Twitch will now allow its users to buy products without dragging them away from the stream they’re watching. Announced ahead of TwitchCon, which kicks off today in San Diego, Twitch is launching the live-shopping feature in partnership with e.l.f. Cosmetics, a sub-brand of e.l.f. Beauty. The tech is powered by Amazon Ads.

The brand’s eyes.lips.first. shoppable element will appear on its official Twitch channel, e.l.f.YOU!, which Patrick O’Keefe, the company’s Chief Integrated Marketing Communications Officer, said was designed to “empower female gamers, celebrate creativity and build confidence at the intersection of makeup and the streaming culture.” Twitch users can purchase e.l.f. Cosmetics products as they discover them in a stream, without being taken to a separate page.

E.l.f. Launched on Twitch in 2020 and often collaborates with gaming content creators to boost brand awareness. Twitch’s move into live shopping is likely at least partly inspired by TikTok, which launched the TikTok Shop back in 2023, where businesses can display their products and have affiliate videos placed in users’ feeds. TikTok creators can earn commission if a product they’re promoting is converted into sales.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/twitch-adds-a-new-live-shopping-feature-powered-by-amazon-ads-162554481.html?src=rss

Spotify sees the music industry’s AI problem, and it’s going to do… something about it. On Thursday, the company published a blog post heavy on principles, partnerships and vague plans. Unfortunately, it’s practically devoid of specifics. The most explicit bit is that it’s partnering with the big three music labels. Together, they’ll “develop responsible AI products that empower the artists and songwriters they represent, and connect them with the fans who support them.”

The move follows Spotify’s announcement last month that it would clean up the AI slop proliferating on its platform. The company frames today’s news as a direct defense against competition from unauthorized AI music production. “If the music industry doesn’t lead in this moment, AI-powered innovation will happen elsewhere, without rights, consent or compensation,” the company wrote.

Spotify says artists don’t find that current AI tools are “built to power their careers, their businesses, and their fan bases.” That will inform whatever comes out of the partners’ plans. “We’ll develop new products for artists and fans through upfront agreements, not by asking for forgiveness later,” the company wrote.

Spotify laid out four principles that will guide its hazy plans for “artist-first AI music products.” The first is through partnerships with labels, distributors, and publishers. (In addition to the big three of Sony, Universal and Warner, Spotify is partnering with digital rights company Merlin and the French music label Believe.) The other tenets include choice in participation, fair compensation and artist-fan connections.

Although it’s been forced to clean up the AI mess that grew on its platform, Spotify has adopted AI features of its own. Most notably, that includes its AI DJ. But it’s also released a personalized daylist and AI Playlist features. The company differentiated its tools from unauthorized ones it’s combating. It described its AI features as helping listeners to discover and connect with real artists.

“Our goal is to ensure the future of music innovation happens responsibly, and to invite the best minds in AI to help build it,” Spotify wrote.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/spotify-partners-with-the-big-three-music-labels-on-artist-first-ai-music-products-161047159.html?src=rss

South Korea’s government has stripped AI-powered textbooks of their official status after a single semester of use. The textbooks were introduced in March for math, English, and computer science classes as a flagship initiative under former President Yoon Suk Yeol. Students and teachers complained about technical problems, factual inaccuracies, and increased workload.

The government spent more than 1.2 trillion won ($850 million) on the program. Publishers invested around 800 billion won ($567 million). The textbooks were reclassified as supplementary material. Adoption rates dropped from 37% in the first semester to 19% in September. Only 2,095 schools now use them, about half the number from earlier in the year.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

If you use Firefox, and you’re lucky, then you might be getting a free VPN. Over the next few months, Mozilla says it will be testing a “free, browser-only VPN” for some users, but you’ll need to rely on the luck of the draw if you want to try it yourself.

That’s because Mozilla is only enabling the feature for randomly selected users, at least for now. The announcement technically came in June, but fortunate writers at a number of different tech sites are now reporting that they’re finally starting to see the feature pop up.

How Firefox’s free VPN compares

The VPN, once fully implemented, would put Firefox in competition with Opera and Microsoft’s own Edge browser, but ahead of other alternatives like Chrome and Safari, which do not offer free VPNs at time of writing.

The key selling point here, it seems, is that Firefox VPN will run on Mozilla’s VPN network, which likely means it will use the same respected Mullvad servers as Mozilla’s paid VPN service. Incidentally, Mullvad is currently Lifehacker’s favorite VPN for privacy.

That said, don’t expect the same functionality from the free offering as a full Mozilla VPN subscription. While Mozilla VPN can encrypt all web traffic from up to five devices at once, Firefox VPN only covers your browser. Also, while Mozilla VPN offers servers across 30 countries, allowing you to act as if you’re browsing in that country, Firefox VPN will instead automatically connect to the nearest available server, which is likely to be in the same country as you.

Still, the move is a boon for privacy, as the free VPN will hide your IP address and mask your traffic from your ISP. As for Mozilla itself, the company says it will collect “only the technical data needed to keep Firefox VPN reliable and secure,” and will automatically delete logs linked to your account after three months. Firefox VPN also purportedly “never logs the websites you visit or the content of your communications,” and there are no stated usage limits at this time.

All of that is great news, particularly as governments and websites start to ask for more personal data. Sadly, you likely won’t be able to use Firefox VPN to get around a website block in your state (unless it happens to direct your traffic through another state, if you’re lucky), but it’s always a good idea to let websites and ISPs collect as little personal information about you as possible.

How to check if you have the free Firefox VPN

Because the VPN is only going out to random testers at the moment, it could take a while until you’re actually able to access it. Check if you can try out Firefox VPN by opening the browser and seeing if there’s a VPN setup prompt in the top-right corner, next to the toolbar.

If it’s there, hit the Next button to begin. The setup process will guide you through turning it on, which will involve signing into (or creating) a Mozilla account and hitting a toggle. To turn Firefox VPN off after enabling it (useful if a website blocks VPN traffic), simply click the VPN icon in the Firefox toolbar and toggle it off.

EA employees involved with the Communications Workers of America union have issued a sternly-worded statement against the recently-proposed private acquisition of the company by Saudi-backed investors, according to a report by Eurogamer. The complaints don’t involve Saudi Arabia’s long history of human rights violations, but rather that workers weren’t represented in any negotiations for the $55 billion deal.

The employees worry that any jobs lost as a result of the purchase would “be a choice, not a necessity, made to pad investors’ pockets.” In addition to this formal response, unionized workers have issued a petition that urges regulators to scrutinize the deal.

“EA is not a struggling company,” the statement reads, going on to note that the company’s success has been driven by workers. “Yet we, the very people who will be jeopardized as a result of this deal, were not represented at all when this buyout was negotiated or discussed.”

The statement calls out the huge number of layoffs that have impacted the industry in recent years. Unionized staffers note that “every time private equity or billionaire investors take a studio private, workers lose visibility, transparency and power.”

“We are calling on regulators and elected officials to scrutinize this deal and ensure that any path forward protects jobs, preserves creative freedom and keeps decision-making accountable to the workers who make EA successful,” the statement reads. “The value of video games is in their workers. As a unified voice, we, the members of the industry-wide video game workers’ union UVW-CWA, are standing together and refusing to let corporate greed decide the future of our industry.”

Eurogamer reached out to the FTC to inquire about the status of the proposed acquisition but the agency refused to comment on the grounds that it doesn’t speak about “pending mergers or acquisitions.” It’s worth noting that President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is involved with the purchase. The Financial Times recently suggested that the deal won’t face any real opposition, as “what regulator is going to say no to the president’s son-in-law?”

As previously noted, the proposed deal is valued at $55 billion. This would take the company private for the first time in its 35-year history. Various entities have partnered to make this deal, including the Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund (PIF), Silver Lake and Kushner’s Affinity Partners. US Senators Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal have also voiced concerns about this acquisition. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/unionized-ea-staffers-are-not-happy-about-that-proposed-saudi-backed-acquisition-155559256.html?src=rss

The FCC is moving to expel Hong Kong Telecom (HKT) from US telecom networks, citing national security concerns. The agency sent HKT an “Order to Show Cause,” which directs the company to explain why the FCC should not begin revocation proceedings against it.

The 30-page order outlines the agency’s reasoning, including a focus on applying new certification and disclosure requirements to entities “owned by, controlled by or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a foreign adversary.”

“Today’s Order continues the FCC’s work of ensuring that CCP-controlled entities that pose national security risks to our country cannot connect to our telecom networks,” said FCC Chairman Brendan Carr in a statement announcing the move. HKT is one of the largest telecommunications companies in Hong Kong and is a subsidiary of communications giant PCCW. Roughly 18 percent of PCCW is owned by China Unicom, a state-owned telecommunications company.

HKT is not the only target of the agency’s ongoing effort to root out potential vulnerabilities. On October 28, the FCC will be voting on steps to further strengthen guardrails under its equipment authorization program to protect US networks and the communications supply chain against national security threats.

The past month has seen ramped-up regulatory activity from both China and the United States aimed at companies that operate in or generate revenues from one another’s markets. Chinese regulators have been investigating large tech acquisitions, telling local companies not to buy American AI chips and tightening export controls on rare earth minerals. Much of this comes against the backdrop of trade negotiations between the two countries.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/general/the-fcc-wants-to-expel-one-of-hong-kongs-biggest-telecom-operators-from-us-networks-155204605.html?src=rss

The Department of the Air Force has approved SpaceX’s plans to launch up to 100 missions per year from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

This would continue the tectonic turnaround at the spaceport on California’s Central Coast. Five years ago, Vandenberg hosted just a single orbital launch. This year’s number stands at 51 orbital flights, or 53 launches if you count a pair of Minuteman missile tests, the most in a single calendar year at Vandenberg since the early 1970s.

Vandenberg is used for missions launching into polar orbits, paths oriented north-south that, over time, cover most of the Earth’s surface area. These orbits are popular for Earth observation satellites.

Read full article

Comments

The California Broadband & Video Association has objected to legislation signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 15 that allows apartment tenants to opt out of mandatory bulk billing for internet service. The cable industry group called the measure “an anti-affordability bill masked as consumer protection.”

The association said property owners would have to provide refunds to tenants who decline internet service provided through building contracts. The law “undermines the basis of the cost savings and will lead to bulk billing being phased out,” the group said. Assembly member Rhodesia Ransom, who authored the bill, said lobby groups for internet providers and real estate companies worked hard to defeat it.

The association told the Sacramento Bee it was disappointed Newsom signed the legislation because it would be “an impediment to utilizing an effective tool” that helped middle-class Californians get discounted rates. The law takes effect January 1. Tenants who are denied the right to opt out can deduct subscription costs from their rent.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.