Was the cutting of undersea cables part of a larger pattern? Russia and its proxies are accused by western officials of “staging dozens of attacks and other incidents across Europe since the invasion of Ukraine three years ago,” reports the Associated Press.

That includes cyberattacks and committing acts of sabotage/vandalism/arson, as well as spreading propaganda and even plotting killings, according to the article. (“Western intelligence agencies uncovered what they said was a Russian plot to kill the head of a major German arms manufacturer that is a supplier of weapons to Ukraine…”) The news agency documented 59 incidents “in which European governments, prosecutors, intelligence services or other Western officials blamed Russia, groups linked to Russia or its ally Belarus.”

[Western officials] allege the disruption campaign is an extension of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war, intended to sow division in European societies and undermine support for Ukraine… The incidents range from stuffing car tailpipes with expanding foam in Germany to a plot to plant explosives on cargo planes. They include setting fire to stores and a museum, hacking that targeted politicians and critical infrastructure, and spying by a ring convicted in the U.K. Richard Moore, the head of Britain’s foreign intelligence service, called it a “staggeringly reckless campaign” in November…

The cases are varied, and the largest concentrations are in countries that are major supporters of Ukraine… In about a quarter of the cases, prosecutors have brought charges or courts have convicted people of carrying out the sabotage. But in many more, no specific culprit has been publicly identified or brought to justice.
Despite that, “more and more governments are publicly attributing attacks to Russia,” the article points out.
This week a nonprofit, bipartisan think tank on global policy released a report which “found that Russian attacks in Europe quadrupled from 2022 to 2023 and then tripled again from 2023 to 2024,” reports the New York Times.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland noted in a social media post on Monday that Lithuanian officials had confirmed his assessment that Russia was responsible for a series of fires in shopping centers in Warsaw and Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital…

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Slashdot reader Required Snark shared this article from Phys.org:

In the realm of science fiction, [sun-energy capturing] Dyson spheres and ringworlds have been staples for decades. But it is well known that the simplest designs are unstable against gravitational forces and would thus be torn apart. Now a scientist from Scotland, UK has shown that certain configurations of these objects near a two-mass system can be stable against such fractures…

[A] rigid ring around a star or planet, as in Larry Niven’s “Ringworld” series of novels, is also unstable, as it would drift under any slight gravitational differences and collide with the star. So [engineering science professor Colin] McInnes considered a restricted three-body problem where two equal masses orbit each other circularly with a uniform ring of infinitesimal mass rotating in their orbital plane. The ring could enclose both masses, just one or none… McInnes also investigated a shell-restricted three-body problem with the shell also of infinitesimal mass, again with the shell enclosing two masses, one or none.

For the restricted ring, McInnes found that there are seven equilibrium points in the orbital plane of the dual masses, on which, if the ring’s center were placed, it would stay and not experience stresses, akin to the three stable Lagrange points where a small mass can reside permanently for the two-body problem… McInnes restricted this research to a planar ring (in the plane of the circularly orbiting masses) but says it can be shown that a vertical ring, normal to the plane, can also generate equilibria…

These results can aid the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, McInnes said, “If we can understand when such structures can be stable, then this could potentially help direct future SETI surveys.” An important technosignature would be one bright star orbiting in tandem with an object showing a strong infrared excess. Shells around a sun-exoplanet pair or an exoplanet-exoplanet pair could also be possible. A nested set of Dyson spheres is also a feasible geometry.

In 2003 Ringworld author Larry Niven answered questions from Slashdot readers…

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

“I intend to sue the National Archives,” said Joseph diGenova, an 80-year-old former Trump campaign lawyer (and a U.S. Attorney from 1983 to 1988). While releasing 63,000 unredacted pages about the 1963 assassination of President Kennedy, the U.S. government erroneously “made public the Social Security numbers and other sensitive personal information of potentially hundreds of former congressional staffers and other people,” reports USA Today. (“It is virtually impossible to tell the scope of the breach because the National Archives put them online without a way to search them by keyword, some JFK files experts and victims of the information release told USA TODAY…”)

Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer who represented current and former spies and other officials in cases against the government, told USA Today that he “saw a few names I know and I informed them of the breach… Hundreds were doxxed but of that number I don’t know how many are still living.”

Zaid, who has fought for decades for the JFK records to be made public, said many of the thousands of investigative documents had been made public long ago with everything declassified and unredacted except for the personal information. Releasing that information now, he told USA TODAY, poses significant threats to those whose information is now public, including dates and places of birth, but especially their Social Security numbers. “The purpose of the release was to inform the public about the JFK assassination, not to help permit identity theft of those who actually investigated the events of that day,” Zaid said.

The Associated Press reported Thursday afternoon that government officials “said they are still screening the records to identify all the Social Security numbers that were released.”
One of the newly unredacted documents… discloses the Social Security numbers of more than two dozen people seeking security clearances in the 1990s to review JFK-related documents for the Assassination Records Review Board.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Apple’s most recent Mac mini is down to its lowest price yet in an early Amazon Spring Sale deal. The M4 Mac mini starts at just $499 right now for 16GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, or 17 percent off the usual price of $599. Other versions are $100 off too, with 16GB/512GB currently going for $699 and the model with 24GB of RAM and 512GB of internal storage sitting at $899. You can also get the Mac mini with the M4 Pro chip for $1,299, down from its usual $1,399.

The M4 Mac mini earned a review score of 90 in our review this past fall, impressing us with how much power it packs into its tiny frame. Engadget’s Devindra Hardawar wrote at the time, “The Mac mini was the fastest computer I’ve reviewed this year, at least when it comes to CPU benchmarks.” That it starts at 16GB of RAM (as is now standard for new Macs) is a big plus, and in addition to the connections on the back, it has some useful front ports: two USB-C ports and a headphone jack.

The M4 Mac mini’s diminutive size means you won’t have to sacrifice much desk space for it, but it’ll still be powerful enough for tasks like light video editing and some gaming. Devindra wrote that “the Mac mini impressed me by running Lies of P in 1,440p with maxed out graphics settings at 60fps,” along with Resident Evil 4 and No Man’s Sky, which “also held a steady 60 fps in 1,440p.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/amazon-spring-sale-apple-deals-include-the-mac-mini-m4-for-a-record-low-price-161156926.html?src=rss

Founded in 1979, the Association for the Advancement of AI is an international scientific society. Recently 25 of its AI researchers surveyed 475 respondents in the AAAI community about “the trajectory of AI research” — and their results were surprising.

Futurism calls the results “a resounding rebuff to the tech industry’s long-preferred method of achieving AI gains” — namely, adding more hardware:

You can only throw so much money at a problem. This, more or less, is the line being taken by AI researchers in a recent survey. Asked whether “scaling up” current AI approaches could lead to achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), or a general purpose AI that matches or surpasses human cognition, an overwhelming 76 percent of respondents said it was “unlikely” or “very unlikely” to succeed…

“The vast investments in scaling, unaccompanied by any comparable efforts to understand what was going on, always seemed to me to be misplaced,” Stuart Russel, a computer scientist at UC Berkeley who helped organize the report, told New Scientist. “I think that, about a year ago, it started to become obvious to everyone that the benefits of scaling in the conventional sense had plateaued….” In November last year, reports indicated that OpenAI researchers discovered that the upcoming version of its GPT large language model displayed significantly less improvement, and in some cases, no improvements at all than previous versions did over their predecessors. In December, Google CEO Sundar Pichai went on the record as saying that easy AI gains were “over” — but confidently asserted that there was no reason the industry couldn’t “just keep scaling up.”

Cheaper, more efficient approaches are being explored. OpenAI has used a method known as test-time compute with its latest models, in which the AI spends more time to “think” before selecting the most promising solution. That achieved a performance boost that would’ve otherwise taken mountains of scaling to replicate, researchers claimed. But this approach is “unlikely to be a silver bullet,” Arvind Narayanan, a computer scientist at Princeton University, told New Scientist.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The US Federal Communications Commission has launched what it describes as a “sweeping investigation” on Chinese companies already on its “Covered List.” Those companies include Huawei, ZTE and China Telecom, which the US government believes are aligned with the Chinese Communist Party. In 2022, the Biden administration banned the sale of communications equipment, video surveillance gear and services from those companies in an effort to protect the country’s national security and ensure that “untrustworthy communications equipment is not authorized for use within [US] borders.”

According to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, the agency has reason to believe that some of the entities in the Covered List are still operating in the US, because they don’t think the ban covers “particular types of operations or otherwise.” These companies are “trying to make an end run around those FCC prohibitions by continuing to do business in America on a private or ‘unregulated’ basis,” he said. 

This investigation is the first major initiative under the Council for National Security that Carr recently established within the FCC. The new council’s main purposes is to reduce American technology and telecommunications sectors’ reliance on foreign adversaries, mitigate the country’s vulnerability to cyberattacks and espionage, as well as to ensure that the US “wins the strategic competition with China over critical technologies.”

The FCC intends to gather a wide range of information on entities in the Covered List, including details about their ongoing business in the US and the business of companies that may be aiding their operations. It said it will “close any loopholes that have permitted untrustworthy, foreign adversary state-backed actors to skirt [its] rules.” 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/the-fcc-is-investigating-whether-huawei-other-chinese-companies-are-evading-us-ban-150002185.html?src=rss

Two “groundbreaking research reports” on open source security were announced this week by the Linux Foundation in partnership with the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) and Linux Foundation Europe. The reports specifically address the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (or CRA) and “highlight knowledge gaps and best practices for CRA compliance.”

“Unaware and Uncertain: The Stark Realities of CRA-Readiness in Open Source” includes a survey which found that when it comes to CRA requirements, 62% of respondents were either “not familiar at all” (36%) or “slightly familiar” (26%) — while 51% weren’t sure about its deadlines. (“Only 28% correctly identified 2027 as the target year for full compliance,” according to one infographic, which adds that CRA “is expected to drive a 6% average price increase, though 53% of manufacturers are still assessing pricing impacts.”)

Manufacturers, who bear primary responsibility, lack readiness — many [46%] passively rely on upstream security fixes, and only a small portion produce Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs). The report recommends that manufacturers take a more active role in open source security, that more funding and legal support is needed to support security practices, and that clear regulatory guidance is essential to prevent unintended negative impacts on open source development.

The research also provides “an in-depth analysis of how open collaboration can strengthen software security and innovation across global markets,” with another report that “examines how three Linux Foundation projects are meeting the CRA’s minimum compliance requirements” and “provides insight on the elements needed to ensure leadership in cybersecurity best practices.” (It also includes CRA-related resources.)

“These two reports offer actionable conclusions for open source stakeholders to ready themselves for 2027, when the CRA comes into force,” according to a Linux Foundation reserach executive cited in the announcement. “We hope that these reports catalyze higher levels of collaboration across the open source community.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.