Meta didn’t consult its Oversight Board last year when it announced sweeping policy changes to content moderation and a rollback of third-party fact checking in the United States in favor of Community Notes. But the company did ask the board for advice on how to expand the crowd-sourced fact checks to other countries.

Now the Oversight Board is publishing its advice to Meta. In a 15,000-word policy advisory opinion, the group urged Meta to be cautious with an international rollout, warning that an expansion of the program could “pose significant human rights risks and contribute to tangible harms” if safeguards are not put in place. 

The board, notably, was asked to weigh in on a fairly narrow set of questions, including how it should evaluate whether to withhold the feature in certain countries. Meta “respectfully” asked the Oversight Board to avoid “general” critiques about the system, which it has said is modeled after X.

In its opinion, the Oversight Board said that Community Notes “could enhance users’ freedom of expression and improve online discourse” with enough safeguard. But it recommended Meta withhold the feature in countries with “high polarization,” as well as countries in the midst of a crisis or “protracted conflict.” The board also said that Meta should avoid countries with a history of organized disinformation networks, because the notes may be more easily manipulated in such places, and countries with “linguistic complexity” that Meta may be ill-equipped to understand. 

Depending on how you interpret that advice, that could exclude quite a few countries, though the board stopped short of making country-specific recommendations. Still, it raises questions about how closely Meta will follow the suggested guidelines. For example, the United States could be considered a country with “high polarization.” (Community Notes has been live in the US for more than a year.)

While the Oversight Board was careful to say it “neither endorses nor opposes” an expansion of Community Notes, it did discuss Meta’s approach to fact checking, noting that its partnerships with outside fact-checking organizations are still largely in place outside of the US. And the opinion cautions against ending these relationships, noting that research into Community Notes on X shows that authors writing notes often rely on work done by professional fact checkers.

“Community Notes and fact checking are not mutually exclusive,” Oversight Board member Paolo Carozza tells Engadget. “One doesn’t have to replace or substitute for the other, they can coexist. And in some situations, there are really important reasons for them to coexist. The board really deliberately stayed away from any kind of suggestion that the introduction of Community Notes ought to result in the removal or ending of fact checking.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/oversight-board-tells-meta-expanding-community-notes-outside-of-us-poses-significant-risks-100000213.html?src=rss

Longtime Slashdot reader theodp writes: In Melania and the Robot, the New York Times reports on First Lady Melania Trump’s inaugural Fostering the Future Together Coalition Summit, which brought together international leaders, First Spouses from around the world, tech leaders, educators, and nonprofits to collaborate on practical solutions that expand access to educational tools while strengthening protections for children in digital environments (Day 2 WH summary). The Times begins:

“On Wednesday, Mrs. Trump appeared at the White House alongside Figure 3, a humanoid, A.I.-powered robot whose uses, according to the company that makes it, include fetching towels, carrying groceries and serving champagne. But Mrs. Trump joins tech executives and some researchers in envisioning a world beyond robot butlery. She is interested in how these robots could cut it as educators. Both clad in shades of white, the first lady and the visiting robot walked into a gathering of first spouses from around the world, a group that included Sara Netanyahu of Israel, Olena Zelenska of Ukraine, and Brigitte Macron of France. The dulcet tones from a (presumably human) military orchestra played as the first lady and her guest entered the event. Both lady and robot extolled the virtues of further integrating robots into the educational and social lives of children. In the history of modern first-lady initiatives, which have included building a national book festival (Laura Bush), reshuffling the food pyramid (Michelle Obama) and advocating for free community college (Jill Biden), Mrs. Trump’s involvement of a humanoid robot in education policy was a first.”

“Figure 3 delivered brief remarks and delivered salutations in several languages. With its sleek black-and-white appearance, Figure 3 would fit right in with the first lady’s branding aesthetic, which includes a self-titled coffee table book and movie, not least because the name “MELANIA” was emblazoned on the side of its glossy plastic head. After Figure 3 teetered gingerly away, Mrs. Trump looked around the room and told them that the future looked a lot like what they had just witnessed. ‘The future of A.I. is personified,’ she told her audience. ‘It will be formed in the shape of humans. Very soon artificial intelligence will move from our mobile phones to humanoids that deliver utility.’ She invited her guests to envision a future in which a robot philosopher educated children.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Thirty years after the alleged 1996 “ET of Varginha” encounter, debate continues to rage over the events that happened in Brazil’s self-styled UFO capital. An anonymous reader quotes an excerpt from the Guardian: The skies over this far-flung coffee-growing hub went charcoal black, the heavens opened and one of Brazil’s greatest mysteries was born. “It really was something unique,” recalls Marco Antonio Reis, a zoo director, who was at his ranch outside Varginha one stormy day in January 1996 when, he says, an otherworldly creature came to town. Reis and other locals claim the unusually ferocious downpour heralded a series of disturbing and seemingly paranormal events. At least six of the zoo’s animals, including a spider monkey, a tapir and a raccoon, died mysteriously after a horned interloper with bulging red eyes was spotted in the vicinity by a woman who had gone out for a smoke. When a vet examined their corpses, “they were all black inside,” Reis claims.

On a nearby wasteland, three young women spotted a peculiar and malodorous being with a heart-shaped face and three lumps on its head cowering beside a wall. “I’ve seen the devil,” one of those witnesses would later tell her mum. Soon afterwards, an unexplained infection was rumored to have killed a strapping police intelligence officer who was said to have grappled with the oleaginous unidentified being. Three decades later, Reis says he is convinced Varginha received a non-human visit. His only doubt was from where it came.

“We don’t know if it was extraterrestrial or intraterrestrial,” the 71-year-old says as he climbs a staircase to the veranda where the smoker claims to have seen what, in reference to Steven Spielberg’s 1982 film, became known as the “ET of Varginha”. A 2ft statue of a two-toed alien now marks the spot. “It’s possible it was an intraterrestrial, from inside the Earth They don’t just come from space,” Reis says. “It might have come from the depths of the Earth, too. We don’t even know what it’s like at the bottom of the sea, do we?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The U.S. Postal Service plans to impose its first-ever fuel surcharge on packages (source paywalled; alternative source), adding an 8% fee starting in April as it struggles with rising fuel costs and ongoing financial pressure. The surcharge will not apply to letter mail and is currently expected to remain in place until January 2027. The Wall Street Journal reports: Other parcel carriers, including FedEx and United Parcel Service, have imposed fuel surcharges, as well as a basket of other surcharges and fees, for years. Both FedEx and UPS have dramatically raised their fuel surcharges in recent weeks as the price of oil has increased amid the turmoil in the Middle East. […] The post office has been trying to increase the volume of packages it delivers. It previously differentiated itself from commercial carriers by saying that it doesn’t apply residential, Saturday delivery or fuel or remote-delivery surcharges.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Because some people are still out there having fun (crazy to think about), this is a video of Youtuber Handy Geng making a giant sword (inspired by Ichigo’s Soul-Cutter sword from manga Bleach), then attaching it to the business end of an excavator. Well, provided the business end is the excavator’s arm, MY business end is the rear *wink* The swordcavator lacks the speed to do any real slashing damage, but it’s still plenty capable of piercing (like my roommate’s voice) and crushing (like the weight of life). *runs AI feel-good check on post, AI terminates its own session* Sometimes they be like that though.

New submitter haroldbasset writes: Canada’s Immigration Department rejected an applicant because the duties of her current job did not match the Canadian work experience she had claimed, but the Department’s AI assistant had invented that work experience. She has been working in Canada as a health scientist — she has a Ph.D. in the immunology of aging — but the AI genius instead described her as “wiring and assembling control circuits, building control and robot panels, programming and troubleshooting.” “It’s believed to be the first time that the department explicitly referred to the use of generative AI to support application processing in immigration refusals,” reports the Toronto Star. “The disclaimer also noted that all generated content was verified by an officer and that generative AI was not used to make or recommend a decision.”

The applicant’s lawyer was shocked “how any human being could make this decision.” “Somehow, it hallucinated my client’s job description,” he said. “I would love to see what the officer saw. Something seriously went wrong here.”

The applicant’s refusal came just as Canada’s Immigration Department released its first AI strategy, which frames artificial intelligence as a way to improve efficiency, service delivery, and program integrity. The department says it has long used digital tools like analytics and automation to flag fraud risks and triage applications, and is now also experimenting with generative AI for tasks such as research, summarizing, and analysis. In this case, however, the department insisted the decision was made by a human officer and that generative AI was not involved in the final decision.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

If money was on sale 20% off, you’d buy a ton of it, right? Well, this Roblox gift card is “worth” $100 in Robux, the online currency used on the gaming platform Roblox, but it’s on sale for $80 during Amazon’s Big Spring Sale. If you’re reading this, chances are good that at some point in the next day/week/month, your child is going to hassle you for Robux anyway, so you might as well pay 20% less. (Your purchase also comes with a free “virtual item,” but your child doesn’t care about that.)

Roblox Digital Gift Code for 10,000 Robux [Redeem Worldwide – Includes Exclusive Virtual Item] [Online Game Code]

$80.00
at Amazon

$100.00
Save $20.00

$80.00
at Amazon

$100.00
Save $20.00

Speaking of children, parents, listen up: If you keep a bunch of these cards around, you’ll never have to scramble for a last minute present again, whether for your kid’s Easter basket or the birthday party you forgot about until the invite reminder showed up on your phone. The chances are very good that any kid who gets a Roblox gift card is going to like it better than all the stupid educational toys they were given, making your kid the hero of the day.

Amazon doesn’t put these cards on sale often, and not usually at such a deep discount. Here’s a chart to show you how relatively rare an occurrence it is:

Credit: Amazon

The point is, don’t wait. It will hurt 20% less next time your kid asks you to give them real money to spend on virtual items in a game they will probably tire of within a week. I love Roblox.