We may earn a commission from links on this page.
When it comes to the common, everyday tools we use to do quick maintenance and repair work around the house, there’s a tendency to just stick with what you have. If you have a measuring tape or clamp in your tool chest, you’re probably not going to think about getting a new one until the old one breaks. Usually, that’s a good practice—if a tool is doing its job, why waste money on a new one? One reason is to upgrade that tool. Just because the standard spirit level you’ve been using for the last decade still does the job doesn’t mean an upgraded version won’t do the job better. These upgraded versions of common, everyday tools make every project just a bit easier—and that makes them worth the investment.
If you’re like me, you have to make a lot of notes when you’re working around the house. I learned long ago that I need to be a “measure 15 times, cut once” kind of DIYer, so I tend to jot down measurements and other details in a little notebook—it’s much better than writing on the wall, or your hand. That is, unless you’re working in damp conditions that turn your notebook into mush. That’s why buying a few of these weatherproof notebooks is such a powerful upgrade: Water, oil, dirt, sweat—it all just beads and rolls off, but you can write on it with a #2 pencil or a pen designed for all-weather use (you can use any old pen or pencil when its dry). Even when you’re knee-deep in a flooded crawl space, you’ll be able to make notes easily.
Though I like my little notebook, sometimes you’re in a tight space and you just need to mark something or make a notation anywhere. A standard marker is usually fine for this, but if you’re working in damp, dirty spaces, not only will standard markers fail, they’ll also get damaged. Enter these Inkzall markers. They’ll write on anything, even if it’s wet, dirty, or greasy. And if you’ve ever tried to write on a rough surface like concrete, you know that it will chew up a standard marker tip. These markers are made to handle rough surfaces, though, and will write just fine.
It’s such a small innovation, but having a tape measure with markings on both sides removes one minor frustration with standard tape measures: When the tape gets twisted around, or you need to hook it onto something but read from underneath. This tape measure from Lufkin is not only double-sided, it has hooks on both sides as well, so you can just slap it into place and get a measurement. Plus, the matte black finish means zero glare from work lights, and makes it a little easier to read in dim spots.
Clamps are the DIYer’s best friend—they’re the second set of hands you need to get things done on your own. Standard bar clamps have one limitation: their length. If you need to clamp something larger than the span of the clamp, you’ve got a problem—unless you have this clever clamp. Using 2×4 lumber, you can create a clamp of just about any length on the fly. The heads can be positioned anywhere along the 2×4, secured in place, and moved as needed.
Working in dark, constricted spaces can be stressful and frustrating. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve set up a work light in my crawl space or in a tight spot under a floor, only to knock it over when I’m awkwardly moving about. That’s why the Wobblelight is a godsend. It’s a powerful work light that you literally can’t knock over. It will just … wobble, and right itself. This way, even if you do accidentally knock into it, you can just keep working without having to extricate yourself, retrieve your light, and re-insert yourself to get back to work.
We all have a spirit level in our tool collection. Whether it’s a small, plastic number or a more robust version, they all work the same way: You place the level on top of something and then squint to see the tiny bubble and judge whether it’s exactly level or maybe just slightly off. And if you’re me, you always realize it’s “slightly off” after you’ve finished the job. That’s where a digital level comes in. With a large display screen (and a second display on top), you’ll get an extremely accurate measurement from various angles or from a distance. And an audible beep will tell you when you’re level, so you don’t even have to look at it while you work.
The standard procedure in my house when working with sockets is a) choose the wrong size; b) become frustrated; c) repeat until you pick the right socket. But with this universal socket, it just fits automatically every time. While you might not want to throw your socket set away in favor of this, you’ll definitely be using it less, especially for those random moments when you need a socket to remove a stuck bolt or have bolts of varying sizes to deal with.
Jeff Bezos has founded an AI startup called Project Prometheus and will serve as its co-chief executive. This is his first formal operational role since stepping down as chief executive of Amazon in July 2021. The company has raised $6.2 billion in funding, The New York Times reports, partly from Bezos. The funding makes Project Prometheus one of the most well-financed early-stage startups in the world.
Bezos’s co-founder and co-chief executive is Vik Bajaj, a physicist and chemist who worked closely with Google co-founder Sergey Brin at Google X. Dr. Bajaj was among the founders of Verily in 2015 and co-founded Foresite Labs in 2018. He recently left that position to focus on Project Prometheus. The company is focusing on AI for engineering and manufacturing in computers, aerospace, and automobiles. The startup has already hired nearly 100 employees, the report said. Researchers from OpenAI, DeepMind, and Meta are among the hires. Project Prometheus is building AI systems that learn from physical experiments rather than just analyzing digital text.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Most of the affected models were sold in the U.S., though a couple thousand
Scientists have found traces of ancient opiates in the residue lining an Egyptian alabaster vase, indicating that opiate use was woven into the fabric of the culture. And the Egyptians didn’t just indulge occasionally: according to a paper published in the Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology, opiate use may have been a fixture of daily life.
In recent years, archaeologists have been applying the tools of pharmacology to excavated artifacts in collections around the world. As previously reported, there is ample evidence that humans in many cultures throughout history used various hallucinogenic substances in religious ceremonies or shamanic rituals. That includes not just ancient Egypt but also ancient Greek, Vedic, Maya, Inca, and Aztec cultures. The Urarina people who live in the Peruvian Amazon Basin still use a psychoactive brew called ayahuasca in their rituals, and Westerners seeking their own brand of enlightenment have also been known to participate.
For instance, in 2023, David Tanasi, of the University of South Florida, posted a preprint on his preliminary analysis of a ceremonial mug decorated with the head of Bes, a popular deity believed to confer protection on households, especially mothers and children. After collecting sample residues from the vessel, Tanasi applied various techniques—including proteomic and genetic analyses and synchrotron radiation-based Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy—to characterize the residues.
When it comes to productivity hacks, there are two things I love: the tried-and-true classics, like the Pomodoro method, and shaking them up with a few customizations. I’ve written before about other ways to mold Pomodoro to match what you need, but today’s idea, Pomodoro 2.0, is one of the easiest and most effective adaptations.
First, a refresher on what the Pomodoro technique even is. When you’re using this technique to focus and be productive, you set an alarm for 25 minutes, work for that time, then take a five-minute break. You complete that cycle four times, then give yourself a longer break at the end, up to half an hour, before starting again. That’s it. It works because you spend those relatively short bursts concentrating on the task at hand, knowing a reprieve is coming. Since they’re not too long, it doesn’t feel insurmountable.
It also works because those breaks play an important role. Taking periodic breaks can make you more productive, both because they give your brain a rest and because they stop you from toiling to the point that your output gets shoddy.
I saw the idea of “Pomodoro 2.0” mentioned on a forum a while back and started Googling. What I found impressed me—it addresses one of the main critiques I have of the original, which is that 25 minutes isn’t always enough time to get into a state of deep work, or work that is uninterrupted, purely focused, and effortless enough that time seems to be flowing by.
Over at Beyond Productivity, Dr. Christian Poensgen recommends starting the Pomodoro session with a 30-minute work block, then adding more time to it after the break, tacking on between 15 or 60 minutes. I recommend doing this incrementally, adding 15 every time, so you work for 30, then 45, then 60, and finally 75 minutes before your big break. Adding too much too soon—or working in too-large chunks all the way through—defeats one of the main purposes of the technique, which is to not get overwhelmed, so taking it slower and easier while still adding on time is the best bet.
If you’re not sure how much time to add on, familiarize yourself with the concept of flowtime. Also known as “flowmodoro,” the idea here is that you should track how long you can work on a given task before you feel drained, track how long your breaks need to be to make you feel reenergized, and start creating custom, Pomodoro-esque work and rest blocks for every kind of task you do in a given day. It takes a bit of data collection and planning, but it can help you master the general technique while still prioritizing deep work and breaks.
The Pomodoro technique shines (and has been so popular for so long) because it helps you ease into your work, motivated by the small work sprints and promise of rewards. It’s absolutely true that you need to take breaks to keep your productivity up, so that part should never be altered or skipped, but sometimes, 25-minute grind sessions just aren’t enough and five minutes to reset isn’t, either. Getting into a state of deep work takes time. Repeatedly stopping yourself before you hit that point is counter-productive.
Giving yourself more time to work on harder, more complex tasks is critical in some instances, just like taking breaks. Adding time to the work blocks in increments helps you settle in and get more done without overwhelming yourself. You should consider this alteration if you have a major project that demands a lot of resources or energy, letting yourself build up to the hard parts as you add minutes to your timer.
If you’re trying this out and not getting the results you want, you can shake it up another way, too. Remember the idea of “eating the frog,” or tackling your biggest to-do list item first thing in the morning? Consider eating the frog in Pomodoro 2.0, starting with your 75-minute block and working backward to 60, 45, and 30. Remember, none of these rules are hard and fast; you can make changes that match your needs and personal preferences. If you’re someone who doesn’t get overwhelmed and has the ability to jump in on long-term work, this structure could suit you, as the promise of shorter and shorter work sessions can feel like a motivator of its own.
Following months of rumors, Valve finally announced the new Steam Machine earlier this week. And while I might question the company’s decision to ship a system with only 8GB of VRAM in 2026, I believe the “Gabecube” will do more for PC gaming than anything Microsoft has done in the last decade.
With SteamOS and Linux, Valve has polished away many of the things that make PC gaming unapproachable to some people. Want to set a frame limit to extend your Steam Deck’s battery life? It’s an easy-to-find option in the Performance overlay, not something you need to dig through multiple menus to find. Want to suspend a game? That’s possible on SteamOS.
And now with the Steam Machine, Valve is poised to bring the fun of PC gaming to an entirely new audience: home console gamers. Even though I don’t plan to buy one, selfishly I hope it’s a runaway success. Like a lot of PC gamers I imagine, I’m ready to leave Windows behind. Over the last few years, Microsoft has proven to be a poor steward of the platform. The company seems more interested in pushing AI features few care for, rather than solving the issues that have plagued Windows for years. After all, it was only recently that Microsoft said it would tackle shader stutter, a problem that has plagued many recent AAA games. Worse yet, that solution may take years to fully implement.
I want the Steam Machine to be the revolution that brings SteamOS to desktop PCs, but before that can happen, Valve must solve Linux’s cheating problem. Right now, the Steam Deck covers two of the three pillars of PC gaming: indies and singleplayer AAA games. For some people, that’s enough, but it leaves out a huge section of the PC market. Nearly four years after its release, you can’t play some of the most popular competitive games, and it’s all because of how easy it is to make cheating software for Linux-based operating systems.
In a 2024 interview with The Verge, Riot’s Phillip Koskinas summarized the issue concisely. “You can freely manipulate the kernel, and there’s no user mode calls to attest that it’s even genuine,” he told the outlet. “You could make a Linux distribution that’s purpose-built for cheating and we’d be smoked.”
When Valve released the Steam Deck at the start of 2022, there was some hope games like Fortnite and Rainbow Six Siege would eventually be playable on the handheld, and for a while things looked positive. Toward the end of 2021, Valve announced Proton compatibility with BattlEye. A few months later, the company did the same for Epic’s Easy Anti-Cheat. There’s also Valve’s in-house solution, VAC, which is fully supported and means the company’s own games, including Counter-Strike 2 and Dota 2, are playable on Steam Deck.
However, despite Valve’s support for some of the most popular anti-cheat solutions on the market, many studios chose not to bring their competitive games to SteamOS, citing cheating concerns. Some notable examples include Fortnite, Valorant and PUBG. Those games have never been playable on Steam Deck. In fact, last fall EA withdrew Linux and Steam Deck support for Apex Legends, one of the few competitive shooters you could play on Valve’s handheld.
“In our efforts to combat cheating in Apex, we’ve identified Linux OS as being a path for a variety of impactful exploits and cheats. As a result, we’ve decided to block Linux OS access to the game,” the company said at the time. “We believe the decision will meaningfully reduce instances of cheating in our game.”
For EA, Riot, Epic and developers of other popular competitive games, the issue is two-fold: Cheating software is harder to detect when it’s used on Linux. More importantly, for many of them there aren’t enough Linux players to justify the resources needed to secure their games for every Linux distribution. For example, when Riot made its Vanguard software a requirement to play League of Legends in 2024, the studio said there were just over 800 daily users playing the game on Linux. For context, millions of people League every day. Put another way, it’s a chicken and egg problem.
The Steam Machine represents an opportunity for Valve. According to Are We Anti-Cheat Yet, a crowd-sourced database listing games that require anti-cheat software and whether they work through Linux or Valve’s Proton compatibility layer, 682 games don’t work for one reason or another. That means more than half of the 1,136 games that require anti-cheat software can’t be played on SteamOS.
With the nature of Linux being what it is, it’s unlikely Valve could make even the most popular kernel-level anti-cheat apps work across every Linux distribution, and based on the company’s approach, it doesn’t have an interest in doing that. However, if Valve made a better sandbox for developers to secure their games, we could absolutely see a SteamOS version of Valorant, for instance.
Studios will go where their players are. The Steam Deck has proven that. And if the Steam Machine becomes popular enough to warrant companies like EA to bring their games to SteamOS and Linux, the PC gaming landscape will suddenly be very different.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/for-the-steam-machine-to-change-pc-gaming-valve-must-solve-linuxs-anti-cheat-problem-130000088.html?src=rss
Sony’s still excellent WH-1000XM5 wireless headphones are down to $250 for Black Friday. That’s $150 off the list price and equal to the all-time low (give or take a single cent) we saw on Prime Day. They may no longer be Sony’s flagship noise-canceling headphones, but if the WH-1000XM6 are out of your price range, these former Engadget favorites are well worth considering at this heavily reduced price.
We awarded the WH-1000XM5 a score of 95 in our 2022 review, praising the supremely comfortable redesign, sound quality and powerful ANC. Battery life is also very respectable at 30 hours. We found the punchy bass an improvement over their predecessors, and the overall sound deeper and more immersive than the M4 headphones. As for noise-canceling, Sony’s decision to double the number of microphones and processors used for ANC means an improvement in blocking higher frequency sounds, such as human voices. They aren’t entirely baby scream-proof, but then few headphones are.
Naturally, the WH-1000XM6 that this year replaced the M5 as Sony’s flagship model offers even better sound quality and noise cancellation, while remaining extremely comfortable throughout long listening sessions. But they’re also a lot more expensive at $450, and if you’re deal-hunting this Black Friday, the WH-1000XM5 headphones are the ones to go for.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/sonys-wh-1000xm5-headphones-are-152-off-for-black-friday-124434564.html?src=rss
Linux kernel maintainers “are grappling with how to integrate AI-generated contributions without compromising the project’s integrity,” reports WebProNews:
The latest push comes from a proposal by Sasha Levin, a prominent kernel developer at NVIDIA, who has outlined guidelines for tool-generated submissions. Posted to the kernel mailing list, these guidelines aim to standardize how AI-assisted patches are handled. According to Phoronix, the v3 iteration of the proposal [posted by Intel engineer Dave Hansen] emphasizes transparency and accountability, requiring developers to disclose AI involvement in their contributions. This move reflects broader industry concerns about the quality and copyright implications of machine-generated code.
Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, has weighed in on the debate, advocating for treating AI tools no differently than traditional coding aids. As reported by heise online, Torvalds sees no need for special copyright treatment for AI contributions, stating that they should be viewed as extensions of the developer’s work. This perspective aligns with the kernel’s pragmatic approach to innovation. The proposal, initially put forward by Levin in July 2025, includes a ‘Co-developed-by’ tag for AI-assisted patches, ensuring credit and traceability. OSTechNix details how tools like GitHub Copilot and Claude are specifically addressed, with configurations to guide their use in kernel development… ZDNET warns that without official policy, AI could ‘creep’ into the kernel and cause chaos…
The New Stack provides insight into how AI is already assisting kernel maintainers with mundane tasks. According to The New Stack, large language models (LLMs) are being used like ‘novice interns’ for drudgery work, freeing up experienced developers for complex problems… The Linux kernel’s approach could set precedents for other open-source projects. With AI integration accelerating, projects like those in the Linux Foundation are watching closely… Recent kernel releases, such as 6.17.7, include performance improvements that indirectly support AI applications, as noted in Linux Compatible.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Jeff Bezos is spearheading a new AI started called Project Prometheus, focused on his current interests in space and engineering, The New York Times reports. The company, which has yet to be made public, will reportedly have $6.2 billion in funding. Part of that sum will come from Bezos, who will act as co-CEO.
Project Prometheus will reportedly focus on creating AI systems that gain knowledge from the physical world, rather than just processing digital information, like AI chatbots. In particular, the company will reportedly explore how AI can support engineering and manufacturing in areas such as vehicles and space technology. Bezos founded space technology company Blue Origin more than two decades ago. The company’s New Glenn rocket had a successful second flight last week.
He is joined by Vik Bajaj as co-founder and co-CEO. Bajaj is a physicist and chemist who worked on projects at Google X including Wing and what became Waymo. In 2018, he co-founded Foresite Labs, which supports entrepreneurs in the fields of AI and data science. Bajaj is still named as CEO of Foresite Labs on the company’s website and his LinkedIn page — the latter of which also shows his new titles at Project Prometheus. Bajaj lists his involvement in the new company as starting this month and puts San Francisco, London and Zurich as its locations.
On its bare LinkedIn page, Project Prometheus’ overview states only “AI for the physical economy.” It also lists itself as a “Technology, Information and Internet” company with 51-200 employees. According to The New York Times, Project Prometheus has hired nearly 100 people, with some employees coming from fellow AI companies like OpenAI and DeepMind.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/jeff-bezos-will-head-a-new-engineering-focused-ai-startup-called-project-prometheus-122115977.html?src=rss
Valve’s second big foray into first-party PC hardware isn’t a sequel to the much-imitated Steam Deck portable, but rather a desktop computer called the Steam Machine. And while it could go on your desk, Valve clearly intends for it to fit in an entertainment center under a TV—next to, or perhaps even instead of, a game console like the Xbox or PlayStation 5.
I am pretty sure this idea could work, and it’s because I’ve already been experimenting with what is essentially a “Steam Machine” underneath my own TV for months, starting in May when Valve began making it possible to install SteamOS on certain kinds of generic PC hardware.
Depending on what it costs—and we can only guess what it will cost—the Steam Machine could be a good fit for people who just want to plug a more powerful version of the Steam Deck experience into their TVs. But for people who like tinkering or who, like me, have been messing with miniature TV-connecting gaming PCs for years and are simply tired of trying to make Windows workable, the future promised by the Steam Machine is already here.
655″Just a little more than a month after reaching an all-time high, Bitcoin has erased the more than 30% gain registered since the start of the year…” reports Bloomberg:
The dominant cryptocurrency fell below US$93,714 on Sunday, pushing the price beneath the closing level reached at the end of last year, when financial markets were rallying following President Donald Trump’s election victory. Bitcoin soared to a record US$126,251 on Oct 6, only to begin tumbling four days later after unexpected comments on tariffs by Trump sent markets into a tailspin worldwide. “The general market is risk-off,” said Matthew Hougan, the San Francisco-based chief investment officer for Bitwise Asset Management. “Crypto was the canary in the coal mine for that, it was the first to flinch.”
Over the past month, many of the biggest buyers — from exchange-traded fund allocators to corporate treasuries — have quietly stepped back, depriving the market of the flow-driven support that helped propel the token to records earlier this year. For much of the year, institutions were the backbone of Bitcoin’s legitimacy and its price. ETFs as a cohort took in more than US$25 billion, according to Bloomberg data, pushing assets as high as roughly US$169 billion. Their steady allocation flows helped reframe the asset as a portfolio diversifier — a hedge against inflation, monetary debasement and political disarray. But that narrative — always tenuous — is fraying afresh, leaving the market exposed to something quieter but no less destabilising: disengagement. “The selloff is a confluence of profit-taking by LTHs, institutional outflows, macro uncertainty, and leveraged longs getting wiped out,” said Jake Kennis, senior research analyst at Nansen. “What is clear is that the market has temporarily chosen a downward direction after a long period of consolidation/ranging…”
Boom and bust cycles have been a constant since Bitcoin burst into the mainstream consciousness with a more than 13,000% surge in 2017, only to be followed by a plunge of almost 75% the following year… Bitcoin has whipsawed investors through the year, dropping to as low as US$74,400 in April as Trump unveiled his tariffs, before rebounding to record highs ahead of the latest retreat… The market downturn has been even tougher on smaller, less liquid tokens that traders often gravitate toward because of their higher volatility and typical outperformance during rallies. A MarketVector index tracking the bottom half of the largest 100 digital assets is down around 60% this year.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
“To be clear, the current economics of space-based data centers don’t make sense,” writes the Wall Street Journal.
“But they could in the future, perhaps as soon as a decade or so from now, according to an analysis by Phil Metzger, a research professor at the University of Central Florida and formerly of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.”
“Space enthusiasts (comme moi) have long sought a business case to enable human migration beyond our home world,” he posted on X amid the new hype. “I think AI servers in space is the first real business case that will lead to many more….”
The argument essentially boils down to the belief that AI’s needs are eventually going to grow so great that we need to move to outer space. There the sun’s power can be more efficiently harvested. In space, the sun’s rays can be direct and constant for solar panels to collect — no clouds, no rainstorms, no nighttime. Demands for cooling could also be cut because of the vacuum of space. Plus, there aren’t those pesky regulations that executives like to complain about, slowing construction of new power plants to meet the data-center needs. In space, no one can hear the Nimbys scream.
“We will be able to beat the cost of terrestrial data centers in space in the next couple of decades,” Bezos said at a tech conference last month. “Space will end up being one of the places that keeps making Earth better.”
It’s still early days. At Alphabet, Google’s plans sound almost conservative. The search-engine company in recent days announced Project Suncatcher, which it describes as a moonshot project to scale machine learning in space. It plans to launch two prototype satellites by early 2027 to test its hardware in orbit. “Like any moonshot, it’s going to require us to solve a lot of complex engineering challenges,” Pichai posted on social media. Nvidia, too, has announced a partnership with startup Starcloud to work on space-based data centers. Not to be outdone, Elon Musk has been painting his own updated vision for the heavens… in recent weeks he has been talking more about how he can use his spaceships to deploy new versions of his solar-powered Starlink satellites equipped with high-speed lasers to build out in-space data centers.
On Friday, Musk further reiterated how those AI satellites would be able to generate 100 gigawatts of annual solar power — or, what he said, would be roughly a quarter of what the U.S. consumes on average in a year. “We have a plan mapped out to do it,” he told investor Ron Baron during an event. “It gets crazy.” Previously, he has suggested he was four to five years away from that ability. He’s also touted even wilder ideas, saying on X that 100 terawatts a year “is possible from a lunar base producing solar-powered AI satellites locally and accelerating them to escape velocity with a mass driver.” Simply put, he’s suggesting a moon base will crank out satellites and throw them into orbit with a catapult. And those satellites’ solar panels would generate 100,000 gigawatts a year. “I think we’ll see intelligence continue to scale all the way up to where…most of the power of the sun is harnessed for compute,” Musk told a tech conference in September.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
“Windows is evolving into an agentic OS,” Microsoft’s president of Windows Pavan Davuluri posted on X.com, “connecting devices, cloud, and AI to unlock intelligent productivity and secure work anywhere.”
But former Uber software engineer and engineering manager Gergely Orosz was unimpressed. “Can’t see any reason for software engineers to choose Windows with this weird direction they are doubling down on. So odd because Microsoft has building dev tools in their DNA… their OS doesn’t look like anything a builder who wants OS control could choose. Mac or Linux it is for devs.”
Davuluri “has since disabled replies on his original post…” notes the blog Windows Central, “which some people viewed as an attempt to shut out negative feedback.” But he also replied to that comment…
Davuluri says “we care deeply about developers. We know we have work to do on the experience, both on the everyday usability, from inconsistent dialogs to power user experiences. When we meet as a team, we discuss these pain points and others in detail, because we want developers to choose Windows…” The good news is Davuluri has confirmed that Microsoft is listening, and is aware of the backlash it’s receiving over the company’s obsession with AI in Windows 11. That doesn’t mean the company is going to stop with adding AI to Windows, but it does mean we can also expect Microsoft to focus on the other things that matter too, such as stability and power user enhancements.
Elsewhere on X.com, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella shared his own thoughts on “the net benefit of the AI platform wave .” The Times of India reports:
Nadella said tech companies should focus on building AI systems that create more value for the people and businesses using them, not just for the companies that make the technology. He cited Bill Gates to emphasize the same: “A platform is when the economic value of everybody that uses it exceeds the value of the company that creates it.”Tesla CEO Elon Musk responded to Nadella’s post with a facepalm emoji.
Nadella said this idea matters even more during the current AI boom, where many firms risk giving away too much of their own value to big tech platforms. “The real question is how to empower every company out there to build their own AI-native capabilities,” he wrote. Nadella says Microsoft’s partnership with OpenAI is an example of zero-sum mindset industry… [He also cited Microsoft’s “work to bring AMD into the fleet.”]
More from Satya Nadella’s post:
Thanks to AI, the [coding] category itself has expanded and may ultimately become one of the largest software categories. I don’t ever recall any analyst ever asking me about how much revenue Visual Studio makes! But now everyone is excited about AI coding tools. This is another aspect of positive sum, when the category itself is redefined and the pie becomes 10x what it was! With GitHub Copilot we compete for our share and with GitHub and Agent HQ we also provide a platform for others.
Of course, the real test of this era won’t be when another tech company breaks a valuation record. It will be when the overall economy and society themselves reach new heights. When a pharma company uses AI in silico to bring a new therapy to market in one year instead of twelve. When a manufacturer uses AI to redesign a supply chain overnight. When a teacher personalizes lessons for every student. When a farmer predicts and prevents crop failure.That’s when we’ll know the system is working.
Let us move beyond zero-sum thinking and the winner-take-all hype and focus instead on building broad capabilities that harness the power of this technology to achieve local success in each firm, which then leads to broad economic growth and societal benefits.
And every firm needs to make sure they have control of their own destiny and sovereignty vs just a press release with a Tech/AI company or worse leak all their value through what may seem like a partnership, except it’s extractive in terms of value exchange in the long run.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
“Three Chinese astronauts returned from their nation’s space station Friday,” reports the Associated Press, “after more than a week’s delay because the return capsule they had planned to use was damaged, likely from being hit by space debris.”
The team left their Shenzhou-20 spacecraft in orbit and came back using the recently arrived Shenzhou-21, which had ferried a three-person replacement crew to the station, China’s Manned Space Agency said.
The original return plan was scrapped because a window in the Shenzhou-20 capsule had tiny cracks, most likely caused by impact from space debris, the space agency said Friday… Their return was delayed for nine days, and their 204-day stay in space was the longest for any astronaut at China’s space station…
China developed the Tiangong space station after the country was excluded from the International Space Station over U.S. national security concerns. China’s space program is controlled by its military.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Android’s security team published a blog post this week about their experience using Rust. Its title? “Move fast and fix things.”
Last year, we wrote about why a memory safety strategy that focuses on vulnerability prevention in new code quickly yields durable and compounding gains. This year we look at how this approach isn’t just fixing things, but helping us move faster.
The 2025 data continues to validate the approach, with memory safety vulnerabilities falling below 20% of total vulnerabilities for the first time. We adopted Rust for its security and are seeing a 1000x reduction in memory safety vulnerability density compared to Android’s C and C++ code. But the biggest surprise was Rust’s impact on software delivery. With Rust changes having a 4x lower rollback rate and spending 25% less time in code review, the safer path is now also the faster one… Data shows that Rust code requires fewer revisions. This trend has been consistent since 2023. Rust changes of a similar size need about 20% fewer revisions than their C++ counterparts… In a self-reported survey from 2022, Google software engineers reported that Rust is both easier to review and more likely to be correct. The hard data on rollback rates and review times validates those impressions.
Historically, security improvements often came at a cost. More security meant more process, slower performance, or delayed features, forcing trade-offs between security and other product goals. The shift to Rust is different: we are significantly improving security and key development efficiency and product stability metrics.
With Rust support now mature for building Android system services and libraries, we are focused on bringing its security and productivity advantages elsewhere. Android’s 6.12 Linux kernel is our first kernel with Rust support enabled and our first production Rust driver. More exciting projects are underway, such as our ongoing collaboration with Arm and Collabora on a Rust-based kernel-mode GPU driver. [They’ve also been deploying Rust in firmware for years, and Rust “is ensuring memory safety from the ground up in several security-critical Google applications,” including Chromium’s parsers for PNG, JSON, and web fonts.]
2025 was the first year more lines of Rust code were added to Android than lines of C++ code…
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
An anonymous reader shared this report from CNBC:
[T]he computing power of crypto mining generates a lot of
heat, most which just ends up vented into the air. According to
digital assets brokerage, K33, the bitcoin mining industry generates about 100 TWh of heat annually — enough to heat all of
Finland.This energy waste within a very energy-intense
industry is leading entrepreneurs to look for ways to repurpose
the heat for homes, offices, or other locations, especially in colder
weather months.
During a frigid snap earlier this year, The
New York Times reviewed HeatTrio, a $900 space heater that also
doubles as a bitcoin mining rig. Others use the heat from their own
in-home cryptocurrency mining to spread warmth throughout their
house. “I’ve seen bitcoin rigs running quietly in attics, with
the heat they generate rerouted through the home’s ventilation
system to offset heating costs. It’s a clever use of what would
otherwise be wasted energy,” said Jill Ford, CEO of Bitford
Digital, a sustainable bitcoin mining company based in Dallas…
“Same price as heating the house, but the perk is that you are
mining bitcoin,” Ford said…
The crypto-heated future may be unfolding in the town of Challis,
Idaho, where Cade Peterson’s company, Softwarm, is repurposing
bitcoin heat to ward off the winter. Several shops and businesses in
town are experimenting with Softwarm’s rigs to mine and heat. At TC
Car, Truck and RV Wash, Peterson says, the owner was spending $25 a
day to heat his wash bays to melt snow and warm up the water.
“Traditional heaters would consume energy with no returns. They
installed bitcoin miners and it produces more money in bitcoin than
it costs to run,” Peterson said. Meanwhile, an industrial concrete
company is offsetting its $1,000 a month bill to heat its
2,500-gallon water tank by heating it with bitcoin. Peterson has
heated his own home for two-and-a-half years using bitcoin mining
equipment and believes that heat will power almost everything in the
future. “You will go to Home Depot in a few years and buy a water
heater with a data port on it and your water will be heated with
bitcoin,” Peterson said.
Derek Mohr, clinical associate professor at the University of
Rochester Simon School of Business, remains skeptical.
Bitcoin mining is so specialized now that a home computer, or even
network of home computers, would have almost zero chance of being
helpful in mining a block of bitcoin, according to Mohr, with mining
farms use of specialized chips that are created to mine bitcoin much
faster than a home computer… “The bitcoin heat devices I have
seen appear to be simple space heaters that use your own electricity
to heat the room…”
CNBC also spoke to Andrew Sobko, founder of Argentum AI (which is
building a marketplace for sharing computing power), who says the
idea makes the most sense in larger settings. “We’re working
with partners who are already redirecting compute heat into building
heating systems and even agricultural greenhouse warming. That’s
where the economics and environmental benefits make real sense.
Instead of trying to move the heat physically, you move the compute
closer to where that heat provides value.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
From the Business Standard:
Apple has accelerated its succession plans as the company prepares for Chief Executive Tim Cook to potentially step down as early as next year, Financial Times reported. Apple’s board and senior leaders have recently increased their focus on a smooth leadership transition after Cook’s more than 14 years at the helm of the $4 trillion tech giant, the news report said.
John Ternus, senior Vice-President of hardware engineering, is seen by many inside Apple as the top contender to become the next CEO. However, no final decision has been made yet. The leadership shift has been in the works for years and is not connected to its present performance, the news report said. Apple expects a strong year-end sales season, especially for the iPhone… Cook, who turned 65 this month, became Apple’s CEO in 2011 after the passing of co-founder Steve Jobs. Under his leadership, Apple’s market value has grown from around $350 billion in 2011 to $4 trillion today. Apple’s stock is near a record high following strong results last month.
Apple “is unlikely to introduce a new CEO before its earnings report in late January, which covers the crucial holiday quarter,” the article points out. “An early-year announcement would allow the next leadership team time to settle before Apple’s major annual events — the Worldwide Developers Conference in June and the iPhone launch in September…”
Slashdot reader BrianFagioli points out that top-contender
Ternus “is deeply technical and has been central to Apple Silicon and the hardware comeback in the Mac line.”
If Apple elevates him, that would be an unmistakable signal that the board wants a return to stronger, more grounded hardware leadership. The company may finally realize that accessories aren’t enough to keep Apple fans excited, and that expensive experiments are not a substitute for devices people can actually use and afford… Financial success can only hide hardware misfires for so long. Apple needs a leader who can reconnect the company with its reputation for creating devices people can’t live without, not ones people return or ignore.
Tech blogger John Gruber “absolutely loves” the idea of Cook’s successor “being a product person like Ternus, and Ternus is young enoughâ — â50, the same age Cook was in 2011 when he took the reins from Steve Jobsâ — âto hold the job for a long stretch.”
Ternus took over iPhone hardware engineering in 2020, and was promoted to senior vice president of hardware engineering in January 2021, when Dan Riccio stepped aside. Apple’s hardware, across all product lines and including silicon, has been exemplary under Ternus’s leadership. And Ternus clearly loves and understands the Mac. I would also bet that Cook moves into the role of executive chairman, and will still play a significant, if not leading, role for the company.
And Gruber makes another observation about that Financial Times article.
“That ‘several people’ spoke to the FT about this says to me that those sources (members of the board?) did so with Cook’s blessing, and they want this announcement to be no more than a little surprising.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Guardian:
The number of deaths linked to superbugs that do not respond to frontline antibiotics increased by 17% in England last year, according to official figures that raise concerns about the ongoing increase in antimicrobial resistance.
The figures, released by the UK Health Security Agency, also revealed a large rise in private prescriptions for antibiotics, with 22% dispensed through the private sector in 2024. The increase in private prescribing is partly explained by the Pharmacy First scheme, a flagship policy of Rishi Sunak’s government that allows patients to be prescribed antibiotics for common illnesses without seeing a GP, raising questions about whether the shift in prescribing patterns risks contributing to the rise in resistance.
“Antibiotic resistance is one of the greatest health threats we face,” said the UKHSA’s chief executive, Prof Susan Hopkins. “More people than ever are acquiring infections that cannot be effectively treated by antibiotics. This puts them at greater risk of serious illness and even death, with our poorest communities hit the hardest… It’s positive that we’ve seen antibiotic use fall in England within the NHS but we need to go further, faster,” said Hopkins.
“Please remember to only take antibiotics if you have been told to do so by a healthcare professional. Do not save some for later or share them with friends and family. If you have leftover antibiotics, please bring them to a pharmacy for appropriate disposal.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Rivian‘s electric mobility spinoff Also announced a $3,500 starting price for its first e-bike called the TM-B. The startup unveiled the shapeshifting e-bike last month, with options for a limited Launch edition, a Performance version or a base model. During the reveal, Also said both the Launch and Performance TM-B models would start at $4,500, but only hinted at the base model’s price tag being less than $4,000.
While the base model TM-B is more than $1,000 cheaper than the other choices, it comes with several compromises, like a lower max range of 60 miles, a weaker 5x power assist, coil fork suspension and only a standard ride mode. In comparison, the higher-end TM-B options have up to a 100-mile range, a 10x power assist, air fork suspension and the choice between sport and standard ride modes. Also is only offering the base model TM-B in all gray, meaning you won’t get the transparent shell that highlights the virtual drivetrain called DreamRide.
While the TM-B’s starting price is more affordable than we first thought, it’s still a premium price tag for an e-bike. The TM-B base model is available for preorder with a $50 refundable deposit and will start shipping in late 2026, according to Also.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/rivian-spinoff-reveals-a-3500-starting-price-for-its-first-e-bike-195949124.html?src=rss
