Last November Aptera successfully tested its first production-intent three-wheel solar-powered EV — and said it already had over 50,000 reservations. The vehicles had a solar charge range of 40 miles per day, reported Digital Trends, noting the crowdfunded company’s cars also had an NCAS charging port. (“Solar-powered electric vehicles are also being developed by the likes of Germany’s Sono Motors and the Netherlands’ Lightyear, and by big automakers such as Hyundai and Mercedes-Benz.”)

But this week the EV site Electrek pointed out that “There have been a handful of ‘solar car’ projects and they all have failed so far.”
Aptera is one of the rare survivors, thanks to a couple of relatively successful crowdfunding efforts. The company has been inching closer to bringing its vehicle to production, but it still appears to need some investments to make it happen. Now, Aptera is going public.

Generally, that’s good news. An initial public offering (IPO) means that a company is going to raise capital for its operations and give more people the opportunity to invest in the company. However, Aptera is not doing a traditional IPO. It’s not even doing a SPAC deal. It’s doing a direct listing, which means that if approved by NASDAQ, it will allow shareholders to trade their shares on the public market. This is usually an exit strategy for existing shareholders. Aptera won’t receive any proceeds from going public… The company needs to be infused with capital soon, and this direct listing is not it.
The top-rated comment on the site suggests “Open market trading will establish a fair price for exchanges among the holders. I don’t think this necessarily indicates they are trying to wind down the company.”

And the article does also acknowledge the possibility of “public demand for the stock amid this crazy bubble we are in — resulting in a price increase, which Aptera takes advantage of with a public offering…”

“Aptera has now confirmed that it has received NASDAQ approval and the stock will start trading on October 16.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

We may only be a few days away from the big reveal of Apple’s latest chips. According to Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman, Apple is getting ready to release its October lineup of new products powered by the M5 chip as soon as this week. In the latest Power On newsletter, Gurman expects announcements for an upgraded iPad Pro, a refreshed Vision Pro with a revamped strap, and the new base model MacBook Pro, all of which will come with the latest Apple silicon.

Previously, the expected launch for the M5 MacBook Pro flip-flopped between early next year and its typical fall release. Gurman previously reported that Apple was targeting an early 2026 release for the upgraded MacBook Pro, but more recently revealed that the company was “nearing mass production” for its laptops.

Gurman referenced another hint that the entry-level M5 MacBook Pro is on the way, since Apple stores are running low on their M4 MacBook Pro stock, but still have enough inventory with the M4 Pro or M4 Max options. Gurman also noted in a previous edition of his newsletter that the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips wouldn’t be “ready in volume” until early next year. As for the October releases, we’re not expecting another event like Apple did with its iPhone 17 reveal. Instead, Apple will likely reveal its remaining fall lineup with online announcements, like it did with the current MacBook Pro in October of last year.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/the-first-products-with-apples-m5-chip-could-make-their-debut-this-week-163149688.html?src=rss

The Register reports:
Over the past two years, the open source curl project has been flooded with bogus bug reports generated by AI models. The deluge prompted project maintainer Daniel Stenberg to publish several blog posts about the issue in an effort to convince bug bounty hunters to show some restraint and not waste contributors’ time with invalid issues. Shoddy AI-generated bug reports have been a problem not just for curl, but also for the Python community, Open Collective, and the Mesa Project.
It turns out the problem is people rather than technology. Last month, the curl project received dozens of potential issues from Joshua Rogers, a security researcher based in Poland. Rogers identified assorted bugs and vulnerabilities with the help of various AI scanning tools. And his reports were not only valid but appreciated. Stenberg in a Mastodon post last month remarked, “Actually truly awesome findings.” In his mailing list update last week, Stenberg said, “most of them were tiny mistakes and nits in ordinary static code analyzer style, but they were still mistakes that we are better off having addressed. Several of the found issues were quite impressive findings….”

Stenberg told The Register that about 50 bugfixes based on Rogers’ reports have been merged. “In my view, this list of issues achieved with the help of AI tooling shows that AI can be used for good,” he said in an email. “Powerful tools in the hand of a clever human is certainly a good combination. It always was…!” Rogers wrote up a summary of the AI vulnerability scanning tools he tested. He concluded that these tools — Almanax, Corgea, ZeroPath, Gecko, and Amplify — are capable of finding real vulnerabilities in complex code.

The Register’s conclusion? AI tools “when applied with human intelligence by someone with meaningful domain experience, can be quite helpful.”

jantangring (Slashdot reader #79,804) has published an article on Stenberg’s new position, including recently published comments from Stenberg that “It really looks like these new tools are finding problems that none of the old, established tools detect.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

California’s Privacy Protection Agency “issued a record fine earlier this month to Tractor Supply,” according to an EFF Deeplinks blog post — for “apparently ducking its responsibilities under the California Consumer Privacy Act.”

Under that law, companies are required to respect California customers’ and job applicants’ rights to know, delete, and correct information that businesses collect about them, and to opt-out of some types of sharing and use. The law also requires companies to give notice of these rights, along with other information, to customers, job applicants, and others. The CPPA said that Tractor Supply failed several of these requirements. This is the first time the agency has enforced this data privacy law to protect job applicants…

Tractor Supply, which has 2,500 stores in 49 states, will pay for their actions to the tune of $1,350,000 — the largest fine the agency has issued to date. Specifically, the agency said, Tractor Supply violated the law by:

– Failing to maintain a privacy policy that notified consumers of their rights;
– Failing to notify California job applicants of their privacy rights and how to exercise them;
– Failing to provide consumers with an effective mechanism to opt-out of the selling and sharing of their personal information, including through opt-out preference signals such as Global Privacy Control; and
– Disclosing personal information to other companies without entering into contracts that contain privacy protections.

In addition to the fine, the company also must take an inventory of its digital properties and tracking technologies and will have to certify its compliance with the California privacy law for the next four years.
The agency’s web site says it “continues to actively enforce California’s cutting-edge privacy laws.” It’s recently issued decisions (and fines) against American Honda Motor Company and clothing retailer Todd Snyder. Other recent actions include:

Securing a settlement agreement requiring data broker Background Alert — which promoted its ability to dig up “scary” amounts of information about people — to shut down or pay a steep fine.
Launching the bipartisan Consortium of Privacy Regulators to collaborate with states across the country to implement and enforce privacy laws nationwide.
Partnering with the data protection authorities in Korea, France, and the United Kingdom to share information and advance privacy protections for Californians.
The agency has secured more than half a dozen successful enforcement actions against unregistered data brokers following an investigative sweep launched late last year to assess compliance with the Delete Act.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Cryptologist/CS professor Daniel J. Bernstein is alleging that America’s National Security Agency is attempting to influence NIST post-quantum cryptography standards.

Bernstein first emphasizes that it’s normal for post-quantum cryptography (or “PQ”) to be part of “hybrid” security that also includes traditional pre-quantum cryptography. (Bernstein says this is important because since 2016, “We’ve seen many breaks of post-quantum proposals…”)

“The problem in a nutshell. Surveillance agency NSA and its [UK counterpart] GCHQ are trying to have standards-development organizations endorse weakening [pre-quantum] ECC+PQ down to just PQ.”
Part of this is that NSA and GCHQ have been endlessly repeating arguments that this weakening is a good thing… I’m instead looking at how easy it is for NSA to simply spend money to corrupt the standardization process…. The massive U.S. military budget now publicly requires cryptographic “components” to have NSA approval… In June 2024, NSA’s William Layton wrote that “we do not anticipate supporting hybrid in national security systems”…

[Later a Cisco employee wrote of selling non-hybrid cryptography to a significant customer, “that’s what they’re willing to buy. Hence, Cisco will implement it”.]

What do you do with your control over the U.S. military budget? That’s another opportunity to “shape the worldwide commercial cryptography marketplace”. You can tell people that you won’t authorize purchasing double encryption. You can even follow through on having the military publicly purchase single encryption. Meanwhile you quietly spend a negligible amount of money on an independent encryption layer to protect the data that you care about, so you’re actually using double encryption.

This seems to be a speculative scenario. But Bernstein is also concerned about how the Internet Engineering Task Force handled two drafts specifying post-quantum encryption mechanisms for TLS (“the security layer inside HTTPS and inside various other protocols”). For a draft suggesting “non-hybrid” encryption, there were 20 statements of support (plus 2 more only conditionally supporting it), but 7 more statements unequivocally opposing adoption, including one from Bernstein. The IETF has at times said they aim for “rough consensus” — or for “broad consensus” — but Bernstein insists 7 opposers in a field of 29 (24.13%) can’t be said to match the legal definition of consensus (which is “general agreement”). “I’ve filed a formal complaint regarding the claim of consensus to adopt.”
He’s also written a second blog post analyzing the IETF’s decision-making process in detail. “It’s already bad that the IETF TLS working group adopted non-hybrid post-quantum encryption without official answers to the objections that were raised. It’s much worse if the objections can’t be raised in the first place.”
Thanks to alanw (Slashdot reader #1,822) for spotting the blog posts.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Ferrari’s first electric car arrives next summer, reports Carscoops, with a top speed of 193 mph (310 km/h) and accelerating from 0 to 62 mph (0 to 100 km/h) in just 2.5 seconds.

“The Elettrica” will also have a large high-density battery for over 329 miles (530 km) of range, ultra-fast DC charging up to 350 kW, and a 122 kWh capacity and an energy density of 195 Wh/kg that Ferrari “claims is the highest among production EVs.”
But what’s really interesting is its engine noises:

Ferrari’s approach to the Elettrica’s sound moves away from artificial engine simulation. Instead, a sensor mounted on the inverter detects the powertrain’s real mechanical vibrations, which are then amplified to create what the company describes as a natural, evolving tone that reflects how the car is being driven… a reactive soundtrack. Antonio Palermo [Ferrari’s head of sound and vibration] calls it “language and connection,” a way to keep drivers emotionally engaged with the car without resorting to synthetic gimmicks…

Needless to say, how convincing this synthesized feedback will feel in practice remains to be seen, as much of Ferrari’s allure has traditionally rested on the emotional impact of its combustion engines.

“The Torque Shift Engagement system offers five selectable levels of power and torque using the right paddle, while the left paddle adjusts braking intensity,” the article points out.

But if the engine noises are well-executed, argues the EV news site Electrek, “I even think it might convince some petrolheads to give EVs a try,” .

Whether you like them or not, engine sounds are essential, especially in performance vehicles. They are part of the identity of certain cars — a sort of signature. They can be emotional. They can give a sense of power. But beyond that, they are information. The pitch, volume, and texture of the engine sound provide critical, real-time feedback to the driver about RPM, load, and the car’s health.

Some electric automakers are using curated soundscapes (like BMW with Hans Zimmer) or trying to mimic V8s (like Dodge with its “Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust”)… Other automakers are simply letting the natural sounds of the electric motors exist. There’s nothing wrong with that. However, considering that electric motors produce minimal sounds, which are then trapped inside a metal casing, you rarely hear anything significant, especially in modern vehicles with quiet cabins and even active noise cancellation. For most EVs, this is not a problem, but for a performance electric vehicle, it does feel like something is missing…

Ferrari insists the sound will only be used when “functionally useful” to provide feedback to the driver and will be directly tied to torque requests… The entire system was reportedly developed in-house, giving Ferrari complete control over the vehicle’s final acoustic signature… [T]hey are embracing the new technology rather than hiding it. They are making a confident statement that an electric powertrain can be emotionally engaging on its own terms, without having to pretend to be something it’s not…
If you prefer a completely silent drive, you can disable it.
Electrek’s conclusion? “The purists who were worried that Ferrari would lose its soul in the EV transition should be encouraged by this.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

A demo of educational AI-powered tools by a Microsoft product manager (in March of 2024) showed “how AI has the possibility to transform various job sectors and the education system,” according to one report.
But that demo “includes a segment on Copilot in Excel that is likely to resonate with AI-wary software developers,” writes long-time Slashdot theodp:

The Copilot in Excel segment purports to show how even teachers who were too “afraid of” or “intimidated” to use Excel in the past can now just use natural language prompts to conduct Excel analysis. But Copilot advises the teacher there are no ‘outliers’ in the exam scores for their 17 students, whose test scores range from 27%-100%. (This is apparently due to Copilot’s choice of an inappropriate outlier detection method for this size population and score range). Fittingly, the student whose 27% score is confidently-but-incorrectly deemed to be of no concern by Copilot is named after Michael Scott, the largely incompetent and unprofessional boss of The Office. (Microsoft also named the other exam takers after characters from The Office).

The additional Copilot student score “analysis” touted by Microsoft in the demo is also less than impressive. It includes: 1. A vertical bar chart that fails to convey the test score distribution that a histogram would have (a rookie chart choice mistake), 2. A horizontal bar chart of student scores that only displays every other student’s name and shows no score values (a rookie formatting error)… So, will teachers — like programmers — be spending a significant amount of time in the future reviewing, editing, and refining the outputs of their AI agent helpers?

“Not only does it illustrate how the realities of AI assistants sometimes fall maddeningly short of the promises,” argues the original submission. “The demo also shows how AI vendors and customers alike sometimes forget to review promotional AI content closely in all the AI excitement!”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Off the southwest cost of Italy, a remotely operated submarine made “a significant and rare discovery,” reports the Independent — a vast white coral reef that was 80 metres tall (262 feet) and 2 metres wide (6.56 feet) “containing important species and fossil traces.”

Often dubbed the “rainforests of the sea”, coral reefs are of immense scientific interest due to their status as some of the planet’s richest marine ecosystems, harbouring millions of species. They play a crucial role in sustaining marine life but are currently under considerable threat…

hese impressive formations are composed of deep-water hard corals, commonly referred to as “white corals” because of their lack of colour, specifically identified as Lophelia pertusa and Madrepora oculata species. The reef also contains black corals, solitary corals, sponges, and other ecologically important species, as well as fossil traces of oysters and ancient corals, the Italian Research Council said. It called them “true geological testimonies of a distant past.”
Mission leader Giorgio Castellan said the finding was “exceptional for Italian seas: bioconstructions of this kind, and of such magnitude, had never been observed in the Dohrn Canyon, and are rarely seen elsewhere in our Mediterranean”. The discovery will help scientists understand the ecological role of deep coral habitats and their distribution, especially in the context of conservation and restoration efforts, he added.

The undersea research was funded by the EU.
Thanks to davidone (Slashdot reader #12,252) for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader shared this report from The Wrap

Tesla this weekend introduced a new “Tron: Ares” mode, giving drivers an opportunity to turn their on-screen vehicles into the glowing Light Cycles that have been a big part of the Disney franchise since 1982.

The optional update started rolling out on Friday, as Tron: Ares debuted in theaters. Tesla announced the update on X: “The grid has expanded to your Tesla — Tron: Ares update rolling out now.” The feature is activated in Tesla’s Toybox “infotainment” system, and turns the driver’s vehicle avatar into a red Light Cycle. For drivers who have the “ambient lighting” feature, the mode will also expand the theme throughout the cabin.

There was also a sleek black Tesla Optimus robot at the premier of Tron: Ares

Ironically, the Hollywood Reporter writes that by box office figures, “Tron is in big trouble,” selling fewer tickets than expected (despite the movie’s $180 million pre-marketing budget). While Tron’s audience reviews gave it an 86% score on Rotten Tomatoes, its score with critics is just 57%.
The Los Angeles Times says the movie “has glowing style, but its storytelling doesn’t compute.” (Or, as the New York Times puts it, “Who needs logic when you have neon?”)

Read more of this story at Slashdot.