Atherton’s £845 3D-printed titanium cranks are tough enough for downhill with a lifetime warranty

Atherton Bikes has announced details of its new GR titanium crankset – with prices starting at £845.

The new crankset is additive manufactured in Atherton’s Renishaw 3D printer, like the British brand’s top-end AM-series frames.

The GR cranks are available in 11 lengths, and Atherton says they’re not only tough enough for downhill mountain biking, but also light enough for trail riding.

They have an ultra-low profile pedal end for maximum ground clearance – thinner than is possible with an aluminium or carbon crank because titanium is stronger and so less material is required.

Trail, Trail Wide or DH

11 lengths, three offsets, two axle standards and three finish options mean these cranks are highly customisable. Atherton Bikes

The lengths on offer range from 150mm to 175mm in 2.5mm increments, and the chainring offset choices are Trail (52mm), Trail Wide (55mm) and DH (56.5mm).

You can chose between 28.99mm (SRAM DUB) and 30mm (Hope, 5DEV, etc) axle diameters.

The GR Ti cranks are additive-manufactured in Atherton’s in-house Renishaw 3D printer. Atherton Bikes

They run the latest SRAM standard eight-bolt chainring interface, so finding compatible chainrings shouldn’t be difficult.

Atherton Bikes sells Works Components’ Staffordshire-made chainrings alongside the cranks if you want to order them as a package.

The GR cranks all use the SRAM standard eight-bolt direct-mount chainring interface. Atherton Bikes

Titanium is highly abrasion-resistant and Atherton is confident these cranks will last a long time. They come with a lifetime warranty for any use and are EFBE and ISO cat-5 certified for DH use.

Atherton claims a weight of only 506g for a bare 165mm crank, which is not ultra-light for trail cranks, but it’s competitive for a downhill crank.

Three finishes enable you to choose the roughness of the raw titanium on show. Atherton Bikes

There are three finishes available: raw (the roughest), burnished (slightly finished) and tumbled (shiny and smooth).

They will take four to eight weeks to arrive after ordering the specific length, chainring offset, spindle diameter and finish you require.

The cranks are available now, direct from Atherton Bikes’ website.

Atherton GR crankset pricing details

  • Raw: £845 / $1,128.36
  • Burnished: £875 / $1,168.42
  • Tumbled: £895 / $1,195.13

VR Pioneer nDreams Announces Studio Closures & Layoffs Amid “challenging” Games Market

nDreams, one of VR’s most senior game studios, announced plans to close two internal studios responsible for some of its most forward-thinking VR projects, which could also include a sizable number of layoffs.

While nDreams hasn’t officially shuttered Near Light or Compass at this point, the company says in a LinkenIn post that it could soon see a reduction of 78 roles across “all levels and multiple teams, including senior leadership.”

“Despite every effort to make our existing structure a success and avert this outcome, the VR games market remains challenging, making further changes necessary to ensure a commercially viable and sustainable future,” nDreams says.

nDreams spun up Elevation in 2022 to produce ‘AAA’ quality VR games. Elevation released its debut solo title Reach (2025) across all major VR headsets last year, making for a strong opening bid as the company’s remote-first studio.

That same year, nDreams acquired Near Light, a Brighton, UK-based studio known for virtual travel experience Perfect (2016) and single-player arcade shooter Shooty Fruity (2018). More recently, Near Light released PvP shooter Frenzies, which launched into early access in Quest in 2024.

In early 2025, nDreams opened internal an additional internal studio called ‘Compass’, which melded staff from both its nDreams Studio Orbital and nDreams Studio after a layoff round in late 2024 that affected 17.5% of the company.

Founded in 2013, nDreams has released a host of VR games over the years as both developer and publisher, including Phantom: Covert Ops (2020), Fracked (2021), Ghostbusters: Rise of the Ghost Lord (2023), and Vendetta Forever (2024).

This follows wider turmoil in the VR games industry, most recently precipitated by Meta’s reorganization of its Reality Labs XR division and rash of first-party studio closures, which included the shuttering of Armature Studio (Resident Evil 4 VR), Twisted Pixel (Deadpool VR), and Sanzaru Games (Asgard’s Wrath).

Here’s nDreams’ full statement below:

Our team was today informed of proposals to restructure nDreams, including a significant reduction in overall staffing levels. These changes would impact all levels and multiple teams, including senior leadership.

Since 2024, our staff have been divided across three internal studios: Elevation, Near Light, and Compass. At the core of the restructured business will be Elevation, which currently has around 120 staff engaged on unannounced projects. nDreams will also retain a lean group dedicated to XR R&D. Together, we will remain focused on delivering world-class VR and XR games.

Regrettably, the proposals include the closure of the Near Light and Compass studios, and a reduction in our Facilities, Talent, Shared Technology, and Executive teams, with 78 roles at risk of redundancy. Despite every effort to make our existing structure a success and avert this outcome, the VR games market remains challenging, making further changes necessary to ensure a commercially viable and sustainable future.

We’re committed to exploring every option to retain talent and will now enter a collective consultation process with the people impacted by these proposals. We recognise that this will be stressful and challenging for everyone affected and will be offering support throughout the process.

The post VR Pioneer nDreams Announces Studio Closures & Layoffs Amid “challenging” Games Market appeared first on Road to VR.

IBM Scientists Unveil First-Ever ‘Half-Mobius’ Molecule

BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz: An international team of scientists has done something chemistry has never seen before. IBM, working alongside researchers from the University of Manchester, Oxford University, ETH Zurich, EPFL, and the University of Regensburg, has created and characterized a molecule whose electrons travel through its structure in a corkscrew-like pattern, fundamentally altering its chemical behavior. The findings were published today in Science. The molecule, known as C13Cl2, is the first experimental observation of what scientists call a half-Mobius electronic topology in a single molecule. To the researchers’ knowledge, nothing like it has ever been synthesized, observed, or even formally predicted. And proving why it behaves the way it does required something equally extraordinary — a quantum computer.

The whole thing started at IBM, where the molecule was assembled atom by atom from a custom precursor synthesized at Oxford. Working under ultra-high vacuum at near-absolute-zero temperatures, researchers used precisely calibrated voltage pulses to remove individual atoms one at a time. The result is an electronic structure that undergoes a 90-degree twist with each circuit through the molecule, requiring four complete loops to return to its starting phase. That is a topological property that has no counterpart anywhere in chemistry’s existing record. What makes it even more interesting to folks who follow materials science is that this topology can be switched. The molecule can move reversibly between clockwise-twisted, counterclockwise-twisted, and untwisted states. That means electronic topology is not just a curiosity to be stumbled upon in nature — it can be deliberately engineered. That is a big deal.

The quantum computing angle here is not just a supporting role. Electrons within C13Cl2 interact in deeply entangled ways, each influencing the others simultaneously. Modeling that requires tracking every possible configuration of those interactions at once — something that causes computational demands to grow exponentially and can quickly overwhelm classical machines. A decade ago, researchers could exactly model 16 electrons classically. Today that number has crept to 18. Using IBM’s quantum computer, the team was able to explore 32 electrons. Quantum computers can represent these systems directly rather than approximate them, because they operate according to the same quantum mechanical laws that govern electrons in molecules. In this case, that capability helped reveal helical molecular orbitals for electron attachment — a fingerprint of the half-Mobius topology — and exposed the mechanism behind the unusual structure: a helical pseudo-Jahn-Teller effect.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

New Merida Reacto beats big-name aero bikes for speed, according to independent testing 

When Merida set out to design the new Reacto, it had one major goal in mind: to create a bike fast enough to break the 200-watt barrier, as measured by Tour Magazine in its wind-tunnel tests. 

The German cycling publication’s independent wind-tunnel tests have become a benchmark in the industry for how well road bikes perform. The 200-watt barrier refers to the pedalling power required to overcome drag at 45km/h, which only two bikes have surpassed. 

According to Tour Magazine, the 2022 Simplon Pride II had an aero drag of 199W and the Storck Aerfast.5 Pro achieved 198W.

So how fast is the new Reacto? 

Man riding Merida Reacto V.
Merida says the new Reacto is 2.5 per cent quicker than the previous generation of the bike. Merida

Merida says the previous-generation Reacto IV, which was one of the best-value aero bikes, and was released back in 2021, required 211W to overcome its own drag.

For its latest aero bike, Merida has managed to shave that figure down to 206W for the top-spec Reacto One (£10,000 / €11,500), according to a Tour Magazine test. 

However, there are some caveats to this figure. Merida says the Reacto IV and the new Reacto One were both fitted with the brand’s SL 1P cockpit and 60mm-deep wheels. 

But the newest version was fitted with a wider 30mm tyre, because the clearance of the bike has increased from 28mm to 32mm, which Hutchinson recently suggested could be faster than 30mm.

The new Reacto One is also fitted with a Classified Powershift hub and 1x drivetrain, which would help reduce aero drag compared to a more conventional 2x setup. 

Yet, Merida adds that if you switch the SL 1P cockpit for its new CW 1P design, the Reacto One drops below 200W and achieves 196W.

Merida Reacto V studio shot.
The bike can be fitted with the new CW 1P, a gull-shaped cockpit. Merida
Merida Reacto V gull handlebar.
The CW 1P is similar to the cockpit found on the Colnago Y1Rs. Merida

The CW 1P cockpit is a ‘gull wing’ design similar to that found on the Colnago Y1Rs. Merida says the “V-shape and foil profile maximise efficiency in all wind conditions, and its ergonomic shape ensures comfort and relief during even the most demanding rides”. 

The bar is available for the top Reacto One and the Reacto 10k (£9,500 / €11,000), which features a 2x SRAM Red AXS groupset, and still achieves a score of 202W, according to Tour Magazine and Merida.

This means the new Merida Reacto is faster than the Simplon and Storck bikes tested by Tour Magazine and faster than aero bikes from bigger brands. Tour Magazine said the 2021 Canyon Aeroad scored 202W and the latest Cervélo S5 scored 204W. 

Aerodynamic shapes 

Merida Reacto V.
Merida has refined the Reacto’s tube shapes following a change in UCI regulations. Merida

Alongside the new bar, Merida has made use of changes in UCI regulations to make the Reacto faster. 

Merida says the bike utilises the “aerodynamic boundaries set by the UCI”, which we can take to mean the change in tube ratios. In 2022, cycling’s governing body said bicycle tubes could be eight times longer than they were wide, whereas the ratio had previously been 3:1.

The previous Reacto was released just before this change, and therefore couldn’t make use of it, but the latest version has. 

As we remarked when we spotted the unreleased bike at last year’s Tour de France, the new Reacto’s head tube is far deeper than the previous version. This is one of the latest trends in road bike design and is particularly notable on the latest Ridley Noah. 

Merida Reacto V head tube.
The Reacto now has a deep head tube, following one of the biggest trends in current road bike design. Merida

Merida says it has also updated the Reacto’s fork shape, “which now features deeper and thinner fork legs to reduce air drag at the fork/tyre intersection”. 

“Updates have also been made to the head tube, especially in terms of integrating the cockpit and stem areas into the frame. The downtube has been positioned further away from the front wheel to improve aerodynamics and reduce weight,” Merida explains.

The Taiwanese company also paid attention to the position and integration of water bottles. 

“We maintained a more conventional aero downtube profile, but are very close to releasing our own aero bottle and cage combination, which, when used on the new Reacto, easily outperforms the often-seen cradle-shaped downtubes that hide a classic bottle and cage combination,” it says. 

Speed isn’t everything  

Woman riding Merida Reacto V.
Merida says it has ensured the new Reacto is comfortable and lighter than before to make it an “all-rounder”. Merida

Just as Tour Magazine doesn’t only consider aerodynamic performance in its overall ranking of road bikes, Merida says it has balanced the Reacto’s speed with comfort.  

“We also wanted to create one of the most aerodynamic bikes that still maintains impressive comfort and control attributes,” Merida says. 

Merida says it has managed to achieve a comfortable ride quality comparable to a “classic, thin-tubed road bike,” by combining the compliance of the S-Flex seatpost with the clearance for 32mm tyres. But it should be noted that none of the 10 models available at launch come with tyres this wide.

Merida adds that the carbon layup of the bike achieves a balance of stiffness and flex: “Balancing the contrasting needs of comfort and efficiency is no easy task, but by using knowledge gained over years of carbon fibre manufacture and the efforts of our in-house testers and world-class athletes, we’ve found what we feel is the correct balance in each area of the bike.” 

Woman riding Merida Reacto V.
Merida says it could be possible to get the top Reacto models under the UCI weight limit. Merida

Merida says it has also reduced the weight of the Reacto. The Reacto 10k is the lightest version in the new range with a claimed weight of 7.1kg, but Merida says it could be possible to get the bike under the UCI weight limit of 6.8kg. 

It claims this combination of aerodynamics, comfort and low weight makes the Reacto a “more versatile ‘aero all-roudner’” and that this makes it “hugely significant amongst road racing professionals as well as speed loving enthusiasts”. 

The Reacto is available with two carbon levels. The top five models in the range use the lighter CF5 frame, which is 11g lighter than the previous generation, while the complete frameset weighs 108g less at 1,616.2g in a size medium. 

Meanwhile, the CF3 frameset – available on bikes ranging from £2,400 / €2,800 to £5,000 / €5,750 – weighs 1,704g in the same size. 

The framesets have the same geometry and offer “identical aerodynamic performance”.  

Merida Reacto geometry 

3XS XXS XS S M L XL
Seat tube (mm) 440 470 500 520 540 560 590
Top tube (mm) 506 521 535 545 560 575 590
Chainstay (mm) 410 410 410 410 410 410 410
Head tube angle (degrees) 70.5 70.5 72 72.5 73.5 73.5 74
Seat tube angle (degrees) 75.5 74.5 74 74 73.5 73 73
Head tube (mm) 100 105 112 128 140 155 175
Reach (mm) 373 377 384 390 395 400 409
Stack (mm) 512 517 529 542 557 571 593
Wheelbase (mm) 981 987 984 992 992 1,002 1,011


Edit Table

Merida Reacto range overview 

Reacto One

  • Frame: Reacto CF5 V
  • Groupset: Shimano Dura-Ace Di2
  • Wheelset: DT Swiss ARC 1100 with Classified Powershift hub 
  • Tyres: Continental Aero 111 / Continental GP5000s TR, 700x30c 
  • Weight: 7.4kg 
  • Price: £10,000 / €11,500

Reacto 10k

  • Frame: Reacto CF5 V
  • Groupset: SRAM Red AXS
  • Wheelset: Reynolds BL 60 Pro 
  • Tyres: Continental GP5000s TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 7.2kg 
  • Price: £9,500 / €11,000

Reacto Team

  • Frame: Reacto CF5 V
  • Groupset: Shimano Dura-Ace 
  • Wheelset: Vision Metron 60 RS i23 Clincher TL
  • Tyres: Continental GP5000s TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 7.1kg 
  • Price: £9,500 / €11,000

Reacto Pro

  • Frame: Reacto CF5 V
  • Groupset: Shimano Dura-Ace 
  • Wheelset: DT Swiss ARC 1600
  • Tyres: Continental Grand Prix TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: Not stated 
  • Price: £7,500 / €8,750

Reacto 9000

  • Frame: Reacto CF5 V
  • Groupset: Shimano Ultegra
  • Wheelset: Reynolds BL 60 Expert DB
  • Tyres: Continental GP5000s TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 7.8kg 
  • Price: £6,250 / €7,250 

Reacto 8000

  • Frame: Reacto CF3 V
  • Groupset: Shimano Ultegra
  • Wheelset: Reynolds AR 60 DB
  • Tyres: Continental GP5000s TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 8kg 
  • Price: £5,000 / €5,750

Reacto 7000

  • Frame: Reacto CF3 V
  • Groupset: SRAM Rival AXS
  • Wheelset: Vision SC 60 i23
  • Tyres: Continental GP5000s TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 8.4kg 
  • Price: £4,750 / €5,500

Reacto 6000 

  • Frame: Reacto CF3 V
  • Groupset: Shimano 105 Di2
  • Wheelset: Vision SC 60 i23
  • Tyres: Continental Grand Prix TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 8.5kg 
  • Price: £3,800 / €4,400

Reacto 5000

  • Frame: Reacto CF3 V
  • Groupset: Shimano 105 Di2
  • Wheelset: Vision Team 35
  • Tyres: Continental Grand Prix TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 9kg 
  • Price: £3,000 / €3,500

Reacto 4000 

  • Frame: Reacto CF3 V
  • Groupset: Shimano 105
  • Wheelset: Shimano 
  • Tyres: Continental Grand Prix TR, 700x28c
  • Weight: 9.1kg 
  • Price: £2,400 / €2,800

Congress Extends ISS, Tells NASA To Get Moving On Private Space Stations

A recently-revised Senate authorization bill (PDF), co-sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted Cruz, would extend the International Space Station’s lifespan from 2030 to 2032 while pushing NASA to accelerate plans for commercial space stations to replace it. Ars Technica’s Eric Berger reports: Regarding NASA’s support for the development of commercial space stations, the bill mandates the following, within specified periods, of passage of the law:

– Within 60 days, publicly release the requirements for commercial space stations in low-Earth orbit

– Within 90 days, release the final “request for proposals” to solicit industry responses

– Within 180 days, enter into contracts with “two or more” commercial providers for such stations

Cruz is trying to inject urgency into NASA as several private companies — including Axiom Space, Blue Origin, Vast, and Voyager — are finalizing designs for space stations. All have expressed a desire for clarity from NASA on how long the space agency would like its astronauts to stay on board, the types of scientific equipment needed, and much more. These are known as “requirements” in NASA parlance.

[…] Cruz and other senators on the committee appear to share those concerns, as their legislation extends the International Space Station’s lifespan from 2030 to 2032 (an extension must still be approved by international partners, including Russia). Moreover, the authorization bill states, “The Administrator shall not initiate the de-orbit of the ISS until the date on which a commercial low-Earth orbit destination has reached an initial operational capability.” With this legislation, the U.S. Senate is making clear that it views a permanent human presence in low-Earth orbit as a high priority. This version of the authorization legislation must still be passed by the full Senate and work its way through the House of Representatives.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

I can’t believe how comfortable the new Assos jersey and bib shorts are – and the price isn’t bad either

I’ve got my hands on the latest Assos Mille GT jersey and bib shorts, and I can’t believe how comfortable the ensemble is.

Comfort is always subjective, but consider the context. I’m a wide-built, 188cm-tall 36-year-old, who weighs close to 87kg.

Most kit I wear is compromised in some way, with spare fabric here and there, where I’ve had to go up a size to accommodate my broad-for-a-cyclist chest and shoulders. Likewise, when I stick to a size for desirable compression levels, I might find it’s a bit… snug.

But the latest Mille GT kit has some refined features geared towards making it more comfortable for endurance riding, with an accommodating cut suitable for more than just racing whippets. 

Bearing in mind a reasonable total price tag of £250, don’t dismiss it on Assos’ premium-price reputation alone.

For the longest days: Assos Mille GT jersey

SQUIRREL_TEXT_13821002

Assos Mille GT jersey and bib shorts
The Mille GT jersey features a lightweight and breathable main fabric. Scott Windsor / Our Media

Up top, the Mille GT jersey makes use of Assos’ lightweight AirCell fabric. Its hexagonal structure is engineered to promote airflow while remaining stretchy.

This helps it feel light and breathable, while avoiding the tell-tale flap of excess material or an overly tight feel.

The sleeves have been reworked using a new lightweight ‘Eclipse’ fabric and finished with a raw-cut hem. Even with my broader shoulders, the sleeves settle naturally around the mid-point of my arm without digging in or pulling on the neckline. It’s a subtle update, but one I suspect will prove comfortable on the long rides this kit is designed for.

Assos Mille GT jersey and bib shorts
The sleeves are raw-cut, which should increase comfort. Scott Windsor / Our Media

Round the back, Assos’ familiar ‘Triple Ramp’ pockets are designed to help prevent sagging when you’ve packed in the supplies for an all-day ride. Fully loaded, I’ve found the jersey doesn’t feel too weighed down.

The overall cut is excellent, though, with generous enough proportions that it will accommodate riders like me who don’t conform to the snake-thin cycling stereotype, but still manage to flatter.

SQUIRREL_13821002

Tried-and-tested and eco-friendly

SQUIRREL_TEXT_13820988

Assos Mille GT jersey and bib shorts
The shorts feel like remarkably good value at £135, including a version of Assos’ excellent S11 chamois. Scott Windsor / Our Media

The matching Mille GT Bib Shorts S11 retain Assos’ slightly awkward naming convention, but the focus on endurance riding is clear. 

Assos says the slightly longer leg offers a modern silhouette, and while I’m not a fan of shorts that extend right down to the back of the knee, this design seems to strike a happy medium.

The legs are made from Assos’ Quartz fabric, which is said to be permanently odour-free (ideal if you wanted to use the shorts on a light bikepacking trip). 

Assos Mille GT jersey and bib shorts
Assos has prioritised a low-profile pad design, cutting away unnecessary cushioning. Scott Windsor / Our Media

80 per cent of the material is made from recycled polyamide, a welcome move for the eco-conscious, yet it feels tough-wearing and compressive. Assos says the fabric is engineered to remain a deep black even when stretched, saving potential blushes and retaining a premium look.

The GT chamois is based on highly regarded ‘S11’ tech shared with the brand’s top-level shorts, and is 12mm thick but designed to be as minimalist and breathable as possible to avoid the dreaded hot puffy-pillow sensation. 

Assos’ Rollbar bib-strap design is said to keep the insert securely in place during hard efforts, by anchoring lower down the backside. It’s this that gives a real supportive, locked-in sensation when riding. 

Assos Mille GT jersey and bib shorts
The updated Assos Mille GT kit seems to offer an enticing blend of premium performance and a mid-range price tag. Scott Windsor / Our Media

The brand’s Golden Gate 2.0 tech, whereby the pad is only partially stitched in, enables it to settle into the optimum position more easily before the bib-strap design does its work to hold everything in place. 

I’m also a fan of the leg grippers, which use a textured design that I find slightly reminiscent of the first-generation Rapha Pro team bib shorts, offering a definitive feel to the end of the shorts. These are less tight-feeling, though, which helps to mitigate a sausage-leg look or unsightly marks on the skin. 

The Assos Mille GT kit is available now, priced at £115 for the jersey and £135 for the bib shorts, both in multiple colourways.

SQUIRREL_13820988

Anthropic says it will challenge Defense Department’s supply chain risk designation in court

In a new blog post, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has admitted that it received a letter from the Defense Department, officially labeling it a supply chain risk. He said he doesn’t “believe this action is legally sound,” and that his company sees “no choice” but to challenge it in court. Hours before Amodei published the post, the Pentagon announced that it notified the company that its “products are deemed a supply chain risk, effective immediately.”

If you’ll recall, the Defense Department (called the Department of War under the current administration) threatened to give the company the designation typically reserved for firms from adversaries like China if it didn’t agree to remove its safeguards over mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. President Trump then ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s tech.

Amodei explained that the designation has a narrow scope, because it only exists to protect the government. That is why the general public, and even Defense Department contractors, can still use Anthropic’s Claude chatbot and its AI technologies. Microsoft told CNBC that it will continue using Claude after its lawyers had concluded that it can keep on working with Anthropic on non-defense related projects.

The CEO has also admitted that his company had “productive conversations” with the department over the past few days. He said that they were looking at ways to serve the Pentagon that adheres to its two exceptions, namely that its technology not be used for mass surveillance and the development of fully autonomous weapons, and at ways to “ensure a smooth transition if that is not possible.” That confirms reports that Anthropic is back in talks with the agency in an effort to reach a new deal. In addition, he apologized for a leaked internal memo, wherein he reportedly said that OpenAI’s messaging about its own deal with the department is “just straight up lies.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/anthropic-says-it-will-challenge-defense-departments-supply-chain-risk-designation-in-court-054459618.html?src=rss

Microsoft Confirms ‘Project Helix,’ a Next-Gen Xbox That Can Run PC Games

An anonymous reader quotes a report from 80 Level: Microsoft has officially confirmed development of its next-generation Xbox console, currently known internally as Project Helix. While concrete details remain limited, early information suggests the company is positioning the device as a hybrid between a traditional console and a gaming PC, capable of running both Xbox titles and PC games. The codename was revealed recently by new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, who reaffirmed Microsoft’s continued commitment to dedicated gaming hardware despite speculation that the company might shift entirely toward cloud or platform-based ecosystems. According to Sharma, Project Helix represents the next step in Xbox’s console strategy.

Although official specifications have not yet been announced, early reports indicate the system will likely rely on a new AMD system-on-chip combining Xbox hardware with PC-style architecture. The device is expected to emphasize high performance while maintaining compatibility with existing Xbox game libraries. […] If the concept holds, Project Helix could mark a significant shift in how console ecosystems are structured, moving away from tightly closed hardware platforms toward something closer to a unified PC-console environment. Sharma wrote in a post on X: “Great start to the morning with Team Xbox, where we talked about our commitment to the return of Xbox, including Project Helix, the code name for our next generation console. Project Helix will lead in performance and play your Xbox and PC games. Looking forward to chatting about this more with partners and studios at my first GDC next week!”


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The new Giant Propel is the lightest aero bike we’ve ever seen

The fourth-generation Giant Propel is here and it weighs as little as 6.56kg in a top-spec, size-medium build.

Despite a reduction in complete bike weight of around 350g (for the top-spec, Advanced SL 0 model), Giant claims the new version doesn’t skimp on aerodynamics or efficiency.

In total, Giant says the 2026 Propel has an 18.4-watt ‘advantage’ at 40kph over the previous model, thanks in part to a suite of new and improved components and finishing kit.

Ahead of the bike’s launch, we got our hands on the flagship, Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS (£10,499 / $13,500 / €11,999), the mid-range Advanced Pro 0 Di2 (£5,799 / €6,499) and the cheapest bike in the range, the Advanced 0 (£3,499 / €4,399).

Let’s take a look at what’s changed, and how much difference it makes going from the flagship Propel down to the more affordable models.

Total System Speed

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
The Giant Propel remains an all-rounder aero bike. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

While many aero road bikes take an ‘aero is everything’ approach, the Propel has always been more weight-conscious.

The latest model doubles down on that ethos, shaving weight from almost every part of the bike.

Nevertheless, the new Propel looks almost identical to the old one at a glance.

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
The most obvious changes are the more heavily dropped seatstays and the move to an integrated cockpit up-front. Simon von Bromley / Our Media
Giant Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2
The Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2 is a mid-range model, which forgoes an integrated seatpost. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

As with the latest Cannondale SuperSix EVO, there are plenty of small changes – which Giant says add to a big overall improvement. However, it’s fair to say Giant has refined the Propel formula rather than reinventing it.

That’s nothing to grumble about. Both the Advanced SL and Advanced Pro versions of that bike performed extremely well during testing (bar a couple of somewhat outdated spec choices), so a more drastic change to the design would have likely alienated fans of its existing charms.

In terms of what’s new and improved, let’s run through the headline features on the 2026 Giant Propel platform.

Frameset refinements

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
There’s some (very) subtle reshaping up front, plus a bump in tyre clearance to 32mm. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

While the overall silhouette is very similar, the 2026 Propel gets subtle reshaping across the frameset to improve aerodynamic performance, as well as a bump in tyre clearance to 32mm (up from 30mm).

Vertical compliance at the rear of the bike is also said to be 25 per cent better, thanks to more heavily dropped seatstays, and Giant has refined the carbon layup to save 40g and improve the bike’s pedalling and handling stiffness.

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
There’s plenty of room to spare around the 28c tyres fitted as stock on the new Propel. Simon von Bromley / Our Media
Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
Giant says the more heavily dropped seatstays improve rear-end compliance by 25 per cent. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

It also gets a Universal Derailleur Hanger rear dropout, for compatibility with SRAM’s recently launched direct-mount rear derailleurs.

As before, the Advanced SL frames get an integrated seatpost and Giant’s lightest carbon fibre blend, while Advanced Pro and Advanced frames use a telescoping aero seatpost plus a heavier (and cheaper) carbon layup.

The more meaningful changes come elsewhere on the new Propel, however, with new and updated components bringing more tangible gains – especially at the front of the bike…

Integrated and narrower cockpits

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
Giant’s new Contact SLR integrated carbon fibre cockpit cuts drag and weight. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

While many (myself included) valued the adjustability of the old two-piece cockpit, the direction of travel in road cycling is clear – fully integrated, one-piece handlebars are more aerodynamic, lighter and, perhaps most importantly, make a bike more attractive to prospective customers on shop floors. They’re what 99 per cent of pros use at the Tour de France, after all.

Notably, Giant has also got on board with the trend for narrower handlebars and flared drops – which contributes to that 18.4-watt advantage.

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
The bar features a narrow hoods position with wider, flared drops. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

A size-medium Propel, for example, now comes with a 400mm-wide bar (measured centre-to-centre at the drops), compared to 420mm on the previous model, and that 400mm bar measures only 370mm-wide at the brake hoods.

Bike fitters will be relieved to read there are plenty of choices, with bar widths from 360 to 440mm and stem lengths from 80 to 140mm. The D-shaped OverDrive Aero steerer and cable-routing system is also carried over from the previous model, so riders can still use a two-piece setup (or a third-party option) if desired.

Giant Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2
The Propel Advanced Pro also gets a one-piece carbon cockpit, albeit a slightly heavier version. Simon von Bromley / Our Media
Giant Propel Advanced 2
Advanced builds get the two-piece aluminium cockpit, which is carried over from the previous version. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

The top-spec Contact SLR 1 Aero handlebar is claimed to tip the scales at 286g (420x100mm), saving 77g compared to the old two-piece cockpit.

Advanced Pro builds also get an integrated cockpit, albeit a slightly heavier, 350g version. The Advanced builds make do with the two-piece setup from the previous Propel, with an aluminium stem and aero handlebar.

Trickle-down carbon spokes and Aero tyres

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
The Advanced SL builds get the new Cadex Max 50 wheelset. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

We got a taste of what was coming in terms of rolling stock last week, with the launch of the new Cadex Max 50 wheels and Aero tyres.

Designed as a “unified aerodynamic system”, these 1,290g, carbon-spoked wheels and aero-optimised tyres come fitted to Propel Advanced SL models, such as the Advanced SL 0 AXS model we got hands-on with prior to the launch.

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
Cadex’s new Aero tyres are also specced on Advanced SL and Advanced Pro builds. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

As detailed in our news story on those wheels and tyres, the carbon spokes are bonded directly into the hub flanges for a lightweight and reactive construction, while the new Aero tyres are claimed to have lower rolling resistance as well as a tread pattern that helps improve aerodynamic performance.

All bikes in the new Propel range are specced with 28c tyres, up from 25c on previous models, which is a welcome update (even if pro choices are trending wider nowadays, as evidenced by our bike checks at this year’s Opening Weekend).

Together, these wheels and tyres cut another 240g of weight compared to the top-spec old model – the most significant saving of all the changes.

Giant Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2
The Advanced Pro 0 Di2 is specced with Giant’s SLR 0 50 wheelset, with carbon spokes. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

The two pricier Advanced Pro builds, which feature Shimano Ultegra Di2 (£5,799 / €6,499) and SRAM Force AXS groupsets (£5,999 / $7,800 / €6,499), have Giant wheelsets with identical rim dimensions and carbon spokes, but more conventional hubs. This bumps the weight up to 1,410g. They also get the Cadex Aero tyres.

The Advanced Pro 1 (£4,599 / €4,999), with Shimano 105 Di2, sees a step down to steel, Sapim CX-Ray spokes, plus Giant’s Gavia Course 0 tyres. These have also been updated to feature a lower-rolling-resistance rubber compound and an aero tread pattern, Giant says.

Giant Propel Advanced 2
The cheapest build in the range gets aero-optimsed aluminium wheels. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

Advanced builds also feature Giant’s SLR 2 carbon wheels and the Gavia Course 0 tyres, except on the cheapest, Advanced 2 model (£3,499 / €4,399), which rolls on aluminium Giant P-A1 hoops.

All of the carbon rims are hookless or Tubeless Straight Side, meaning they’re only compatible with tubeless tyres.

What does it all mean?

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
The Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS tipped our scales at 6.56kg as pictured. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

Giant says the net effect of these changes is an 18.4-watt improvement to aerodynamic and rolling efficiency, compared to the previous model, plus – according to our scales – a drop in weight of roughly 350g.

Showing it’s working, Giant breaks down where these efficiency savings come from in its press materials:

Model Previous Propel Advanced SL (watts) New Propel Advanced SL (watts)
Linear drag (+/- 20 degrees yaw) 234.9 222.48
Wheel rotating drag (front & rear) 5.46 5.04
Tyre rolling resistance (front & rear) 27.4 21.8
Total resistance 267.76 249.32
Total energy savings -18.44

The previous Propel was set up with the old two-piece cockpit, with Cadex Ultra 50 wheels and 25c Cadex Aero tyres. The new one had the new one-piece cockpit, plus the new Max 50 wheels and 28c Cadex Aero tyres.

Both bikes were ‘ridden’ by Giant’s Grischa 2.0 dummy, which simulates a rider on the bike with articulating legs.

2026 Giant Propel weights
Left to right, the Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS, Advanced Pro 0 Di2 and Advanced 2 on our scales. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

To underscore how impressive the Advanced SL 0’s 6.56kg weight is, that figure represents a fully painted bike with aero components, bottle cages, a computer mount and sealant in the tyres.

Essentially, it’s ready to race once you add pedals, and riders with smaller sizes taking part in UCI-sanctioned events might even need to add some ballast to their bike to comply with the minimum bike weight rule.

Of course, the big caveats to that are that we’ve not yet had a chance to ride the new Propel, and the Advanced SL build is obviously very expensive (£10,499 / $13,500 / €11,999).

Giant Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2
The Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2 is just over half the price of the top-spec model, but is still competitively light. Simon von Bromley / Our Media
Giant Propel Advanced Pro 0 Di2
It gets an Ultegra Di2 (or SRAM Force AXS) plus Giant SLR 0 50 carbon wheels. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

Stepping down to the Advanced Pro 0 Di2 build still nets you a lightweight bike, though, with the size-medium model we saw weighing only 7.18kg.

That’s also impressive, given it costs just over half what the Advanced SL 0 AXS does and it stacks up very well compared to the competition. The £6,995 / $6,999 Cannondale SuperSix Evo 3 I tested recently weighed 7.7kg, for example.

Unsurprisingly, the Advanced 2 build (£3,499 / €4,399) is substantially heavier, at 8.73kg for a size medium.

Giant Propel Advanced 2
The Propel Advanced 2 is the cheapest and heaviest bike in the range. Simon von Bromley / Our Media
Giant Propel Advanced 2
A mechanical Shimano 105 R7100 groupset and aluminium wheels help get the price down. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

You’re still getting a full-carbon frame and fork with the same aero shaping as the more expensive models, though, with plenty of scope to upgrade the spec down the line, should you wish.

All things considered, it looks to be an impressive package at first glance. Giant hasn’t simply put the Propel on a crash diet and compromised its aerodynamic capabilities just to shed a few grams and grab some headlines.

Giant Propel Advanced SL 0 AXS
Giant hasn’t revolutionised the Propel platform, but perhaps that’s no bad thing. Simon von Bromley / Our Media

It’s a restrained update, but one that appears to smartly refine and modernise the Propel platform. It still doesn’t have the outlandish design features of pure aero bikes such as the Ribble Ultra SL R, Factor One or Cervélo S5 (and may not be as slippery as a result), but it also looks to retain the all-rounder characteristics that make the Propel a compelling bike to own and ride.

As with any new bike, though, the proof is in the riding, so we’ll reserve final judgement on the new Propel until we’ve had a chance to test one fully.

Updated Giant Pursuit MIPS and Rev Pro MIPS helmets are aero tuned to save watts

Giant has updated two of its helmets, both with wind-tunnel developed aero features. While the Pursuit is an aero road helmet tuned for aero gains at higher speeds, the Rev Pro is a more vented helmet with low weight and heat management its focus, but still with aero credentials.

The Pursuit was due an update, because the previous model was introduced 10 years ago. We highlighted it as among the oldest gear still being used in pro cycling, worn on his way to Giro d’Italia victory by Tom Dumoulin, back in 2017 when rim brakes still ruled and cable integration was a twinkle in a bike designer’s eye.

Giant claims the new Pursuit MIPS helmet will save you an average of 1.55 watts over its previous-generation Pursuit and that a size medium weighs 280g.

The MIPS Air Node Pro system is integrated into the helmet’s padding.

The helmet has a shell with a central longitudinal groove, which Giant says helps smooth airflow over a range of wind yaw angles. There’s a Fidlock magnetic buckle for easy strap closure, Giant’s Cinch Pro adjustment and dual-density EPS foam. 

Giant uses the minimalist MIPS Air Node Pro rotational impact protection system. Virginia Tech awarded the Pursuit MIPS a five-star rating in its independent impact-protection tests. 

New Rev Pro vented helmet

Giant claims the Rev Pro is cool at climbing speeds, while still aero when riding faster.

The Rev Pro hasn’t been around as long as the Pursuit, having been launched in 2020 and followed by the mid-tier Rev Elite MIPS in 2024.

The updated Rev Pro MIPS helmet’s venting has been developed using thermal mapping to ensure effective cooling. Giant claims the interior channelling helps remove heat at climbing speeds, without compromising aero efficiency when going faster.

The shell is reinforced to enable Giant to include larger vents and keep the weight of a size-medium helmet down to 280g, the same weight as the Pursuit MIPS and 5.4% lighter than the previous-generation helmet. 

Both Giant’s helmets have a magnetic Fidllock buckle for easy strap closure.

The Rev Pro MIPS has the same MIPS Air Node Pro rotational impact protection system and other features as the Pursuit MIPS and, as with that helmet, the Rev Pro has a five-star rating from the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab.

In the UK, the Rev Pro MIPS helmet is priced at £189.99 (€280 in Ireland), while the Pursuit MIPS is priced at £199.99 / €290. Both are available in three sizes to fit head sizes between 51cm and 63cm and either black or white, with either Giant or Liv branding.

Pentagon Formally Designates Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk

The Pentagon has formally designated Anthropic as a “supply chain risk,” ordering federal agencies and defense contractors to stop using its AI tools after the company sought limits on the military’s use of its models. In a written statement, the department said it has “officially informed Anthropic leadership the company and its products are deemed a supply chain risk, effective immediately.” Politico reports: The designation, historically reserved for foreign firms with ties to U.S. adversaries, will likely require companies that do business with the U.S. military — or even the federal government in general — to cut ties with Anthropic.

“From the very beginning, this has been about one fundamental principle: the military being able to use technology for all lawful purposes,” the Pentagon said in the statement. “The military will not allow a vendor to insert itself into the chain of command by restricting the lawful use of a critical capability and put our warfighters at risk.”

A spokesperson for Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But the company said last week it would fight a supply-chain risk label in court.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.