Zwift Camp: Build – Stage 3 Walkthrough

Zwift Camp: Build is now underway. This is a 5-stage route-based workout series, with each stage lasting one week and focusing on developing power over a specific time interval.

My plan is to do each of the five workouts before their weeks begin, so I can write a post unpacking the workout and delivering some tips along the way. This post covers Stage 3’s workout on Watopia’s new Hot Laps route. Let’s roll!

Once again, I pulled the 7-Eleven bike out for this session…

Stage 3 Walkthrough: Chase Your Rival

The third stage of Zwift Camp: Build is focused on “Three 5-minute efforts” according to the event description. But it’s probably not laid out how you’d expect!

The stage is built around the new Hot Laps route in Watopia, which takes riders on 4 full laps of the Volcano Circuit, followed by a finish up the Jarvis KOM:

Animated “Hot Laps” Route Details (Watopia) Map
Animated map provided by ZwiftHacks

Follow the instructions on screen and you’ll use the first lap as a warmup and a bit of recon, learning where that little kicker is at, where you can recover a bit on descents, etc. The instructions have you begin your effort in earnest at the start of the second lap, and there are really two stated goals here:

  1. Put in a hard, steady effort on laps 2, 3, and 4 while also
  2. Negative splitting your lap times (that is, going faster each lap)

So you don’t want to start off with a maximal effort on lap 2, because you won’t be able to beat that effort the next lap!

My legs were tired from a metric century the day before, so I just targeted power numbers I knew I could hold:

  • Lap 2: 250W
  • Lap 3: 260W
  • Lap 4: 270W

I also kept an eye on my previous effort HoloReplay, making sure I beat him each lap.

You might think it would be hard to manage your power well enough to precisely hit power targets, but thanks to the average power number on the Splits HUD, I found it pretty easy. I was bang on my target for laps 2 and 3, then pushed extra hard on lap 4 just because I could, coming in a few watts above my 270W target.

What power targets should you shoot for? You won’t be able to hold true VO2 max power for three continuous laps, but if your legs are fresh, you should be able to push at or just above your FTP for all three laps. Something like this should be doable with fresh legs:

  • Lap 2: 100% of FTP
  • Lap 3: 103% of FTP
  • Lap 4: 106% of FTP

Or you could skip trying to hit a power target, and simply try to stay away from your previous effort HoloReplay every lap. Put in a hard but not maximal effort on lap 2, then just make sure you beat your HoloReplay on laps 3 and 4!

After finishing the fourth lap, the route takes you into Jarvis for a finishing effort up the Jarvis KOM. This short climb will take most riders 3.5-5 minutes to complete, so it’s actually a proper traditional VO2 max interval in terms of its length and the 5 minutes of recovery you get just before it begins. My advice? Just empty the tank. It’s the end of the workout, so put in a maximal effort up that KOM segment and see what you can do!

Overall, I found this the most fun Zwift Camp: Build stage yet. The challenge of pacing myself so I was both working hard but also negative splitting the laps kept me engaged, even if my tired legs didn’t let me ride anywhere near VO2 max targets. And while the HoloReplay bug persists (see below), my previous effort ghosts proved very motivating!

Drafting Note

Your previous effort ghost is an exact replay of your avatar from the previous lap, which means if you drafted on the previous lap, that ghost is moving at the speeds you attained while drafting.

This could make things difficult when you try to beat your ghost on the next lap, and you aren’t drafting.

It worked out fine for me in my on-demand workout, even though I was on a road bike, as I never drafted for a meaningful length of time. But basically, you’ll want to be either drafting most of the time, or not drafting most of the time. One simple way to make sure you don’t draft: ride a TT bike! It looks like they’re allowed in the events, and of course you can always use a TT bike in an on-demand ride.

What Is This Workout?

After Stage 1’s short neuromuscular sprint efforts, and Stage 2’s longer anaerobic sprints, you might expect stage 3 to focus on VO2 max power. And it does… sort of. Since the three laps are back-to-back-to-back, you won’t get the rest/recovery needed to execute traditional VO2 max intervals. Instead, you can work at pacing yourself at or just above FTP, finishing with a maximal effort on lap 4, then recovering a bit before doing one more hard VO2 max interval up the Jarvis KOM.

It’s not a traditional VO2 max workout, but it’s engaging and fun work. Plus, pacing the three Volcano Circuit laps for negative splits is good practice for Stage 4’s effort up The Grade. (Turning in your best effort on that climb really comes down to pacing it well, and starting a bit below your power target while finishing a bit above it is the best way to make that happen.)

Watch My Video

More On VO2 Max Power

VO2 max measures the maximal amount of oxygen your body can consume. It is a key measure of aerobic capacity and thus a key determinant of performance potential (read much more in this TrainerRoad post). A few interesting things about VO2 max:

  • Genetics play a significant role in VO2 capacity, but untrained athletes can often improve by as much as 25%.
  • You might think that lung volume is what drives VO2 max, but in fact it’s largely determined by four factors: cardiac output (how much blood the heart can move), the oxygen-carrying capacity of that blood, the circulatory system itself, and muscular efficiency.
  • Strong anaerobic performance is particularly useful in “spiky” cycling disciplines like cyclocross, crits, and MTB racing
  • While world-class male cyclists have a VO2 max in the 75-90ml/kg/min range (recent studies are saying Tadej Pogačar may have the highest VO2 max of any winner in TdF history at 96ml/kg/min), mere mortals (good amateurs) are closer to 65-80ml/kg/min.

VO2 Max Training Tips

Traditional VO2 max training has you executing repeating intervals that are 2-6 minutes long, each 106-120% of your FTP, with very easy rest intervals in between roughly the same length as the VO2 max interval.

But there are other ways to do VO2 max work. Zwift has a “VO2 Max” folder in its workout directory, with 37 workouts to choose from at the time of this post:

Some of these workouts feature the more traditional, longer VO2 max intervals, while others have you doing high numbers of much shorter intervals (20-30 seconds). The important thing is accumulating time working at VO2 max levels.

You might also try Zwift Insider’s popular Saturday Tiny Races. This is a set of 4 short races completed in under an hour, making it basically a VO2 max workout disguised as a race.

Lastly, hill repeats are a classic outdoor VO2 max workout. Find a climb you can finish in 3-6 minutes, then hit it hard. Turn around at the top, taking your time coming down so you can recover nicely, then do it again. Aim for at least 4 repeats.

Suggestion Box

The third workout of Zwift Camp: Build was my favorite yet, even if my legs weren’t very fresh. Still, there were some things Zwift could change to improve the experience. Here are my suggestions:

  • Clean Up Lap Splits: Unlike stages 1 and 2, the Splits HUD was really useful for this workout. But there are two tweaks that would make it better: making sure splits finish right at the lap arch (the first few fire early, the last fires late), and keeping the Splits HUD up even after you finish the final volcano lap.
  • Fix HoloReplays: I set up my HoloReplay settings as suggested, to only show a single ghost from my previous effort. But it still showed two ghosts every time, from two different efforts, even though both were labeled “Previous.” Fix it, Zwift!
  • Improve the event description: I already mentioned this for earlier stages, but once again, a simple line or two in the event description would clarify what people are signing up for. The current description for this workout (“Target Effort: Three 5-minute efforts”) really isn’t accurate at all. It’s misleading at best.

Sign Up For Stage 3

Sign up for stage 3 events in-game, in the Companion app, or go to zwift.com/events/tag/zwiftcampbuild2025wo3.

Questions or Comments?

Have you done this workout yet? Share your thoughts below, or any questions you may have heading into the workout.

Dell 16 Premium review: Stylish to a fault

We’ve had less than a year to mourn the loss of Dell’s iconic XPS laptop brand, and frankly, I’m still not over it. But time moves on. Engadget has already reviewed the Dell 14 Premium, formerly the XPS 14, and now I’ve finally had a chance to put the larger Dell 16 Premium through its paces. My conclusion? It’s still as beautiful as the last XPS 16, but I also think Dell seriously needs to rethink its ultramodern design strategy. 

With its minimalist design (look Ma, no visible trackpad!), smooth metal case and clean lines, the Dell 16 Premium looks like a work of art. It’s the sort of thing I’d imagine someone creating as a prop for a sci-fi movie in the ’90s, when we could barely imagine real notebooks moving beyond chunky grey bricks. But those good looks come at a cost — both in terms of price (it starts at $2,000) and basic functionality.

If you’ve read my reviews of the XPS 16 and XPS 13 Plus, Dell’s first models to use this aesthetic, you might think I’m just beating a dead horse. But it’s worth pointing out again, more than three years after I first chastised Dell for chasing style over function, that the company seemingly hasn’t learned anything. Sure, it’s a bit faster than before, thanks to Intel’s Core Ultra chips and NVIDIA’s RTX 50-series GPUs, but that’s not saying much. 

I still have trouble using the 16 Premium’s borderless trackpad because it’s tough to tell where the clickable zones are. I still hate the capacitive function row, both because it becomes miraculously invisible in bright light and it’s tough to build muscle memory for specific keys (like changing the brightness or volume). And honestly, I still don’t know how Dell can justify offering only USB-C ports and a microSD card slot on a laptop meant for serious work. Even Apple realized that it had to include a wider variety of ports for professionals, and that’s also something other PC makers like ASUS and Acer offer.  Did Dell miss the memo?

Worst of all, the 16 Premium’s 4K OLED screen seriously hampers its battery life. It only lasted six hours and five minutes during a basic video rundown, whereas the previous XPS 16 lasted eight and a half hours in the much more demanding PCMark 10 battery test. (For some reason, that benchmark didn’t run properly on my review 16 Premium review unit.) Larger laptops often stuff in bigger batteries than smaller models, but the 16 Premium can’t even manage that. 

At least it’s faster than before. The Dell 16 Premium I reviewed was equipped with Intel’s Core Ultra 7 255H chip and a low-wattage version of NVIDIA’s RTX 5070 GPU. It scored around 10 percent higher than last year’s XPS 16 in PCMark 10, and it was notably faster in the Geekbench AI benchmark thanks to Intel’s revamped NPU. I was even able to play Cyberpunk 2077 in 4K at 84 fps thanks to the 5070, though I had to enable DLSS 4 frame generation to do so. For some reason though, the system would slow to an absolute crawl whenever I enabled ray tracing features. At best, I only saw around 60 fps in 1080p while using the low ray tracing settings. 

The Dell 16 Premium from the rear.
The Dell 16 Premium from the rear.
Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

Sure, it’s not a gaming laptop, so I can’t directly compare it to something like the Razer Blade 16. But it’s strange to see one of NVIDIA’s latest GPUs handle ray tracing so poorly. As you’d expect, the Dell 16 Premium also got pretty loud whenever its fans spun up. At least they managed to keep the system relatively cool though: Its CPU and GPU sat at 68C and 70C, respectively, under load.

The more I looked at the Dell 16 Premium’s beautiful facade, the more I wanted something… more. It needs more usable ports, like HDMI and a full-sized SD card reader. It needs more useful function keys that are visible in bright light — and also stay in one place — so I can touch type more easily. And for the love of god, just give up on the invisible trackpad. It’s a parlor trick that just makes it harder to tell left and right mouse clicks apart, despite the impressively large trackpad area.

The 16 Premium's "invisible" trackpad blends seamlessly into its wrist rest, while the keyboard lays perfectly flat and a row of capacitive function keys sits above.
The 16 Premium’s “invisible” trackpad blends seamlessly into its wrist rest, while the keyboard lays perfectly flat and a row of capacitive function keys sits above.
Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

Given its premium positioning, I also expected more from the laptop’s speakers. They sound fine compared to most Windows laptops, but they can’t hold a candle to the audio sorcery Apple accomplishes with the 16-inch MacBook Pro. When playing music, the 16 Premium doesn’t have much dynamic range or low-end tone, whereas Apple’s speakers often surprise me with their depth and enveloping sound. During late night writing sessions, I often find myself playing music straight through the 16-inch MacBook Pro, rather than casting it off to my Sonos speakers like the 16 Premium forces me to do.

To avoid being entirely negative, I’ll reiterate that I genuinely enjoy looking at the Dell 16 Premium. I love the way its keyboard and large key caps lay perfectly flat along the notebook’s lower half. And I’ll admit, the 16-inch OLED screen looks lusciously colorful when it needs to. I’m just asking for Dell’s designers to consider a better balance of style and functionality for their next stab at a premium 16-inch laptop.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/dell-16-premium-review-stylish-to-a-fault-130000463.html?src=rss

New Mars Orbiter Manuever Challenges Theory: That May Not Be an Underground Lake on Mars

In 2018 researchers claimed evidence of a lake beneath the surface of Mars, detected by the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding instrument (or Marsis for short).

But new Mars observations “are not consistent with the presence of liquid water in this location and an alternative explanation, such as very smooth basal materials, is needed.” Phys.org explains

Aboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the Shallow Radar (SHARAD) uses higher frequencies than MARSIS. Until recently, though, SHARAD’s signals couldn’t reach deep enough into Mars to bounce off the base layer of the ice where the potential water lies — meaning its results couldn’t be compared with those from MARSIS. However, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter team recently tested a new maneuver that rolls the spacecraft on its flight axis by 120 degrees — whereas it previously could roll only up to 28 degrees. The new maneuver, termed a “very large roll,” or VLR, can increase SHARAD’s signal strength and penetration depth, allowing researchers to examine the base of the ice in the enigmatic high-reflectivity zone. Gareth Morgan and colleagues, for their article published in Geophysical Research Letters, examined 91 SHARAD observations that crossed the high-reflectivity zone.

Only when using the VLR maneuver was a SHARAD basal echo detected at the site. In contrast to the MARSIS detection, the SHARAD detection was very weak, meaning it is unlikely that liquid water is present in the high-reflectivity zone.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Rocket Lab chief opens up about Neutron delays, New Glenn’s success, and NASA science

The company that pioneered small launch has had a big year.

Rocket Lab broke its annual launch record with the Electron booster—17 successful missions this year, and counting—and is close to bringing its much larger Neutron rocket to the launch pad.

The company also expanded its in-space business, including playing a key role in supporting the landing of Firefly’s Blue Ghost mission on the Moon and building two small satellites just launched to Mars.

Read full article

Comments

Uber One subscribers can now share free deliveries and other perks with their family

Uber is apparently feeling generous this holiday season. The company is launching family sharing for Uber One members, allowing individuals to add another adult to their account for free. They can also include an unlimited number of teens. 

Anyone added to the membership can access all of the same benefits, including free delivery. They will also earn unique credits for rides. You can attach someone to your membership by clicking Account and then Uber One. From there, you can tap manage membership and then family sharing. 

Family sharing Uber One.
Uber

Uber is also giving members additional perks, like prioritized complimentary upgrades. The company claims that it will upgrade over one million rides for members between December 2 and 25. Plus, members traveling between today and Thursday for Thanksgiving should get 10 percent off if booking an Uber Black to or from an airport. 

Tech lovers with an Uber One subscription will be happy to hear that you can get early access to $25 off if you spend $75 or more at Best Buy — through Uber Eats, of course. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/uber-one-subscribers-can-now-share-free-deliveries-and-other-perks-with-their-family-120004629.html?src=rss

442 watts for 40 minutes: Study estimates Tadej Pogačar‘s power output on Tour de France climbs

‘Superhuman’ is a word bandied about for Tadej Pogačar’s race performances. His ability to just ride away from the best cyclists in the world on climbs, often seated, is truly impressive.

Now Ole Kristian Berg at Molde University in Norway has put numbers to the results. His paper, published in the Journal of Science and Cycling, estimates Pogačar’s VO2 max and power output in six climbs on the 2024 and 2025 Tours de France: Plateau de Beille, Isola 2000, Col de la Couillole, Hautacam, Peyragudes and Mont Ventoux.

Faster than Pantani

Berg estimates Pogačar averaged 421 watts on the climb of Mont Ventoux in the 2025 Tour de France. Tim de Waele/Getty Images

To estimate Pogačar’s power numbers, Berg started with Strava data for the six climbs and information on the UAE Team Emirates website.

Berg applied mechanical models of cycling power output and the results of previous studies to arrive at some truly remarkable figures.

He estimates Pogačar‘s mean power output over a climb of around 40 minutes as 442 watts (+/-15 watts).

To achieve that output, Berg estimates, requires a VO2 max of 80 mL/kg/min over the 40 minute climb, with a peak of 90 mL/kg/min. His estimates of power output in watts-per-kilogram across the various climbs are from 6.4 to 7.0.

Berg’s results are based on a few assumptions: he assumes zero wind and no drafting and estimates Pogačar‘s frontal area when racing, his race weight, his efficiency in turning energy into power and the air density. He also uses a pre-established number for the bike’s rolling resistance.

While Pogačar doesn’t publish his power data, Derek Gee, who has recently terminated his contract with Israel-Premier Tech, has, and Berg used this to validate his model of Pogačar‘s power output.

Berg suggests that Pogačar‘s peak outputs may have been even higher during his 1-2 with Vingegaard on the Plateau de Beille climb in the 2024 Tour de France. Tim de Waele/Getty Images

Berg points out that the finishing times of the first three finishers on the Plateau de Beille in the 2024 race were all faster than the previous record set by Marco Pantani in 1998. The peak performance numbers during moves such as the attack by Jonas Vingegaard and the counterattack by Pogačar on that climb were likely even higher, he states.

There have been reports of very high VO2 max numbers in lab tests of elite cyclists, including previous Tour de France winners, with numbers over 80 mL/kg/min and reaching over 90mL/kg/min. In previous posts, we’ve looked at why the Tour de France is getting faster and how Pogačar has become so good.

In 2019, we hooked up elite amateur climber Andrew Feather to an ergometer at the University of Bath to measure his VO2 max in the lab. Feather’s measured VO2 max was 78.7 mL/kg/min and his FTP was 350 watts. 

That may not be enough to win him the Tour de France, but he was the only rider of 1,189 starters not to be overtaken by Pogačar on the recent Pogi Challenge hill climb in Slovenia. Feather did have a six minute start though. 

“Go generate a bridge and jump off it”: How video pros are navigating AI

In 2016, the legendary Japanese filmmaker Hayao Miyazaki was shown a bizarre AI-generated video of a misshapen human body crawling across a floor.

Miyazaki declared himself “utterly disgusted” by the technology demo, which he considered an “insult to life itself.”

“If you really want to make creepy stuff, you can go ahead and do it,” Miyazaki said. “I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all.”

Read full article

Comments

Intel Working On Linux Support For New Power Savings Feature With Xe3P_LPD

The upcoming Linux 6.19 kernel cycle is set to introduce initial support for Xe3P graphics to be found initially with Nova Lake processors. While that initial support is landing for Linux 6.19, other extra Xe3P features are still to be added to the open-source kernel driver over coming release cycles. One of those extra features being currently tackled is a new element with Xe3P_LPD: the ability to use the system cache for FBC…

DJI’s Mic Mini bundle drops to just $66 for Black Friday

If you’re a creator in the market for a good-quality wireless microphone, DJI has the best deal we’ve ever seen on one of its most popular products. This Mic Mini bundle, which includes two mics, a receiver and two charging docks (plus two windscreens and other accessories), is already a good deal at the regular $119 price. For Black Friday, however, it’s marked down to just $66 for a savings of 45 percent. If you only need a single wireless mic, you can also grab a Mic Mini with a mic, receiver, charging dock and accessories for $45, or 49 percent off the regular price. 

DJI’s Mic Mini deal includes two mic transmitters and a receiver that can be connected to a camera or phone. The bundle also includes a pair of charging docks, two windscreens, a splitter USB-C cable for charging, a 3.5mm camera audio cable, two magnetic clips, a smartphone adapter, a charging cable and a compact carrying case. Note that the charging case is not included in this deal. And if you want a simpler setup with just a single mic and receiver, plus all the other accessories, that’s also on sale for $45, or 53 percent off.

The wireless mics weigh just a third of an ounce and attach easily to subjects via magnets or clips. Everything pairs automatically and they offer high quality 24-bit, 20Hz to 20K Hz recording. They also connect easily to smartphones over Bluetooth and other DJI devices like the Action 5 Pro and Osmo Pocket 3 cams using DJI’s OsmoAudio direct connection. With a range of 1300 feet and 48 hours of battery life with the charger case, they’re an excellent addition to a creator’s bag of tricks.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/audio/djis-mic-mini-bundle-drops-to-just-66-for-black-friday-102735161.html?src=rss

How An MIT Student Awed Top Economists With His AI Study – Until It All Fell Apart

In May MIT announced “no confidence” in a preprint paper on how AI increased scientific discovery, asking arXiv to withdraw it. The paper, authored by 27-year-old grad student Aidan Toner-Rodgers, had claimed an AI-driven materials discovery tool helped 1,018 scientists at a U.S. R&D lab.

But within weeks his academic mentors “were asking an unthinkable question,” reports the Wall Street Journal. Had Toner-Rodgers made it all up?
Toner-Rodgers’s illusory success seems in part thanks to the dynamics he has now upset: an academic culture at MIT where high levels of trust, integrity and rigor are all — for better or worse — assumed. He focused on AI, a field where peer-reviewed research is still in its infancy and the hunger for data is insatiable. What has stunned his former colleagues and mentors is the sheer breadth of his apparent deception. He didn’t just tweak a few variables. It appears he invented the entire study. In the aftermath, MIT economics professors have been discussing ways to raise standards for graduate students’ research papers, including scrutinizing raw data, and students are going out of their way to show their work isn’t counterfeit, according to people at the school.

Since parting with the university, Toner-Rodgers has told other students that his paper’s problems were essentially a mere issue with data rights. According to him, he had indeed burrowed into a trove of data from a large materials-science company, as his paper said he did. But instead of getting formal permission to use the data, he faked a data-use agreement after the company wanted to pull out, he told other students via a WhatsApp message in May… On Jan. 31, Corning filed a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization against the registrar of the domain name corningresearch.com. Someone who controlled that domain name could potentially create email addresses or webpages that gave the impression they were affiliated with the company. WIPO soon found that Toner-Rodgers had apparently registered the domain name, according to the organization’s written decision on the case. Toner-Rodgers never responded to the complaint, and Corning successfully won the transfer of the domain name. WIPO declined to comment…

In the WhatsApp chat in May, in which Toner-Rodgers told other students he had faked the data-use agreement, he wrote, “This was a huge and embarrassing act of dishonesty on my part, and in hindsight it clearly would’ve been better to just abandon the paper.” Both Corning and 3M told the Journal that they didn’t roll out the experiment Toner-Rodgers described, and that they didn’t share data with him.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

DJI’s popular Osmo Pocket 3 vlogging camera gets a hefty Black Friday discount

DJI’s hyper-popular vlogging camera, the Osmo Pocket 3, is on sale at a near-record low at Amazon. You can pick one up now for $520 and save 35 percent ($279) off the regular price. This is likely the best deal you’re going to see for the Pocket 3 any time soon, given US tariffs that recently forced DJI to jack up the price.

When DJI’s Osmo Pocket 3 came out I said was “maybe the only vlogging camera you need.” To start with, it has a big one-inch sensor that boosts image quality considerably, particularly in low light. You also get a large swiveling touchscreen that makes it easier to switch between horizontal and vertical video. What really makes it great for vlogging, though, are the follow modes combined with face tracking. When working solo, you can simply set it up and it’ll rotate and tilt to follow you around — so you don’t have to worry about focus or even pointing the camera at yourself. 

While there’s very little not to like about the Osmo Pocket 3, it’s not ideal for photos and is also quite expensive. But with the Black Friday deal and DJI’s Osmo Pocket 4 rumored to be arriving in December, it’s a great time to buy one — just act quickly as stocks are bound to run out.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cameras/djis-popular-osmo-pocket-3-vlogging-camera-gets-a-hefty-black-friday-discount-092339471.html?src=rss

Phoronix Premium Cyber Week “Black Friday” Deal To Help Enable Linux Hardware Reviews

The end of 2025 is quickly approaching and while there are the various end of year holidays, you can still expect to find new and original content on Phoronix each and every single day of the year just as it’s been for more than a decade of the now 21-year-old Phoronix.com. The last day without any new content on Phoronix was all the way back in May of 2012. That’s due to my passion for Linux hardware and open-source, paired in more recent years with the more grueling environment to make ends meet with the ever increasing state of the web advertising industry, rampant ad-block use, and related challenges for web publishers. If you would like to show your support for Phoronix’s Linux hardware content over the past two decades, this week is the “Cyber Week” / “Black Friday” sale to go ad-free, multi-page-articles on a single page, and other benefits at a reduced rate…

‘We Could’ve Asked ChatGPT’: UK Students Fight Back Over Course Taught By AI

An anonymous reader shared this report from the Guardian:

James and Owen were among 41 students who took a coding module at the University of Staffordshire last year, hoping to change careers through a government-funded apprenticeship programme designed to help them become cybersecurity experts or software engineers. But after a term of AI-generated slides being read, at times, by an AI voiceover, James said he had lost faith in the programme and the people running it, worrying he had “used up two years” of his life on a course that had been done “in the cheapest way possible”.

“If we handed in stuff that was AI-generated, we would be kicked out of the uni, but we’re being taught by an AI,” said James during a confrontation with his lecturer recorded as a part of the course in October 2024. James and other students confronted university officials multiple times about the AI materials. But the university appears to still be using AI-generated materials to teach the course. This year, the university uploaded a policy statement to the course website appearing to justify the use of AI, laying out “a framework for academic professionals leveraging AI automation” in scholarly work and teaching…

For students, AI teaching appears to be less transformative than it is demoralising. In the US, students post negative online reviews about professors who use AI. In the UK, undergraduates have taken to Reddit to complain about their lecturers copying and pasting feedback from ChatGPT or using AI-generated images in courses.

“I feel like a bit of my life was stolen,” James told the Guardian (which also quotes an unidentified student saying they felt “robbed of knowledge and enjoyment”.) But the article also points out that a survey last year of 3,287 higher-education teaching staff by edtech firm Jisc found that nearly a quarter were using AI tools in their teaching.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Napster Said It Raised $3 Billion From a Mystery Investor. But Now the ‘Investor’ and ‘Money’ Are Gone

An anonymous reader shared this report from Forbes:

On November 20, at approximately 4 p.m. Eastern time, Napster held an online meeting for its shareholders; an estimated 700 of roughly 1,500 including employees, former employees and individual investors tuned in. That’s when its CEO John Acunto told everyone he believed that the never-identified big investor — who the company had insisted put in $3.36 billion at a $12 billion valuation in January, which would have made it one of the year’s biggest fundraises — was not going to come through.

In an email sent out shortly after, it told existing investors that some would get a bigger percentage of the company, due to the canceled shares, and went on to describe itself as a “victim of misconduct,” adding that it was “assisting law enforcement with their ongoing investigations.” As for the promised tender offer, which would have allowed shareholders to cash out, that too was called off. “Since that investor was also behind the potential tender, we also no longer believe that will occur,” the company wrote in the email.

At this point it seems unlikely that getting bigger stakes in the business will make any of the investors too happy. The company had been stringing its employees and investors along for nearly a year with ever-changing promises of an impending cash infusion and chances to sell their shares in a tender offer that would change everything. In fact, it was the fourth time since 2022 they’ve been told they could soon cash out via a tender offer, and the fourth time the potential deal fell through. Napster spokesperson Gillian Sheldon said certain statements about the fundraise “were made in good faith based on what we understood at the time. We have since uncovered indications of misconduct that suggest the information provided to us then was not accurate.”

The article notes America’s Department of Justice has launched an investigation (in which Napster is not a target), while the Securities and Exchange Commission has a separate ongoing investigation from 2022 into Napster’s scrapped reverse merger.

While Napster announced they’d been acquired for $207 million by a tech company named Infinite Reality, Forbes says that company faced “a string of lawsuits from creditors alleging unpaid bills, a federal lawsuit to enforce compliance with an SEC subpoena (now dismissed) and exaggerated claims about the extent of their partnerships with Manchester City Football Club and Google. The company also touted ‘top-tier’ investors who never directly invested in the firm, and its anonymous $3 billion investment that its spokesperson told Forbes in March was in “an Infinite Reality account and is available to us” and that they were ‘actively leveraging’ it…”

And by the end, “Napster appears to have been scrambling to raise cash to keep the lights on, working with brokers and investment advisors including a few who had previously gotten into trouble with regulators…. If it turns out that Napster knew the fundraise wasn’t happening and it benefited from misrepresenting itself to investors or acquirees, it could face much bigger problems. That’s because doing so could be considered securities fraud.”


Read more of this story at Slashdot.