We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Are you still dusting off your electronics with disposable cans of compressed air? Get with the times, man. All the cool people are using rechargeable air dusters like this one. I love mine so much, and I think you will too—and it’s on sale for 27% off during Amazon’s Big Spring Sale.

WOLFBOX MF70 Compressed Air Duster-110000 RPM Electric Air Duster with Extended Runtime, 3-Speed Rechargeable Air Blower for Keyboard, Computer, Camera, Car, Home, 5 Nozzles

$43.99
at Amazon

$59.99
Save $16.00

$43.99
at Amazon

$59.99
Save $16.00

Seriously, you really need this thing, even if you don’t think you do. For a one-time purchase, you can have endless compressed air, and blow the dust off anything you want to for the foreseeable future. It’s so much better than compressed air cans: It doesn’t get cold in your hand, it’s makes a satisfying high-pitched whining noise, and it never runs out of propellant. You just recharge it and you’re good to go blow. It doesn’t create the waste of spent compressed air cans either.

I got mine for Christmas, and I was skeptical at first. It’s small enough to fit in your hand, so how could it have the blowing power of a can of compressed air? A couple pulls on the trigger prove it’s better than compressed air. The motor’s top speed is 110,000 rpm, more than enough power to blast the gunk out of electronics, all the little crevices in your car, air filters, and anything else that needs dusting.

I use mine so often that I have started giving them out as gifts. It’s the perfect for any practical person—the kind of tool you wouldn’t think of buying for yourself, but that you’ll use all the time.

HBO released a teaser trailer and premiere date for its take on Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. The show will premiere on the HBO Max streaming network this December 25. It’s a rare case where a big-ticket project is coming out earlier than anticipated instead of later; the series wasn’t expected to arrive until 2027. 

HBO has already proved its bona fides with lush adaptations of fantastical stories several times over, and this trailer looks like more of the same. The team behind the camera includes notable names who have worked on series such as Succession, Game of Thrones, The Last of Us and Killing Eve. Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling, who alienated many fans after outing herself as transphobic, is also one of the show’s executive producers.

Engadget’s Jess Conditt has already written eloquently on the struggle of when and how to engage with the Harry Potter franchise while rejecting Rowling’s worldview, although the author’s involvement at the top level may make this adaptation a harder sell to the disillusioned community than, say, the Hogwarts Legacy video game where Rowling was barely involved and the studios took a more proactive approach toward presenting many types of diversity, including gender expression. If you’re hyped for this particular show, seems you’ll have a shorter time to wait for it.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/hbo-maxs-harry-potter-series-premieres-this-christmas-202818238.html?src=rss

The ESA, NASA and CSA have released new images of Saturn captured by the James Webb and Hubble space telescopes that offer an unprecedented view of the gas giant’s atmosphere. Particularly, comparing shots captured with Hubble against an infrared view from Webb highlights details in the composition and movement of Saturn’s outer layers.

The Hubble images were captured as part of the Outer Planet Atmosphere Legacy program in August 2024, while the Webb images were shot a few months later. “Both sense sunlight reflected from Saturn’s banded clouds and hazes,” NASA says, “but where Hubble reveals subtle color variations across the planet, Webb’s infrared view senses clouds and chemicals at many different depths in the atmosphere, from the deep clouds to the tenuous upper atmosphere.”

Hubble has historically been used to track storms on Saturn, and you can see bands of atmospheric clouds in the telescope’s new photo. The infrared sensors on the Webb telescope are able to highlight even more detail, like the highly-reflective ice of Saturn’s ring, which is practically white in the photo, and grey-green shading on the planet’s poles. The different coloring in the Webb photo could be caused by a “a layer of high-altitude aerosols” scattering light across latitudes, or “charged molecules interacting with the planet’s magnetic field” and causing “auroral activity.”

The visual information from both telescopes is valuable to scientists and should prove to be more valuable over time. “These 2024 observations, taken 14 weeks apart, show the planet moving from northern summer toward the 2025 equinox,” NASA says. “As Saturn transitions into southern spring, and later southern summer in the 2030’s, Hubble and Webb will have progressively better views of that hemisphere.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/webb-and-hubble-telescopes-combine-forces-for-a-new-view-of-saturn-202526270.html?src=rss

NASA’s announcement Tuesday that it will “pause” work on a lunar space station and focus on building a surface base on the Moon was no big surprise to anyone paying attention to the Trump administration’s space policy.

But what should NASA do with hardware already built for the Gateway outpost? NASA spent close to $4.5 billion on developing a human-tended complex in orbit around the Moon since the Gateway program’s official start in 2019. There are pieces of the station undergoing construction and testing in factories scattered around the world.

The centerpiece of Gateway, called the Power and Propulsion Element, is closest to being ready for launch. NASA’s rejigged exploration roadmap, revealed Tuesday in an all-day event at NASA headquarters in Washington, calls for repurposing the core module for a nuclear-electric propulsion demonstration in deep space.

Read full article

Comments

Reddit will require accounts that exhibit “automated or otherwise fishy behavior” to verify that a human runs them, Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said in a Reddit post today. The verification process aims to combat unwanted bots from flooding Reddit at a time when AI bots are poised to take over the Internet.

“As AI becomes a bigger part of the Internet, we want to make sure that when you’re on Reddit, you know when you’re talking to a person and when you’re not,” Huffman said.

Human verification will only occur if Reddit suspects that an account is a bot. This is “rare” and won’t apply to “most users,” Huffman emphasized. If the account cannot prove that it’s human, it “may be restricted,” he said.

Read full article

Comments

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Fitbit devices are among today’s fitness tech deals during Amazon’s Big Spring Sale. The Charge 6 is down to $119.95 (from $159.95) and the Versa 4 is $149.95 (down from $199.95), but I think the best deal of the bunch is the Inspire 3 at $69.95 (down from $99.95). If you want a simple, minimalist fitness tracker, this is a great way to grab one on the cheap. 

Fitbit Inspire 3 Health & Fitness Tracker (Midnight Zen/Black)

$69.95
at Amazon

$99.95
Save $30.00

$69.95
at Amazon

$99.95
Save $30.00

The Inspire 3 is, in many ways, a pared-down Charge 6. You can read my review of the Charge 6 here. It’s a basic fitness tracker that will count your steps and track heart rate during workouts, which may be all you want. 

To understand what you’re missing if you go for the Inspire 3: 

• The Inspire 3 doesn’t have its own GPS, and thus needs your phone to be with you if you want to track your distance and pace when you jog or walk. (The Charge 6 has its own GPS, but doesn’t always work as well as you’d hope—more on that in my review.)

• The Inspire 3 doesn’t have Google Wallet, Google Maps, or YouTube Music. The Charge 6 has all three, but all require your phone to be nearby and music requires a subscription. 

• The Inspire 3 has a smaller screen: 0.7×0.5 inches, instead of the Charge 6’s 0.86×0.58 inches.

• The Inspire 3 has 6 workout types, while the Charge 6 has 40+.

If you’re OK without those extra features, I’d recommend the Inspire 3 for a minimalist fitness tracker. It’s got a 10-day battery life and a slim, bracelet-like shape. And if you want something more full-featured, consider Garmin’s Vivoactive 5, which is on sale for just $179.95 today.

Longtime Slashdot reader JackSpratts writes: The Supreme Court unanimously said on Wednesday that a major internet provider could not be held liable for the piracy of thousands of songs online in a closely watched copyright clash. Music labels and publishers sued Cox Communications in 2018, saying the company had failed to cut off the internet connections of subscribers who had been repeatedly flagged for illegally downloading and distributing copyrighted music. At issue for the justices was whether providers like Cox could be held legally responsible and required to pay steep damages — a billion dollars or more in Cox’s case — if they knew that customers were pirating music but did not take sufficient steps to terminate their internet access.

In its opinion released (PDF) on Wednesday, the court said a company was not liable for “merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights.” Writing for the court, Justice Clarence Thomas said a provider like Cox was liable “only if it intended that the provided service be used for infringement” and if it, for instance, “actively encourages infringement.” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote separately to say that she agreed with the outcome but for different reasons. […] Cox called the court’s unanimous decision a “decisive victory” for the industry and for Americans who “depend on reliable internet service.”

“This opinion affirms that internet service providers are not copyright police and should not be held liable for the actions of their customers,” the company said.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

If you’re dedicated enough to have a home gym, there’s no reason you should waste precious workout time by digging through a heap of equipment or making multiple trips across your garage to grab different dumbbells between sets.

Normally $129.99, this home gym storage rack is currently on sale for $79.98 as part of Amazon’s Big Spring Sale. If you’ve been tripping over scattered dumbbells or wasting time hunting for the right weights mid-workout, this deal solves both problems for under $80.

PLKOW Dumbbell Rack

$79.98
at Amazon

$129.99
Save $50.01

$79.98
at Amazon

$129.99
Save $50.01

At 41.5″W x 37″H, this weight rack is specifically designed for a home gym. There are clear spaces for dumbbells, kettlebells, yoga blocks, resistance bands, medicine balls, and so on—and the whole set-up is on wheels.

When all your smaller equipment piles up in corners or gets kicked under furniture, you end up dealing with completely avoidable obstacles to your workout routine. Having everything organized in one storage rack means you can actually find what you need when you need it.

If you have an even bigger (and messier) home gym set-up, you could spring for the larger 50.4″W x 43.7″H version, currently on sale for $151.98 (down from $189.99). Take stock of just how much equipment you have, so that you can find the right storage solution and get back to training.

At the end of a long day on Tuesday, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman looked down at a table littered with microphones and jokingly referred to the space agency’s new Moon base manager, Carlos Garcia-Galan, as the “Lunar Viceroy.” It was a bit of humor, but it also seemed to represent affection from Isaacman for a long-time NASA employee so willingly taking on a major new challenge.

Garcia-Galan was, in many ways, the emerging star at the daylong Ignition event in Washington, DC. Heretofore he has largely been an anonymous engineer at NASA who has now been thrust into a very public role of leading the agency’s ambitious Moon base initiative. (His official title, by the way, is program executive.)

Ars had a chance to speak with Garcia-Galan about NASA’s plans and, more importantly, how they might be implemented. Here is a lightly edited (for clarity) transcript of that conversation.

Read full article

Comments

On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury found both Meta and YouTube negligent for their failure to warn their users about potential dangers associated with their apps and services. Specifically, the jury found that Meta and YouTube “harmed” a young user, a now 20-year-old identified as K.G.M., via addictive features that led to the user’s “mental health distress.”

Meta and YouTube are now on the hook for $3 million in damages. Meta will pay the majority of the sum (70%, or $2.1 million), while YouTube will pay the remaining 30% ($900,000). It’s a landmark case that could have wide-ranging repercussions for all social media platforms.

What was the Meta/YouTube social media case about?

K.G.M.’s case accused Meta and YouTube of acting like tobacco companies or digital casinos in creating products that are addicting and lead to anxiety and depression in their users. Rather than peddle in cigarettes or gambling, Meta and YouTube offer content via infinite scrolling, with recommendations served up by intelligent algorithms that know what users will be interested in. Snap (makers of Snapchat) and TikTok were also named, but settled for an undisclosed sum ahead of the trial.

The case kicked off in January, while the jury began deliberating on Friday, March 13. It’s not over, either: While the jury determined this initial compensation sum, they must now decide on punitive damages for malice or fraud, which could be much higher.

Tech companies are facing many more lawsuits over social media

K.G.M.’s case is far from the only one social media companies are facing. According to The New York Times, there are currently thousands of lawsuits targeting companies like Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snap, brought forward by teenagers, schools districts, and state attorneys general. Meta was previously found liable in New Mexico for failing to protect users from child predators; the jury in that case ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages. It’s an encouraging trend for the plaintiffs, as social media companies were once seen as legally protected in these cases—the idea was, the companies themselves weren’t liable for how people made use of the platform.

A Meta spokesperson told the Times: “We respectfully disagree with the verdict and are evaluating our legal options,” while YouTube did not return a request for comment.

Where do social media companies go from here?

There are still many cases to go, and the verdicts that have been delivered are still fresh. These things also take time: K.G.M. originally filed suit back in 2023, so we might be following many of these other lawsuits for years. But these initial results could be a bellwether for future cases, suggesting that social media companies may need to radically change their platform designs—or risk facing legal repercussions.

In K.G.M.’s case, lawyers presented evidence that executives of both Meta and YouTube knew the harm their platforms caused minors. This is hardly a secret: Social media companies, including Meta, have been documented as being well aware of the effects their platforms have on children—they just chose profits and growth over limiting those potential harms. They might face more of a public reckoning now that these cases are coming back in favor of the plaintiffs.

The key question is whether the impact of such lawsuits will be enough for Meta and the like to change course, or if they will determine their current models are more lucrative, even given the financial risk involved. I have a hard time believing that Meta will change its platform in fundamental ways unless the judgements go a lot higher. The fines involved need to be so great as to overshadow the money the company makes by maintaining the status quo. Otherwise, why would Meta or YouTube change their ways?

To be fair, in recent years companies have started to roll out more controls for parents and more restrictions for underage users. But it’s tough to efforts to protect children seriously when, for example, we know that internally, Meta was perfectly fine with its AI getting flirty with minors.

On Wednesday, a Los Angeles jury ordered Meta and YouTube to pay $3 million in damages to a young woman who successfully argued that the companies’ social media apps were designed to addict children.

Meta will pay the majority of the fine, 70 percent, while YouTube-owner Google is on the hook for 30 percent, the jury decided.

During the six-week trial, the jury heard that Meta and Google designed apps with features like auto-play, infinite scroll, and algorithmic recommendations to keep kids online. Feeling trapped in a cycle of constantly using these apps caused the plaintiff, known as K.G.M., “crippling mental distress,” CNBC reported. She developed “severe body dysmorphia, depression, and suicidal thoughts,” and every notification that came through made it harder to stop logging in.

Read full article

Comments

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: Stephen Colbert already has a new job lined up for when he ends his 11-year run as host of “The Late Show” in May — the comedian and well-known J.R.R. Tolkien superfan announced he will co-write and develop a new film in the blockbuster “Lord of the Rings” franchise. Colbert joined “LOTR” director Peter Jackson to reveal the news in a video announcement.

“I’m pretty happy about it. You know what the books mean to me and what your films mean to me,” the late-night host told Jackson, who led the Oscar-winning team behind the nearly $6 billion original “Lord of the Rings” and “The Hobbit” trilogies. […] Colbert said the next installment will be based on parts of Tolkien’s “The Fellowship of the Ring” book that didn’t make it into the original movies. “The thing I found myself reading over and over again were the six chapters early on in (The Fellowship of the Ring) that y’all never developed into the first movie back in the day … and I thought, ‘Oh, wait, maybe that could be its own story that could fit into the larger story.'” he said.

Colbert said he discussed the idea with his son, screenwriter Peter McGee, to work out the framing of the story. “It took me a few years to scrape my courage into a pile and give you a call, but about two years ago, I did. You liked it enough to talk to me about it,” Colbert told Jackson. Colbert said he, McGee and Jackson have been working alongside screenwriter Philippa Boyens on the development of the story. “I could not be happier to say that they loved it, and so that’s what we’re going to be working on,” Colbert said. Colbert’s LOTR movie, tentatively titled “Shadow of the Past,” will be the second of two new upcoming films in the franchise from Warner Bros. Discovery. The first of which is called “The Hunt for Gollum” due to be released in 2027.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

After leaning into some questionable AI antics at CES 2026, Razer is making some altogether more practical updates to its 16-inch laptop by giving it newer chips and faster RAM. The new Razer Blade 16 features Intel’s new Core Ultra chips and speedy LPDDR5X-9600 MHz RAM, and is available to order today for $3,500.

The Razer Blade 16 is designed to split the difference between the portable Razer Blade 14 and the monstrous Razer Blade 18, mostly by being thin but offering improved performance. Razer says the 2026 Blade 16 is 0.59 inches (14.9mm) at its thinnest point, which matches the thinness of the 2025 Blade 16. The laptop also has a similar 16-inch QHD+, 240Hz OLED screen to last year’s model, though the company says it’s 100 nits brighter than before. Port selection also remains respectable: the laptop includes three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, a Thunderbolt 4 port, a Thunderbolt 5 port, a full-sized HDMI 2.1 port and a UHS-II SD card reader.

Razer

The real notable upgrade is Razer’s switch from AMD Ryzen chips to new Intel Core Ultra 9 386H chips on the 2026 Razer Blade 16. The new Core Ultra chips are some of Intel’s first processors made with its new 18A process and pitched as the company’s comeback. Razer says the new chip es 16 cores and an integrated NPU that “provides up to 50 TOPS” for things like image generation and live translation, which the Razer Blade 16 supports natively as a Copilot+PC. The efficiency of the new chip also contributes to the laptop’s up to 15 hours of battery life. Of course, if you want power, the Razer Blade 16 has it: the laptop includes NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 50 Series Laptop GPUs and up to 64Gb of LPDDR5X-9600MHz RAM, which should give the Razer Blade 16 plenty of pep for games.

Hardware upgrades don’t come cheap, and the higher $3,500 starting price of the Razer Blade 16 — which includes 32GB of RAM, 1TB of storage and a GeForce RTX 5080 GPU at a minimum — is likely reflective of the growing cost of memory and storage that’s already negatively impacting the PC industry.

The Razer Blade 16 is available to purchase now through Razer’s website.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/razers-new-blade-16-has-intels-latest-chips-and-ultra-fast-ram-185858799.html?src=rss

The downloadable versions of Nintendo’s first-party Switch games have always cost the same amount to buy, despite the costs of manufacturing and shipping physical releases. This was still true when the Switch 2 launched last year, despite persistent rumors and misinformation to the contrary.

But that’s finally, definitively changing later this year. Nintendo announced today that beginning in May and for new game releases going forward, the physical releases of new Switch 2-exclusive first-party games will cost more than the digital versions of the same game. That will start with the May 21 release of Yoshi and the Mysterious Book, which will cost $60 in Nintendo’s online store but $70 for a physical copy.

“Nintendo games offer the same experiences whether in packaged or digital format, and this change simply reflects the different costs associated with producing and distributing each format and offers players more choice in how they can buy and play Nintendo games,” reads the company’s brief announcement about the change. Nintendo notes that retailers are free to charge what they want for physical and digital games, but aside from sales or other promotions most tend to follow Nintendo’s guidance on pricing.

Read full article

Comments

Nintendo just announced it will soon start charging different prices for first-party Switch 2 games based on whether the content is digital or physical. This could actually be a good thing for those who like to download their games instead of heading to a brick-and-mortar store to pick up a copy, as digital titles are getting a nice discount.

It starts with the release of Yoshi and the Mysterious Book on May 21, which will be $60 on the eShop but $70 at retail locations. Prior to this, most first-party games were $70 no matter how you bought them. I prefer downloading games, for convenience, and paid that much for both Donkey Kong Bananza and Pokémon Pokopia.

Nintendo

It’s yet another blow, however, for consumers who prefer physical media. They aren’t getting any kind of a discount, and many Switch 2 cartridges don’t even contain the game nowadays. The boxes include game key cards, which allow the user to download the title to the console but are basically paperweights after that.

This isn’t the first time Nintendo has participated in this kind of dual pricing structure. The digital version of Donkey Kong Bananza was cheaper than the physical version in some parts of the world, including the UK.

Is this another sign that making and shipping actual things is getting to be prohibitively expensive? There are storage and memory shortages due to AI and oil shortages due to war, not to mention an ever-shifting tariff policy here in the US. It’s tough out there. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/nintendo/nintendo-to-start-charging-different-prices-for-first-party-digital-and-physical-games-184249374.html?src=rss