But the blog post from Christie’s goes on to acknowledge that AI researchers “are still addressing the fundamental question of whether the images produced by their networks can be called art at all.”

. One way to do that, surely, is to conduct a kind of visual Turing test, to show the output of the algorithms to human evaluators, flesh-and-blood discriminators, and ask if they can tell the difference.
“Yes, we have done that,” says Ahmed Elgammal [director of the Art and Artificial Intelligence Lab at Rutgers University in New Jersey]. “We mixed human-generated art and art from machines, and posed questions — direct ones, such as ‘Do you think this painting was produced by a machine or a human artist?’ and also indirect ones such as, ‘How inspiring do you find this work?’. We measured the difference in responses towards the human art and the machine art, and found that there is very little difference. Actually, some people are more inspired by the art that is done by machine.”
Can such a poll constitute proof that an algorithm is capable of producing indisputable works of art? Perhaps it can — if you define a work of art as an image produced by an intelligence with an aesthetic intent. But if you define art more broadly as an attempt to say something about the wider world, to express one’s own sensibilities and anxieties and feelings, then AI art must fall short, because no machine mind can have that urge — and perhaps never will.

This also begs the question: who gets credit for the resulting work. The AI, or the creator of its algorithm…

Or can the resulting work be considered a “conceptual art” collaboration — taking place between a human and an algorithm?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

But the site adds that newly unsealed court documents “reveal that Meta allegedly used a minimum of 81.7TB of illegally torrented data sourced from shadow libraries to train its AI models.”

Internal emails further show that Meta employees expressed concerns about this practice. Some employees voiced strong ethical objections, with one noting that using content from sites like LibGen, known for distributing copyrighted material, would be unethical. A research engineer with Meta, Nikolay Bashlykov, also noted that “torrenting from a corporate laptop doesn’t feel right,” highlighting his discomfort surrounding the practice.

Additionally, the documents suggest that these concerns, including discussions about using data from LibGen, reached CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who may have ultimately approved the activity. Furthermore, the documents showed that despite these misgivings, employees discussed using VPNs to mask Meta’s IP address to create anonymity, enabling them to download and share torrented data without it being easily traced back to the company’s network.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Nowak said Amazon has quietly developed six significant next-generation fulfillment centers in the past three years that bring automation front and center… Amazon now has industrial robots that can increase efficiencies across the storage, inventory management, pick and packing, and sorting order fulfillment processes.
Fulfillment costs make up about 20% of Amazon’s retail revenue, so he reasoned that automation could have a significant impact on long-term operating profit potential. Nowak says if 30% to 40% of Amazon’s US units were fulfilled through next-generation robotics-enabled warehouses by 2030, it could lead to $10 billion-plus of savings… The investments in robots may already be paying off. Amazon’s North America retail operating margins on a trailing 12-month basis have risen for five straight quarters. North America operating margins improved to 6.2% from 4.6% a year ago.

Nowak made the remarks on a Yahoo Finance podcast (at the top of their article) after touring one of Amazon’s robot-enhanced sites in Louisiana. He believes robotics can drive down Amazon’s costs compared to other retailers like Target (which he sees as lagging behind Amazon on robotics).

Meanwhile workers at an Amazon facility in North Carolina held a vote Saturday on whether to unionize. But roughly 75% of the workers voted against unionization.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Earlier this week, Mangione accepted $297,000 in donations to cover his legal bills from the December 4 Legal Committee, which is stewarding a fundraiser on GiveSendGo for his legal defense, according to a post shared by the group. (A source with knowledge of the situation confirmed to PEOPLE that the post was genuine.) The committee — named after the death date of Thompson — said the donations were offered by over 10,000 individual supporters. Mangione’s lead attorney, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, told the committee that Mangione “very much appreciates the outpouring of support….”

His federal murder charges could land him the death penalty, and he also faces state murder charges that accuse him of committing an act of terrorism.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.