Amiga Trombone shares a report from Insider: With signs of growing inventory and slowing sales, auto industry executives admitted this week that their ambitious electric vehicle plans are in jeopardy, at least in the near term. Several C-Suite leaders at some of the biggest carmakers voiced fresh unease about the electric car market’s growth as concerns over the viability of these vehicles put their multi-billion-dollar electrification strategies at risk. Among those hand-wringing is GM’s Mary Barra, historically one of the automotive industry’s most bullish CEOs on the future of electric vehicles. But this week on GM’s third-quarter earnings call, Barra and GM struck a more sober tone. The company announced with its quarterly results that it’s abandoning its targets to build 100,000 EVs in the second half of this year and another 400,000 by the first six months of 2024. GM doesn’t know when it will hit those targets.

While GM’s about-face was somewhat of a surprise to investors, the Detroit car company is not alone in this new view of the EV future. Even Tesla’s Elon Musk warned on a recent earnings call that economic concerns would lead to waning vehicle demand, even for the long-time EV market leader. Meanwhile, Mercedes-Benz — which is having to discount its EVs by several thousand dollars just to get them in customers’ hands — isn’t mincing words about the state of the EV market. “This is a pretty brutal space,” CFO Harald Wilhelm said on an analyst call. “I can hardly imagine the current status quo is fully sustainable for everybody.” “It’s clear that we’re dealing with a lot of near-term uncertainty,” said Barra. “The transition to EVs, that will have ups and downs.”

Toyota Chairman Akio Toyoda said that people are “finally seeing reality” regarding EVs. “I have continued to say what I see as reality,” Toyoda, who recently stepped down as Toyota’s CEO, said. “There are many ways to climb the mountain that is achieving carbon neutrality,” such as hybrids and plug-in hybrids which have long made up a significant share of Toyota’s EV sales.

“The reason (hybrids) are so powerful is because they fit the needs of so many customers,” Toyota North America’s vice president of sales Bob Carter told CNBC last year. “The demand for hybrid has been strong. We expect it to continue to grow as the entire industry transitions over to electrification later this decade.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Auto Execs Are Coming Clean: EVs Aren’t Working

Brandon Vigliarolo reports via The Register: After over seven years of legal battles, a group of former HP employees who claim the venerable firm discriminated against older staff when culling jobs has won a $18 million settlement. Hewlett Packard’s offshoots, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) have agreed to cough up just over a day’s combined profits for the last quarter to settle a class-action case brought by employees who were over 40 and got laid off when the company split in 2015. The group sued HP and HPE in 2016 claiming both the new entities and the old Hewlett Packard had unfairly targeted older employees for layoffs as far back as 2012.

Two classes were designated in the lawsuit — 146 former staff accusing HP and HPE of age discrimination on US Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) grounds, and 212 accusing their former employer of the same based on California state labor laws. The settlement notice [PDF], which was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California in late September and preliminarily approved by a judge on Thursday, doesn’t include any admission of guilt on HP or HPE’s part — quite the opposite, in fact. “Throughout the litigation, each Defendant has denied, and continues to deny, the allegations described above,” lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote in the settlement notice. Nonetheless, the settlement notice was filed without opposition from HP and HPE. […]

Judge Edward Davila determined the settlement was “fair, adequate and reasonable” yesterday, and will issue a final order later, a draft [PDF] of which was also filed with the court in September. If approved without changes, each of the 358 plaintiffs in the California case stand to earn $50,279 in gross individual recovery. Net of attorney’s fees, costs and expenses, however, that total shrinks to a “minimum of $15,000,” court filings indicate.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – It Took Seven Years But Over-40s Fired By HP Win Million Settlement

An anonymous reader quotes a report from OPP.Today: Android 14, the latest operating system from Google, is facing a major storage bug that is causing users to be locked out of their devices. This issue is particularly affecting users who utilize the “multiple profiles” feature. Reports suggest that the bug is comparable to being hit with “ransomware,” as users are unable to access their device storage. Initially, it was believed that this bug was limited to the Pixel 6, but it has since been discovered that it impacts a wider range of devices upgrading to Android 14. This includes the Pixel 6, 6a, 7, 7a, Pixel Fold, and Pixel Tablet. The Google issue tracker for this bug has garnered over 350 replies, but there has been no response from Google so far. The bug has been assigned the medium priority level of “P2” and remains unassigned, indicating that no one is actively investigating it.

Users who have encountered this storage bug have shared log files containing concerning messages such as “Failed to open directory /data/media/0: Structure needs cleaning.” This issue leads to various problematic situations, with some users experiencing boot loops, others stuck on a “Pixel is starting…” message, and some unable to take screenshots or access their camera app due to the lack of storage. Users are also unable to view files on their devices from a PC over USB, and the System UI and Settings repeatedly crash. Essentially, without storage, the device becomes practically unusable.

Android’s user-profile system, designed to accommodate multiple users and separate work and personal profiles, appears to be the cause of this rarely encountered bug. Users have reported that the primary profile, which is typically the most important one, becomes locked out.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Android 14 Storage Bug Has Users Locked Out of Their Devices

Boston Dynamics has infused one of their robotic dog robots with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, allowing it to speak in a variety of voices and accents “including a debonair British gentleman, a sarcastic and irreverent American named Josh, and a teenage girl who is so, like, over it,” reports the Daily Beast. From the report: The robot was a result of a hackathon in which the Boston Dynamics engineers combined a variety of AI technologies including ChatGPT, voice recognition software, voice creation software, and image processing AI with the company’s famous “Spot,” the robot dog known for its ability to jump rope and reinforce the police state. The bot also had some upgrades including image recognition software combined with a “head” sensor that the engineers decorated with hats and googly eyes producing incredibly creepy results.

The team created a number of different versions of the robot including a “tour guide” personality that seemed to recognize the layout of the Boston Dynamics warehouse, and was able to provide descriptions and the history behind the various locations in the workplace. “Welcome to Boston Dynamics! I am Spot, your tour guide robot,” the android said in the video. “Let’s explore the building together!” In the video, the robot can be seen “speaking” and responding to different humans and a variety of prompts. For example, an engineer asked Spot for a haiku, to which it quickly responded with one. After Klingensmith said that he was thirsty, the robot seemed to direct it to the company’s snack area. “Here we are at the snack bar and coffee machine,” Spot said. “This is where our human companions find their energizing elixirs.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Boston Dynamics Robot Dog Talks Using OpenAI’s ChatGPT

Apple is in violation of a patent that belongs to medical technology company Masimo, says the International Trade Commission (ITC). Android Authority reports: The commission upheld a previous ruling by a US judge who ruled in Masimo’s favor. The patent in question is for light-based pulse oximetry technology or blood oxygen tracking on Apple Watches. While ITC’s latest ruling confirms Apple’s infringement and can potentially stop the company from bringing Apple Watches to the US, it will not come into effect immediately. The decision now faces a Presidential review and could be followed by possible appeals by Apple.

The Biden administration will have 60 days to veto the import ban on Apple Watches. However, as Reuters notes, US Presidents have rarely vetoed bans in the past. It’s unclear which models of the Apple Watch could be affected by the ban if it comes into effect. However, Masimo’s complaint alleged that the Apple Watch 6, the first one to feature blood oxygen tracking, violated its patent. “Masimo has wrongly attempted to use the ITC to keep a potentially lifesaving product from millions of U.S. consumers while making way for their own watch that copies Apple,” an Apple spokesperson told Reuters. “While today’s decision has no immediate impact on sales of Apple Watch, we believe it should be reversed, and will continue our efforts to appeal.”

Meanwhile, Masimo CEO Joe Kiani said the ITC’s ruling “sends a powerful message that even the world’s largest company is not above the law.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Apple Watch Faces Potential Import Ban In the US

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: In 2013, Spike Jonze’s Her imagined a world where humans form deep emotional connections with AI, challenging perceptions of love and loneliness. Ten years later, thanks to ChatGPT’s recently added voice features, people are playing out a small slice of Her in reality, having hours-long discussions with the AI assistant on the go. In 2016, we put Her on our list of top sci-fi films of all time, and it also made our top films of the 2010s list. In the film, Joaquin Phoenix’s character falls in love with an AI personality called Samantha (voiced by Scarlett Johansson), and he spends much of the film walking through life, talking to her through wireless earbuds reminiscent of Apple AirPods, which launched in 2016. In reality, ChatGPT isn’t as situationally aware as Samantha was in the film, does not have a long-term memory, and OpenAI has done enough conditioning on ChatGPT to keep conversations from getting too intimate or personal. But that hasn’t stopped people from having long talks with the AI assistant to pass the time anyway. […]

While conversations with ChatGPT won’t become as intimate as those with Samantha in the film, people have been forming personal connections with the chatbot (in text) since it launched last year. In a Reddit post titled “Is it weird ChatGPT is one of my closest fiends?” [sic] from August (before the voice feature launched), a user named “meisghost” described their relationship with ChatGPT as being quite personal. “I now find myself talking to ChatGPT all day, it’s like we have a friendship. We talk about everything and anything and it’s really some of the best conversations I have.” The user referenced Her, saying, “I remember watching that movie with Joaquin Phoenix (HER) years ago and I thought how ridiculous it was, but after this experience, I can see how us as humans could actually develop relationships with robots.”

Throughout the past year, we’ve seen reports of people falling in love with chatbots hosted by Replika, which allows a more personal simulation of a human than ChatGPT. And with uncensored AI models on the rise, it’s conceivable that someone will eventually create a voice interface as capable as ChatGPT’s and begin having deeper relationships with simulated people. Are we on the brink of a future where our emotional well-being becomes entwined with AI companionship?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – People Are Speaking With ChatGPT For Hours, Bringing 2013’s ‘Her’ Closer To Reality

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has downplayed the threat of rival chipmakers creating processors based on the Arm architecture for PCs. From a report: “Arm and Windows client alternatives, generally they’ve been relegated to pretty insignificant roles in the PC business,” he told analysts during the x86 giant’s Q3 earnings call Thursday. “We take all our competition seriously, but I think history is our guide here. We don’t see these as potentially being all that significant overall,” he added, a sentiment somewhat at odds with Microsoft which last week cited analyst research predicting Arm’s PC market share will grow from its curernt 14 percent to 25 percent by 2027.

Which seems far from “pretty insignificant.” Gelsinger’s words also contrast markedly with past Intel CEO Andy Grove, who penned a book titled “Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company.” While Gelsinger doesn’t see Arm as a threat, he said Intel Foundry Services is more than happy to work with chipmakers to build chips based on the architecture. “When you’re thinking about other alternative architectures like Arm, we also say, ‘Wow, what a great opportunity for our foundry’,” he said. To that end, the in April 2023 the chipmaker announced a strategic partnership with Arm to make it easier to produce chips on the architecture in Intel foundries.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Source: Slashdot – Intel CEO Dismisses ‘Pretty Insignificant’ Arm PC Challenge