U.K. postmasters were mistakenly sent to prison due to a bug in their “Horizon” accounting software — as first reported by Computer Weekly back in 2009. Nearly 16 years later, the same site reports that now the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission “is attempting to contact any former subpostmasters that could have been prosecuted for unexplained losses on the Post Office’s pre-Horizon Capture software.
“There are former subpostmasters that, like Horizon users, could have been convicted of crimes based on data from these systems…”
Since the Post Office Horizon scandal hit the mainstream in January 2024 — revealing to a wide audience the suffering experienced by subpostmasters who were blamed for errors in the Horizon accounting system — users of Post Office software that predated Horizon have come forward… to tell their stories, which echoed those of victims of the Horizon scandal. The Criminal Cases Review Commission for England and Wales is now reviewing 21 cases of potential wrongful conviction… where the Capture IT system could be a factor…
The SCCRC is now calling on people that might have been convicted based on Capture accounts to come forward. “The commission encourages anyone who believes that their criminal conviction, or that of a relative, might have been affected by the Capture system to make contact with it,” it said. The statutory body is also investigating a third Post Office system, known as Ecco+, which was also error-prone…
A total of 64 former subpostmasters in Scotland have now had their convictions overturned through the legislation brought through Scottish Parliament. So far, 97 convicted subpostmasters have come forward, and 86 have been assessed, out of which the 64 have been overturned. However, 22 have been rejected and another 11 are still to be assessed. An independent group, fronted by a former Scottish subpostmaster, is also calling on users of any of the Post Office systems to come forward to tell their stories, and for support in seeking justice and redress.
The Debian Project released APT 3.0 today as the new stable series for Debian’s command-line interface (CLI) for managing packages, a major release that introduces new features and many enhancements.
The Starliner spacecraft lost four thrusters while approaching the International Space Station last summer. NASA astronaut, Butch Wilmore took manual control, remembers Ars Technica, “But as Starliner’s thrusters failed, Wilmore lost the ability to move the spacecraft in the direction he wanted to go…”
Starliner had flown to within a stone’s throw of the space station, a safe harbor, if only they could reach it. But already, the failure of so many thrusters violated the mission’s flight rules. In such an instance, they were supposed to turn around and come back to Earth. Approaching the station was deemed too risky for Wilmore and Williams, aboard Starliner, as well as for the astronauts on the $100 billion space station.
But what if it was not safe to come home, either?
“I don’t know that we can come back to Earth at that point,” Wilmore said in an interview. “I don’t know if we can. And matter of fact, I’m thinking we probably can’t.”
After a half-hour exclusive interview, Ars Technica’s senior space editor Eric Berger says he’d heard “a hell of a story.”
After Starliner lost four of its 28 reaction control system thrusters, Van Cise and this team in Houston decided the best chance for success was resetting the failed thrusters. This is, effectively, a fancy way of turning off your computer and rebooting it to try to fix the problem. But it meant Wilmore had to go hands-off from Starliner’s controls. Imagine that. You’re drifting away from the space station, trying to maintain your position. The station is your only real lifeline because if you lose the ability to dock, the chance of coming back in one piece is quite low. And now you’re being told to take your hands off the controls…
Two of the four thrusters came back online.
Wilmore: “…But then we lose a fifth jet. What if we’d have lost that fifth jet while those other four were still down? I have no idea what would’ve happened. I attribute to the providence of the Lord getting those two jets back before that fifth one failed…
Berger: Mission Control decided that it wanted to try to recover the failed thrusters again. After Wilmore took his hands off the controls, this process recovered all but one of them. At that point, the vehicle could be flown autonomously, as it was intended to be.
“Wilmore added that he felt pretty confident, in the aftermath of docking to the space station, that Starliner probably would not be their ride home,” according to the article. And Williams says it was the right decision.
Publicly, NASA and Boeing expressed confidence in Starliner’s safe return with crew. But Williams and Wilmore, who had just made that harrowing ride, felt differently.
Microsoft has created a real-time AI-generated rendition of Quake II gameplay (playable on the web).
Friday Xbox’s general manager of gaming AI posted the startling link to “an AI-generated gaming experience” at Copilot.Microsoft.com “Move, shoot, explore — and every frame is created on the fly by an AI world model, responding to player inputs in real-time. Try it here.”
They started with their “Muse” videogame world models, adding “a real-time playable extension” that players can interact with through keyboard/controller actions, “essentially allowing you to play inside the model,” according to a Microsoft blog post.
A concerted effort by the team resulted in both planning out what data to collect (what game, how should the testers play said game, what kind of behaviours might we need to train a world model, etc), and the actual collection, preparation, and cleaning of the data required for model training. Much to our initial delight we were able to play inside the world that the model was simulating. We could wander around, move the camera, jump, crouch, shoot, and even blow-up barrels similar to the original game. Additionally, since it features in our data, we can also discover some of the secrets hidden in this level of Quake II. We can also insert images into the models’ context and have those modifications persist in the scene…
We do not intend for this to fully replicate the actual experience of playing the original Quake II game. This is intended to be a research exploration of what we are able to build using current ML approaches. Think of this as playing the model as opposed to playing the game… The interactions with enemy characters is a big area for improvement in our current WHAMM model. Often, they will appear fuzzy in the images and combat with them (damage being dealt to both the enemy/player) can be incorrect.
They warn that the model “can and will forget about objects that go out of view” for longer than 0.9 seconds. “This can also be a source of fun, whereby you can defeat or spawn enemies by looking at the floor for a second and then looking back up. Or it can let you teleport around the map by looking up at the sky and then back down. These are some examples of playing the model.”
This generative AI model was trained on Quake II “with just over a week of data,” reports Tom’s Hardware — a dramatic reduction from the seven years required for the original model launched in February.
Some context from The Verge:
“You could imagine a world where from gameplay data and video that a model could learn old games and really make them portable to any platform where these models could run,” said Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer in February. “We’ve talked about game preservation as an activity for us, and these models and their ability to learn completely how a game plays without the necessity of the original engine running on the original hardware opens up a ton of opportunity.”
“Is porting a game like Gameday 98 more feasible through AI or a small team?” asks the blog Windows Central. “What costs less or even takes less time? These are questions we’ll be asking and answering over the coming decade as AI continues to grow. We’re in year two of the AI boom; I’m terrified of what we’ll see in year 10.”
“It’s clear that Microsoft is now training Muse on more games than just Bleeding Edge,” notes The Verge, “and it’s likely we’ll see more short interactive AI game experiences in Copilot Labs soon.”
Microsoft is also working on turning Copilot into a coach for games, allowing the AI assistant to see what you’re playing and help with tips and guides. Part of that experience will be available to Windows Insiders through Copilot Vision soon.
Berkeley, California is “the latest city to try to block landlords from using algorithms when deciding rents,” reports the Associated Press (noting that officials in many cities claim the practice is driving up the price of housing).
But then real estate software company RealPage filed a federal lawsuit against Berkeley on Wednesday:
Texas-based RealPage said Berkeley’s ordinance, which goes into effect this month violates the company’s free speech rights and is the result of an “intentional campaign of misinformation and often-repeated false claims” about its products.
The U.S. Department of Justice sued Realpage in August under former President Joe Biden, saying its algorithm combines confidential information from each real estate management company in ways that enable landlords to align prices and avoid competition that would otherwise push down rents. That amounts to cartel-like illegal price collusion, prosecutors said. RealPage’s clients include huge landlords who collectively oversee millions of units across the U.S. In the lawsuit, the DOJ pointed to RealPage executives’ own words about how their product maximizes prices for landlords. One executive said, “There is greater good in everybody succeeding versus essentially trying to compete against one another in a way that actually keeps the entire industry down.”
San Francisco, Philadelphia and Minneapolis have since passed ordinances restricting landlords from using rental algorithms. The DOJ case remains ongoing, as do lawsuits against RealPage brought by tenants and the attorneys general of Arizona and Washington, D.C…
[On a conference call, RealPage attorney Stephen Weissman told reporters] RealPage officials were never given an opportunity to present their arguments to the Berkeley City Council before the ordinance was passed and said the company is considering legal action against other cities that have passed similar policies, including San Francisco.
RealPage blames high rents not on the software they make, but on a lack of housing supply…
Wikipedia remembers Dave Täht as “an American network engineer, musician, lecturer, asteroid exploration advocate, and Internet activist. He was the chief executive officer of TekLibre.”
But on X.com Eric S. Raymond called him “one of the unsung heroes of the Internet, and a close friend of mine who I will miss very badly.”
Dave, known on X as @mtaht because his birth name was Michael, was a true hacker of the old school who touched the lives of everybody using X. His work on mitigating bufferbloat improved practical TCP/IP performance tremendously, especially around video streaming and other applications requiring low latency. Without him, Netflix and similar services might still be plagued by glitches and stutters.
Also on X, legendary game developer John Carmack remembered that Täht “did a great service for online gamers with his long campaign against bufferbloat in routers and access points. There is a very good chance your packets flow through some code he wrote.” (Carmack also says he and Täht “corresponded for years”.)
Raymond remembered first meeting Täht in 2001 “near the peak of my Mr. Famous Guy years. Once, sometimes twice a year he’d come visit, carrying his guitar, and crash out in my basement for a week or so hacking on stuff. A lot of the central work on bufferbloat got done while I was figuratively looking over his shoulder…”
Raymond said Täht “lived for the work he did” and “bore deteriorating health stoically. While I know him he went blind in one eye and was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.”
He barely let it slow him down. Despite constantly griping in later years about being burned out on programming, he kept not only doing excellent work but bringing good work out of others, assembling teams of amazing collaborators to tackle problems lesser men would have considered intractable… Dave should have been famous, and he should have been rich. If he had a cent for every dollar of value he generated in the world he probably could have bought the entire country of Nicaragua and had enough left over to finance a space program. He joked about wanting to do the latter, and I don’t think he was actually joking…
In the invisible college of people who made the Internet run, he was among the best of us. He said I inspired him, but I often thought he was a better and more selfless man than me. Ave atque vale, Dave.
Weeks before his death Täht was still active on X.com, retweeting LWN’s article about “The AI scraperbot scourge”, an announcement from Texas Instruments, and even a Slashdot headline.
Täht was also Slashdot reader #603,670, submitting stories about network latency, leaving comments about AI, and making announcements about the Bufferbloat project.
Back in 2023 Python’s infrastructure director called it “the first step in our plan to build financial support and long-term sustainability of PyPI” while giving users “one of our most requested features: organization accounts.” (That is, “self-managed teams with their own exclusive branded web addresses” to make their massive Python Package Index repository “easier to use for large community projects, organizations, or companies who manage multiple sub-teams and multiple packages.”)
Nearly two years later, they’ve announced that they’re “making progress” on its rollout…
Over the last month, we have taken some more baby steps to onboard new Organizations, welcoming 61 new Community Organizations and our first 18 Company Organizations. We’re still working to improve the review and approval process and hope to improve our processing speed over time. To date, we have 3,562 Community and 6,424 Company Organization requests to process in our backlog.
They’ve also onboarded a PyPI Support Specialist to provide “critical bandwidth to review the backlog of requests” and “free up staff engineering time to develop features to assist in that review.” (And “we were finally able to finalize our Terms of Service document for PyPI,” build the tooling necessary to notify users, and initiate the Terms of Service rollout. [Since launching 20 years ago PyPi’s terms of service have only been updated twice.]
In other news the security developer-in-residence at the Python Software Foundation has been continuing work on a Software Bill-of-Materials (SBOM) as described in Python Enhancement Proposal #770. The feature “would designate a specific directory inside of Python package metadata (“.dist-info/sboms”) as a directory where build backends and other tools can store SBOM documents that describe components within the package beyond the top-level component.”
The goal of this project is to make bundled dependencies measurable by software analysis tools like vulnerability scanning, license compliance, and static analysis tools. Bundled dependencies are common for scientific computing and AI packages, but also generally in packages that use multiple programming languages like C, C++, Rust, and JavaScript. The PEP has been moved to Provisional Status, meaning the PEP sponsor is doing a final review before tools can begin implementing the PEP ahead of its final acceptance into changing Python packaging standards. Seth has begun implementing code that tools can use when adopting the PEP, such as a project which abstracts different Linux system package managers functionality to reverse a file path into the providing package metadata.
Security developer-in-residence Seth Larson will be speaking about this project at PyCon US 2025 in Pittsburgh, PA in a talk titled “Phantom Dependencies: is your requirements.txt haunted?”
Meanwhile InfoWorld reports that newly approved Python Enhancement Proposal 751 will also give Python a standard lock file format.
Wikipedia remembers Dave Täht as “an American network engineer, musician, lecturer, asteroid exploration advocate, and Internet activist. He was the chief executive officer of TekLibre.”
But on X.com Eric S. Raymond called him “one of the unsung heroes of the Internet, and a close friend of mine who I will miss very badly.”
Dave, known on X as @mtaht because his birth name was Michael, was a true hacker of the old school who touched the lives of everybody using X. His work on mitigating bufferbloat improved practical TCP/IP performance tremendously, especially around video streaming and other applications requiring low latency. Without him, Netflix and similar services might still be plagued by glitches and stutters.
Also on X, legendary game developer John Carmack remembered that Täht “did a great service for online gamers with his long campaign against bufferbloat in routers and access points. There is a very good chance your packets flow through some code he wrote.” (Carmack also says he and Täht “corresponded for years”.)
Raymond remembered first meeting Täht in 2001 “near the peak of my Mr. Famous Guy years. Once, sometimes twice a year he’d come visit, carrying his guitar, and crash out in my basement for a week or so hacking on stuff. A lot of the central work on bufferbloat got done while I was figuratively looking over his shoulder…”
Raymond said Täht “lived for the work he did” and “bore deteriorating health stoically. While I know him he went blind in one eye and was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.”
He barely let it slow him down. Despite constantly griping in later years about being burned out on programming, he kept not only doing excellent work but bringing good work out of others, assembling teams of amazing collaborators to tackle problems lesser men would have considered intractable… Dave should have been famous, and he should have been rich. If he had a cent for every dollar of value he generated in the world he probably could have bought the entire country of Nicaragua and had enough left over to finance a space program. He joked about wanting to do the latter, and I don’t think he was actually joking…
In the invisible college of people who made the Internet run, he was among the best of us. He said I inspired him, but I often thought he was a better and more selfless man than me. Ave atque vale, Dave.
Weeks before his death Täht was still active on X.com, retweeting LWN’s article about “The AI scraperbot scourge”, an announcement from Texas Instruments, and even a Slashdot headline.
Täht was also Slashdot reader #603,670, submitting stories about network latency, leaving comments about AI, and making announcements about the Bufferbloat project.
Is OpenAI’s ChatGPT violating copyrights? The New York Times sued OpenAI in December 2023. But Ars Technica summarizes OpenAI’s response. The New York Times (or NYT) “should have known that ChatGPT was being trained on its articles… partly because of the newspaper’s own reporting…”
OpenAI pointed to a single November 2020 article, where the NYT reported that OpenAI was analyzing a trillion words on the Internet.
But on Friday, U.S. district judge Sidney Stein disagreed, denying OpenAI’s motion to dismiss the NYT’s copyright claims partly based on one NYT journalist’s reporting. In his opinion, Stein confirmed that it’s OpenAI’s burden to prove that the NYT knew that ChatGPT would potentially violate its copyrights two years prior to its release in November 2022… And OpenAI’s other argument — that it was “common knowledge” that ChatGPT was trained on NYT articles in 2020 based on other reporting — also failed for similar reasons…
OpenAI may still be able to prove through discovery that the NYT knew that ChatGPT would have infringing outputs in 2020, Stein said. But at this early stage, dismissal is not appropriate, the judge concluded. The same logic follows in a related case from The Daily News, Stein ruled. Davida Brook, co-lead counsel for the NYT, suggested in a statement to Ars that the NYT counts Friday’s ruling as a win. “We appreciate Judge Stein’s careful consideration of these issues,” Brook said. “As the opinion indicates, all of our copyright claims will continue against Microsoft and OpenAI for their widespread theft of millions of The Times’s works, and we look forward to continuing to pursue them.”
The New York Times is also arguing that OpenAI contributes to ChatGPT users’ infringement of its articles, and OpenAI lost its bid to dismiss that claim, too. The NYT argued that by training AI models on NYT works and training ChatGPT to deliver certain outputs, without the NYT’s consent, OpenAI should be liable for users who manipulate ChatGPT to regurgitate content in order to skirt the NYT’s paywalls… At this stage, Stein said that the NYT has “plausibly” alleged contributory infringement, showing through more than 100 pages of examples of ChatGPT outputs and media reports showing that ChatGPT could regurgitate portions of paywalled news articles that OpenAI “possessed constructive, if not actual, knowledge of end-user infringement.” Perhaps more troubling to OpenAI, the judge noted that “The Times even informed defendants ‘that their tools infringed its copyrighted works,’ supporting the inference that defendants possessed actual knowledge of infringement by end users.”
Jamie Siminoff, who founded Ring and started the company in his garage, is back at Amazon after leaving the company as its CEO in 2023. Siminoff joined Amazon when the e-commerce website acquired Ring in 2018, but he left in 2023 and founded another startup that he sold to lock maker Latch Inc. When he left Amazon two years ago, he said that invention was his true passion. Now, he’s taking on the role as the vice president in charge of not just Ring, but also Amazon’s smart home camera unit Blink, the company’s in-garage delivery operations called Key and the Amazon Sidewalk low-bandwith, long-range shared network.
Siminoff is replacing Elizabeth Hamren, who took over his role two years ago. Hamren used to be the COO of Discord and was also an executive at Microsoft and at Meta. According to Bloomberg, she’s still looking for new opportunities from inside and outside the company.
In a post welcoming him back posted on the Amazon website, Siminoff briefly and broadly talked about his plans for the divisions he’s heading. He plans to focus on security, on making people feel their “homes are safe, even when they’re thousands of miles away.” Siminoff also wants to make sure Amazon’s experiences related to home security “work seamlessly across different types of devices.” In addition, he talked about how he’s going to explore the use of artificial intelligence in Amazon’s products and services in the future. “The AI transformation happening right now is a once-in-a-generation opportunity, and I think we’re super well positioned with helpful and practical AI features like Smart Video Search,” he said. “It’s just the start here — we’re just scratching the surface of what we can do with AI — and I look forward to digging into this with the team even more.”
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/ring-founder-jamie-siminoff-is-back-at-amazon-to-run-its-video-doorbell-unit-130009731.html?src=rss
An anonymous reader shares a report: Yet another busy hurricane season is likely across the Atlantic this year — but some of the conditions that supercharged storms like Hurricanes Helene and Milton in 2024 have waned, according to a key forecast issued Thursday.
A warm — yet no longer record-hot — strip of waters across the Atlantic Ocean is forecast to help fuel development of 17 named tropical cyclones during the season that runs from June 1 through Nov. 30, according to Colorado State University researchers. Of those tropical cyclones, nine are forecast to become hurricanes, with four of those expected to reach “major” hurricane strength.
That would mean a few more tropical storms and hurricanes than in an average year, yet slightly quieter conditions than those observed across the Atlantic basin last year. This time last year, researchers from CSU were warning of an “extremely active” hurricane season with nearly two dozen named tropical storms. The next month, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released an aggressive forecast, warning the United States could face one of its worst hurricane seasons in two decades.
The forecast out Thursday underscores how warming oceans and cyclical patterns in storm activity have primed the Atlantic basin for what is now a decades-long string of frequent, above-normal — but not necessarily hyperactive — seasons, said Philip Klotzbach, a senior research scientist at Colorado State and the forecast’s lead author.
The official launch of Apple’s iOS 18 brought with it some fresh ways to customize your iPhone’s home screen. Rather than leaving unwanted apps hanging around like a bad smell in places you don’t want them, users can now take full control of app placement and make their home screen their own. Whether you’re looking to add useful widgets, reorganize your apps or get rid of the ones you never use, customizing your iPhone home screen can help your device feel a little more unique. Here’s a simple step-by-step guide to everything you can do to make your iOS 18 home screen look better and work the way you want.
How to add, edit and remove widgets
Widgets provide a convenient at-a-glance view of an app’s data or functionality, giving you quick access to information and reducing the need to open the app itself. A well-placed widget allows you to check the weather, view your calendar or access music controls, all without opening an app, giving your thumb a well-earned rest. Everybody loves a good shortcut, and with iOS 18, you can add, edit, or remove widgets easily, letting you jump straight to the information that matters.
To add a widget:
Touch and hold an empty area on your home screen until the app icons start to jiggle.
Tap the Edit button in the top-left corner and select Add Widget.
Scroll or search for the widget you want, then tap it.
Swipe left or right to choose a size (some offer different layouts).
Tap Add Widget to place it on your screen.
Drag it to your preferred spot, then tap Done (top right).
To edit a widget:
Press and hold the widget you want to change.
Tap Edit Widget (if available). If Edit Widget isn’t available, you can cycle through the icons for different placement and layout options.
Adjust settings like what calendar it shows, which location for the weather, etc. These options will be unique to each app’s widget.
To remove a widget:
Press and hold the widget.
Tap Remove Widget, then confirm.
Rob Webb for Engadget
How to move apps and widgets on the home screen
Shuffling your home screen apps and widgets is also a cinch thanks to iOS 18’s customization overhaul. It’s a simple but useful way to personalize your iPhone’s home screen and declutter your wallpaper, so your loved ones’ faces don’t become buried underneath a wall of app icons.
Tap and hold on any app to reveal a menu.
Select Edit Home Screen, where you can move the apps across pages by dragging them to the edge of the screen.
Tap Done when you’re finished.
You can also stack one app on top of another to automatically create a folder (more on that below).
How to customize apps and widgets on the home screen
Moving your most-used apps into prime position is all well and good, but if you’re going for a particular aesthetic with your home screen, the default appearance of an app icon can sometimes spoil the overall look. Luckily, in iOS 18, you can exert more control over how your apps look, including the option to change app icon colors and how widgets are displayed.
To customize your app icon colors:
Press and hold on the home screen and tap Edit at the top.
Choose Customize to change background colors (like dark, light or a custom color) or apply a different layout.
However, bear in mind that not all app icons can change color. If these steps don’t work for you, you may be left with the odd rogue app icon, sticking out like a sore thumb. In which case, you can hide the app icon from view, while still being able to access it easily from the app library.
How to lock or hide an app
Security is a top priority, particularly when it comes to your smartphone. You might have certain apps you want to keep private and for your eyes only. If so, you’ll be happy to know that there are two ways in which you can prevent unwanted eyes on your apps. You can hide or lock an app behind a passcode or Face ID; this prevents unauthorized access and keeps your apps in a Hidden folder. Similarly, you can remove apps entirely from the home screen, still allowing you (and others if they have access) to view them in your App Library.
To lock an app:
Long-press the icon of the app you want to lock on the home screen.
Select Require Face ID (or Touch ID or Passcode).
Confirm your selection by pressing Require Face ID (or Touch ID or Passcode).
To hide an app:
Long-press the icon of the app you want to lock on the home screen.
Select Require Face ID (or Touch ID or Passcode).
Confirm your selection by pressing Require Face ID (or Touch ID or Passcode)
Tap Hide and Require Face ID (or Touch ID or Passcode), then tap Hide App.
How to organize your apps in folders
Folders are a great way to declutter your home screen and keep similar apps grouped together. If you’re the type of person who likes to keep things tidy and organized, storing your apps in folders is a good way to do it.
To create a folder:
Drag one app icon over another, and iOS 18 will automatically create a folder with both.
Tap the name to rename the folder (e.g., “Social” or “Work”).
Drag in additional apps if you want.
To remove a folder:
Move all the apps out of the folder, and it will disappear once it’s empty.
How to remove or delete apps
The struggle is real when it comes to app bloat, and sometimes a bit of a spring clean is needed. If your home screen needs a bit of freshening up, you can kick a seldom-used app to the curb, or at least kick it off your home screen.
To remove an app from the home screen (without deleting it):
Tap and hold the app icon.
Tap Remove App.
Select Remove from Home Screen.
When you want to use that app, navigate to the App Library (swipe left past your last home page) or swipe down from the top of your home screen to search for it.
To delete an app completely:
Tap and hold the app icon.
Tap Remove App.
Select Delete App, then confirm.
To re-download a deleted app:
Open the App Store, search for the app and tap the download icon.
Rob Webb for Engadget
A few more tips to personalize your home screen space
Widgets Smart Stacks: Using this feature, you can combine multiple widgets into a stack you can swipe through. To do this, just drag one widget on top of another of the same size.
App Library shortcuts: If you want a cleaner home screen, you can remove most apps and rely on the App Library (swipe all the way left) or the search tool to launch what you need.
Focus mode customization: Each Focus mode can have its own custom home screen. This is a useful tool for separating your work life from your personal life.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/how-to-customize-your-iphones-home-screen-in-ios-18-120100872.html?src=rss
Road trips with just two people always have their awkward silences. In Dustland Delivery, my character, a sharpshooter, has tried to break the ice with the blacksmith he hired a few towns back, with only intermittent success.
Remember that bodyguard, the one I unsuccessfully tried to flirt with at that bar? The blacksmith was uninterested. What about that wily junk dealer, or the creepy cemetery? Silence. She only wanted to discuss “Abandoned train” and “Abandoned factory,” even though, in this post-apocalypse, abandonment was not that rare. But I made a note to look out for any rusted remains; stress and mood are far trickier to fix than hunger and thirst.
Dustland Delivery release trailer.
Dustland Delivery, available through Steam for Windows (and Proton/Steam Deck), puts you in the role typically taken up by NPCs in other post-apocalyptic RPGs. You’re a trader, buying cheap goods in one place to sell at a profit elsewhere, and working the costs of fuel, maintenance, and raider attacks into your margins. You’re in charge of everything on your trip: how fast you drive, when to rest and set up camp, whether to approach that caravan of pickups or give them a wide berth.
The start-up Colossal Biosciences aims to use gene-editing technology to bring back the woolly mammoth and other extinct species. Recently, the company achieved major milestones: last year, they generated stem cells for the Asian elephant, the mammoth’s closest living relative, and this month they published photos of genetically modified mice with long, mammoth-like coats. According to the company’s founders, including Harvard and MIT professor George Church, these advances take Colossal a big step closer to their goal of using mammoths to combat climate change by restoring Arctic grassland ecosystems. Church also claims that Colossal’s woolly mammoth program will help protect endangered species like the Asian elephant, saying “we’re injecting money into conservation efforts.”
In other words, the scientific advances Colossal makes in their lab will result in positive changes from the tropics to the Arctic, from the soil to the atmosphere.
Colossal’s Jurassic Park-like ambitions have captured the imagination of the public and investors, bringing its latest valuation to $10 billion. And the company’s research does seem to be resulting in some technical advances. But I’d argue that the broader effort to de-extinct the mammoth is—as far as conservation efforts go—incredibly misguided. Ultimately, Colossal’s efforts won’t end up being about helping wild elephants or saving the climate. They’ll be about creating creatures for human spectacle, with insufficient attention to the costs and opportunity costs to human and animal life.
A new study shows bonobos can combine vocal calls in ways that mirror human language, producing phrases with meanings beyond the sum of individual sounds. “Human language is not as unique as we thought,” said Dr Melissa Berthet, the first author of the research from the University of Zurich. Another author, Dr Simon Townsend, said: “The cognitive building blocks that facilitate this capacity is at least 7m years old. And I think that is a really cool finding.”
The Guardian reports: Writing in the journal Science, Berthet and colleagues said that in the human language, words were often combined to produce phrases that either had a meaning that was simply the sum of its parts, or a meaning that was related to, but differed from, those of the constituent words. “‘Blond dancer’ — it’s a person that is both blond and a dancer, you just have to add the meanings. But a ‘bad dancer’ is not a person that is bad and a dancer,” said Berthet. “So bad is really modifying the meaning of dancer here.” It was previously thought animals such as birds and chimpanzees were only able to produce the former type of combination, but scientists have found bonobos can create both.
The team recorded 700 vocalizations from 30 adult bonobos in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, checking the context of each against a list of 300 possible situations or descriptions. The results reveal bonobos have seven different types of call, used in 19 different combinations. Of these, 15 require further analysis, but four appear to follow the rules of human sentences. Yelps — thought to mean “‘et’s do that” — followed by grunts — thought to mean “look at what I am doing,” were combined to make “yelp-grunt,” which appeared to mean “let’s do what I’m doing.” The combination, the team said, reflected the sum of its parts and was used by bonobos to encourage others to build their night nests.
The other three combinations had a meaning apparently related to, but different from, their constituent calls. For example, the team found a peep — which roughly means “I would like to …” — followed by a whistle — appeared to mean “let’s stay together” — could be combined to create “peep-whistle.” This combination was used to smooth over tense social situations, such as during mating or displays of prowess. The team speculated its meaning was akin to “let’s find peace.” The team said the findings in bonobos, together with the previous work in chimps, had implications for the evolution of language in humans, given all three species showed the ability to combine words or vocalizations to create phrases.
SpaceX’s Fram2 mission returned safely after becoming the first crewed spaceflight to orbit directly over Earth’s poles. From a report: Led by cryptocurrency billionaire Chun Wang, who is the financier of this mission, the Fram2 crew has been free-flying through orbit since Monday. The group splashed down at 9:19 a.m. PT, or 12:19 p.m. ET, off the coast of California — the first West Coast landing in SpaceX’s five-year history of human spaceflight missions. The company livestreamed the splashdown and recovery of the capsule on its website.
During the journey, the Fram2 crew members were slated to carry out various research projects, including capturing images of auroras from space and documenting their experiences with motion sickness. […] This trip is privately funded, and such missions allow for SpaceX’s customers to spend their time in space as they see fit. For Fram2, the crew traveled to orbit prepared to carry out 22 research and science experiments, some of which were designed and overseen by SpaceX. Most of the research involves evaluating crew health.
