Reuters reports that the United States Department of the Treasury under the Donald Trump administration has lifted sanctions on three executives linked to the spyware firm Intellexa. Reuters reports: The move partially reverses the imposition of sanctions last year by then-President Joe Biden’s administration on seven people tied to Intellexa. The Treasury Department at the time described the consortium, opens new tab, launched by former Israeli intelligence official Tal Dilian, as “a complex international web of decentralized companies that built and commercialized a comprehensive suite of highly invasive spyware products.”

Treasury said in an email that the removal “was done as part of the normal administrative process in response to a petition request for reconsideration.” It added that each of the individuals had “demonstrated measures to separate themselves from the Intellexa Consortium.”

The notice said sanctions were lifted on Sara Hamou, whom the U.S. government accused of providing managerial services to Intellexa, Andrea Gambazzi, whose company was alleged by the U.S. government to have held the distribution rights to the Predator spyware, and Merom Harpaz, described by U.S. officials as a top executive in the consortium.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian: France intends to follow Australia and ban social media platforms for children from the start of the 2026 academic year. A draft bill preventing under-15s from using social media will be submitted for legal checks and is expected to be debated in parliament early in the new year. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has made it clear in recent weeks that he wants France to swiftly follow Australia’s world-first ban on social media platforms for under-16s, which came into force in December. It includes Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube.

Le Monde and France Info reported on Wednesday that a draft bill was now complete and contained two measures: a ban on social media for under-15s and a ban on mobile phones in high schools, where 15- to 18-year-olds study. Phones have already been banned in primary and middle schools. The bill will be submitted to France’s Conseil d’Etat for legal review in the coming days. Education unions will also look at the proposed high-school ban on phones. The government wants the social media ban to come into force from September 2026.

Le Monde reported the text of the draft bill cited “the risks of excessive screen use by teenagers,” including the dangers of being exposed to inappropriate social media content, online bullying, and altered sleep patterns. The bill states the need to “protect future generations” from dangers that threaten their ability to thrive and live together in a society with shared values. Earlier this month, Macron confirmed at a public debate in Saint Malo that he wanted a social media ban for young teenagers. He said there was “consensus being shaped” on the issue after Australia introduced its ban.

“The more screen time there is, the more school achievement drops the more screen time there is, the more mental health problems go up,” he said. He used the analogy of a teenager getting into a Formula One racing car before they had learned to drive. “If a child is in a Formula One car and they turn on the engine, I don’t want them to win the race, I just want them to get out of the car. I want them to learn the highway code first, and to ensure the car works, and to teach them to drive in a different car.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader shares a report: Getting to space is hard. In many ways, getting back is even harder. NASA soon aims to pull off the kind of re-entry it last conducted more than 50 years ago: safely returning astronauts to Earth after they fly to the moon and back. The mission is a big moment for NASA, which will put a crew on its Orion ship for the first time. The flight will test the spacecraft’s heat shield, designed to protect the astronauts on board.

Re-entries of vehicles from orbit remain one of the high-stakes parts of any human spaceflight, given the stress they put on spacecraft. In 2003, NASA’s Columbia Space Shuttle broke apart as it came back from low-Earth orbit due to a breach on the vehicle that occurred during launch. All seven astronauts on board were killed. Orion will be coming back to Earth from much further away than low-Earth orbit, where all recent human spaceflights have been conducted. That means its velocity and the energy it needs to disperse will be greater, putting even more stress on the heat shield.

During a test flight in 2022 that didn’t include astronauts, Orion’s heat shield didn’t perform as expected. That sparked worries about crew safety on future missions, prompting NASA to investigate and address what happened. NASA will launch Orion with the astronauts on board as soon as February. […] When the vehicle initially re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, it will be traveling around 25,000 miles an hour and face temperatures of 5,000 degrees as it slows down. The Orion craft, developed by Lockheed Martin for NASA, has a shield that is almost 17 feet in diameter. Installed on the vehicle’s underside, the shield is covered in what is called an “ablative” material, which is designed to shift heat away from the craft during re-entry by burning off in a controlled manner.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

It’s no secret that AI-generated content took over our social media feeds in 2025. Now, Instagram’s top exec Adam Mosseri has made it clear that he expects AI content to overtake non-AI imagery and the significant implications that shift has for its creators and photographers.

Mosseri shared the thoughts in a lengthy post about the broader trends he expects to shape Instagram in 2026. And he offered a notably candid assessment on how AI is upending the platform. “Everything that made creators matter—the ability to be real, to connect, to have a voice that couldn’t be faked—is now suddenly accessible to anyone with the right tools,” he wrote. “The feeds are starting to fill up with synthetic everything.”

But Mosseri doesn’t seem particularly concerned by this shift. He says that there is “a lot of amazing AI content” and that the platform may need to rethink its approach to labeling such imagery by “fingerprinting real media, not just chasing fake.”

From Mosseri (emphasis his):

Social media platforms are going to come under increasing pressure to identify and label AI-generated content as such. All the major platforms will do good work identifying AI content, but they will get worse at it over time as AI gets better at imitating reality. There is already a growing number of people who believe, as I do, that it will be more practical to fingerprint real media than fake media. Camera manufacturers could cryptographically sign images at capture, creating a chain of custody.

On some level, it’s easy to understand how this seems like a more practical approach for Meta. As we’ve previously reported, technologies that are meant to identify AI content, like watermarks, have proved unreliable at best. They are easy to remove and even easier to ignore altogether. Meta’s own labels are far from clear and the company, which has spent tens of billions of dollars on AI this year alone, has admitted it can’t reliably detect AI-generated or manipulated content on its platform.

That Mosseri is so readily admitting defeat on this issue, though, is telling. AI slop has won. And when it comes to helping Instagram’s 3 billion users understand what is real, that should largely be someone else’s problem, not Meta’s. Camera makers – presumably phone makers and actual camera manufacturers — should come up with their own system that sure sounds a lot like watermarking to “to verify authenticity at capture.” Mosseri offers few details about how this would work or be implemented at the scale required to make it feasible.

Mosseri also doesn’t really address the fact that this is likely to alienate the many photographers and other Instagram creators who have already grown frustrated with the app. The exec regularly fields complaints from the group who want to know why Instagram’s algorithm doesn’t consistently surface their posts to their on followers.

But Mosseri suggests those complaints stem from an outdated vision of what Instagram even is. The feed of “polished” square images, he says, “is dead.” Camera companies, in his estimation, are “are betting on the wrong aesthetic” by trying to “make everyone look like a professional photographer from the past.” Instead, he says that more “raw” and “unflattering” images will be how creators can prove they are real, and not AI. In a world where Instagram has more AI content than not, creators should prioritize images and videos that intentionally make them look bad. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/instagram-chief-ai-is-so-ubiquitous-it-will-be-more-practical-to-fingerprint-real-media-than-fake-media-202620080.html?src=rss

JPMorgan Chase is now fighting to avoid paying $10.2 million in disputed legal charges racked up by Charlie Javice, the convicted founder of student-finance startup Frank, after court filings revealed her defense team billed more than $5 million simply for attending her fraud trial — including on days when court wasn’t even in session.

A previously sealed Delaware court filing [PDF] released Monday showed that Javice’s total legal tab has reached $74 million, far exceeding the $30 million Elizabeth Holmes spent defending herself in the Theranos case. JPMorgan claims the five law firms representing Javice operated under the mindset that “someone else is paying her bills.” The bank’s filing focused on Quinn Emanuel and Mintz Levin, the two largest firms on Javice’s defense. JPMorgan said Javice had between 16 and 29 lawyers and legal staff present every day of her six-week trial, billing an average of $360,000 daily. No more than four lawyers had speaking roles.

Among the 2,377 pages of receipts submitted for March: a Cookie Monster toddler’s toy, lavender and jasmine sachets, 57 hotel room upgrades at $300 per night, and a $900 meal at Koloman, a highly rated New York restaurant. A New York jury found Javice guilty in March of misleading JPMorgan into acquiring Frank for $175 million by fabricating millions of fake users. She was sentenced in September to seven years in prison but remains free on bail pending her appeal.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The fight over net neutrality saw another turbulent year in 2025, as federal protections that seemed poised for a comeback in 2024 were first struck down by a court and then preemptively removed by the Trump administration’s FCC without a chance for public comment.

The removal, The Verge summarizes in a report, was part of Chairman Brendan Carr’s “Delete, Delete, Delete” initiative targeting what the agency deems unnecessary regulations. Federal net neutrality rules have now been on and off for 15 years, passing under Obama in 2010, returning in 2015, getting overturned in 2017, and briefly revived in 2024 before courts struck them down again.

Matt Wood, vice president of policy and general counsel at nonprofit Free Press, told The Verge that ISPs often feel little financial impact from these rules. “A lot of their complaints about the supposed ‘burdens’ from these rules are really just ideological in nature,” Wood said. States have filled the void.

California’s 2018 law remains the nation’s gold standard, and Maine passed a bipartisan bill in June. John Bergmayer, legal director at Public Knowledge, said state-level laws and the threat of new ones “has kept some of the worst outcomes in check.”

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration is now pressuring states to exempt ISPs from net neutrality laws to remain eligible for broadband infrastructure funding. Chao Jun Liu of the Electronic Frontier Foundation summed up the year’s pattern: “ISPs just want to do whatever they want to do with no limits and nobody telling them how to do it.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Samsung is arguably the 800-pound gorilla of CES, with a full spectrum of products that range from phones and computers to refrigerators to AI assistants and rolling robots. But for CES 2026, the company is shaking up the schedule a bit: Instead of its longtime midday Monday press conference position, the Korean giant will front-run the entire show with a Sunday night presentation.

Samsung has already given a few hints as to what’s on the agenda, but what we’re really hoping to see is an update on the Ballie robot — a star of previous CES presentations that ostensibly missed its previously promised 2025 release date.

How to watch Samsung’s “The First Look” presentation at CES 2026

The event will stream live from the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas on Sunday, January 4 at 10PM ET. There are several ways to tune in: you can watch via the Samsung Newsroom, Samsung Electronics’ official YouTube channel or via Samsung TV Plus. (We’ll embed the stream here once it appears on the channel.)

What to expect from Samsung at CES 2026

Keynote speaker TM Roh, the CEO of Samsung’s Device eXperience (DX) Division, will discuss the company’s plans for the new year and beyond, which will (of course) include “new AI-driven customer experiences,” the company said in a press release. In addition, we’ll hear from the President and Head of the Visual Display Business, SW Yong and Executive Vice President and Head of Digital Appliances Business, Cheolgi Kim. Those two will “share their respective business directions for the upcoming year.”

But if you’re looking for more specifics, Samsung is following its “Advent calendar” approach to early CES announcements, with new press releases dropping nearly each day. So far, we know that — like competitors LG and Hisense — the company will be offering details on a line of micro RGB TVs (replete with confirmed screen sizes of 55 to 115 inches). Also confirmed: a full line of appliances infused with what Samsung calls Bespoke AI.

It’s likely Samsung will map out its CES plans in greater detail as the January 4 event approaches, so we’ll update this story accordingly when it does.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/how-to-watch-samsungs-first-look-ces-2026-presentation-190027604.html?src=rss

Another year wraps up, and with it comes the annual ritual of taking stock. What were the movies, TV shows and books from this year that stood out to you? Not necessarily the ones that dominated conversation or topped charts, but the ones you found yourself recommending to friends, or returning to for a second watch or read.

Share your picks and, if you’re inclined, a line or two on what made them stick.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Skinny is officially back in—not that it ever really left, if you ask me. Between “what I eat in a day” videos and before-and-after transformations, there’s always been this undercurrent of weight loss anxiety masquerading as wellness. “Weight loss” is assumed to be synonymous with “healthy,” but that’s never been the whole story. And during this time for reflection and goal-setting, I urge you to think bigger than simply making yourself smaller.

If you’ve struggled to identify health goals beyond weight loss, you’re not alone. We’ve been conditioned to believe that smaller bodies are the ultimate achievement, when in reality, health is so much more expansive, personal, and interesting than that. Here are the resolutions I’m making for 2026—and how to reframe your own goals around what truly matters.

Move in ways that feel good

The weight-loss version: I need to burn calories. Exercise is punishment for eating. Even if I hate working out, I have to do it anyway because discipline.

The reframe: What if movement was about feeling capable in your body? About the rush of endorphins after a dance class, the meditative quality of a morning walk, or the satisfaction of getting stronger over time?

My resolution: Find three types of movement I genuinely enjoy and do them regularly—not because I “should,” but because they make me feel alive. Maybe that’s swimming, hiking with friends, or finally trying that aerial yoga class. The goal isn’t to torch calories; it’s to build a relationship with movement that’s based on joy rather than obligation.

How to measure success: Can I do things I couldn’t do before? Do I feel energized rather than depleted? Am I actually looking forward to moving my body? These are the metrics that matter.

Eat foods that make me feel energized

The weight-loss version: Good foods versus bad foods. Restriction as virtue. Guilt when you inevitably “fall off the wagon.”

The reframe: Food is information for your body. Am I making choices based on the moral value of different foods, or am I actually listening to what my body wants and needs?

My resolution: Notice how different foods actually make me feel, without judgment. Keep a simple log—not of calories, but maybe of energy levels, mood, digestion, and satisfaction. Do I feel better when I include more vegetables, not because they’re “virtuous,” but because they genuinely help me feel my best?

How to measure success: Am I making food choices based on how I want to feel rather than what the scale might say? Do I have stable energy throughout the day? Can I eat without guilt?

Stay hydrated

The weight-loss version: Water fills you up so you eat less; it’s a diet hack.

The reframe: Proper hydration affects everything from your cognitive function and mood to your digestion, skin health, and energy levels. You deserve to drink water because your body literally needs it to survive and thrive.

My resolution: Drink enough water that I’m not constantly tired, headache-prone, or confusing thirst for hunger. Keep a bottle with me and actually notice the difference in how I feel when I’m properly hydrated versus when I’m running on empty.

How to measure success: Are my headaches less frequent? Is my brain fog lifting by mid-afternoon? Do I have more energy?

Build confidence through competence

The weight-loss version: I’ll like myself when I’m smaller. Confidence is contingent on appearance.

The reframe: Confidence comes from doing hard things, from developing skills, from taking pride in how I’m moving my body.

My resolution: Set a goal that has nothing to do with how I look and everything to do with what I can do. Maybe it’s learning to cook five new recipes, or finally achieving my lifelong dream of doing the splits.

How to measure success: Do I feel proud of myself? Am I challenging myself in ways that feel meaningful? Is my self-worth becoming less tied to my appearance?

Develop a nighttime routine that actually works for me

The weight-loss version: Eating at night makes you gain weight. It’s all about willpower, baby.

The reframe: Maybe you’re eating at night because you’re bored, stressed, or genuinely didn’t eat enough during the day. Or maybe you’re staying up too late scrolling, and food is just something to do.

My resolution: Create an evening routine that actually addresses what I need—whether that’s genuine hunger (in which case, I’ll eat something nourishing without guilt), stress relief (maybe a bath, stretching, or reading), or better sleep hygiene (setting boundaries with screens).

How to measure success: Am I sleeping better? Do I feel more rested? Am I addressing the root cause of nighttime habits rather than just restricting them?

Feel strong and capable in my body

The weight-loss version: I need to earn the right to wear certain clothes. My body is a before photo.

The reframe: Your body is the vehicle through which you experience your entire life. What if the goal was to feel powerful, mobile, and pain-free rather than small?

My resolution: Focus on functional fitness. Can I lift my suitcase into the overhead bin? Hike without getting winded? Play with kids or pets without my back hurting? These are the markers of a body that serves me well.

How to measure success: Am I stronger than I was last month? Can I do daily activities with greater ease? Do I feel capable and comfortable in my body?

The bottom line

Perhaps the most important resolution of all is this: Stop putting your life on hold until you reach a certain size. Don’t wait to buy clothes you love, try new activities, take photos, or simply exist without constant self-criticism.

What would your health goals look like if weight loss wasn’t part of the equation? I’m willing to bet they’d be more interesting, more sustainable, and far more meaningful than anything a number could tell you. This year, I’m measuring success by how I feel, not how I look.

Colossal Biosciences, the Texas-based startup now valued at more than $10 billion that has attracted investments from Paris Hilton, Peter Jackson and Tom Brady, claimed earlier this year to have resurrected the dire wolf — an animal that disappeared at the end of the last ice age — but a group of leading canid experts concluded the company had done no such thing.

The scientists found that Colossal had made 20 edits to the DNA of grey wolves and the resulting animals did not substantially differ from wolves currently roaming North America. Beth Shapiro, Colossal’s own chief scientist, acknowledged to New Scientist: “It’s not possible to bring something back that is identical to a species that used to be alive. Our animals are grey wolves with 20 edits that are cloned.”

Nic Rawlence, director of the palaeogenetics laboratory at the University of Otago in New Zealand, added: “Rather than true de-extinction, Colossal’s attempts are genetically engineered poor copies at best, passed off as the real deal.”

The company has nevertheless pressed forward. It has launched projects to revive the Tasmanian tiger, the dodo, and the moa and plans to unveil its interpretation of the woolly mammoth — a genetically modified Asian elephant adapted to survive at -40C — in the coming years. The Trump administration cited the dire wolf announcement while making efforts to cut the US endangered species list, calling de-extinction technology a potential “bedrock for modern species conservation.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

On Tuesday, US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright issued a now familiar order: because of a supposed energy emergency, a coal plant scheduled for closure would be forced to remain open. This time, the order targeted one of the three units present at Craig Station in Colorado, which was scheduled to close at the end of this year. The remaining two units were expected to shut in 2028.

The supposed reason for this order is an emergency caused by a shortage of generating capacity. “The reliable supply of power from the coal plant is essential for keeping the region’s electric grid stable,” according to a statement issued by the Department of Energy. Yet the Colorado Sun notes that Colorado’s Public Utilities Commission had already analyzed the impact of its potential closure, and determined, “Craig Unit 1 is not required for reliability or resource adequacy purposes.”

The order does not require the plant to actually produce electricity; instead, it is ordered to be available in case a shortfall in production occurs. As noted in the Colorado Sun article, actual operation of the plant would potentially violate Colorado laws, which regulate airborne pollution and set limits on greenhouse gas emissions. The cost of maintaining the plant is likely to fall on the local ratepayers, who had already adjusted to the closure plans.

Read full article

Comments

Starting in July 2026, every public school district in California will be required to have policies on the books that restrict or prohibit students from using smartphones during the school day, thanks to Assembly Bill 3216 that Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law back in 2024.

The legislation also mandates that districts update these policies every five years. Newsom had previously signed related legislation in 2019, though that earlier law merely affirmed that school districts have the authority to regulate smartphone use rather than requiring them to do so.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Finnish authorities on Wednesday seized a vessel suspected of severing an undersea telecommunications cable that connects Helsinki to Tallinn by dragging its anchor across the Gulf of Finland, the latest in a string of infrastructure incidents that have put Baltic Sea nations on edge since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Police are investigating the case as aggravated criminal damage and have not disclosed the ship’s name, nationality or details about its crew. The cable belongs to Finnish telecoms group Elisa. Estonia’s justice ministry reported that a second telecoms cable connecting the two countries — owned by Sweden’s Arelion — also went down on Wednesday. This follows Finland’s December 2024 boarding of the Russian-linked oil tanker Eagle S, which investigators said damaged a power cable and multiple telecoms links using the same anchor-dragging method. A Finnish court in October dismissed criminal charges against the Eagle S crew after prosecutors failed to prove intent.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

China’s Commerce Ministry on Wednesday demanded that the Netherlands “immediately correct its mistakes” over chipmaker Nexperia, escalating a standoff that has disrupted global semiconductor supply chains and triggered warnings from automakers about component shortages. The Dutch government in September invoked a Cold War-era law to effectively seize control of the Chinese-owned chipmaker, reportedly after the United States raised security concerns. China responded by blocking Nexperia products from leaving the country.

Nexperia manufactures billions of foundation chips — transistors, diodes and power management components — that are produced in Europe, assembled and tested in China, and then re-exported to customers worldwide. These low-tech, inexpensive chips are essential in almost every device that uses electricity, from car braking systems and airbag controllers to electric windows and entertainment systems.

The Commerce Ministry spokesperson said the Netherlands “remains indifferent and stubbornly insists on its own way, showing absolutely no responsible attitude towards the security of the global semiconductor supply chain.” Dutch Economy Minister Vincent Karremans has repeatedly defended the intervention. Auto industry groups have warned that disruptions have not been fundamentally resolved. Japan’s Nissan and German supplier Bosch have flagged looming shortages, and the German Association of the Automotive Industry warned of elevated supply risks “particularly for the first quarter” of 2026.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.