Music Pioneer Napster Sells For $207 Million

Infinite Reality, a 3D technology company, has acquired Napster for $207 million, the companies announced Tuesday. The deal aims to transform the once-notorious music sharing service into a metaverse platform.

Napster, launched in 1999 by Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker, was the first major peer-to-peer file-sharing application before legal battles forced its closure in 2001. Since 2016, it has operated as a subscription streaming service. Infinite Reality plans to create virtual 3D spaces where music fans can experience concerts together and artists can sell merchandise.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The Great Pyramids

This week, there has been a lot of chatter in the weirder parts of the online world about the supposed discovery of a hidden complex of underground chambers beneath the Great Pyramids of Giza in Egypt. It seems a team of researchers announced they’d used SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) to reveal a number of underground buildings beneath the Khafre Pyramid.

This discovery could offer proof the ancient Egyptian civilization was far more advanced than is generally believed, and possessed technology that rivals our own. It could change everything we think we know about humanity itself! In other words, big if true. 

Spoiler: It’s not true though. All signs point to the “discovery” being an especially elaborate example of pyramid-based misinformation, another in a long string of untrue claims about the ancient Egyptian monuments that never seems to end, because cranks just love making up stories about the pyramids.

What was supposedly discovered under the Great Pyramids? 

I gotta give the “researchers” behind this “discovery” an A for effort. The supposed results of the SAR-based research were shared with the world at a press conference held in Bologna, Italy, on March 15, and it all looks very official. Here’s a video of the event:

It’s in Italian, and there are no English translation available yet, so I’m relying on other people’s translation work, but the gist is that the GIZA Project involves a team of “researchers, historians, archaeologists, and technologists” using high tech imaging techniques. They say they’ve discovered five identical structures connected by “geometric pathways,” eight “structures resembling vertical wells, surrounded by descending spiral pathways,” and “two large cubic structures measuring approximately 80 meters per side at a depth of 648 meters” at the site of the Great Pyramids.

The conference featured multimedia detailing the supposed discoveries, charts and graphs, people acting very serious, and all sorts of “this is real science!” frippery, so as you’d expect, the easily fooled were fooled, easily. Alex Jones touted this as “greatest archeological find in HISTORY.” Others wondered if the structures under the pyramids are part of a massive power plant, or maybe an ancient super weapon, or part of the “legendary Amenti,” a subterranean city “linked to ‘universal knowledge of humankind and its ultimate spiritual transformation.’”

Or maybe the entire thing is nonsense and nobody discovered shit.  

Where does this new pyramid research come from?

Many of the claims made in the press conference aren’t based on any published research, so it’s just people saying stuff in Italian, but the facts that can be checked are largely based on a research paper published in the journal Remote Sensing in 2022. Corrado Malanga and Filippo Biondi are listed at the top of a paper named “Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza.” It’s a dense read, full of technical information and equations like this:

Math equations

Credit: Remote Sensing

Don’t bother plowing through it and checking the math: The paper’s most notable feature is that it’s not peer reviewed, so you can safely ignore it for now. No independent expert in imaging has looked at this paper in a serious way to determine if SAR could even work like this, and radar experts doubt you could penetrate 648 meters through limestone bedrock. No archeologists have substantiated these claims. Neither have any historians or sociologists. Bottom line: without peer review, there’s no reason to take this paper more seriously than you’d take wild claims made by a random person on a bus. 

And that’s the generous interpretation. A less generous view is expressed by established Egyptologist Dr. Zahi Hawass, who wrote on his Facebook:

All this information is completely wrong and has absolutely no scientific basis… the claim that a radar was used inside the pyramid is false…These people who announced this wrong information, they used techniques that are not approved nor validated, the details announced would never have been seen by using this technique.

Until actual scientists have a look at this research (and I wouldn’t hold my breath) it’s safe to file it under “pyramid misinformation,” a hearty mind-weed that’s been around forever and seems impossible to kill. But pyramid myths are at least fun, so here are some other common things people get wrong about them.

Myth: The pyramids were built by slaves or aliens

Conspiracy theorists often argue that “mainstream” archeologists and historians shouldn’t be believed because they have a compelling interest in rejecting new ideas to maintain the academic status quo. But until relatively recently, many historians, archeologists, and most of the general public believed the pyramids were built by slave labor—specifically by the Jews. This is probably because Egyptians enslaving Jews is mentioned in the Bible (though the pyramids are not) and because Greek historian Herodotu reported that slaves were building the pyramids when he visited in 450 B.C. 

Even though it challenged the orthodoxy of their field of study, archeologists uncovered new evidence and reexamined existing evidence to change the conventional wisdom. It turns out the pyramids were not built by slave labor, at least not as we understand slavery today. Instead, the archeological evidence suggests the the pyramids were built by around 20,000 Egyptians who were paid, well-fed, had the equivalent of medical care, worked seasonally, and even left graffiti behind bragging about how awesome their work crew was compared to the others. This evidence also helps us cross “aliens” off the list of potential pyramid-makers. (Giants didn’t build the pyramids either.)

Myth: Ancient people could not have moved the pyramids’ heavy stones

We don’t know exactly how the stones they used to build the pyramids were moved into place, but we have evidence that the ancient Egyptians loaded the stones on barges, floated them down the Nile, then dragged them on sledges over pathways they’d made of of slaked lime or tafla, probably using water to reduce friction. No advanced technology or extraterrestrial help was needed, and there’s no evidence at all to suggest they were employed. A lot of people working together can accomplish great things, especially if they have all been given enough beer.

Myth: Pyramids existing independently in different prehistoric societies is evidence of a common culture

From Mayan pyramids in Central America to Angkor Wat in Cambodia, many disparate ancient civilizations built pyramid-shaped monuments, leading some to suggest they had a common culture or there was an ancient means of communication between groups. Some think there’s something inherently “spiritual” in a pyramid’s shape.

While some ancient civilizations did communicate and trade with each other, the main reason pyramids all look similar is the same reason sand castles all have a vaguely pyramidal shape: It’s the most stable way to build anything upwards, no matter where your ancient civilization is located. 

Plot-twist: A real anomaly was discovered near the Great Pyramid

This news was not breathlessly tweeted by Alex Jones, but in 2024, real scientists announced they’d discovered a mysterious structure under the royal graveyard near the Great Pyramid of Giza.

Using ground penetrating RADAR and electrical resistivity tomography, researchers from Higashi Nippon International University and other institutions identified an L-shaped structure that is about 33 feet long and is buried 6.5 feet deep. Maybe that’s not as impressive as a city-sized proto-battery under hundreds of meters of limestone, but beneath that there’s a “highly resistive anomaly!”

It’s totally unknown, so you can pretend it’s an alien spaceship if you want, but scientists think it’s probably a mix of sand and gravel or “an air void.” It’s not an underground city or the remains of an ancient battery, but at least it’s real.  

This Kindle Paperwhite Kids Is $40 Off Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Amazon’s Big Spring Sale, running from March 25 to March 31, doesn’t quite hit the same discount highs as Prime Day, but it’s still worth a look—especially if you’ve had your eye on big-ticket items or tech gifts. This is only the second time Amazon’s hosting the event, and unlike Prime Day, you don’t need a Prime membership to shop (that said, Prime members do get better deals). If you think it’s worth it, a Prime membership starts at $14.99 per month, but if you’re still on the fence about that kind of commitment, you can always sign up for a 30-day free trial, use it to shop the sale, and cancel afterward.

If your kid’s been swiping your Kindle and you’ve thought it might be time to get them their own, this PCMag Editor’s Choice-winning Kindle Paperwhite Kids (2024) is worth a look—especially now that it’s at an all-time low price of $139.99 (down from $179.99), according to price-trackers. It’s not just a regular Kindle with a “Kids” sticker slapped on it or some dumbed-down screen with clunky interface. You’re getting the same seven-inch 300ppi display as the adult Paperwhite, but with a kid-friendly twist—a cute, colorful case in either Starfish or Cyber City, a two-year, worry-free guarantee (they break it, Amazon replaces it), and a six-month subscription to Amazon Kids+, which gives gives them access to a curated library of age-appropriate books, including Harry Potter, Percy Jackson, and more. After the six months, the subscription auto-renews at $5.99/month plus tax, but you can cancel anytime.

The screen of the Paperwhite Kids is warm-lit and adjustable, so it’s easy on the eyes, even during bedtime reading. The interface is distraction-free (there are no games or ads here) and designed to help kids build a reading habit without nudging them toward screen time, according to this PCMag review. Battery life stretches into multiple weeks, even with daily use, and there’s 16GB of storage, which is plenty of room for books, comics, and audiobooks (it supports Audible via Bluetooth). Additionally, the Paperwhite Kids comes with an IPX8 waterproof rating, so a juice spill or a poolside accident won’t end in tears. That said, it’s not the cheapest e-reader for kids, and if your child isn’t into reading yet, this might be overkill. But if they’ve already shown a love for books, this is a well-rounded, future-proof option that can grow with them.

Shopping for tech? Lifehacker can help you make the right decision. Browse our tech reviews and head-to-head comparisons for everything from laptops and smartwatches to e-bikes and home gyms. Subscribe to our deals newsletter, Add to Cart, for the best sales sent to your inbox, or browse our best-of lists directly on Amazon, including:

The DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro Camera Is at Its Lowest Price Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Amazon’s Big Spring Sale is back, running from March 25 through March 31. It’s basically Prime Day’s laid-back cousin—longer, with slightly less fanfare, but still a decent time to pick up things you’ve been eyeing for months. And no, you don’t have to be a Prime member, but the better deals go to those who are. Luckily, Amazon still hands out 30-day Prime trials like candy, so you can sign up now, grab the deals, and bail before paying a dime.

If you’ve been waiting to upgrade your action cam setup, the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro just dropped to its lowest price yet, according to online price-tracking tools. The Adventure Combo is down to $369 from $449 and comes fully loaded with accessories—three extended-life batteries, a protective frame, multiple mounting options, a lens cover and protector, a battery case that doubles as a charger, and a 1.5-meter extension rod (handy for wide shots or selfie-style vlogging).

It’s a lot, but it makes sense if you’re shooting outdoors for long stretches or need the flexibility of different angles and setups. It was named Best Action Camera of 2024 by PCMag, thanks to features like its 10-bit D-Log M for richer color grading, sharp HDR video, and a front OLED touchscreen that’s bright enough to use in direct sunlight. The sensor size is also a healthy 1/1.3 inch, which reportedly makes a difference when you’re shooting in low light. Plus, it’s waterproof up to 20 meters without a case, and its image stabilization handles chaotic movement surprisingly well—great for someone capturing rough terrain on a mountain bike or filming themselves surfing. Read an in-depth review of the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro here.

That said, if you’re more of a casual creator or don’t need all the bells and whistles, the Essential Combo is probably enough. It’s $319, down from $339, and includes just one battery and the core mounts, though it lacks the horizontal-vertical protective frame. Same camera, fewer accessories. For day trips, vlogging, or hobby shooting, it’ll do the job without cluttering your bag. Just keep in mind that battery life hovers around two to four hours per charge (depending on usage), so having only one battery might get frustrating fast if you’re planning to shoot all day. Still, it’s hard to argue with the performance packed into such a small body, especially at this price.

Shopping for tech? Lifehacker can help you make the right decision. Browse our tech reviews and head-to-head comparisons for everything from laptops and smartwatches to e-bikes and home gyms. Subscribe to our deals newsletter, Add to Cart, for the best sales sent to your inbox, or browse our best-of lists directly on Amazon, including:

AMD CEO Says Radeon RX 9070 XT Week 1 Sales Smoked All Prior Radeons By 10x

AMD CEO Says Radeon RX 9070 XT Week 1 Sales Smoked All Prior Radeons By 10x
AMD was quick to debunk a recent report claiming it revealed combined Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9070 shipments had topped 200,000 units. Maybe it did, maybe it didn’t. Either way, AMD never shared an actual specific tally. In the days since, however, AMD CEO Dr. Lisa Su did provide an interesting figure regarding AMD’s latest generation

Anker’s Eufy 3-in-1 E20 robot vacuum is $150 off during the Amazon Big Spring Sale

Anker’s Eufy 3-in-1 E20 robot vacuum is $150 off right now, as part of Amazon’s Big Spring Sale. That brings the price down to $450, which is a record low. For those averse to using Amazon, the deal is also available directly from the company.

The E20 made our list of the best robot vacuums, and with good reason. We loved the hybrid functionality, as this robovac quickly transforms into a cordless stick vacuum and a handheld unit. This in no way impedes the overall performance, as we found the automatic cleaning mode to be top-tier.

The self-emptying base also holds a lot, considering its compact size. We praised the proprietary app in our official review, as editing room maps is both quick and easy. All told, it only took the robovac ten minutes to scoot around the house and create an accurate map. 

The suction power of the robotic unit is strong enough for major cleaning tasks, but the same cannot be said of the stick vacuum attachment. The power is on the weaker side. Also, it doesn’t come with a wall mount for the stick vacuum. That costs extra, to the tune of around $30. Today’s savings more than makes up for that.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/ankers-eufy-3-in-1-e20-robot-vacuum-is-150-off-during-the-amazon-big-spring-sale-140020547.html?src=rss

You Should Delete Your 23andMe Data Right Now

23andMe, the genetic testing company that has collected data from more than 15 million customers, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and is looking for a buyer. If you’re one of those millions who has used 23andMe’s DNA sequencing process, there are a number of serious privacy implications with a potential sale—and it’s time to delete your data.

How your privacy may be at risk

In a general sense, any time you give your data to a company, you cede some control over what happens to it. As 404 Media points out, in the case of 23andMe, this includes how your genetic information is analyzed, monetized, and secured, as well as whether it will be shared or sold (intentionally) or leaked or hacked (unintentionally).

While 23andMe has stated that its bankruptcy filing “does not change how we store, manage, or protect consumer data,” there’s also no way to know what will happen to millions of users’ genetic information in a potential buyer’s hands.

This presents a number of risks, according to privacy advocates interviewed by The Washington Post. 23andMe already suffered a data breach in 2023 in which hackers accessed the records of around 7 million customers, and users are now trusting a company navigating bankruptcy to keep their information secure going forward.

23andMe’s privacy statement also leaves open the possibility of your data being sold or transferred to a buyer like an asset. If that buyer’s privacy terms and practices differ, you’re responsible for tracking those changes—and when is the last time you actually read a privacy policy?

Organizations similar to 23andMe have shared users’ genetic information with law enforcement, government agencies, and pharmaceutical and insurance companies, which opens a whole host of privacy concerns, from police using the data to identify suspects to insurers denying coverage based on genetic risk factors. Your genetic data is connected to your family members, so any invasions of privacy also extend to other people.

23andMe itself has collaborated with pharma companies like GSK, and other genetic databases have created similar partnerships after being sold to for-profit entities.

How to delete your 23andMe data

According to a consumer alert from the California attorney general, there are a few steps you can take to protect your data from any potential privacy concerns. First, you’ll want to delete your genetic data using the following steps:

  1. Log into your account on the 23andMe website.

  2. Go to Settings > 23andMe Data.

  3. Next to 23andMe Data, click View.

  4. Download your data if you want to keep a copy.

  5. Scroll to Delete Data and click Permanently Delete Data.

  6. Click the link in the confirmation email from 23andMe to finalize your request.

You can also request that your test sample be destroyed under Settings > Preferences and revoke consent for your data to be used in research under Settings > Research and Product Consents.

Pirelli rolls back the years with a new flagship clincher road tyre

Pirelli has announced a tube-type version of its fastest road bike tyre, the P Zero Race RS.

The new clincher tyre uses the same SmartEvo rubber compound as the P Zero Race TLR RS, but swaps the SpeedCore tubeless casing for a 120 TPI TechBelt Road clincher version.

According to the Italian brand, a 28c P Zero Race RS clincher weighs only 230g per tyre, compared to 290g for an equivalent tubeless version.

This, Pirelli says, enables it to offer a “record system weight” when paired with its SmarTube TPU inner tubes.

Available now in 700×26, 28c and 30c sizes, the Pirelli P Zero Race RS clincher tyre costs €79.99 (US and UK pricing is to be confirmed).

Why is Pirelli launching a high-end clincher tyre in 2025?

Pirelli P Zero Race RS
Pirelli’s new P Zero Race RS ditches the tubeless casing and cuts weight significantly. Pirelli

With tubeless road bike tyres becoming increasingly dominant in recent years, it’s rare to see one of cycling’s biggest tyre brands releasing a new flagship clincher.

With the P Zero Race RS, though, Pirelli says it’s looking to better serve the needs of riders who prefer to stick with inner tubes.

According to Pirelli’s head of global marketing, Samuele Bressan, the pros want tubeless tyres and technology, but around 50 per cent of its Italian customers still prefer clinchers.

As a result, then, it’s convinced there’s still a big enough market for clinchers to warrant making separate tyres.

After all, it’s worth remembering tubeless tyres can be used with inner tubes on both hooked and hookless rims, whereas clincher tyres (including the new P Zero Race RS) can only be used on hooked rims.

The primary gains from ‘tube type’ tyres, then, come from a reduction in weight. In this case, for example, the P Zero Race RS clincher is a little more than 20 per cent lighter than the tubeless version.

This is because clincher tyres can use a lighter bead and casing, because there’s no requirement for them to be airtight without an inner tube and pressure from inside the tube helps retain the tyre on the rim.

Clincher tyres also offer improved compatibility with older clincher rims, which lack the deep central channel designed to offer more slack when installing inflexible tubeless tyre beads.

Different construction, same performance

Pirelli P Zero Race RS clincher
Pirelli says the P Zero Race RS clincher isn’t too delicate for everyday use. Pirelli

Despite the change in construction, Pirelli says the P Zero Race RS offers comparable performance to the tubeless version (when paired with a high-quality inner tube, of course), with a focus on speed and racing.

Despite this and the tyre’s low weight, Bressan insists the P Zero Race RS is “usable in the real world”, because the TechBelt Road casing includes a dedicated puncture protection belt.

Bressan also notes that its pro teams have consistently requested lighter, faster tyres in recent years, even at the cost of some durability, because they experience relatively few punctures.

This Samsung Flagship 4K QLED TV Is at Its Lowest Price Ever

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Amazon’s Big Spring Sale is back for its second year, running from March 25 to March 31, and it’s basically a slower, longer version of Prime Day. The deals may not be as flashy, but the price drops are real—and you don’t need to be a Prime member to shop. That said, Amazon says Prime members will get access to better discounts and more options. If you’re not already subscribed, you can grab a free 30-day trial to take full advantage of the week-long event, then cancel before the billing kicks in.

One of the biggest markdowns this week is on the Samsung 50-Inch QN90D 4K QLED TV, which is currently going for $899—almost $500 off its list price of $1397.99. That’s the lowest price it’s ever hit, according to price-trackers. Samsung’s QLED panels have always had a reputation for sharp visuals and punchy brightness, and the QN90D keeps that legacy going, especially with its Neo QLED tech, Quantum HDR+, and mini LED backlighting, which helps with contrast and HDR performance—blacks look deeper, highlights pop more, and you won’t be squinting during those darker movie scenes.

The main trade-off here is the lack of Dolby Vision support—something Samsung has consistently skipped, and that hasn’t changed with the QN90D. If that’s your go-to HDR format, this TV might fall short. Additionally, while it does come with an ATSC 1.0 tuner for live TV, it skips ATSC 3.0, so you won’t get newer over-the-air 1080p or 4K broadcasts. For most people, that’s not a dealbreaker, but if you rely on an antenna instead of streaming, it’s worth keeping in mind.

At 50 inches, this TV is best suited for a living room or bedroom where you’re sitting maybe six to eight feet away. It runs on Samsung’s Tizen OS, which can be a bit cluttered if you’re not used to Samsung’s smart TV interface, but it does support all the major apps out of the box, including Netflix, Prime Video, and Disney+. You can also stream straight from your iPhone, iPad, or Mac using Apple AirPlay, and it also works with Miracast or WiDi if you want to mirror your Windows PC. Amazon Alexa is built in, and thanks to the far-field microphones, you can use voice commands without picking up the solar-powered remote. Gaming-wise, the TV’s 120Hz refresh rate push up to 144Hz with VRR and supports AMD FreeSync Premium Pro. Additionally, with an input lag of just 2.9 milliseconds in game mode, you can expect smooth, responsive gameplay, according to this PCMag review.

Shopping for tech? Lifehacker can help you make the right decision. Browse our tech reviews and head-to-head comparisons for everything from laptops and smartwatches to e-bikes and home gyms. Subscribe to our deals newsletter, Add to Cart, for the best sales sent to your inbox, or browse our best-of lists directly on Amazon, including:

The Sony Playstacean: A Playstation That’s A Crab

Inspired by these illustrations by artist Anh Dang of a Playstation crab, this is the Sony Playstacean constructed by Instagram user GingerOfOz using a Sony PSOne and 3D printed parts to make it look like an orange crab, complete with a controller modded into its arms and claws. It’s delightful. Granted, it’s doesn’t look very practical to use with those controller claws, but I wasn’t born to be practical, I was born to be delighted. Just kidding, I think I was born to test the limits of human regret and disappointment.

Europe is looking for alternatives to US cloud providers

The global backlash against the second Donald Trump administration keeps on growing. Canadians have boycotted US-made products, anti–Elon Musk posters have appeared across London amid widespread Tesla protests, and European officials have drastically increased military spending as US support for Ukraine falters. Dominant US tech services may be the next focus.

There are early signs that some European companies and governments are souring on their use of American cloud services provided by the three so-called hyperscalers. Between them, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) host vast swathes of the Internet and keep thousands of businesses running. However, some organizations appear to be reconsidering their use of these companies’ cloud services—including servers, storage, and databases—citing uncertainties around privacy and data access fears under the Trump administration.

“There’s a huge appetite in Europe to de-risk or decouple the over-dependence on US tech companies, because there is a concern that they could be weaponized against European interests,” says Marietje Schaake, a nonresident fellow at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center and a former decadelong member of the European Parliament.

Read full article

Comments

Anker’s latest chargers and power banks are up to 20 percent off in the Amazon Spring Sale

Anker makes some of the best power banks on the market and debuted a few great options earlier this year. That included Anker’s Laptop Power Bank, a 25,000mAh portable charger with triple 100W USB-C ports and one USB port. Well, currently, that charger is on sale for $88, down from $110 — a 20 percent discount — as part of Amazon’s Spring Sale. 

The new power bank, available in Black and Silver, comes with two USB-C cables and can charge four devices simultaneously. It works with laptops, smartphones, cameras, gaming consoles and more. For example, it can charge an MacBook Air with an M3 chip to 50 percent in 33 minutes. It can also get an iPhone 16 to the same level in just 25 minutes. Plus, its display shows the battery’s health and temperature, along with output and input wattage. 

Anker’s 140W four-port wall charger is also discounted for Amazon’s Spring Sale. You can pick it up right now for $77, down from $90. It offers a display that tracks power usage for each port, fast-charge status and temperature. Plus, it has something Anker refers to as an “odometer,” tracking lifetime usage hour by hour. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/ankers-latest-chargers-and-power-banks-are-up-to-20-percent-off-in-the-amazon-spring-sale-130131799.html?src=rss

Otter.ai’s Meeting Agent can schedule calls and write emails for you

The next time you join a video call, Otter.ai is hoping its new AI tool will help make things run smoother. On Tuesday, the company introduced the Otter Meeting Agent. It’s part of a suite of three new AI helpers designed to assist a variety of different users. The first of those, the voice-activated Meeting Agent, can schedule follow-up calls and draft emails for you. It can also answer questions based on information it finds in your company’s meeting database.

“This agent goes beyond simple transcription and empowers users to interact with AI meeting data in real-time to increase productivity,” explains Otter.ai. The two other agents the company is releasing today can provide real-time coaching to sales agents during customer calls and live demos to potential customers. Otter.ai says it plans to release more “vertical” agents in the future. They will be designed to assist marketing, recruiting and other job functions.

In the meantime, Otter.ai has begun rolling out the Meeting Agent to all users. As of today, it works with Zoom exclusively, with support for Microsoft Teams and Google Meet arriving in the coming weeks. If you don’t have access right away, it may take a few days before the company rolls out the agent to you.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/otterais-meeting-agent-can-schedule-calls-and-write-emails-for-you-130048189.html?src=rss

I Tested Boxed Cake Mix Without the Eggs, and It Was Fantastic

There was a time, not so long ago, that I was completely abusing my right to use boxed mixes. I made a crumb cake out of muffin mix, peach dump cake, very convincing black and white cookies, and a super tender boxed cake by adding too much oil and not enough egg. I’ve learned a lot from all this screwing around with boxed mixes (for science, of course). With the recent surge in egg prices and the rate of birthday celebrating as consistent as ever, I began to wonder if there was a way for folks to make boxed cakes without using up all of their precious eggs. Then I remembered, of course there is—you can skip them completely. 

It was when I was trying to manipulate boxed cake mix to make thick, soft black and white cookies that I made this crucial discovery: All boxed cake mix wants to be cake. I used Duncan Hines yellow cake mix and tried everything to change the batter. I took out the oil. I added only egg. I added just a few tablespoons of water. All of my attempts bubbled, spread, and puffed into full-blown cake. I ended up using muffin mix to come up with the right consistency for black and white cookies. 

If you think about it, this basic understanding (that cake mix will always become cake) is why we know dump cake works. For those unfamiliar with this casually named dessert, you simply dump fruit (canned or otherwise) into a casserole dish and sprinkle dry cake mix over the top. Even the scant liquid from simmering fruit is enough to moisten the dry cake mix and activate it. Boxed cake mixes, like those from Duncan Hines, Pillsbury, or Betty Crocker, are all designed to be nearly foolproof. You just need to add liquid—eggy or not—and it will become cake. 

Don’t get me wrong, in a side-by-side comparison (see one below) you’ll notice the difference in puff and color, but the flavor is consistently good. It’s really hard to screw them up to the point that they’re not delicious. I’ve been trying for years and I haven’t managed to make it taste bad. Changing the ratios, especially the oil, might actually give you a cake texture you prefer (more on that later).

Two, one, or zero eggs all result in cake

I wanted to test out how far I could push cake mix so I did a Funfetti test. The batter, prepared with the manufacturer’s suggestions, takes a cup of water, half a cup of oil, and three eggs. I did a few iterations. One test with only a single egg and double the oil, one test with no eggs and double the oil, and one with the proper amount of oil but zero eggs. 

Three layers of funfetti cake on a wire cooling rack.
Left: no eggs and double oil. Center: no eggs and normal oil. Right: One egg and double oil.
Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

While the mixture properly prepared according to the package’s directions has more of a domed top than the other reduced-egg versions, absolutely all of them became fluffy, soft, delectable cake layers. I think the single egg and double oil cake was my favorite because the single egg was just enough of an emulsifier to support the extra fat. It wasn’t weighed down, but it was decadent and moist. 

Three cakes cut in half next to each other to show the difference in height.
Left: cake prepared according to directions. Center: cake with one egg and double oil. Right, Cake with no eggs and directed amount of oil and water.
Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

But I digress: The real victory here is that the cake with absolutely no egg was fantastic. It didn’t dome, which is actually preferable if you’re stacking layers for a cake with icing, the texture was fluffy and moist, and the flavor was as Funfetti as could be. There was no need to replace the egg with anything, by the way. No extra water. No banana. Just mix the indicated amounts of water and oil into the dry mix. Pour it into the pans and smooth out the tops. Keep in mind that you can do anything in between too. Add one egg. Maybe you have two leftover egg whites. A stray yolk lurking in your fridge? Toss it in instead of the suggested three whole eggs.

Not all boxed mixes are as forgiving

While boxed cake mix is completely fine without eggs, not all boxed mixes are as forgiving. I tried to skip the egg in boxed Ghirardelli walnut brownie mix and—ho boy. That was absolutely disgusting. I was surprised, honestly; I figured since there was only a single egg in the recipe, what harm could it do to skip it? Lots. I made six brownie bites—three with a no-egg mixture, and three with the batter prepared according to the manufacturer’s directions. You get three guesses which is which.

One greasy and dark brown brownie bite next to a lighter brown and fluffy brownie bite.

Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

Eggs are an emulsifier after all, and it seems like brownie mix truly needs the help of that single egg to integrate the fats and yield a moist and ungreasy final product. Your brownie mix is not the place to skip eggs. Do that with boxed cake mix instead. 

AlexNet, the AI Model That Started It All, Released In Source Code Form

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet: There are many stories of how artificial intelligence came to take over the world, but one of the most important developments is the emergence in 2012 of AlexNet, a neural network that, for the first time, demonstrated a huge jump in a computer’s ability to recognize images. Thursday, the Computer History Museum (CHM), in collaboration with Google, released for the first time the AlexNet source code written by University of Toronto graduate student Alex Krizhevsky, placing it on GitHub for all to peruse and download.

“CHM is proud to present the source code to the 2012 version of Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffery Hinton’s AlexNet, which transformed the field of artificial intelligence,” write the Museum organizers in the readme file on GitHub. Krizhevsky’s creation would lead to a flood of innovation in the ensuing years, and tons of capital, based on proof that with sufficient data and computing, neural networks could achieve breakthroughs previously viewed as mainly theoretical. The Computer History Museum’s software historian, Hansen Hsu, published an essay describing how he spent five years negotiating with Google to release the code.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

How Polestar engineers EVs that can handle brutal winters

LULEA, Sweden—Staring out the window of a puddle jumper descending from Stockholm into Lulea, I spy frozen seawater for the first time in my life. Not nearly as much as I expected, though, for the middle of February at the northern end of Sweden. I’ve flown here to drift electric Polestars on an icy lake called Stor-Skabram, near the small outpost of Jokkmokk, fully above the Arctic Circle. Yet the balmy weather serves as a constant reminder of the climate change that inspires much of the narrative around the electric vehicle industry.

EVs on ice

An opportunity to get somebody else’s cars sideways as much as possible on ice and snow is a particularly enjoyable way to spend a day, if you like driving cars. More importantly, automotive manufacturers rely on this kind of winter testing to fine-tune traction and stability-control programming, ensuring their cars can work well in the depths of the deepest winter. For EVs in particular, winter testing presents a more complex range of equations.

First of all, an EV can’t ever turn the electronic nannies off entirely, because electric motors will rev to the moon with instantaneous torque the very instant their tires lose traction. So while software uses wheel speed sensors and regenerative braking, as well as accelerometers that detect yaw rates, each EV needs to then maintain progressive output responses to driver inputs that allow for confident performance and safety simultaneously.

Read full article

Comments

iRobot’s 2-in-1 vacuum and mop drops to $149 for the Amazon Spring Sale

If you’re looking for a budget-friendly robot vacuum that can handle both vacuuming and mopping, iRobot’s Roomba Combo Essential just hit its lowest price ever. Thanks to the Amazon Spring Sale, it’s down to $150 from $275, matching the lowest price we’ve seen. It previously dipped to $149 during the holiday season and earlier this year, but it’s unclear how long this deal will stick around this time.

As you can see in our roundup of the best budget robot vacuums, we’ve consistently rated iRobot’s machines highly for their reliability and ease of use. The Roomba Combo Essential is a simple, no-frills option that both vacuums and mops, making it a solid pick for small apartments, dorm rooms or anyone who wants a cleaner floor without spending a fortune.

The vacuum uses special multi-surface brushes to pick up dirt, dust and pet hair from hard floors and carpets. Unlike some budget models that struggle with transitions, this one automatically adjusts to different surfaces, so you won’t have to worry about it getting stuck. When it’s time to mop, the built-in mopping pad wipes down hard floors, tackling light spills and everyday messes. It’s not as advanced as iRobot’s higher-end models with precision scrubbing, but it’s a convenient way to keep your floors looking fresh with minimal effort.

One of iRobot Roomba Combo Essential’s most convenient features is its auto-adjusting cleaning power — the robot increases suction when it detects extra debris, so it’s more effective on high-traffic areas like entryways or around pet bowls. It also has cliff sensors to prevent it from tumbling down stairs and a low-profile design that helps it slip under some couches and other furniture for a more thorough clean.

Despite it being an entry-level robot vacuum, the iRobot Roomba Combo Essential comes with app control and voice assistant support, so you can set cleaning schedules and initiate cleaning whether you’re at home lounging on the couch or away on vacation. For $150, this is a solid deal for an iRobot machine that can vacuum and mop, especially considering its usual $275 price tag. If you’ve been thinking about automating some of your floor cleaning, this is one of the most affordable ways to do it.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/deals/irobots-2-in-1-vacuum-and-mop-drops-to-149-for-the-amazon-spring-sale-123058730.html?src=rss

You Can Grow a ‘Micro Orchard’ in Your Garden

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

I have a problem: My garden is a finite size. It will hold only so many trees, though I’ve been trying for years to squeeze in more. The solution might be a micro orchard, which provides distinct benefits. First, all the fruit on your trees is reachable (because nothing is as frustrating as a peach just out of your reach) because the trees are kept small and fruit is encouraged to grow close to the ground. That small stature of tree means you can pack more into a smaller space. Being able to have many trees instead of one allows you to diversify your harvest, or improve the pollination of one kind of fruit tree by having a few trees of the same kind instead of just one. 

With trees this small, you can more easily control pests and viruses. A tiny tree is much easier to spray than a fifteen-foot tree. To make this easier, there’s an ever increasing amount of cross breeding in fruit to make trees more compact and to create hardier breeds of fruit. You can now grow olives and citrus in the cold, or apples in the desert. 

Start by choosing the right root stock

Something you might not know about fruit trees we buy today is that almost none are grown from seed. Instead, a young branch from a fully grown fruit tree (a scion) is grafted to the young trunk of a completely unrelated tree (root stock) known to be particularly disease-resistant or weather-resilient, or very tall or very small. The scion will grow instead of the root stock, and you end up with a fruit tree that has the fruit of the scion and the characteristics of the root stock, like a dwarf nectarine. The most common reason people choose root stock is the height. To achieve a micro orchard, you’ll want to choose fruit trees grown on dwarf stock trees that won’t grow taller than ten or twelve feet, and there is a difference between dwarf and semi-dwarf, which is 12-15 feet and likely too tall for a micro-orchard. You’ll prune the tree to be even smaller than the full 8-12 foot height, but you want to start with a tree that is already primed to grow as small as possible. 

dwarf peach tree
The taller of my dwarf peach trees still wasn’t as tall as my shovel.
Credit: Amanda Blum

How to choose your fruit tree varieties

I spent this weekend at One Green World, a national retailer of fruit trees, shrubs, and vines. They have the deepest catalog of fruit trees I’ve seen, with almost a hundred varieties of pomegranate alone. I spoke to Matt Voedisch, a crew member of One Green World, about how to choose trees for a micro-orchard. I had room in my front yard for four trees to start. I’ve been studying mini or micro orchards for the last few months, and there seemed to be some common trends. Apples and pears were common, and given the variety available on stock, that made sense. Plums were popular, as were peaches. However, the truth is that any fruit would be appropriate, so long as it is available on dwarf root stock, and that variety is noted for your growing zone. This could include mulberries, cherries, olives, and even citrus.

Voedisch encouraged me to consider medlar and persimmon, both excellent ideas, but I was focused on peaches and pomegranates. He guided me to an Eldorado and Bonanza peach, both of which are available nationwide. I couldn’t get over how small these peach trees were—less than three feet with roots, but full of branches and buds. I chose two pomegranates of the Hydranar x Goulosha variety, and was able to see what they’d look like grown up, as one was planted on site.  

A dwarf pomegranate, full grown
The Hydranar x Goulosha pomegranate, full grown, only stands five feet or less tall.
Credit: Amanda blum

When to prune fruit trees

In some videos, I’ve watched micro orchard gardeners march out of Home Depot with 8-foot fruit trees, and lop them to hip height in the parking lot to fit into their car and get started on the pruning. I appeared at One Green World with pruners, steeled to take this drastic step, but Voedisch encouraged patience. Particularly for stone fruit, spring is too wet for big cuts, he said. He suggested waiting for dry conditions this summer. 

Generally, plants are pruned while dormant, after fruiting or flowering. So the end of summer would be an appropriate time to prune your stone fruit and quince. For apples and pears, the appropriate time is fall or winter. Medlars get pruned in late winter or early spring.  While these are general rules, it’s always a good idea to check in with a local nursery for guidelines on when to prune, given local weather conditions any particular year. 

How to start prune fruit trees

Understanding how the nuances of pruning—particularly, the angle and location of the cut—affect tree growth will be the success of your orchard. As a general rule, never take more than a third of a plant or tree at once. In almost all cases for a micro orchard, your first cut is going to be to lop the plant at hip height, regardless of what is growing above that cut. You want cuts to be at 45 degrees, so the branch grows up out of that cut. Think of the cut like it is forming an elbow. 

Each cut creates branching, with new branches forming from the nearest growth point (spur) on the branch you cut. By cutting the main trunk of your tree, you’ll force the tree to form branches at that junction, which will grow horizontally, not vertically, and they will each grow more branches—and now the fruit that grows on those branches will be much lower to the ground. 

How to prune fruit trees over the long term

After the initial lopping, successive years will be about helping your fruit tree maintain its shape and balance. You always want the center of the tree to be open and airy, allowing air flow, sunlight, and pollinators to move through. There’s a greater likelihood of illness when trees or plants have a lot of leaves or branches in crammed quarters, and the less fruit you produce, the bigger and tastier that fruit should be anyway.

The first cuts each year should be to remove any branches that are directed inward, rather than outward. All the branches should be moving up and away from the center. Next, you’ll want to consider branches that cross other branches, which should be removed. Any small, dead branches should be cut away. Finally, on each tree, you want to establish three to four strong lead branches (leaders) that leave the tree balanced, with that big airy center. There are excellent videos on how to prune using this method. During the first few years, you’ll want to limit your fruit by plucking blossoms from the tree (so they can’t develop fruit), so the tree has time to develop strong roots and branches.

Concerns about micro orchards

There are some concerns about keeping trees this small, and they should affect where you plant and how you maintain your micro orchard. Dwarf stock often doesn’t have the same disease resistance as taller or regular stock. This can be negated somewhat by staying on top of spraying your trees with the appropriate treatments for your area. In the wet northwest, we treat stone fruit with copper to prevent leaf curl and other diseases, and this is made much easier by keeping the plants small. Another problem is that the roots will not be as deep and this will affect the stability of the tree. Micro orchards shouldn’t be used as wind shields in your yard, and you should consider staking the trees for stability. You’ll want to be diligent during pruning about maintaining balance in your trees to help with this problem.

Two dwarf peach trees in the ground
Good luck, trees.
Credit: Amanda Blum

On Saturday, I dug holes roughly three times the width and depth of the tree roots and plunked my new mini trees into the front yard. These trees are so small they won’t need that initial hip height cut, but next year, I’ll be pruning them to keep them petite and, hopefully, in two years, I’ll be harvesting fruit from them.

Samsung CEO Jong-hee Han has died

One of Samsung’s CEOs, Jong-hee Han, has died due to a heart attack, according to Reuters and CNBC. He was 63. Han joined the company in 1988 and became the head of product research and development for visual display in 2011. He then led Samsung’s TV business before he was named as the head of Samsung DX, which is what the company calls its merged mobile and consumer electronics divisions, in 2021. In 2022, he officially became the company’s Vice Chairman and CEO. Han had no experience in mobile before he started leading the company’s DX group, but Samsung gave him credit for helping it get to the top of global TV sales for 15 years. 

CNBC says Han was one of the executives who hosted Samsung’s annual general shareholders meeting just a week ago and answered questions about the company’s poor stock performance. During the meeting, Han apologized to the shareholders, telling them that Samsung “failed to adequately respond to the rapidly evolving AI semiconductor market.” He also told the shareholders that Samsung was having difficulties when it came to semiconductor-related mergers and acquisitions due to regulatory issues, but that the company was “determined to produce some tangible results this year.”

Based on the notice Samsung published, Han’s co-CEO Young-Hyun Jun is now the sole CEO of the company. Jun, who also heads Samsung’s semiconductor business, was appointed as Han’s co-CEO in November 2024. It’s not clear whether Samsung is planning to appoint another CEO in the future. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/samsung-ceo-jong-hee-han-has-died-120029286.html?src=rss

Zwift Bike Upgrade Performance: New Charts + Public Test Data

It’s been a busy couple of weeks here at Zwift Insider! We’ve been testing Zwift’s recent frame and wheel performance tweaks as well as the new Bike Upgrades functionality so we can present data and help everyone wrap their heads around what has changed.

If you haven’t read up on these changes, but want to become an expert on all things Zwift performance, here is some further reading:

All About Bike Upgrades >
Frame and Wheelset Performance Change >

Below you’ll find charts and data that can give you the most thorough, detailed view yet when it comes to understanding how all the frames, wheels, and upgrade options in Zwift interact. This includes a new publicly-available Google sheet with all of our test results, so you can crunch numbers in your own way. Good luck!

Test Methodology Notes

The following results are from tests done using our standard parameters: a 75kg rider, 183cm tall, without drafting. Flat tests were done on Watopia’s Tempus Fugit since it’s Zwift’s flattest route, while Climbing tests were done on Alpe du Zwift since it’s a long, steady climb.

While we present time data with tenths-of-a-second precision, it’s important to understand there is a 1-second margin of error in these results, so it’s probably not worth obsessing over fractional seconds.

Public Test Data Now Available!

Several readers asked for access to our raw speed test results, so we’ve compiled those into a public, read-only Google sheet.

Access this test data here >

The data is presented differently than we’ve done in the past, but you should find it much more useful for a variety of purposes. The following test results are compiled in the sheet:

  • All frames in Zwift at both stage 0 (un-upgraded) and stage 5 (fully upgraded) status, at 300W and 150W
    • Flat test average speed and hour time gaps
    • Climb test average speed and hour time gaps
  • All wheels in Zwift at 300W and 150W with the Zwift Carbon frame
    • Flat test average speed and hour time gaps
    • Climb test average speed and hour time gaps
  • All wheels in Zwift at 300W with the Zwift TT frame
    • Flat test average speed and hour time gaps
    • Climb test average speed and hour time gaps

Time Savings Over 1 Hour (Stage 0 Frames)

This is a chart many of you have already seen, in our post previewing Zwift’s recent performance tweaks. Here you see time savings across 1 hour of riding at 300W (4 W/kg) on each frame compared to the stock Zwift Carbon frame. These are “stage 0” frames, meaning no performance upgrades have been applied.

The chart is sorted from the best-performing frames to the worst, and you can sort based on flat performance or climb performance.

Sort Chart By:

Flat Performance
Climb Performance

Takeaways

When sorted by flat performance, you can easily see that the top 10 frames are very close on flat ground, separated by less than 3 seconds across an hour. There is also a big chunk of bikes near the low end (26 of them, in fact) which are all rather slow on flats, but perform within 2 seconds of each other.

If you sort by climb performance, the speed falloff from one bike to the next is more even across the board. The new S-Works Tarmac SL8 is king of the hill, but remember, this is before any performance upgrades. Let’s move on to the next chart to see which fully-upgraded frame climbs fastest!

Time Savings Over 1 Hour (Stage 5 Frames)

This chart is just like the one above, except these are “stage 5” frames, meaning all possible performance upgrades have been applied.

Read all about Bike Upgrades here >

We are still charting time savings across 1 hour of riding at 300W (4 W/kg) on each frame compared to the stock (stage 0) Zwift Carbon frame.

The chart is sorted from the best-performing frames to the worst, and you can sort based on flat performance or climb performance.

Sort Chart By:

Flat Performance
Climb Performance

Takeaways

We don’t see any major rankings changes in terms of flat performance, but that’s no surprise. The Bike Upgrades system is structured in a way that increases performance differences between different frame types as upgrades progress.

So climbing bikes become even stronger climbers, and aero bikes become even more aero.

Sort the results by Climb Performance and you can see obvious evidence of this. The all-arounder S-Works Tarmac SL8 is no longer king of the hill at stage 5, as the Aethos has received more weight reduction upgrades than the Tarmac.

Two other climbing road bikes (Bridgestone Anchor and Trek Emonda) move up dramatically in the rankings compared to their stage 0 counterparts, handily beating the S-Works Tarmac.

The takeaway? If you want a true pure climbing weapon in Zwift, you’ll want to upgrade the S-Works Aethos.

Time Savings for Climbing (2 W/kg vs 4 W/kg)

Some readers have asked us to compute time gaps at lower power numbers, which is a perfectly reasonable request. Making this change has the interesting effect on climb times of making lightweight bikes move up the rankings while the more aero-focused bikes drop.

This is because, as you reduce your climbing speed, having an aero bike delivers less benefit.

Below we’ve charted climb time gaps for both 2 W/kg and 4 W/kg, and you can toggle between those two power levels to see how the rankings change. (The 2 W/kg time gap is compared to the Zwift Carbon frame at 2 W/kg, while the 4 W/kg time gap is compared to the Zwift Carbon frame at 4 W/kg).

Show Chart For:

2 W/kg
4 W/kg

Takeaways

If you’re a lower-powered rider, this chart may help you decide to focus on lighter-weight frames for races or PR efforts where significant climbing is involved.

Stacked Percentile Rank (Stage 0 vs Stage 5 Frames)

Lastly, we have one of our favorite charts: the stacked percentile. This chart ranks frames by their performance relative to other frames, but combines those rankings so you can see which frames are strongest all around.

We give you the option of viewing stage 0 frames, or fully-upgraded stage 5 frames.

Show Chart For:

Stage 0
Stage 5

Takeaways

The non-climbing bikes don’t move around a lot between the stage 0 and stage 5 versions of this chart, and this makes sense, since they receive the same upgrades.

What you do see, though, is the climbing bikes actually losing ground, as their increased climb performance isn’t enough to make up for the aero performance boosts of the other frames. The Aethos manages to lose only 1 spot, but the Bridgestone Anchor and Trek Emonda each drop several spots.

Questions or Comments?

Hopefully these charts help you make decisions about which frames to use in which events, and which frames you want to upgrade first.

Got questions or comments? Share below!