If you’ve been eyeing Apple‘s new MacBook Air with the M4 chip, now’s a good time to scoop one up. The 13-inch model (16GB RAM, 256GB SSD) is over $100 off its usual starting price of $999 in a Memorial Day sale on Amazon — and a coupon available for three of the four colors brings the price down even further to $850. That applies to the 13-inch M4 MacBook Air in Midnight, Silver and Sky Blue. The Starlight variant is on sale too, but with no additional coupon, making it $899.

Models with higher storage options are on sale too, also with savings of more than $100 and a coupon for certain colors. The model with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD is down to around $1,050 from its usual $1,199, while the version above that (24GB RAM, 512GB SSD) is around $1,250 compared to the normal $1,399 price tag. The prices are unbeatable for the laptop that’s only been out for a few months, and is our pick for the best MacBook you can get in 2025.

The 13-inch MacBook Air M4 was released in March and scored a 92 in our review. Engadget’s Devindra Hardawar called it “a nearly flawless ultraportable,” especially with a starting price that’s lower than what we’ve seen in earlier models. It weighs just 2.7 pounds and measures 0.44 inches thick, but is a fast and capable laptop with a bright display and impressive battery life. In Engadget’s tests, the 13-inch MacBook Air lasted for more than 18 hours with HD video running.

Even the base model should be fine for most users, with a 10-core CPU, 8-core GPU and 16-core Neural Engine. As Devindra noted in his review, this year’s 13- and 15-inch MacBook Airs are “zippy, wonderfully light and can last well beyond a full day of work.”

Check out our coverage of the best Apple deals for more discounts, and follow @EngadgetDeals on X for the latest tech deals and buying advice.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/apples-13-inch-macbook-air-m4-drops-to-850-for-memorial-day-164500635.html?src=rss

Around the world fungal infections kill an estimated 2.5 million people a year, notes a report from CNN. But new research predicts that certain species of infection-causing Aspergillus fungi could spread into new areas as the earth’s temperature rises. (“The study, published this month, is currently being peer reviewed…”)

Aspergillus fungi grow like small filaments in soils all over the world. Like almost all fungi, they release huge numbers of tiny spores that spread through the air. Humans inhale spores every day but most people won’t experience any health issues; their immune system clears them. It’s a different story for those with lung conditions including asthma, cystic fibrosis and COPD, as well as people with compromised immune systems, such as cancer and organ transplant patients, and those who have had severe flu or Covid-19. If the body’s immune system fails to clear the spores, the fungus “starts to grow and basically kind of eat you from the inside out, saying it really bluntly,” said Norman van Rijn, one of the study’s authors and a climate change and infectious diseases researcher at the University of Manchester. Aspergillosis has very high mortality rates at around 20% to 40%, he said. It’s also very difficult to diagnose, as doctors don’t always have it on their radar and patients often present with fevers and coughs, symptoms common to many illnesses. Fungal pathogens are also becoming increasingly resistant to treatment, van Rijn added. There are only four classes of antifungal medicines available…

Aspergillus flavus, a species that tends to prefer hotter, tropical climates, could increase its spread by 16% if humans continue burning large amounts of fossil fuels, the study found… [Mainly in parts of Europe and the northernmost edges of Scandinavia, Russia, China, and Canada, and the western edge of Alaska.] This species can cause severe infections in humans and is resistant to many antifungal medications. It also infects a range of food crops, posing a potential threat to food security. The World Health Organization added Aspergillus flavus to its critical group of fungal pathogens in 2022 because of its public health impact and antifungal resistance risk…

Conversely, temperatures in some regions, including sub-Saharan Africa, could become so hot they are no longer hospitable to Aspergillus fungi. This could bring its own problems, as fungi play an important role in ecosystems, including healthy soils. As well as expanding their growing range, a warming world could also be increasing fungi’s temperature tolerance, allowing them to better survive inside human bodies. Extreme weather events such as drought, floods and heatwaves can affect fungi, too, helping to spread spores over long distances.
Thanks to Slashdot reader quonset for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Apple‘s long-awaited smart home hub could be available as soon as the end of this year, according to the latest report from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Rumors surrounding Apple’s smart home hub began circulating as early as 2022, when the product was first reportedly greenlit. However, the road to its release has been rocky since the product was expected to heavily rely on Apple Intelligence. Gurman previously reported in March that Apple had delayed the announcement of its smart home hub thanks to issues with upgrading Siri.

Gurman has since updated his expected timeline for Apple’s upcoming product, claiming that a lower-end version will release “by the end of this year at the earliest.” Gurman also revealed that a more advanced version that can “move around a person’s desk on the end of a robotic arm” should release a year or two after the basic model’s launch and is a “major priority at Apple.” To meet this release window, Apple will reportedly abandon some of the “bolder features” with the robotic arm model. Gurman added that those features could be pushed back to later models instead.

Apple has said very little about its smart home hub, but rumors detail a design that draws from both the HomePod and iPad. It’s rumored to have a seven-inch display, a new operating system called homeOS, and a dashboard that resembles the iPhone’s StandBy mode. Apple will have to compete with existing smart home hubs like Amazon’s Echo lineup and Google’s Nest Hub, but it’s rumored that the starting price for the robotic arm version could start at $1,000.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/home/smart-home/apples-smart-home-hub-could-reportedly-make-its-debut-later-this-year-161702487.html?src=rss

A year ago, the original creator of SerenityOS posted that “for the past two years, I’ve been almost entirely focused on Ladybird, a new web browser that started as a simple HTML viewer for SerenityOS.” So it became a stand-alone project that “aims to render the modern web with good performance, stability and security.” And they’re also building a new web engine.

“We are building a brand-new browser from scratch, backed by a non-profit…” says Ladybird’s official web site, adding that they’re driven “by a web standards first approach.” They promise it will be truly independent, with “no code from other browsers” (and no “default search engine” deals).

“We are targeting Summer 2026 for a first Alpha version on Linux and macOS. This will be aimed at developers and early adopters.” More from the Ladybird FAQ:
We currently have 7 paid full-time engineers working on Ladybird. There is also a large community of volunteer contributors… The focus of the Ladybird project is to build a new browser engine from the ground up. We don’t use code from Blink, WebKit, Gecko, or any other browser engine…

For historical reasons, the browser uses various libraries from the SerenityOS project, which has a strong culture of writing everything from scratch. Now that Ladybird has forked from SerenityOS, it is no longer bound by this culture, and we will be making use of 3rd party libraries for common functionality (e.g image/audio/video formats, encryption, graphics, etc.) We are already using some of the same 3rd party libraries that other browsers use, but we will never adopt another browser engine instead of building our own…

We don’t have anyone actively working on Windows support, and there are considerable changes required to make it work well outside a Unix-like environment. We would like to do Windows eventually, but it’s not a priority at the moment.

“Ladybird’s founder Andreas Kling has a solid background in WebKit-based C++ development with both Apple and Nokia,,” writes software developer/author David Eastman:

“You are likely reading this on a browser that is slightly faster because of my work,” he wrote on his blog’s introduction page. After leaving Apple, clearly burnt out, Kling found himself in need of something to healthily occupy his time. He could have chosen to learn needlepoint, but instead he opted to build his own operating system, called Serenity. Ladybird is a web project spin-off from this, to which Kling now devotes his time…
[B]eyond the extensive open source politics, the main reason for supporting other independent browser projects is to maintain diverse alternatives — to prevent the web platform from being entirely captured by one company. This is where Ladybird comes in. It doesn’t have any commercial foundation and it doesn’t seem to be waiting to grab a commercial opportunity. It has a range of sponsors, some of which might be strategic (for example, Shopify), but most are goodwill or alignment-led. If you sponsor Ladybird, it will put your logo on its webpage and say thank you. That’s it. This might seem uncontroversial, but other nonprofit organisations also give board seats to high-paying sponsors. Ladybird explicitly refuses to do this…

The Acid3 Browser test (which has nothing whatsoever to do with ACID compliance in databases) is an old method of checking compliance with web standards, but vendors can still check how their products do against a battery of tests. They check compliance for the DOM2, CSS3, HTML4 and the other standards that make sure that webpages work in a predictable way. If I point my Chrome browser on my MacBook to http://acid3.acidtests.org/, it gets 94/100. Safari does a bit better, getting to 97/100. Ladybird reportedly passes all 100 tests.

“All the code is hosted on GitHub,” says the Ladybird home page. “Clone it, build it, and join our Discord if you want to collaborate on it!”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The FAA last week cleared SpaceX’s Starship to fly again after concluding its review of the previous flight, which ended in an explosion, and the next test could now take off as soon as Tuesday. SpaceX is eyeing May 27 for Starship’s ninth flight test, with a launch window opening at 7:30PM ET (6:30PM local time for the Texas Starbase). This launch will mark the first time SpaceX reuses a Super Heavy booster; the booster for flight nine previously flew with Starship’s seventh flight test earlier this year. While single-use parts have been replaced, SpaceX says it’s reusing 29 of the booster’s 33 Raptor engines.

As always, viewers at home will be able to watch along by tuning into the livestream, starting about 30 minutes before Starship launches. That will be available on SpaceX’s website and in a broadcast on its X profile.

SpaceX conducted Starship’s eighth flight test back in March, but the vehicle ran into some issues a few minutes after launch. The Super Heavy booster was able to return to the launch site after separation from the upper stage and be successfully caught by the tower’s “chopstick” arms, but as for the ship itself, several Raptor engines shut off, causing it to tumble and ultimately blow itself up. 

SpaceX says the issue was likely due to “a hardware failure in one of the upper stage’s center Raptor engines that resulted in inadvertent propellant mixing and ignition.” It’s since made some changes to prevent that from happening again. SpaceX said in an update on May 22 that “engines on the Starship’s upper stage will receive additional preload on key joints, a new nitrogen purge system, and improvements to the propellant drain system.” 

For flight nine, the Super Heavy booster won’t return to the launch site, but will instead splash down in the ocean. The Starship upper stage will attempt to deploy eight Starlink dummy satellites, and SpaceX is otherwise looking to this flight to test “several experiments focused on enabling Starship’s upper stage to return to the launch site.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/how-to-watch-spacexs-ninth-starship-flight-test-on-tuesday-213424312.html?src=rss

Mojo (the programming language) reached a milestone today.

The story so far… Chris Lattner created the Swift programming language (and answered questions from Slashdot readers in 2017 on his way to new jobs at Tesla, Google, and SiFive). But in 2023, he’d created a new programming language called Mojo — a superset of Python with added functionality for high performance code that takes advantage of modern accelerators — as part of his work at AI infrastructure company Modular.AI.

And today Modular’s product manager Brad Larson announced Python users can now call Mojo code from Python. (Watch for it in Mojo’s latest nightly builds…)

The Python interoperability section of the Mojo manual has been expanded and now includes a dedicated document on calling Mojo from Python. We’ve also added a couple of new examples to the modular GitHub repository: a “hello world” that shows how to round-trip from Python to Mojo and back, and one that shows how even Mojo code that uses the GPU can be called from Python. This is usable through any of the ways of installing MAX [their Modular Accelerated Xecution platform, an integrated suite of AI compute tools] and the Mojo compiler: via pip install modular / pip install max, or with Conda via Magic / Pixi.

One of our goals has been the progressive introduction of MAX and Mojo into the massive Python codebases out in the world today. We feel that enabling selective migration of performance bottlenecks in Python code to fast Mojo (especially Mojo running on accelerators) will unlock entirely new applications. I’m really excited for how this will expand the reach of the Mojo code many of you have been writing…

It has taken months of deep technical work to get to this point, and this is just the first step in the roll-out of this new language feature. I strongly recommend reading the list of current known limitations to understand what may not work just yet, both to avoid potential frustration and to prevent the filing of duplicate issues for known areas that we’re working on.

“We are really interested in what you’ll build with this new functionality, as well as hearing your feedback about how this could be made even better,” the post concludes.

Mojo’s licensing makes it free on any device, for any research, hobby or learning project, as well as
on x86 or ARM CPUs or NVIDIA GPU.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

“I am a huge fan of Star Wars,” opines an article from the gaming Aftermath. “As every Star Wars fan knows, being a Star Wars fan means you hate Star Wars as much as you love it.”

But fortunately there’s Going Rogue and Galactic — two tabletop games “inspired” by the Star Wars universe (which just successfully crowdfunded a printed illustrated hardcover edition). They’re described as “war among the stars” role-playing games, where members of The Liberation dedicate their lives to the war against The Mandate — “rebels, soldiers, spies, and criminals, or perhaps someone who simply picked up and blaster and said ‘enough is enough.'”

The article notes that Going Rogue was a way for the game’s designer to work out their issues with Star Wars:
“You can re-skin Going Rogue to be all the original stuff [from Star Wars]. I prefer, at this point, to play it not in canon Star Wars,” Levine said. “And also, there are things I hate about canon Star Wars. I think it sucks that the Jedi are child kidnapping, sexless acetics!” In particular Going Rogue is a remix of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, which depicts the lives of a group of rebel agents who give their lives for the rebellion before the original trilogy. “I love Rogue One and I hate Rogue One,” Levine said…

But Going Rogue aims to do more than just allow players to “fix” Star Wars’s narrative problems. It also allows players to explore this narrative of rebellion without having to interface with an evil entertainment empire: Disney… Going Rogue is an opportunity for Star Wars fans to make the story of Star Wars their own, including making it more in league with their own politics by taking Disney out of it. “Something I like about tabletop role playing and adaptational tabletop role playing is it says, ‘Actually, fuck them. They don’t get to own this thing,'” Levine said. “We can’t fully divest from the connection to Star Wars. Obviously, we are downstream of it in certain ways. But we are also trying to say, fuck [Disney’s] ownership of this thing that you love.”

Aftermath adds that the game Going Rogue “intrigued me specifically because it was inspired by Rogue One: A Star Wars Story and Andor — in particular, Going Rogue has a mechanic baked into the game where your character is more or less guaranteed to go out in a blaze of glory for the cause.”

[The game’s designer says] “I wanted to design the game in a way that, as your character realized that they were willing to voluntarily sacrifice their life for this, you were narratively guaranteed by the mechanics that that sacrifice was worth it. You get to see, after they die, how it transforms the galaxy. I wanted you to get that feeling because you don’t get that certainty in real life.” They didn’t make this game to convince anyone to become a socialist, but instead to create an emotional tool that serves as a mirror for the players’ own feelings about what it means to devote your life to a political cause.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Texas could become the next US state to lay down the law with social media platforms. A Texas bill that would ban social media use for anyone under 18 recently moved past the Senate committee and is due for a vote in front of the Texas State Senate. The bill has until the state’s legislative session comes to an end on June 2, leaving roughly a week for it to be approved by both the Senate and the governor.

Earlier this year, the bill passed the House committee stage and was later voted in favor of by the state’s House of Representatives. If made into law, the bill would force social media platforms to verify the age of anyone setting up an account, much like how Texas passed legislation requiring websites hosting porn to implement an age verification system. On top of that, Texas’ social media ban proposes to let parents delete their child’s social media account, allowing the platforms 10 days to comply with the request or face a fine from the state’s attorney general.

Texas isn’t the only governing body interested in restricting social media access. Last year, Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, signed into law a bill that outright bans anyone under 14 from using social media and requires 14- and 15-year-olds to get parental consent to make an account or use an existing account. Notably, Texas’ proposed law is much stricter than that. 

On a larger scale, the US Senate introduced a bill to ban social media platforms for anyone under 13 in April 2024. After being stuck in the committee stage, Senators Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) recently made comments that signal a potential second attempt at getting this passed.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/texas-is-getting-ready-to-ban-social-media-for-anyone-under-18-180202219.html?src=rss

“Do we need publicly-owned social networks to escape Silicon Valley?” asks an opinion piece in Spain’s El Pais newspaper.
It argues it’s necessary because social media platforms “have consolidated themselves as quasi-monopolies, with a business model that consists of violating our privacy in search of data to sell ads…”

Among the proposals and alternatives to these platforms, the idea of public social media networks has often been mentioned. Imagine, for example, a Twitter for the European Union, or a Facebook managed by media outlets like the BBC. In February, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez called for “the development of our own browsers, European public and private social networks and messaging services that use transparent protocols.” Former Spanish prime minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero — who governed from 2004 until 2011 — and the left-wing Sumar bloc in the Spanish Parliament have also proposed this. And, back in 2021, former British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn made a similar suggestion.

At first glance, this may seem like a good idea: a public platform wouldn’t require algorithms — which are designed to stimulate addiction and confrontation — nor would it have to collect private information to sell ads. Such a platform could even facilitate public conversations, as pointed out by James Muldoon, a professor at Essex Business School and author of Platform Socialism: How to Reclaim our Digital Future from Big Tech (2022)… This could be an alternative that would contribute to platform pluralism and ensure we’re not dependent on a handful of billionaires. This is especially important at a time when we’re increasingly aware that technology isn’t neutral and that private platforms respond to both economic and political interests.

There’s other possibilities. Further down they write that “it makes much more sense for the state to invest in, or collaborate with, decentralized social media networks based on free and interoperable software” that “allow for the portability of information and content.” They even spoke to Cory Doctorow, who they say “proposes that the state cooperate with the software systems, developers, or servers for existing open-source platforms, such as the U.S. network Bluesky or the German firm Mastodon.” (Doctorow adds that reclaiming digital independence “is incredibly important, it’s incredibly difficult, and it’s incredibly urgent.”

The article also acknowledges the option of “legislative initiatives — such as antitrust laws, or even stricter regulations than those imposed in Europe — that limit or prevent surveillance capitalism.” (Though they also figures showing U.S. tech giants have one of the largest lobbying groups in the EU, with Meta being the top spender…)

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Whether General Motors survives “depends in part on whether its bets on battery technology pay off,” writes the Wall Street Journal.

At $33,600 the company’s Chevy Equinox is one of the cheapest EVs in America (only $5,000 more than the gas-powered model). “But it also recently announced a novel type of battery that promises to be significantly cheaper, while still providing long range, due to be rolled out in 2028…”

Like many of its competitors, GM has made huge investments in EV battery factories, and in production lines for the vehicles themselves, and it faces challenges in generating a return on investment in the short term… In the long run, however, GM’s focus on creating a North American supply chain for batteries could prove savvy, says David Whiston, U.S. auto equities analyst at Morningstar. The company is investing $625 million to mine lithium in Nevada. It is working on sourcing every material and every part in its batteries domestically, down to the copper and aluminum foils that go into its cells, says [battery and sustainability lead Kurt] Kelty…

GM recently unveiled a new type of battery the company has been working on for a decade called lithium manganese-rich batteries, or LMR. These batteries combine the low cost of LFP batteries with the longer range of conventional, expensive lithium-ion batteries. What makes LMR batteries more affordable is that they use far less nickel, cobalt and other minerals that have become increasingly expensive. Instead, they use more manganese, a common element… The company’s next initiative, says Kelty, is to further drive down the cost of its batteries by putting more of another common element, silicon, into them.

“If GM can continue to grow demand for its EVs, in a few years the rollout of its latest tech could give it a price and performance advantage…” the article points out.

While the EV transition is happening more slowly than projected in the U.S., GM hiring Kelty is a bet that the country’s current EV struggles are temporary, and that technologists like Kelty will help GM get past them. “When we reach cost parity with [internal combustion engine] vehicles, I think that’s one big milestone,” says Kelty. “When you get there, then you’re really going to see the transition happen very quickly — and we’re not that far away from it.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Besides pressure on Apple to make iPhones in the U.S., CEO Tim Cook “is facing off against two U.S. judges, European and worldwide regulators, state and federal lawmakers, and even a creator of the iPhone,” writes the Wall Street Journal, “to say nothing of the cast of rivals outrunning Apple in artificial intelligence.”

Each is a threat to Apple’s hefty profit margins, long the company’s trademark and the reason investors drove its valuation above $3 trillion before any other company. Shareholders are still Cook’s most important constituency. The stock’s 25% fall from its peak shows their concern about whether he — or anyone — can navigate the choppy 2025 waters.

What can be said for Apple is that the company is patient, and that has often paid off in the past.
They also note OpenAI’s purchase of Jony Ive’s company, with Sam Altman saying internally they hope to make 100 million AI “companion” devices:

It is hard to gauge the potential for a brand-new computing device from a company that has never made one. Yet the fact that it is coming from the man who led design of the iPhone and other hit Apple products means it can’t be dismissed. Apple sees the threat coming: “You may not need an iPhone 10 years from now, as crazy as that sounds,” an Apple executive, Eddy Cue, testified in a court case this month…

The company might not need to be first in AI. It didn’t make the first music player, smartphone or tablet. It waited, and then conquered each market with the best. A question is whether a strategy that has been successful in devices will work for AI.

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

James Gentz has seen birds aplenty on his East Texas rice-and-crawfish farm: snow geese and pintails, spoonbills and teal. The whooping crane couple, though, he found “magnificent.” These endangered, long-necked behemoths arrived in 2021 and set to building a nest amid his flooded fields. “I just loved to see them,” Gentz says.