Justin Wheeler writes, on Fedora
Magazine, that Fedora is now available in Syria once again:
Last week, the Fedora Infrastructure Team lifted
the IP range block on IP addresses in Syria. This action restores
download access to Fedora Linux deliverables, such as ISOs. It also
restores access from Syria to Fedora Linux RPM repositories, the
Fedora Account System, and Fedora build systems. Users can now access
the various applications and services that make up the Fedora
Project. This change follows a recent update to the Fedora Export
Control Policy. Today, anyone connecting to the public Internet from
Syria should once again be able to access Fedora.
[…] Opening the firewall to Syria took seconds. However, months of
conversations and hidden work occurred behind the scenes to make this
happen.
NZXT has launched a compact prebuilt gaming PC that it’s calling the H2 Mini PC, and you have a choice between an AMD or Intel foundation with both setups carrying the same price tag. Despite it’s name, the system falls more into the small form factor (SFF) category than a traditional mini PC though it’s certainly a smaller setup measuring
Early every year, Google releases a budget-oriented a-series phone that acts like a stripped down version of its latest mainline Pixel phone. The Pixel 9a, for instance, had the same chip as the Pixel 9, reduced memory and camera specs, and most importantly, a slimmed down design that finally ditched the obtrusive camera bar. The Pixel 10a, announced today, is a bit of an outlier. Instead of upgrading to the same chip as the Pixel 10, it also has the same chip as the Pixel 9, with only slight improvements to everything else that was already in the Pixel 9a. So, is it worth an upgrade?
The Pixel 10a’s specs
The Pixel 10a’s specs are, on paper, nearly identical to the Pixel 9a’s. Both phones have a Tensor G4 processor, 8GB of RAM, and up to 256GB of storage. They also have the same camera system, with a 48MP main lens, a 13MP ultrawide lens, and a 13MP selfie camera. Battery life also sits at the same promised 30+ hours, with a typical 5,100 mAh capacity. The only real difference on paper is that the 6.3-inch screen is a little brighter, with up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness instead of 2,700. The bezels are also supposed to look about 10% thinner, although I needed to be told that to spot it during a hands-on session with the Pixel 10a.
Even the Pixel 10’s MagSafe-like Pixelsnap feature is gone, meaning you won’t be able to use this phone with any magnetic accessories, at least without adhesive magnets or special third-party cases.
Google Pixel 10a (left) vs. Google Pixel 9a (right) Credit: Michelle Ehrhardt
That said, there are a few changes to the hardware, notably to the look of the phone. Like the Pixel 9a, the Pixel 10a also ditches the camera bar, and evolves on Google’s last budget model for a completely flat back. That means the rear camera has no bump or lip to it at all, for a completely flush and seamless feel. It’s definitely clean, but the 9a’s miniscule camera bump was already barely an inconvenience back when I reviewed it.
Meanwhile, you’d need to be told about the other design upgrades to appreciate them. Google says the Pixel 10a has improved Corning Gorilla Glass 7i cover glass so that it’s more resilient to drops and scratches, but I couldn’t test that while carefully handling the company’s demo units.
Essentially, when looking at raw specs, the Pixel 10a comes across at first less like a stripped down version of the Pixel 10, and more like another iteration of the Pixel 9. But Google’s hoping its software can win you over.
Pixel 10a AI camera features and satellite SOS
The Pixel 10a does differ from the Pixel 9a when it comes to AI, and introduces two AI camera features that debuted on the main-series Pixel 10. These are Auto Best Take and Camera Coach, although one of them is also an iteration on something that came out alongside the Pixel 8.
That would be Auto Best Take. Essentially, what this does is detect when you’re in a group shot with other people, then take up to 150 frames all in one press. It’ll then intelligently find the best shot from those frames and ditch the rest, and if it can’t find a good shot, it’ll stitch together elements from multiple shots so that everyone has their eyes open. You will know when a shot has been stitched together using Auto Best Take (it’ll have a Gemini icon), and can choose to use a non-AI assisted one if you prefer. The ability to stitch together photos is a few generations behind at this point, but not having to choose when to load it up is convenient, if you’re into AI-generated photos.
If you’re not, Camera Coach lets you get some AI assistance in your photos without actually having AI in your shots. Essentially, this will look through your camera for you, generate an ideal shot for you to take, then guide you through the real-world steps you need to follow to recreate it. You’re essentially handing off the ideation part of photography to Gemini, but you also won’t have to risk any hallucinations popping up in your pics.
Credit: Michelle Ehrhardt
Aside from new photography features, you’ve also got Satellite SOS for the first time on an a-series phone. This lets you connect to a Satellite if you’re away from wifi or your mobile network, so you can ping emergency services for help if you need it. Hopefully, you’ll never actually have to use this feature, but it is some great piece of mind.
Is the Pixel 10a worth it?
Like the Pixel 9a, the Pixel 10a is $500, so if you’re trying to choose between the two and aren’t buying a 9a at a discount secondhand, it’s a no-brainer. It does also have a new selection of colors, including a poppy red “berry” look and a purplish blue hue named Lavender.
Google Pixel 10a in Berry Credit: Michelle Ehrhardt
But if you’ve already got a Pixel 9a and are eyeing an upgrade, it’s a bit harder to justify. The biggest new additions are all software, and Google has already brought previously Pixel 10-exclusive software to older phones before (although with mixed results). That means the 9a is likely to stay relevant for a good few more years, and may actually eventually have all the same features as the 10a, minus that completely flush back.
The standard Pixel 10 series is also likely to remain a good choice. Back when I reviewed it, I thought the 9a was better than the Pixel 9, but since the 10a doesn’t even have the same chip as the regular Pixel 10, it’s much less likely to be able to stand in for it, however clean it looks.
If that doesn’t deter you, though, you can pre-order the Pixel 10a now on Google’s website, with models set to ship out and hit retail stores on March 5.
It’s that time of year—a new budget Pixel phone is about to hit virtual shelves. The Pixel 10a will be available on March 5, and pre-orders go live today. The 9a will still be on sale for a while, but the 10a will be headlining Google’s store. However, you might not notice unless you keep up with the Pixel numbering scheme. This year’s A-series Pixel is virtually identical to last year’s, both inside and out.
Last year’s Pixel 9a was a notable departure from the older design language, but Google made few changes for 2026. We liked that the Pixel 9a emphasized battery capacity and moved to a flat camera bump, and this time, it’s really flat. Google says the camera now sits totally flush with the back panel. This is probably the only change you’ll be able to identify visually.
5,100 mAh, 23 W wired charging, 7.5 W wireless charging
5,100 mAh, 30 W wired charging, 10 W wireless charging
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 6e, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, sub-6 GHz 5G, USB-C 3.2
Wi-Fi 6e, NFC, Bluetooth 6.0, sub-6 GHz 5G, USB-C 3.2
Measurements
154.7×73.3×8.9 mm; 185 g
153.9×73×9 mm; 183 g
Google also says the new Pixel will have a slightly upgraded screen. The resolution, size, and refresh rate are unchanged, but peak brightness has been bumped from 2,700 nits to 3,000 nits (the same as the base model Pixel 10). Plus, the cover glass has finally moved beyond Gorilla Glass 3 to Gorilla Glass 7i, which supposedly has improved scratch and drop protection.
Now that pre-orders are open for the Google Pixel 10a, it’s time to see how it stacks up against last year’s Pixel 9a. At first glance, the two phones look very similar, and that’s not a bad thing. Google hasn’t tried to reinvent its budget-friendly formula this year, sticking to the same compact design, clean software experience and camera-first approach that made the 9a such a good value.
Both phones share a lot in common, including 120Hz OLED displays, Google’s Tensor G4 chip, strong computational photography and seven years of OS and security updates. The actual differences are more incremental, including a moderately brighter, tougher display, improved Extreme Battery Saver longevity, slightly faster wireless charging and the addition of Satellite SOS. Importantly, Google is keeping the starting price the same as before, with both phones coming in at $499.
On paper, the Pixel 10a doesn’t dramatically rethink what an affordable Pixel should be, but it does offer meaningful upgrades for the same price. While we wait for a review unit to evaluate the Pixel 10a’s day-to-day performance, here’s a quick comparison of the spec sheets of the two devices to see what the new model brings.
Pixel 10a vs Pixel 9a: Design and display
There’s very little separating these two on performance. Both the Pixel 9a and Pixel 10a run Google’s Tensor G4 chip with 8GB of RAM and the same storage options, so day-to-day speed should feel virtually identical. The Pixel 10a ships with Android 16 out of the box, though the 9a can be updated to the same version.
Off the bat, the Pixel 10a doesn’t look dramatically different from the Pixel 9a, and that appears to be intentional. Google is sticking with the same compact, no-frills approach from the last few A-series Pixels, so you’re still getting a 6.3-inch OLED panel with a smooth 60–120Hz refresh rate and a clean, understated aesthetic.
The meaningful changes show up once you dig into the display specs. The Pixel 10a upgrades the cover glass from Corning Gorilla Glass 3 to Gorilla Glass 7i, which should offer better durability against drops and scratches over time. Brightness also gets a noticeable bump. The 9a topped out at 1,800 nits for HDR content and 2,700 nits at peak, while the 10a pushes that to 2,000 nits for HDR and up to 3,000 nits at peak brightness. In practice, that should make the Pixel 10a easier to read outdoors and a bit punchier when watching HDR video.
Contrast is improved as well. The Pixel 10a’s panel is rated at a contrast ratio of more than 2,000,000:1, doubling the already respectable figure on the Pixel 9a. That won’t radically change how the phone looks day to day, but it should translate to deeper blacks and slightly more depth in darker scenes, especially when streaming video or browsing photos at night.
Pixel 10a vs Pixel 9a: Cameras
On paper, the Pixel 10a’s camera hardware looks very familiar. Like the Pixel 9a, it uses a 48-megapixel main camera paired with a 13MP ultra-wide, and there’s no dedicated telephoto lens. Image quality, color science and low-light performance should therefore be similar between the two.
Where the Pixel 10a pulls ahead is in software features. Google has added a few camera tools that aren’t available on the Pixel 9a, even though the underlying hardware hasn’t changed much. One of those is Camera Coach, which debuted on last year’s Pixel 10 series and offers on-screen tips to help you frame shots better or adjust how you’re holding the phone. The Pixel 10a also gains Macro Focus, allowing you to get much closer to small subjects like plants or textures. In our Pixel 9a review, we found the phone could capture solid close-up detail, but locking focus could be finicky at times, so a more dedicated macro mode should make those shots easier to nail.
Finally, there’s Auto Best Take, which automatically picks the best expressions from a burst of photos and combines them into a single image. The feature debuted on Google’s Pixel 10 lineup last year, and it’s especially handy for group shots where someone always seems to blink at the wrong moment. By bringing it to the 10a, Google is extending one of its more genuinely practical AI camera tricks to a cheaper phone.
Battery life and charging
Both the Pixel 9a and Pixel 10a use a 5,100mAh battery and support the same 23W wired charging speeds. Where the Pixel 10a does pull ahead slightly is wireless charging. The Pixel 9a tops out at 7.5W, while the Pixel 10a supports wireless charging at up to 10W when used with Qi-certified Extended Power Profile (EPP) chargers, which are designed to deliver faster wireless power than basic Qi pads. The difference isn’t dramatic, but the Pixel 10a should charge a bit quicker on a compatible wireless stand when you’re in a pinch.
You’ll also get some extra hours in dire situations. When you activate Extreme Battery Saver, the Pixel 9a is rated for up to 100 hours, while the Pixel 10a extends that to up to 120 hours.
The Pixel 10a gets Satellite SOS
The biggest safety-related upgrade on the Pixel 10a is the addition of Satellite SOS. Because it uses a newer modem compared to the Pixel 9a’s Exynos Modem 5300, it is capable of tapping satellite networks when necessary. This allows the phone to contact emergency services when you’re outside of cellular or Wi-Fi coverage, which can be genuinely useful if you spend time hiking, traveling or driving in remote areas.
If you already own a Pixel 9a, there doesn’t appear to be a huge reason to upgrade. Day-to-day performance may feel almost identical, since both phones use the same Tensor G4 chip, the same amount of RAM and very similar camera hardware.
That said, the Pixel 10a does make a stronger case for first-time buyers or anyone upgrading from an older Pixel. The biggest differentiator, though, is Satellite SOS — it’s the one feature the Pixel 9a simply can’t match due to hardware limitations. At the same $499 starting price, the Pixel 10a is, on paper, the better long-term buy if you’re choosing between the two today.
Google Pixel 10a vs. Google Pixel 9a: Specs at a glance
Spec
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 9a
Price
$499
$499
Processor
Google Tensor G4, Titan M2 coprocessor
Google Tensor G4, Titan M2 coprocessor
Display
6.3-inch Actua display, 1080 x 2424 pOLED at 422.2 PPI, Gorilla Glass 7i
6.3-inch Actua display, 1080 x 2424 pOLED at 422.2 PPI, Corning Gorilla Glass 3
RAM
8GB
8GB
Storage
128GB, 256GB
128GB, 256GB
Battery
5,100mAh
5,100mAh
Wireless charging
Up to 10W
Up to 7.5W
Rear camera
48MP wide, 13MP ultrawide, Super Res Zoom up to 8x
48MP wide, 13MP ultrawide, Super Res Zoom up to 8x
Front camera
13MP selfie cam
13MP selfie cam
SIM
Dual SIM (single nano SIM, eSIM)
Dual SIM (single nano SIM, eSIM)
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth v6, NFC
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth v5.3, NFC
OS
Launch with Android 16
Launch with Android 15
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/google-pixel-10a-vs-pixel-9a-whats-changed-and-which-one-should-you-buy-150000786.html?src=rss
Google debuted the Pixel 10a phone today. Pre-orders are open now and the smartphone will be available starting March 5. Although it’s the new 2026 addition to the A series lineup, the Pixel 10a invites many comparisons with last year’s Pixel 9a. For starters, the price is identical at $499.
Design-wise, not much as changed. The back of the phone can lay flat, which has become a hallmark of the Pixel A collection, rather than wobbling around on a bulky camera housing. The screen is still 6.3 inches with an Actua display. The phone’s insides are also the same; the 10a comes with the same Tensor G4 chip and 8GB of RAM as its predecessor, and buyers have the option to upgrade to either 128GB or 256GB of storage. The phone has an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance and its display uses Corning Gorilla Glass 7i.
One of the few areas where the 10a is getting a marked upgrade is on its battery. This version claims more than 30 hours of battery life, or up to 120 under the Extra Battery Saver mode. The 10a also brings the welcome addition of proper fast charging, where a compatible charger can get the device to 50 percent battery in about 30 minutes. This addresses one of the few complaints we had about the 9a.
For the photo buffs, the Pixel 10a has a 48MP main camera and a 13MP ultrawide lens; again unchanged from the specs in the 9a. AI is also present in the new model’s photography suite, with the addition of the Camera Coach resource for the first time on the A series lineup. Camera Coach uses Gemini AI models to read the scene and offer tips on getting the desired shot. The 10a also has the Auto Best Take feature for getting everyone’s best side in a group shot and the Add Me tool that lets you insert yourself into a photo after the fact.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/googles-500-pixel-10a-smartphone-arrives-on-march-5-150000489.html?src=rss
Google’s A-series phones have offered some of the best value among midrange handsets for years, and after checking out the new Pixel 10a, I don’t see that trend stopping anytime soon.
Let’s start with the specs. Starting at just $499, you get a vivid 6.3-inch OLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate and 3,000 nits of peak brightness, 8GB of RAM and either 128GB or 256GB of onboard storage. The phone also features a durable aluminum frame along with a stronger Corning Gorilla Glass 7i panel in front and a composite plastic back with a lovely matte finish. As a nod towards sustainability, Google says the P10a’s chassis is made from 100 percent recycled material, while the rear panel comes in at 81 percent. And just like its predecessor, you still get an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance and the same battery capacity (5,100mAh) — except now it charges even faster, both wired (30 watts, up from 23) and wirelessly (10 watts, up from 5).
While lavender is the new hero color for the Pixel 10a, berry is the hue I’d pick.
Sam Rutherford for Engadget
The one place where the Pixel 10a might come up a touch short is that unlike its more expensive siblings, it features an older Tensor G4 processor instead of the Tensor G5 chip used on the main Pixel 10 line. Google says the decision to go with an older SoC is due to budget constraints. While it might not be the first choice for gamers or power users, I’ve never really had an issue with the day-to-day performance of Google’s recent homegrown silicon.
However, even with a one-year-old chip, Google found a way to port over three flagship features to the Pixel A series for the first time. Camera Coach uses AI to help you compose and come up with more interesting shots. Meanwhile, Auto Best Take is designed to ensure that everyone in a group shot ends up with their finest expression. Finally, Satellite SOS allows you to call for help during emergencies, even when you don’t have proper cell service.
Satellite SOS support is one of three new features coming to the Google’s A-series phones for the first time.
Sam Rutherford for Engadget
As for its cameras, the P10a looks to be using the same sensors as before, including a 48MP main camera, a 13MP ultra-wide and a 13MP selfie shooter in front. That might be a bummer for some, but considering that the Pixel 9a offered by far the best image quality of any phone in its price bracket, I’m not that bothered. Also, it’s quite likely that if Google had opted for new hardware, it may have pushed the phone above $500.
After seeing the positive response to the barely-there camera bump on its predecessor, Google leaned in and made the Pixel 10a’s rear camera module completely flat, and it’s my favorite thing about the phone. There’s no hump or protrusions to speak of, and when combined with the rest of the phone’s design, it results in a really sleek, minimalist look. Plus, after almost a decade of big and bulky camera warts on the back of phones, it’s just nice seeing the Pixel 10a go the opposite direction.
I really appreciate how Google double downed on feedback regarding the Pixel 9a’s tiny camera bump (left) by making the Pixel 10a’s camera (right) completely flat.
Sam Rutherford for Engadget
On the flipside, my biggest complaint about the P10a is that Google didn’t include Pixelsnap support (aka magnetic Qi2 compatibility). It’s another feature that got cut due to cost and it’s a real bummer because after introducing it on last year’s main Pixel 10 line, I was hoping that it would become a standard inclusion on all Google phones going forward. Thankfully, when I asked about the lack of Pixelsnap support, Google representatives were able to confirm that there will be third-party accessory makers such as Casefinite, Dbrand and Spigen that will offer cases with built-in magnetic rings, so anyone hoping to attach magnetic peripherals will still have an avenue to do so.
The Pixel 10a’s charging speeds have been improved to 30 watts for wired and 10 watts wirelessly.
Sam Rutherford for Engadget
Regardless, for Android phone owners who are in the market for a simple, no-nonsense upgrade that covers all the basics without breaking the bank, the Pixel 10a is looking like another top contender.
The Pixel 10a is available for pre-order today in lavender, berry, fog and obsidian with official sales slated for March 5.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/pixel-10a-hands-on-google-locks-down-the-midrange-phone-game-150000513.html?src=rss
Apple is reportedly accelerating the development of smart glasses, as the company is ostensibly making a shift toward AI-centric hardware.
According to a report from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple is ramping up development of its forthcoming smart glasses, which are slated to head into production as early as December 2026, with public release expected sometime in 2027.
Apple’s smart glasses are being positioned to compete with Meta and EssilorLuxottica’s most recent smart glasses, the report maintains.
While this mostly echoes previous reports from last October, Apple appears to be accelerating development, having recently distributed a broader set of glasses prototypes within its hardware engineering division.
According to an all-hands meeting with employees earlier this month, CEO Tim Cook supposedly also hinted that Apple would be pushing hard into AI devices, noting that the company was working on new “categories of products” centered around AI.
“We’re extremely excited about that,” Cook said in the internal meeting, saying “[t]he world is changing fast.”
Citing people familiar with Apple’s plans, the smart glasses (allegedly codenamed ‘N50’) are said to include two cameras: a high-resolution camera for photos and video, and another dedicated to computer vision tasks. The high quality onboard cameras and overall build quality are expected to set it apart from competing products, the report maintains.
Array of Meta smart glasses | Image courtesy Brad Lynch
Similar to Meta’s audio-only smart glasses though, Apple’s N50 hardware isn’t expected to include a display of any kind, instead relying on cameras, speakers and microphones for things such as phone calls, AI queries, listening to music, and capturing images.
Apple allegedly floated the idea of partnering with eyewear brands—similar to Meta’s partnership with EssilorLuxottica or Google’s partnership with Warby Parker and Gentle Monster—the company seems to have more recently decided on developing in-house designs, which are said to arrive in a variety of sizes and colors.
“Early prototypes of the glasses connect via a cable to a standalone battery pack and an iPhone, but newer versions have the components embedded in the frame,” Bloomberg reports. “The design uses high-end materials, including acrylic elements intended to give the glasses a premium feel. Apple is already discussing launching the device in additional styles over time.”
This comes as Apple is investing more heavily in AI in effort to better compete with Google and OpenAI, which comes part and parcel with a critical redesign of Siri. The report also maintains Apple is working on an AI-powered pendant and AirPods with expanded AI capabilities—all three of which will rely on visual input.
Notably, the report maintains that all three will rely on connection to iPhone. Apple did not respond to Bloomberg’s request for comment.
The setting and imagery of Ghost in the Shell is iconic by this point.
A futuristic, dystopian society where AI and cybernetic technology have transformed society into a militarized, oppressive surveillance state where the border between humanity and machine is blurred. The title, even, refers to the idea that a soul (‘the ghost’) could be uploaded and transferred into a mechanical shell, or flesh could be fused to transform the human. It’s an idea that has been used to comment on humanity’s relationship with technology, and, to mark thirty years since the first anime adaptation of the 1989 manga, a new art exhibition celebrating the franchise in its entirety has hit Tokyo.
But this isn’t any normal exhibition. It make sense that a franchise speculating about the future of technology would implement the cutting-edge aspects of this technology into even a showcase of the human artistry that went into its creation, but this Ghost in the Shell Exhibition has implemented AR technology using Xreal Air 2 Ultra to enhance the experience of exploring and understanding the artwork on display.
The series in every iteration follows members of Public Security Section 9, professionals separate to to the police that work at solving and preventing crime, typically with a cybercrime and counter-terrorist purpose. The crimes they encounter, and the personal stories that reverberate into the broader world, touch on corruption, surveillance, technological overreach and abuse and more. The Puppet Master, the antagonist of the original manga and first film, can hack and overtake cybernetic bodies, whereas the Laughing Man circumvents surveillance through hacked video feeds.
Conceptually, this is the first deep dive into the history of the entire franchise in a single exhibition, showcasing materials used in the production of not just early works but every series and film from the 1995 original all the way until the more recent Netflix-produced CG works, Arise, and an all-new preview for the all-new series from Science Saru premiering later this year. As such, original cels, storyboards, sketches and production materials from every series were on display, alongside newly-produced artworks from a range of creatives that explore questions on humanity, AI, technology and the human body posed by the franchise. An analogue look at a technological world, as original paper sketches are framed on walls and in glass panels.
In an opening room, you also had tall PCs with a digital interface to witness lines of dialogue, sketches, hear music, and more from across the franchise. In the main gallery featuring art from every series also sat a PC with digitized assets from every series to flick through at your leisure, a hard drive with a treasure trove of materials from the dense work of the series. Then you have the Xreal Air 2 Ultra AR device.
Their implementation at this exhibition is certainly unusual, one of the first examples in the world of AR glasses being used at an art exhibition in such a manner. While you could simplify their use as a more thematically-fitting audio guide like the listening devices available to rent at museums around the world, their use here was a bit more involved and interesting than such a simplistic summation. For a cost of 1500yen ($10) on top of your ticket, you will be given a pair of Xreal Air 2 Ultra glasses and a smartphone in a case to hold around your neck. After plugging the glasses into the phone, selecting your language between Japanese and English, and being instructed on how to use the device for the first time, you enter the exhibition.
Dotted around the floor of every room of the exhibition are special marks featuring Tachikoma, the cute blue robot from the series. Scanning these marks will trigger an AR scene superimposed over that room or area of the exhibition. The first marker, serving as an introduction to this enhanced walkthrough of the space, places Tachikoma inside the open-plan first room of the showcase in order to explain the franchise and the exhibition, featuring the machine voiced by its original voice actor, Sakiko Tamagawa.
These AR markings are primarily found in the next room, the main gallery space and centerpiece of the exhibition featuring original production sketches, cels and more each broken up by series or film. At the beginning of each entry in the franchise’s space within the showcase sits a large Tachikoma mark that you scan with the Xreal glasses, letting them know where you are in the space and triggering the enhancements related to that entry. Each begins with an introduction to that work by Tachikoma enhanced by video clips and audio from that movie or series, before light paths appear on the floor guiding you to specific sketches and cels on display on the show floor.
Scanning these will not only work as a story-driven runthrough of the story of that particular production, but provide production background and context to the work you’re seeing.
While functionally similar to an audio guide, the format using this technologically allows this guide to go further in expanding upon what visitors can understand about each piece on display. Highlighting specific works and provided overlayed video places these sketches within the context of the finished work for those less familiar with the animation production process, which can be eye-opening for anyone unaware of everything that goes into taking a work from page to screen.
Of course, it doesn’t do this for every sketch, but it’s easily possible to wander the floor and look at these assets at your own pace, then scan these enhanced works at any moment. Newly-produced artworks are placed alongside these original production materials that each lean into the themes of the series, leaving you with fresh perspectives to ponder as you bask in the world of Ghost in the Shell. One that particularly stood out to me was a human-sized doll in a box with a mirror for a face, reflecting the viewer as they stared at the piece. When humanity can be moved into a new shell to the point the flesh is unimportant, what is a body? What is human?
Considering the warnings the franchise has made about the convergence of technology and humanity in the wake of the potentially-ruining consequences of AI or technological overabundance, all while still recognizing the potential of these advancements, these artworks and even the use of XReal glasses felt fitting. Innocence, the second film by Mamoru Oshii, specifically dives into the AI question at some depth, which coincidentally is where this doll artwork was positioned in the event space.
Not all of these art pieces and technology-infused additions to the showcase felt fitting – moving from the warnings of Innocence regarding AI to the uncritical embrace of the technology via distorted Generative AI artwork was disappointing to witness in an exhibition celebrating human creativity. But most 0f these artworks and technological experiments enhanced the experience overall.
After viewing every series and film in order, the Xreal experience ends with an exclusive preview of Science Saru’s new series, alongside a brief original 30-second animation featuring Motoko evoking the imagery of the original film. Beyond the glasses implementation, the merchandise area featured collaborations with numerous artists and companies that also merged traditional methods with technological innovation. STYLY, an AR company, produced a fascinating traditional Japanese folding curtain that, when scanned with your phone’s camera, would render an animation of Motoko.
An embrace of technology to enhance the artistic display of 30 years of adaptations for this seminal manga series felt befitting of this unique exhibition, but the technological potential of this work goes far beyond Ghost in the Shell. The use of Xreal glasses here wasn’t perfect, but any issues spoke more to the currently limits of the technology than their implementation here. The field of view is still relatively limited with notable edges, and they’re difficult to use when also wearing glasses. They could occasionally desync, especially if you removed them from your face for any reason, and if this occurs the resync process is far from simple due to how locked-down these devices are for security reasons during this exhibition.
Still, I could imagine this technology finding great use in other showcases in future, even beyond ones where it’s thematically apt to use them like seen here. Classic museums have already embraced technology to provide context to artworks in the past: the Louvre used 3DS devices for a decade, and phone apps are commonplace. AR glasses give a visual enhancement not possible with a phone, however, making it an enhancing use-case for the technology which genuinely benefits the experience.
Regardless of if you do choose to rent the glasses, however, the Ghost in the Shell exhibition is more than worth your time if you care for the series. If you live in or visit Tokyo, the rare opportunity to see original sketches and cels from the franchise history is a real treat. The exhibition runs at Tokyo Node until April 5th.
The Battlefield-like 32-player VR FPS Forefront will see a “major update” and price increase later this month.
Triangle Factory, the maker of the popular 32-player Battlefield-inspired VR FPS Forefront, has announced that the price of their game will increase at the end of February, alongside what the team calls “a major update.”
The updated price has not been revealed, but Forefront is currently available on Meta Quest, Steam, and Pico, at a cost of $22.99.
Since launching in Early Access, Forefront has been well-supported by its makers, receiving several updates to add new maps and weapons, address balancing issues, provide graphics updates, and more.
I previously covered Forefront and found it to be an exciting and tense take on the Battlefield formula. The game’s combat is immersive, its VR gunplay is tactile and satisfying, and its dynamic environments are well-designed. While there were certainly a few small problems in that Early Access build, mostly due to weapon balance issues, on the whole, Forefront jumped ahead of every other multiplayer shooter I’ve played in VR. Its large-scale battlefields are hard to beat.
Polestar is gearing up to launch three new models in the next two years, including a station wagon (estate or shooting brake) version of the Polestar 4 that harkens back to the company’s Volvo roots. The Geely-owned Swedish company sold a record 61,000 EVs in 2025, but hopes that the new models will help it take an even bigger bite out of the market. “We want to get more volume out of a bigger cake,” CEO Michael Lohscheller said.
Polestar currently offers two models in the US, the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4, both SUVs. However, the new Polestar 4 will come in two variants, one a traditional SUV as before and the other a four-door wagon-type version that combines “the space of an estate and the versatility of an SUV,” Loscheller said. “It’s all the good things from the current car, but it’s a bit more practical.” This new model is due later this year and will be built in Busan, South Korea in order to avoid US tariffs on cars built in China.
The automaker is also planning to release a new version of the Polestar 2 targeted at young buyers, though that one is unlikely to come to the US. It will be slightly longer for more passenger space and be produced in China like the current model 2.
Polestar
Finally, the Polestar 7 will be a compact SUV in the same family as Volvo’s EX60, set to arrive in Europe to address the fast-growing compact SUV segment. “We are convinced that we can offer customers a progressive performance-driven car for a very attractive price point, built in Europe,” Lohscheller said.
The new models are designed to help Polestar hit its goal of 60 percent of EV sales worldwide by “targeting the big profit pools of the BEV segment,” Lohscheller stated. Following Polestar’s withdrawal from the hyper-competitive Chinese market, Europe accounts for 78 percent of its sales and the US most of the rest — but the company hopes to boost its fortunes in the latter. “People forget that the U.S. is a big EV market, especially on the east and west coasts,” the CEO added. “And it will stay a big market.”
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/polestar-unveils-a-station-wagon-version-of-the-4-144025505.html?src=rss
The Food and Drug Administration has reversed its decision on Moderna’s flu vaccine and has agreed to review it for possible approval, Moderna announced on Wednesday. From a report: Last week, the agency rejected Moderna’s application for review of a new flu vaccine, saying the company’s research design was flawed. But in subsequent discussions the company said that the agency had relented and agreed to begin a review.
Moderna said it split its application for the flu vaccine based on age, seeking a traditional approval for people 50 to 64 years old, and accelerated approval for those 65 and older. The company also said it agreed to conduct an additional study among those 65 and older once the vaccine reached the market. Moderna said on Wednesday that the F.D.A. set a deadline of August to decide whether to approve the vaccine. If it is authorized, it would be available for those older adults in the flu season that begins later this year.
The vaccine uses messenger RNA technology, which Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has repeatedly criticized as unsafe and ineffective. The mRNA approach, which instructs the body to produce a fragment of a virus that sets off an immune response, was widely successful in Covid vaccines and is considered generally safe by public health experts and scientists.
The Asahi Linux project, which is working to implement support for Linux on
Apple CPUs, has published a detailed 6.19
progress report.
We’ve made incredible progress upstreaming patches over the past 12
months. Our patch set has shrunk from 1232 patches with 6.13.8, to
858 as of 6.18.8. Our total delta in terms of lines of code has
also shrunk, from 95,000 lines to 83,000 lines for the same kernel
versions. Hmm, a 15% reduction in lines of code for a 30% reduction
in patches seems a bit wrong…
Not all patches are created equal. Some of the upstreamed patches
have been small fixes, others have been thousands of lines. All of
them, however, pale in comparison to the GPU driver.
The GPU driver is 21,000 lines by itself, discounting the
downstream Rust abstractions we are still carrying. It is almost
double the size of the DCP driver and thrice the size of the
ISP/webcam driver, its two closest rivals. And upstreaming work has
now begun.
Adam Harvey, on behalf of the crates.io
team has published a blog
post to inform users of a change in their practice of publishing
information about malicious Rust crates:
The crates.io team will no longer publish a blog post each time a
malicious crate is detected or reported. In the vast majority of cases
to date, these notifications have involved crates that have no
evidence of real world usage, and we feel that publishing these blog
posts is generating noise, rather than signal.
We will always publish a RustSec
advisory when a crate is removed for containing malware. You can
subscribe to the RustSec
advisory RSS feed to receive updates.
Crates that contain malware and are seeing real usage or
exploitation will still get both a blog post and a RustSec
advisory. We may also notify via additional communication channels
(such as social media) if we feel it is warranted.
We’re heading toward the back half of February—and according to your weird aunt on Facebook, this is an unusual, maybe magical month. Some say it is a “miraclein,” a lucky calendar configuration that only occurs once every 823 years. Others say February 2026 is a “perfect month.” Some say it is the beginning of an extremely unlucky year. Some say that a late-month planetary alignment will cause great upheaval.
The February 2026 “miraclein”
Though it is not a word used by astronomers (or even astrologers, to my knowledge), some are describing this month as a “miraclein,” a month in which every day of the week falls four times during the month. This only happens every 823 years, they say. A variation of the miraclein month has some people calling February “moneybags” and making the claim that it’s a good month for abundance. (The markets don’t agree: February has been volatile.)
Here’s a video explaining the theory:
A quick check of a calendar reveals that miracleins happen almost every year. Every day of the week falls exactly four times every February (except leap years), because four times seven is 28, and there are 28 days in the month. It’s not a miracle—it’s math. It’s not even new. People spread this every February. This is an example of a pervasive strain of myths and superstitions based on the calendar.
Is February 2026 a “perfect month”?
If you dig a little deeper into the lore of February 2026, you’ll find people describing it as a “perfect month,” in that it begins on a Sunday and ends on a Sunday. There’s logic to this, because the calendar is a perfect grid, with no days overhanging. This is nice and orderly, but it’s not that unusual. February 2015 was a “perfect” month and February 2037 will be perfect as well.
February’s planetary parade
The “miraclein” and perfect month only exist because that’s how we decided to write calendars, but there isa cosmic event happening this month that goes beyond humanity. On the 28th of February, six planets—Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune—will appear to be “lined up” in the sky. Some describe it as a “once every 6,000 years planetary conjunction” that will create a “paradigm shift for the entire planet” or cause gravitational anomalies. Some warn: “Do not look at the sky during the planetary alignment;” other, funnier, people say “The planets are having some type of conference or gang meeting on February 28.” But whether you call it a “conjunction” or a “conference,” it’s not rare. Five or six planet line ups happen every few years, and last February, seven planets attended a gang meeting.
The planets aren’t actually lining up, anyway. They’ll just look lined up from our perspective on earth. Nothing will happen to your eyes if you look at it (you won’t even be able to see Uranus and Neptune without a telescope anyway) and it won’t affect gravity or cause a paradigm shift. It’s just planets doing their thing in space.
Is 2026 unusually unlucky?
In 2026, there will be three Friday the 13ths—one just passed in February, one is coming in March, and there’s a third in November—this leads some to believe that 2026 is a particularly unlucky or cursed year. Jury’s out on whether the year is cursed, but if so, it’s not because of Friday the 13ths. While three is the maximum number of Friday the 13ths that can happen in a calendar year, it’s not unusual. There were three Friday the 13ths in 2015, and there will be three in 2037 too.
Speaking of the 13th, the belief that it’s a bad, or unlucky day dates back to 19th-century France, but it’s not entirely clear why people think it’s unlucky. One guess is that Judas was the 13th apostle, but there’s also a Norse myth about Loki showing up to as the thirteenth guest at a dinner party and doing mischief. Other cultures have other unlucky days. The 4th is unlucky in China. In Italy, the 17th is unlucky because XVII can be rearranged to form “VIXI,” Latin for “my life is over,” a common inscription on tombstones. The through-line is that none of these superstitions have anything to do with the physical world. They’re examples of seeing connections where none exist.
All hail Apophenia, ruler of human thought
I don’t have research to back this up, but I imagine the Venn diagram of people who believed the Rapture was coming, that Leviathan was rising from the oceans, and aliens were landing has serious overlap with the people who think there’s something portentous about the planets aligning or that February is moneybags month. You’d think that when the aliens didn’t land and the rapture didn’t happen, folks would be more discerning about spreading future predictions, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. But it’s not just because people are gullible. It’s a byproduct of how our brains are wired.
Apophenia is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things. Neurologist Klaus Conrad coined the term in a 1958 study of schizophrenics, describing “a specific feeling of abnormal meaningfulness,” but apophenia goes beyond schizophrenics. It’s in every gambler on a “lucky streak,” everyone who sees a “man in the moon,” and everyone who ever mistook correlation for causation. So: everyone. Our brains evolved to find patterns in data because it kept us alive and led to things like the scientific method, but the trade-off is that we think a rally cap is going to help our ball club win the series.
Pascal’s Wager
Apophenia isn’t the only thing at play here. Spreading a TikTok video promising abundance is a cranked-up version of Pascal’s Wager, the philosophical argument that it’s smarter to bet on a reward when the cost of entry is low—hitting “share” takes almost no effort, and what if it works? While none of these beliefs are new, in the Before Times, if you wanted to be a doomsayer, you’d have to stand on a street corner with a sign reading “the end is near.” That’s a lot of effort and you wouldn’t have an algorithm ensuring your message got to the people who would be most receptive to it.
Even misinformation that doesn’t promise a monetary reward offers something to the person who spreads it. Sometimes it’s the momentary high of feeling like you possess secret knowledge. Or it’s a way of signaling belonging to an in-group (“I’m the kind of person who thinks the position of the stars has mystical significance!”) or maybe it’s just to get some attention.
I don’t choose to post about “moneybags February” because my “cost of entry” would be my friends thinking I’m weird for sharing Facebook glurge, and a general sense that it’s harmful to spread lies, but really, your weird aunt on Facebook and I are doing the same thing. We’re both out here matching patterns and hitting “share”; we just have different ideas about which patterns to pay attention to. I’ll still take bets on any conspiracy theory, but February is a cold month, and if it warms your aunt’s heart to think it’s bringing money, who am I to call her wrong? It’s just that the same wiring that spreads “February is magic” also spreads beliefs and ideas that are legitimately dangerous, even deadly—at least according to the way I read the patterns.
NVIDIA and Meta have formed a multi-year partnership that represents a total platform commitment spanning CPU and GPU hardware, networking solutions, and NVIDIA’s Confidential Computing platform for end-to-end encryption of data in a secure enclave. The sheer size of the deal—unconfirmed scuttlebutt puts it north of $100 billion based on Meta’s
In Qing dynasty China, artisans augmented decorative pieces by incorporating iridescent kingfisher feathers—a technique known as tian-tsui. Scientists at Northwestern University’s Center for Scientific Studies in the Arts have used high-energy x-ray imaging to achieve unprecedented nanoscale resolution of the unique structure of those feathers, presenting their findings at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
As previously reported, nature is the ultimate nanofabricator. The bright iridescent colors in butterfly wings, soap bubbles, opals, or beetle shells don’t come from any pigment molecules but from how they are structured—naturally occurring photonic crystals. In nature, scales of chitin (a polysaccharide common to insects), for example, are arranged like roof tiles. Essentially, they form a diffraction grating, except photonic crystals only produce specific colors, or wavelengths, of light, while a diffraction grating will produce the entire spectrum, much like a prism. In the case of kingfisher feathers, the color is due to the microscopic ridges that cover the parallel rows of keratin strands that grow along the central shaft.
Also known as photonic band-gap materials, photonic crystals are “tunable,” which means they are precisely ordered to block certain wavelengths of light while letting others through. Alter the structure by changing the size of the tiles, and the crystals become sensitive to a different wavelength. They are used in optical communications as waveguides and switches, as well as in filters, lasers, mirrors, and various anti-reflection stealth devices.
“ERO is too busy dressing up as Black Ops Commandos with Tactical body armor, drop down thigh rigs, balaclavas, multiple M4 magazines, and Punisher patches, to do an Admin arrest of a non criminal, non-violent EWI that weighs 90 pounds and is 5 foot 2, inside a secure Federal building where everyone has been screened for weapons,” wrote one user in July 2025. (ERO stands for Enforcement and Removal Operations; along with HSI, it’s one of the two major divisions of ICE, and is responsible for detaining and deporting immigrants.)
The forum describes itself as a space for current and prospective HSI agents, “designed for the seasoned HSI Special Agent as well as applicants for entry level Special Agent positions.” HSI is the division within ICE whose agents are normally responsible for investigating crimes like drug smuggling, terrorism, and human trafficking.
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.
Samsung HW-QS700F dropped to $355.49 in open-box condition at Woot, which is a steep cut from its $799.99 list price. Amazon currently has it for $597.99, and the lowest it has dipped there was $397.99. So this is comfortably below its previous low, according to price trackers. “Open-box” here means it may have been repackaged due to damaged packaging but you still get the full setup: soundbar, wireless subwoofer, HDMI cable, wall mount kit, rubber feet, and a remote with batteries.
This is a 3.1.2-channel system, which in plain terms means left, right, and center speakers; a dedicated subwoofer for bass; and two upward-firing speakers for height effects like Dolby Atmos and DTS:X. What makes this model different is its adjustable (Convertible Fit) design, meaning it actually changes how the speakers behave depending on whether it’s sitting flat on a TV stand or mounted vertically on a wall. Built-in sensors detect the position and reassign the speaker roles so the sound still points where it should. In practice, that means you’re not sacrificing performance just because you prefer one setup over the other. The included subwoofer, too, does a good job of adding depth to movies without overwhelming dialogue. It also supports wifi and Bluetooth streaming, including Chromecast, AirPlay, Spotify Connect, and Tidal Connect, so it works easily with most phones and TVs.
That said, it does not include rear speakers, so you won’t get full wraparound surround sound unless you buy extras separately. The HDMI passthrough also skips 4K at 120Hz for high-end gaming consoles, so serious gamers will need to plug directly into the TV and use eARC. Also, dialogue can reportedly sound slightly restrained in certain placements, though you can tweak levels manually. Still, for most living rooms, this soundbar setup delivers strong volume, clear detail, and convincing Atmos height in either position. At this open-box price, it’s worth considering if you want flexible placement and big sound without paying flagship money.