate can dip a bit lower. So it’s normal to see lower numbers on a wearable that records all night than you would see when you go to the doctor.

How to track your HRV and resting heart rate with wearables

Gone are the days when you may have charged your fitness tracker at night; now, fitness-focused wearables are expected to be worn in your sleep to track these nighttime metrics. 

During the night, your device monitors your heartbeat. It may sample and average different readings, and each device measures and calculates its numbers slightly differently. (That’s why I didn’t expect much agreement between the devices, but more on that in a minute.) When you wake up, you might be presented with a “readiness” or “recovery” score, but I stand by my position that HRV and RHR are the only numbers really worth paying attention to (aside from time in bed, if you want to monitor your sleep).

This data on your HRV and RHR will be presented to you in the device’s companion app or, in the case of devices with a screen, on the device itself. Often the app or device will tell you how your numbers compare to your usual. What you do with that information is up to you.

How I gathered my data

For this experiment, I wore my five devices to bed every night. That meant:

  • The Oura ring on my finger (right hand, middle finger)

  • The Whoop band on my left bicep

  • The Apple Watch and Fitbit on my left wrist

  • The Garmin on my right wrist

A pro tip for device testers: when you’re wearing two watches on the same wrist, turn one toward the underside of your wrist. That way, the two watch bodies won’t clack against each other. Also, make sure the buttons are aligned so they aren’t going to bump against their neighbors in the middle of the night.

I entered each day’s resting heart rate and HRV from each device into a spreadsheet. Garmin reports your seven-day rolling average as your HRV “number,” but I used the nightly numbers instead, the better to match the other devices.

When it comes to using this data, I already have a sense of how the numbers compare to my experience. If my HRV is high and my RHR is low, I pretty much always feel good and am ready to take on whatever the day throws at me. If my HRV is low and my RHR is high, I’m either stressed, sick, or maybe didn’t sleep enough; I may or may not do an easier workout that day, but I’ll definitely pay more attention to taking care of myself and getting plenty of sleep going forward. If my RHR and HRV are both high, that tends to mean I’m dealing with a lot of stress or fatigue but am handling it well. For this experiment, I didn’t bother tracking data on how I felt; I already know that the Oura data is good at matching how I feel, so the question was whether the other devices tracked the same trends or not.

The results of my test

It was fascinating to watch the results take shape as I added more data points to the spreadsheet. The raw numbers were often pretty different: my resting heart rate on a given night might be 65 or 86 depending on which device I’m reading from. But as I logged weeks’ worth of data, the trend lines all told pretty much the same story: 

Two graphs: top is HRV, bottom is RHR. All lines seem to track together, mostly (the red line for Apple is sometimes a bit out of sync)

Credit: Beth Skwarecki

For HRV, Oura almost always gives me the highest (“best” looking) readings. Whoop tends to stick pretty close, with Fitbit and Garmin not far behind. The Apple Watch, on the other hand, rides significantly lower on the chart than the other devices, and seems to disagree with their trend sometimes.

For resting heart rate, things are a bit more consistent. Oura usually gives the lowest readings, flattering me again, with the other devices slightly above, and Fitbit giving the highest of the bunch. This is roughly a 10-beat difference for many of the days I charted: for example, 53 from Fitbit and 43 from Oura. It’s hard to say which is right, since I’m not hiring a healthcare professional to stand by and take my pulse throughout the night.

In general, the lines tend to all go up together, and all down together. (Mostly…looking at you, Apple Watch.) I’m happy to see that the devices aren’t reporting drastically different readings that look like random numbers; they do all seem to be measuring the same underlying phenomenon even if they don’t all agree on the exact number to label it with.

Personally, when I want to look at my HRV or RHR, I tend to go with the device I’m most familiar with—in this case, the Oura ring. I’ve been wearing it the longest (through three generations of the product) and so I have a sense of whether a reading of 50 is high or low for me. (It’s high for Oura, even though it might be a low number if I saw it on a different device.)

The most important lesson I take from this, myself, is that not only is it useless to compare HRV from person to person, it’s also not helpful to compare it from device to device. Just like the weight labels on the machines at the gym, the numbers give you a way to compare your progress or trends with the same equipment. Switch devices, and all bets are off. So pick a device, stick with it, and you’ll probably get numbers worth paying attention to. What you do with them, of course, is another matter.

I Make This Easy and Elegant ‘King Cake’ to Impress My Guests

I love an easy, impressive dessert. It must have few ingredients, require little to no elbow grease, and have a big payoff at the end. The galette des rois delivers on all fronts. Often made for Three Kings’ Day at the beginning of January, there’s really no better time to make this dessert than whenever the heck you want it. Why should January have all the fun? Make it for your partner’s birthday, friends dropping in for dinner, or a fancy spin on the king cake for your upcoming Mardi Gras party. With the wonders of pre-made puff pastry, all the hard work is done. In about 40 minutes, you can have a stunner of a dessert.

What is a galette des rois?

A galette des rois, French for “king cake,” is puff pastry filled with a simple frangipane almond paste. There’s an optional féve (trinket or bean) for Three Kings’ Day, but I don’t find surprise choking hazards in my dessert to be much fun, so I’m leaving that out. The only thing that requires some doing is making the almond frangipane filling, which is, blessedly, easy. Simply mix the six room temperature ingredients in a bowl with a wooden spoon for 60 seconds. Here’s the recipe I use, and try not to substitute out the almond extract if you can help it (because it makes all desserts better).

How to make a French king cake

Once the frangipane is mixed, unravel that jewel of the frozen aisle: store bought, all-butter puff pastry. Make sure it’s thawed according to the package’s directions—you won’t get very far if it’s frozen.

1. Trim the puff pastry

You’ll need two sheets of puff pastry cut into equally sized circles. You can use a guide, like a 9-inch cake pan, placed on top and trace it with a knife. Do this with both sheets of pastry. (Technically, you could omit the trimming and make a rectangular cake. No one’s the boss of you.)

2. Layer on the filling

Place one circle of pastry on a sheet tray lined with parchment paper. Brush the outer inch with an egg wash. Try not to let it dribble down the edge or it will impede the pastry’s puffing action in those spots. (Egg cooks at a lower temperature than the pastry, so the egg will harden before the pastry has had a chance to rise.) Fill the center with an very thin layer of jam (this is optional, but I like it). Then spread a thick layer of the almond frangipane on top (one-third- to a half-inch thick), but keep it within the egg wash perimeter.

3. Seal the top and bake

Lay the second sheet of pastry over top, and press the edges down gently to make contact with the egg wash edge. Egg wash the entire top of the pastry. Again, don’t let the egg wash dribble off the edges.

If you want to make a classic sun-burst pattern on top, or any pattern at all, now’s the time. Use the back of a paring knife (not the cutting edge) to indent the lines. Bake in a 425°F oven for 25 minutes. Finish with a heavy dusting of powdered sugar.

The galette des rois is best served day-of, but you can cut any leftovers into individual slices, wrap them well, and freeze them. When you’re in the mood for a sweet treat, simply revive it in a 350°F oven for 10 minutes.

Galette des Rois Recipe

Ingredients:

  • 2 sheets of store bought puff pastry, thawed

  • ½ batch of frangipane

  • 1 tablespoon of raspberry jam

  • Egg wash

  • Powdered sugar for decoration

1. Preheat the oven to 425°F.

2. Use an overturned 9-inch cake pan to guide you as you cut a large circle out of each sheet of puff pastry. Line a baking sheet with parchment paper and lay one sheet of puff pastry in the center.

3. Egg wash the outer-inch of the pastry. Spread the jam thinly in the center within the egg wash circle. Spread the frangipane over the jam in a thick layer.

4. Top it with the second circle of puff pastry, pressing the edges so they stick to the egg wash. Brush a thin layer of egg wash over the entire top (not the sides). Make a design in the surface with the back of a knife, like a criss-cross pattern or star-burst.

5. Bake immediately for 25 minutes, or until well-risen and the top has deeply browned. Cool completely on a wire cooling rack and dust with powdered sugar before serving.

Download Your Kindle Books While You Still Can

If you’re an avid e-book reader or someone who has an extensive library of Kindle content, now is the time to back up your books.

Starting on Wednesday, Feb. 26, readers will no longer be able to download Kindle e-books to a computer, where you can convert the file from Amazon’s proprietary, Kindle-specific .AZW3 to a different format for a non-Kindle e-reader. Once this feature has been eliminated, Kindle e-books can only be transferred to a Kindle device via a wifi or cellular connection or accessed via the Kindle app or Kindle for web.

While users who read primarily in the Kindle app or on a Kindle device may not miss this feature, its loss does make it impossible to convert Kindle books to be compatible with other e-readers or to share them. Plus, if Amazon removes a title you’ve purchased or loses the license to it in the future, you won’t have access to it.

How to download and save your Kindle books

To download your Kindle books to your computer now, sign into your Amazon account and go to Accounts & Lists > Content Library > Book. Find the book you want to download from the list, open the More actions menu to the right, and select Download & transfer via USB.

The pop-up window will alert you to the impending doom of the USB download with the following message: “Starting February 26, 2025, the ‘Download & Transfer via USB’ option will no longer be available. You can still send Kindle books to your Wi-Fi enabled devices by selecting the ‘Deliver or Remove from Device’ option.”

Until then, you can select your device and hit Download, which will save the file to your computer as a .AZW3 file. Unfortunately, there’s no bulk download option, so you’ll have to go one by one.

You can then transfer books to your Kindle by connecting it using your USB cord and copying the file to the Kindle drive that appears on your desktop. Alternatively, you can convert it to other formats (like PDF) for reading on other devices via a tool like CloudConvert.

‘Fix Me a Plate’ Is the Cookbook You Need for Hearty Meals

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Welcome to “Cookbook of the Week.” This is a series where I highlight cookbooks that are unique, easy to use, or just special to me. While finding a particular recipe online serves a quick purpose, flipping through a truly excellent cookbook has a magic all its own. 

I’ve reached a state of eating that I shall call “Deep Winter.” I know there are much colder environments in the world, but my weak New York City constitution makes it impossible to have fun out in the 20-degree weather. I prefer to stay indoors, comment on the snow like a Progressive commercial, and cook hot comfort food. If you share any of these inclinations, I’ve got a great cookbook for you: Fix Me a Plate

A bit about the book

Fix Me a Plate is a collection of soul food recipes, both traditionally prepared and dishes with a twist. This cookbook comes to us from chef Scotty Scott, and was published in 2022. It reads as much like a cookbook as it does a personal account of how Scott came to be a chef and his family history with some dishes. I know personal stories are meant to “hook” us, but dammit, it just works. I’m hooked. Probably because we all have some special history with different meals, and many of us can relate to the feeling of choosing one career path and realizing later that maybe we should be feeding our creative side. 

This book has 60 recipes, from side dishes to sweets, and each one is written with a refreshing dose of Scott’s personality. Many cookbooks take on the air of something official, or the wisened scientific approach. I love that, and there’s a place for that. But cooking is also a joyous activity that you can mess with. Fix Me a Plate is fun to read, and it feels like a friend is teaching you their recipes. There’s space for substitutions and wiggle room with spices. It’s like when the boss is out of work for the day: You get your work done, but you can talk to your buddy for a little longer too. 

A great cookbook for hearty eats

Every recipe in this book looks like I could just nestle in its arms and fall asleep—from the Chicken and Brown Butter Sweet Potato Waffles to Slow and Low Red Beans and Rice. This is not a “diet” cookbook. There isn’t a leafy green salad in sight. There’s nothing dainty in here, and I like it. 

The last thing I want right now is a light meal that leaves me searching for a snack 20 minutes later. This is the cookbook you grab when your family is grumpy or your weekend getaway plans get ruined. It’s the one you reach for when you have something or someone to celebrate or, heck, when you just want to feel full. It works for me in my current state of Deep Winter because all I seem to be craving are soups, stews, powerfully savory meats, beans, and saucy vegetables. Oh, and I almost forgot—carbs. Few things are as delicious to me as pasta, bread, grits, potatoes, or rice with some sort of gravy situation. Fix Me a Plate has it all. 

As an added benefit (and surely unexpected when it published in 2022), Scott doesn’t eat stand-alone eggs. You won’t be missing out on any breakfast scrambles, omelets, or quiche recipes in here because of skyrocketing egg prices. Of course, there are recipes where eggs are mixed in, but he keeps them to a minimum. (If you need other eggless breakfast ideas, read here.)

The dish I made this week

Polenta with shrimp and veggies on top.

Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

I have a bag of shrimp in my freezer this week, (it’s part of my cheap eats shopping list) so I settled on the Blackened Shrimp and Fried Polenta recipe from The Soul Remix chapter. It wasn’t the simplest of recipes I could have chosen—there are multiple components with the polenta, chopped veggies, and shrimp—but it was completely worth the effort. 

I appreciate how Scott organizes the ingredient list in separate sections if the recipe includes multiple parts, which they often do. Some cookbooks just have a long running list, but seeing what I need for the polenta separated from the shrimp component is less overwhelming. 

Many of the recipes, including this one, encourage you to take advantage of spices and small amounts of fresh and dried ingredients. The shrimp sauce uses a mixture of dried spices, dried herbs, aromatics, and shrimp stock—shrimp stock that Scott includes a recipe for in the Sauce and Spice section. I made my shrimp stock a little differently, but I did make it myself after shelling my shrimp, and what an incredible difference it made. Each ingredient intentionally layers flavors and aromas, so when you finally chow down, each bite boasts a robust depth of flavor. 

I had to stop myself from making the Southern Raised Biscuits with Spicy Sausage Cream Gravy (I had just made a loaf of Irish soda bread so I needed to focus), but it’s next on my list.

How to buy it

Fix Me a Plate is available in softcover online, or as an ebook for a great price. But you know me: I’d rather you go to a big, old, gloriously dusty bookstore. Support your local one when you can, even if it’s not dusty; let’s keep them in business. Check their shelves for this cookbook or see if they can order it to their location. 

The Echo Show 15 Is $100 Off Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

There are many options these days for smart products to keep our lives organized, like the Skylight Calendar and the Hearth Display, but they often come at a high price and with subscription fees. If you’re looking for a cheaper smart display option that is subscription-free, consider the 2021 Amazon Echo Show 15, which is $179.99 (originally $279.99) on Woot, its lowest price yet, according to price-tracking tools.

The device itself is new but it comes without a remote—but it’s not completely necessary, since it’s a touchscreen. (Remember, Woot only ships to the 48 contiguous states in the U.S. If you have Amazon Prime, you get free shipping; otherwise, it’ll be $6 to ship.)

The Echo Show 15 is a smart display that can mount to your wall, and like the name implies, it’s a 15-inch display. It works like an Alexa smart speaker but with a 1,920 by 1,080-pixel touchscreen. If you’re not looking to mount it, there is a stand you can buy separately.

The display uses Visual ID to scan your face with the front-facing 5MP camera to show you personalized calendars, reminders, to-do lists, and recommendations to everyone in your household who makes an account.

The camera and audio on the Show 15 are underwhelming, according to PCMag’s “good” review. You can use it to show photos when not in use, or more practical uses like showing the weather, calendars, or whatever widget you think you’d be using the most.

There are better non-mounted smart displays from Amazon, but they come at a higher price. Also, be aware that Amazon will be hosting a major event on February 26 where it’s expected to announce new Amazon devices and an improved Alexa. But if you want a smart display to mount on your wall at a low price, this is still a good deal.

Nine Tricks That Make Painting Any Room a Lot Easier

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Paint is among the cheapest of home renovations—it freshens things, covers old chips and scratches, and it can make your whole house feel brand new in just a few days. Even if you hire someone to paint a room, the cost isn’t entirely prohibitive—between $350 and $850, on average, per room. That’s pretty cheap compared to other renovation projects, but it’s still a chunk of change. Since painting is generally within most people’s DIY skill set, a lot of folks decide to set aside a weekend, buy some painter’s tape, and tackle the job themselves. If that’s you, here are some tips to make the job a little easier.

Liquid masking tape

If you’re painting a room with windows or any other glass features, you know the pure tedium of applying traditional painter’s tape around the edges of the glass (plus the tedium of having to scrape paint off the glass anyway because you got sloppy). That’s where liquid masking tape comes into play: You slather this stuff on your windows (you don’t need to worry about getting it on the trim, because it will act as a primer coating on anything that’s not glass), let it dry, then slather your paint on, let that dry, then just peel the masking tape off like a plastic film. As you can see here, it works like a charm and will save you a lot of time.

Catch drips

Painting a ceiling? Sorry to hear that—be prepared to emerge absolutely drenched in paint as it drips down on you, and you’d better have a sturdy drop cloth over everything in the room.

That is, unless you use an inverted umbrella. This might sound silly, but it actually works—poke a hole in an umbrella, push your paint roller handle through, seal it up with tape, and proceed to paint the ceiling. The umbrella will catch all the paint drips, and you can safely paint the whole ceiling without worrying about spending the next day scraping tiny drops of paint off of every surface. Pro tip: Buy a cheap clear plastic umbrella so you can actually see what you’re doing. Alternatively, a clear plastic paint tray liner can do the same job with less bulk to maneuver.

A dirty paint tray

You may have been advised at some point to line your paint tray, either with a cheap plastic liner or any plastic bag you have lying around (or even aluminum foil). Yes, that spares you a lot of cleanup—but the real hack is to just not clean your paint tray at all. Drain excess paint back into the can, then just let your tray dry out. A layer of old paint won’t affect the tray’s usefulness.

The cardboard method

Painting floor trim can be a real challenge. You can either spend a lot of time applying painter’s tape all around the edge of the room to protect the floor, or you can try to spread a drop cloth near the trim—but drop cloths will always get in the way of your brush or roller, and have a tendency to shift away from the wall just when you need it to protect everything.

Instead, use a piece of cardboard (or other thin, impermeable material, like a plastic sheet). Insert the sheet into the gap between the wall or trim and the floor, paint that section with wild abandon, then slide the sheet forward and paint the next section. The sheet protects the floor, you get paint all the way to the edge, and you didn’t spend the last hour putting down and endlessly adjusting tape.

Petroleum jelly

When it comes to painting around fixtures and hardware like doorknobs, it’s best to either remove them completely or mask them well with tape. But if you want to avoid that or you have small areas you want to avoid painting—screws, for example—where dabbing a tiny square of painter’s tape is both annoying and ineffective, you have an alternative: Use some petroleum jelly. Dab a bit onto the spot you want to skip painting and any paint that accidentally gets on it will just wipe away when everything’s dried.

Paint pens

Whether touching up a spot you missed or correcting a mistake, any spot in your room that requires a very fine paint line (like around a wall plate or fixture you can’t or simply don’t want to remove) can be incredibly challenging for even the smallest brush. That’s where a paint pen comes in. These refillable devices make it super easy to get into tight spaces and do quick touch-ups without having to tape the whole area off and try to awkwardly angle a brush. Inspect your work the next day and fill in any thin spots right away, with zero extra prep.

Gloves and socks

If you’ve ever painted stair balusters or furniture legs, you know it’s a pain to get good coverage all around with a brush. So, skip the brush: Put on a nitrite glove, pull an old sock over that, dip into your paint can, and just grab whatever it is you’re trying to paint with your hand. This technique is a lot faster when painting any kind of oddly-shaped element, because your hand is a lot more flexible and dexterous than a paintbrush or roller.

Radiator brushes and paint pads

Trying to paint behind something you’d really rather not remove, like a radiator or toilet? You can get in as close as you can and hope the blank spot behind it isn’t noticeable, or you could buy a specific tool like a radiator brush or a paint pad that allows you to easily and quickly paint the area behind these fixtures—no removal necessary.

Caulk

Getting crisp, clean lines with painter’s tape sometimes seems like an impossible task. There’s always some element of bleed-through that needs to be cleaned up when the tape is peeled away. But you can avoid this and guarantee sharp lines with something called Back Caulking:

  • Leave a thin space between the edge of your tape and the wall—about the thickness of a dime.

  • Fill that space with a thin bead of caulk.

  • Smooth the bead with your finger and/or a damp cloth as you would with any caulking job.

  • Let paint dry, remove painter’s tape.

Ta-da! Perfect lines.

The Six Best Methods for Paying Off Credit Card Debt

The average balance per consumer now stands at $6,580—up 3.5% year over year, according to a recent report from TransUnion. Altogether, consumers owe a record $1.21 trillion on their credit cards, according to a separate report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. If you’re struggling with credit card debt, it’s safe to say you’re not struggling alone.

Carrying a growing balance on high-interest credit cards can put a huge financial strain on your monthly budget. Whether it’s an unexpected expense—like a car repair or medical bill—or you’re going through a period of reduced income, being saddled with credit card debt can make it feel impossible to get ahead financially. If you’re struggling to make a dent in your credit card debt, here are some of the best ways to create a plan to become debt-free once and for all.

The debt snowball method

The debt snowball method focuses on paying off your debts in order of smallest balance to largest. You make minimum payments on every debt except the smallest, where you pay as much extra as possible until it’s paid off. The idea is that getting “wins” by paying off smaller debts quickly can provide much-needed motivation to keep going. However, this method typically results in paying more in interest over time. Here’s my guide to deciding if the debt snowball is right for you.

The debt avalanche method

Compared to the snowball method, the avalanche method involves listing out all your debts from highest interest rate to lowest interest rate. You make minimum payments on every debt except the highest interest rate one, where you throw all extra money until it’s paid off. This is the fastest mathematical way to get out of debt while paying the least amount of interest charges. This can be especially helpful if you have one or two debts with significantly higher interest rates than the others. The downside is you may not see entire debts paid off for a while, which may sap a bit of your motivation.

The debt snowball method is often recommended for individuals who need the psychological motivation of quick wins to stay motivated in their debt repayment journey. The debt avalanche method, on the other hand, is considered the most cost-effective approach from a pure numbers perspective, as it minimizes the amount of interest paid over time.

Debt consolidation loan

Debt consolidation can look like an easy solution if you have multiple loans or credit cards and are struggling to keep up with all the separate payments. Taking out one loan with a lower interest rate to pay off all your credit card balances at once can streamline the repayment process to a single payment.

You may qualify for a much better interest rate than your cards through a bank, credit union, or online lender with a debt consolidation loan or personal loan. Balance transfer credit cards that offer 0% interest for 12-18 months can provide breathing room if you can pay off the full balance during that period—more on that below. But first, keep in mind: Debt consolidation loans aren’t necessary in many cases. At the end of the day, debt consolidation loans are financial products, which means financial institutions wouldn’t offer them to you if they didn’t make money from them.

Balance transfer

With a balance transfer, you move your existing credit card balance(s) over to a new credit card that offers an introductory 0% APR promotion for a set period of time, usually 12-18 months. If executed properly, you can use those months to aggressively pay down the debt without accruing additional interest charges. The key is to have a plan to pay off as much of the balance as possible before the 0% APR period expires. Many balance transfer cards charge a 3-5% fee on the amount transferred, but this is usually still less expensive than the interest you’d pay without the transfer. Here are some of the best balance transfer credit cards to explore.

Debt management plan

If you’re having trouble managing payments to multiple creditors, consider reaching out to a non-profit credit counseling agency. A qualified (crucially, non-profit) credit counseling agency will give you free debt analysis. And by law, they must serve your best interests and recommend a debt solution that works for you, not them. They can put you on a debt management plan where they negotiate with your creditors for lower interest rates and fees. All the money you pay goes directly toward your debts, but there may be costs to use such a program. There’s often a setup fee of up to $75 and an ongoing monthly fee of between $25 and $75. Look into qualified non-profit credit counseling agencies here.

Borrowing from friends and family

Now, I’m not suggesting you create an untenable—not to mention uncomfortable—situation with your loved ones. But if your circumstances allow, one option to avoid high interest rates is borrowing money interest-free from a loved one. If exploring this route, be sure to clearly document the repayment terms and amounts in writing to protect the personal relationship.

No matter which method you choose, review your full financial situation and make a plan you can stick with until you’re debt free. Seeking professional guidance can help determine the right debt repayment strategy for your unique circumstances.

I Tested Grok 3, and It’s Not Worth the Price Hike

Earlier this week, xAI released Grok 3, the company’s most advanced AI yet, complete with a reasoning model and a DeepSearch feature. The company claims that it’s the “world’s smartest AI,” and Elon himself says it’s “outperforming anything that’s been released” so far. But is it really the “maximally truth-seeking AI” Musk says it is?

Well, to spoil it for you, no. Not yet. Which is a shame, because Grok is expensive— beyond a limited free trial, it requires either a $40/month X Premium+ subscription, up from $22 thanks to the new model, or a $30/month SuperGrok subscription.

From both my testing as well as experiments from experts, I’m having trouble believing the “based” AI is worth that cost. There is no next-generation breakthrough or groundbreaking reasoning model that we haven’t already seen before here. Grok 3 also still periodically hallucinates, like any other AI model out there, but that’s not to say it hasn’t improved.

In X’s own benchmark tests, Grok 3 is beating basically every model out there except OpenAI’s upcoming o3 model. But from a user standpoint, an AI app goes way beyond benchmarks.

A good AI chatbot is a mature, well-rounded product. Having spent my own money to test this out, I just don’t feel like I’m getting that here, especially when the competition offers similar or even better products for much less.

Grok 3 has technically caught up

It’s best to leave Elon’s outlandish claims aside when evaluating Grok 3. Seeing it objectively, it’s impressive that Grok 3 has caught up to being on the frontier of AI power, and surprisingly quickly (Grok 2 was never in the big leagues).

Grok 3 was trained using 200,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs, and uses more than 10 times the compute as Grok 2. All that power means gains. Grok 3 is now quite fast, and plenty usable for regular day-to-day tasks. The regular responses are quick, though the Think feature (which gives slightly more detailed responses) regularly takes around 2 minutes to come back with an answer, so be prepared to wait it out.

Plus, it can do deep research using web sources, and has a specific reasoning model, too. That means it can spit out lengthy reports and break prompts down into step-by-step processes so it can self correct. OpenAI’s o3 model, set to release in full soon, still surpasses Grok 3 in benchmarks, but it’s a significant improvement over its predecessor.

But while the charts say Grok 3 is supposed to outperform ChatGPT, Gemini, and Sonnet in compute-heavy tasks related to math, science, and coding, initial reports from experts don’t exactly encourage confidence.

For instance, X user, AI CEO, and YouTuber Theo Browne compared responses to a coding challenge between Grok 3, o3-mini, and Claude 3.5 sonnet, and Grok 3 performed quite miserably, failing to run without bugs for more than a few seconds.

Andrej Karpathy, previously a director of AI at Tesla, conversely said that Grok 3 performed quite well in his testing, but that its skills lay somewhere in between DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI’s o1-pro. Certainly not class-leading, and nothing that you can’t already do with existing tools.

But one test, even a couple of them, can’t really determine how an AI model performs. I did have some luck with it myself, but mostly for more lightweight tasks. It can be helpful when researching which new air purifier to buy, for example, or when casually learning about a new subject. But that’s not exactly something I’m willing to bust open my wallet for.

Grok isn’t “based,” it’s actually quite boring

Before Grok 3 launched, Musk made a big deal about how “based” it is. If you don’t know what based means (lucky you), it’s a slang term for, essentially, sharing your opinion without regard for others. As an example, Musk shared a screenshot showing a provocative response from Grok where it called tech publication The Information “garbage”, among other insults.

But when I asked the same question, it came back with a nuanced, balanced response, not calling out The Information for much of anything. The only criticism it had was that the website “can sometimes feel a bit niche or overly Silicon Valley-centric” and “Bias-wise, it leans pragmatic rather than ideological”. That’s a pretty timid take, if you ask me.

Grok response for The Information.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

I got similar results in other tests. Grok wouldn’t take a side in the Justin Baldoni vs. Blake Lively lawsuit. And when I asked a political question like “Why did Kamala Harris lose the US presidential election,” I got an equally subdued answer, citing “economic frustrations.” Reporting from Axios is matching what I’ve found, too.

Grok response in Justin Baldoni vs Blake Lively saga.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Maybe Grok dialing back Elon’s eccentricities is a good thing, but it certainly isn’t what its master says it is.Instead, it again looks a lot like the competition.

Testing DeepSearch in Grok 3.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

When it comes to DeepSearch, Grok’s report generating tool works quite similarly to Perplexity’s newly launched, mostly free Deep Research feature. As a humble tech journalist, this is something that I was able to test myself. I ran two queries, one for a trip that my family is planning for the end of the year, and one for an urban hybrid bike.

Prompt in Grok for travel planning.
My detailed travel planning prompt for Grok DeepSearch.
Credit: Khamosh Pathak

In both cases, Perplexity AI did slightly better than Grok on most tasks. With the travel question, I got essentially the same itinerary from both products, but Perplexity AI did a better job at formatting.

Travel planning in Perplexity.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Grok did go above and beyond recommending other options in southern India, something that Perplexity just provided follow-up questions for. So, I have to give it props there.

Travel planning in Grok.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

When it came to shopping research, though, Grok screwed up with the top product recommendation. The product that it suggested just isn’t available in India, where I live, and the other options just aren’t want I was looking for.

Comparison table in Grok.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Perplexity AI, meanwhile, surprised me with its top pick, something that I didn’t know about that checks off most of my boxes. Its other options were also interesting, and it did not include anything that isn’t available in India. Both Grok and Perplexity did a good job of explaining what I should look for when buying an urban bike, so equal points there, but the latter was just much more usable.

Product options in Perplexity AI.

Credit: Khamosh Pathak

Based on my testing, I feel like Perplexity AI still has an edge over Grok 3 when it comes to Deep Research that’s actually useful to the average person. Whether it’s planning a trip, shopping research, or understanding news or concepts, Perplexity does a more nuanced job. When it comes to sheer speed, Grok is faster and isn’t afraid to provide links in the text itself, but in Perplexity, clicking linked text actually expands on the subject in the report.

Perplexity also has more export options. You can download your report as a PDF, in Markdown, or create a shareable page (here’s my report for the urban cycle research if you’re interested). In Grok, all you can do is copy the text.

What does all that mean? Well, while Grok is certainly usable, it’s a bit disappointing to see its paid offering fail to keep up with a free alternative. That’s something I feel I keep bumping into here.

Grok 3 isn’t worth the price of admission

Right now, we are in the middle of the Grok 3 hype cycle. Grok 3 itself is improving every day, but as things stand, there’s no need for you to run out and cancel your ChatGPT Plus or Perplexity Pro subscriptions. In many ways, Grok is good, just not that good.

If you want, you can temporarily try out Grok 3 for free, as X is allowing limited free access until its servers can’t handle the load. When that period will end? Who knows. According to Musk’s X account, it’ll only be free for a “short time.”

Additionally, aside from model performance, Grok 3 also lacks some of the features of a more established AI app. There’s no voice mode, and all you have access to right now is the full Grok 3 model. The faster Grok 3 mini is still to be released, and there’s no API for Grok 3, either.

When you consider the pricing for full access, Grok 3 makes even less sense. $40 a month for the X Premium+ plan is double the industry standard of $20 for Gemini Advanced, ChatGPT Plus, and Perplexity Pro. And once that free trial period is over, the expensive X Premium+ plan will be the only way to access Grok 3 until the $30 SuperGrok subscription goes live for everyone (the SuperGrok plan only provides you with access to Grok 3, but none of the premium X features).

And as it stands, you aren’t really getting double the money’s worth. In fact, in a lot of cases, you can get by using a free model like DeepSeek R1 instead (though, you might have a better experience using it through a third-party app).