What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The Most Influential Hoax in American History

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

For April Fools’ Day, I thought I’d look into the fascinating story of a major source of one of the longest-lasting and widely believed conspiracy theories in American history. According to a 2023 YouGov poll, 54% of Americans believe that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone when he gunned down president John F. Kennedy in 1963—so most Americans are wrong about this, and they’re wrong about it partly due to a work of fiction published in the late 1960s.

The granddaddy of all modern conspiracy theories

Widespread disbelief in the “official story” of the Kennedy assassination has inspired a library of books, congressional hearings, major motion pictures, and most recently, the declassification of thousands of documents (none of which, by the way, support the idea of a conspiracy). But more importantly, Kennedy assassination conspiracies normalized and mainstreamed conspiracy theories in general, bolstering every piece of fake news that followed, from Obama’s birth certificate to vaccine skepticism—if the government could cover up a political assassination, the argument goes, they could be up to anything.

But what if the basis of the most widely accepted Kennedy conspiracy theory was a work of satirical fiction? That’s the premise behind Phil Tinline’s recent book Ghosts of Iron Mountain: The Hoax of the Century, Its Enduring Impact, and What It Reveals About America Today, an examination of the history and impact of Report from Iron Mountain, a 1967 work of fiction that started as left-wing satire but became one of the most influential texts in American history.

Oliver Stone’s JFK and the “CIA did it” conspiracy

While there are hundreds of theories about who was really behind Kennedy’s assassination and why they did it, probably the most widely accepted version of the story, the one you may believe, is the theory Oliver Stone went with in his 1991 film JFK: The CIA killed Kennedy because he was about to withdraw troops from Vietnam and end the Cold War.

Main character Jim Garrison lays it out like this in the film: “What took place on November 22, 1963 was a coup d’état … The war is the biggest business in America worth $80 billion a year. President Kennedy was murdered by a conspiracy that was planned and advanced at the highest levels of our government, and was carried out by fanatical and disciplined cold warriors in the Pentagon and CIA’s covert-operation apparatus.”

But where did Stone’s protagonist get this idea? As Tinline’s book details, the CIA theory is laid out in JFK by “X,” a character based on real-life former air-force colonel L. Fletcher Prouty. Prouty’s source is what he believed was a “suppressed think-tank paper” called Report from Iron Mountain: On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace. And Report from Iron Mountain is a literary hoax dreamed up by the editors of the short-lived, left-wing satirical journal The Monocle.

The birth of Report from Iron Mountain

Back in 1966, Victor Navasky, editor of The Monocle, read a news item about a dip in the stock market caused by a cutback in military spending; Wall Street called it a”peace scare.” This inspired Navasky to commission writer Leonard Lewin, with help from economist John Kenneth Galbraith and others, to write Report from Iron Mountain, supposedly the leaked findings of “Special Study Group” tasked by the Kennedy Administration to plan the transition from a wartime to a peacetime economy. Its conclusion: Peace would likely bring about the collapse of the USA.

Iron Mountain was edited by H.L. Mencken, and published as a work of non-fiction in 1967, but most reviewers and literary types recognized it as social commentary. Members of the general public were divided, however, so author Lewin dispelled all doubt by confirming Iron Mountain was a hoax in 1974. And that should have been the end of it. But it wasn’t.

The strange afterlife of Report from Iron Mountain

The real point of Iron Mountain was to highlight the absurdity of the Cold War through exaggeration and satire—the book tips its hand fairly heavily by suggesting UFO hoaxes, “blood games,” and bringing back slavery as possible replacement for war—but its ideas, shorn of their satirical context, spun outside the control of the literary types who dreamed it up. Iron Mountain started percolating in the poisonous coffee pot of fringe thinkers, combining and metastasizing with other seminal, fictional, conspiracy texts like Alternative 3 and The Protocols of the Brotherhood of Zion, until Iron Mountain became a foundational text for cranks, part of the ideological framework they can hang anything on.

It wasn’t just Oliver Stone’s source who mistook Report from Iron Mountain as truth. Much to the author’s dismay, the book was also rediscovered by the burgeoning-right wing militia movement of the 1980s, and reprinted as non-fiction by the anti-semitic Noontide Press. Milton William Cooper excerpted Iron Mountain in seminal conspiracy theory text Behold a Pale Horse, said to be a favorite of Oklahoma City Bomber Timothy McVeigh. From there, it’s a straight shot to “The Deep State,” Q-anon, Alex Jones, Covid cover-ups, and whatever else loonies are on about this week on X.

Tuesday Telescope: On Mars, the rovers take pictures of robotic arms and rocks

We’re back! A long-time reader and subscriber recently mentioned in the Ars Forums that they “kind of” missed the Daily Telescope posts that I used to write in 2023 and 2024. Although I would have preferred that everyone desperately missed the Daily Telescope, I appreciate the sentiment. I really do.

I initially stopped writing these posts about a year ago because it just became too much to commit to writing one thing every day. I mean, I could have done it. But doing so on the daily crossed over the line from enjoyable to drudgery, and one of the best things about working for Ars is that it tends very much toward the enjoyable side. Anyway, writing one of these posts on a weekly basis feels more sustainable. I guess we’ll find out!

Today’s image comes to you all the way from Mars. One of the most powerful tools on NASA’s Perseverance rover is the WATSON camera attached to the end of the rover’s robotic arm. In the fine tradition of tortured acronyms at the space agency, WATSON stands for Wide Angle Topographic Sensor for Operations and eNgineering. And because of course it is, WATSON is located on the SHERLOC (Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman and Luminescence for Organics and Chemicals) instrument. Seriously, NASA must stand for Not Another Screwball Acronym.

Read full article

Comments

OpenAI’s built-in image generator for ChatGPT is now available to free users

ChatGPT’s built-in image generation feature is now available to everyone. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said last week that the company is delaying its rollout to free tier “for a while,” because the tool was way more popular than they had expected. But the company made the feature available to free users over the weekend, allowing them to generate images from within ChatGPT and without having to switch to OpenAI’s DALL-E generator. Prior to its rollout to the free tier, the tool was only available to Plus, Pro and Team subscribers. 

Altman previously said that free users will get a limit of three images per day. Based on our experience trying it out, some accounts are limited to just one a day. Those who find themselves able to generate more than one will still have to wait anywhere between a few minutes and a few hours. One of the tool’s most popular uses that we’ve seen so far is the creation of Ghibli-style images using real-life photos. Users simply have to upload the photo they want to use and then instruct ChatGPT in natural language to create a Ghibli-style version of it. The trend had raised concerns, yet again, about the legality of using copyrighted work as training data for artificial intelligence. It also resurfaced the reaction of Hayao Miyazaki, Studio Ghibli’s founder, upon being shown AI-generated animation years ago. “I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself,” the director said. 

In a tweet, Altman said that the tool could still exhibit erratic behavior and could refuse some generations that should be allowed. OpenAI is still fixing the issue. The company also told TechCrunch that it “takes action” if a generated image violates company guidelines, though it didn’t exactly detail about what those actions are.

Creating and customizing images is as simple as chatting using GPT‑4o—just describe what you need, including any specifics like aspect ratio, exact colors using hex codes, or a transparent background. pic.twitter.com/fnen1aDjNZ

— OpenAI (@OpenAI) March 25, 2025

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/openais-built-in-image-generator-for-chatgpt-is-now-available-to-free-users-120003146.html?src=rss

British authors want Meta to answer for alleged copyright infringement

Creatives in the UK are once again speaking out against AI developers accessing copyrighted material. The Society of Authors have published an open letter calling for UK Secretary of State Lisa Nandy to hold Meta accountable for possible copyright infringement regarding its LLM, Llama 3. Signatories of the letter include successful British authors Richard Osman, Kazuo Ishiguro, Val McDermid and Sarah Waters. 

A March 20 article in The Atlantic served as the letter’s impetus. It reported that Meta had used LibGen, a pirated collection of over 7.5 million books, to train its AI models. Anyone on the internet over the last few weeks has likely seen videos of distraught authors learning that their work is available on the database (and potentially used by Meta without their permission). A lawsuit in the US alleges Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg approved the use of LibGen’s data to train its AI. The lawsuit’s plaintiffs include writers Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates.

“These cases are shining a light on the unscrupulous behaviour exhibited by global tech companies which seemingly exploit copyright-protected material, safe in the knowledge that they will not be held to account,” the Society of Authors’ letter stated. “This must change, and global tech companies must now be held accountable and pay for the use they make of authors’ works.”

The authors implore Nandy to bring Meta senior executives before Parliament and make them commit to respecting copyrights and compensating authors for any previous infringements. 

“Authors are almost powerless given the enormous cost and complexities of pursuing litigation against corporate defendants with such deep pockets,” the letter continued. “We call upon you and the UK Government to take all action available to ensure that the rights, interests and livelihoods of authors are adequately protected. Failure to act without further delay will unquestionably have a catastrophic and irreversible impact on all UK authors given that from development through to output, creators’ rights are being systematically and repeatedly ignored.”

Artists across the creative industries have also recently protested the UK government’s December 2024 proposal to change copyright law. The shift would provide AI developers with a copyright exemption and require creatives to “opt out” or allow access to their materials. 

In February, over 1,000 musicians released an album called Is This What We Want?, with 12 songs spelling out, “The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companies.” It coincided with the UK News Media Association’s Make It Fair campaign calling on the government to support creative industries and compensate those individuals if allowing AI to train on their work. 

That same week creatives, from Paul McCartney to Helen Fielding, also shared an open letter against the proposal. Published in The Times, it stated, “There is no moral or economic argument for stealing our copyright. Taking it away will devastate the industry and steal the future of the next generation.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/british-authors-want-meta-to-answer-for-alleged-copyright-infringement-114501800.html?src=rss

MCP: The new “USB-C for AI” that’s bringing fierce rivals together

What does it take to get OpenAI and Anthropic—two competitors in the AI assistant market—to get along? Despite a fundamental difference in direction that led Anthropic’s founders to quit OpenAI in 2020 and later create the Claude AI assistant, a shared technical hurdle has now brought them together: How to easily connect their AI models to external data sources.

The solution comes from Anthropic, which developed and released an open specification called Model Context Protocol (MCP) in November 2024. MCP establishes a royalty-free protocol that allows AI models to connect with outside data sources and services without requiring unique integrations for each service.

“Think of MCP as a USB-C port for AI applications,” wrote Anthropic in MCP’s documentation. The analogy is imperfect, but it represents the idea that, similar to how USB-C unified various cables and ports (with admittedly a debatable level of success), MCP aims to standardize how AI models connect to the infoscape around them.

Read full article

Comments

The Morning After: Get ready for Nintendo’s big Switch 2 reveal

I’m sidestepping the desperate attempts at April 1 shenanigans and focusing on the imminent Nintendo Direct broadcast, which is likely to confirm rumors and sink others.

The last few Switch 1 games have been revealed, meaning tomorrow’s Nintendo Direct: Switch 2 presentation, kicking off at 9AM ET / 6AM PT will be all about the new console — no distractions. (Although, I’d be cool with a Silksong release date, finally.)

We already know the Switch 2 will be a bigger console, with a bigger screen and Joy-Cons. There also may be some sort-of-mouse functionality baked into the controllers this time, but Nintendo’s focus is on tech specs — and the games. What does the company have cooking?

— Mat Smith

The biggest tech stories you missed

Get this delivered direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here!


The Light Phone III doesn’t have apps or internet, but still costs $799

$599 if you pre-order.

Light Phone
Light Phone

The company behind several minimalist handsets has just released the Light Phone III. It may be the perfect device for folks who brag about giving up smartphones and have the money to experiment with stripped-down phones that are the ultimate step back from modern convenience. Whoops, sorry, I let my mask slip there. Hey, at least there’s no AI nonsense.

There is a cool, crisp B&W OLED display, new for this third iteration, instead of e-ink paper. There’s still no internet, no apps, no email. There is, however, a place for your podcasts and a simple camera with a physical button. There’s also a Maps app, powered by Here, but it’s private, so there’s no info shared on where you’re trying to get to. Privacy like that, however, costs a heady $799, unless you can get the pre-order price of $599 at launch, with estimated delivery in July.

Continue reading.


xAI, Elon Musk’s AI company, just purchased X, Elon Musk’s social media company

Confused? You should be.

Yes, xAI has purchased X, according to a post shared by Musk. Besides their owner and similar names, the companies are already connected through xAI’s chatbot, Grok, so it makes some sense. The biggest surprise may be that X is still valued at $33 billion — according to Musk and his companies, at least. X, once Twitter, was acquired by Musk in 2022 for $43 billion. xAI, like many leading AI companies, has been raising money as often and as quickly as possible. Combining the two companies may ease some of the debt Musk took on.

The companies’ futures are “intertwined,” according to Musk. Financially, now, that’s very true.

Continue reading.


iOS 18.4 is available now

It adds new emoji, Apple News+ Food and priority notifications.

iOS 18.4, iPadOS 18.4 and macOS 15.4 include a new Apple News+ Food section in the News app that collects recipes and food-oriented articles, including exclusive recipes for Apple News+ subscribers. The updates also introduce new emoji, AI-sorted Priority Notifications in the Notification Center and a new Ambient Music tool in the Control Center.

After a bit of a delay, Apple Intelligence will be available in the European Union for the first time on iPhone and iPad. The suite of AI features will now also work in several new languages “including French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Spanish, Japanese, Korean and Chinese (simplified) — as well as localized English for Singapore and India.”

Continue reading.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/general/the-morning-after-engadget-newsletter-111414827.html?src=rss

Alan Turing Institute Plans Revamp in Face of Criticism and Technological Change

Britain’s flagship AI agency will slash the number of projects it backs and prioritize work on defense, environment and health as it seeks to respond to technological advances and criticism of its record. From a report: The Alan Turing Institute — named after the pioneering British computer scientist — will shut or offload almost a quarter of its 101 current initiatives and is considering job cuts as part of a change programme that led scores of staff to write a letter expressing their loss of confidence in the leadership in December.

Jean Innes, appointed chief executive in July 2023, argued that huge advances in AI meant the Turing needed to modernise after being founded as a national data science institute by David Cameron’s government a decade ago this month. “The Turing has chalked up some really great achievements,” Innes said in an interview. “[But we need] a big strategic shift to a much more focused agenda on a small number of problems that have an impact in the real world.” A review last year by UK Research and Innovation, the government funding body, found “a clear need for the governance and leadership structure of the Institute to evolve.” It called for a move away from the dominance of universities to a structure more representative of AI in UK.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Sarto’s Raso Gravel is an off-road race bike you can build your way – if you can afford it

The new Sarto Raso Gravel is designed as a gravel race bike with aerodynamics at its core, blended with lightweight and class-leading clearances to meet the demands of gravel racers.

You may not have heard of Sarto, but if you’ve ridden a high-end Italian bike over the last decade, the chances are you’ve ridden a frameset Sarto constructed at its Venice HQ.

More recently, Sarto has moved away from building for other brands and into making its own designs, concentrating on custom builds to meet the exacting needs of its customers.

The new Sarto Raso Gravel requires deep pockets, however. A frameset will set you back £8,210 / $8,250 / €7,750, while the bike we have in for testing has a price tag of £14,190 / $17,290 / €13,990.

The new Raso Gravel

Sarto Raso Gravel fork crown detail
The Raso Gravel can be had in two designs, with differing tyre clearances. Warren Rossiter / OurMedia

The Raso Gravel’s frame can be configured to take tyres from 48mm up to a huge 55mm (2.1 inches) on 700c wheels. The 48mm option can run 1x or 2x drivetrains, while the 55mm is 1x only. It can take up to a huge 52-tooth chainring size to meet the needs of the fastest gravel racers.

Sarto’s pro-gravel athlete Skyler Taylor had this to say about the wider option: “Tire size: the simple answer is bigger tires roll much faster on rough terrain and don’t puncture as easily.

“The reason 2.2 (inch) is so important is that all the tire performance tests show that the Continental Race King 2.2 performance has the best combination of rolling resistance, puncture protection, grip, and aerodynamics, and is the fastest tire on most dirt surfaces.

“There has been a huge amount of testing on these topics in the US. The results have been pretty clear. So you will see almost all the US pro gravel racers squeezing the biggest tires they can into their frames.

“Most frame manufacturers don’t understand this and still design around 45mm clearance. So there’s a competitive advantage to bikes like the Raso Gravel from a clearance perspective.”

Raso Gravel frameset

Sarto Raso gravel seat stays
The Raso Gravel’s back end has plenty of tyre clearance. Warren Rossiter / OurMedia

The frame design is inspired by Sarto’s performance road bike, the Raso. It has an integrated front end and tube shapes with similar aerodynamically designed profiles to its road-going cousin.

The rear triangle has the same silhouette on the 48mm and 55mm versions. Only the width changes and the rear dropout is SRAM’s Universal Derailleur Hanger, meaning the custom Raso gravel frame is set for the future.

At the front, a broad, torsionally stiff but slender fork has been created to aid vibration-damping control.

Sarto says the frame is a tri-composite. Each tube section is handmade by the Italian brand using a combination of carbon fibre sheets sourced in Italy and its proprietary lamination process.

The junctions on the frame are made from forged carbon, which is claimed to provide superior strength, accuracy and that stunning marble-like finish (on our unpainted test bike).

Sarto Raso gravel downtube detail
The transition between the forged carbon lugs and unique carbon tubes looks stunning. Warren Rossiter / OurMedia

The Raso Gravel’s design mixes aerodynamics with a light weight, with features such as a dedicated aero seatpost, and a one-piece bar and stem.

Fully integrated brake hoses take care of the aero details.

The bike has an impressively low weight of 7.88kg (size 58cm), with two bottle cages and an out-front Garmin mount.

Forged carbon headtube of the Sarto Raso Gravel
The forged carbon head tube looks stunning. Warren Rossiter / OurMedia

The build

SRAM's latest 13 speed RED XPLR AXS
SRAM’s latest 13-speed Red XPLR AXS adorns the Raso Gravel. Warren Rossiter / OurMedia

Being built to order, the Raso Gravel can be had either as a frame kit or built as a complete bike to your specific budget.

It doesn’t come cheap, however, with the frameset kit (fork, headset, spacers, stem, handlebar, seatpost, two bottle cages, thru-axles and computer mount) costing £8,210 / $8,250 / €7,750 in stock geometries. Specifying custom geometry typically involves around a £1,000 / $1,200 / €1,100 upcharge.

Sarto gravel cockpit
Sarto also makes the one-piece UD carbon gravel cockpit. Warren Rossiter / OurMedia

The full bike we have in for testing features SRAM Red AXS XPLR, Campagnolo Shamal Dual Profile DB wheels, a Selle Italia SLR Boost 3D Carbon Kit saddle and Rene Herse Oracle Ridge TC 48mm tyres. It comes with a retail price of £14,190 / $17,290 / €13,990.

Anthropic Will Begin Sweeping Offices For Hidden Devices

Anthropic said it will start sweeping physical offices for hidden devices as part of a ramped-up security effort as the AI race intensifies. From a report: The company, backed by Amazon and Google, published safety and security updates in a blog post on Monday, and said it also plans to establish an executive risk council and build an in-house security team. Anthropic closed its latest funding round earlier this month at a $61.5 billion valuation, which makes it one of the highest-valued AI startups.

In addition to high-growth startups, tech giants including Google, Amazon and Microsoft are racing to announce new products and features. Competition is also coming from China, a risk that became more evident earlier this year when DeepSeek’s AI model went viral in the U.S. Anthropic said in the post that it will introduce “physical” safety processes, such as technical surveillance countermeasures — or the process of finding and identifying surveillance devices that are used to spy on organizations. The sweeps will be conducted “using advanced detection equipment and techniques” and will look for “intruders.”


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Pocket Scotty Arrives for April Fools’ Day on Zwift

This is our 11th April Fools’ Day on Zwift, and each year ZHQ has come up with something fun for the community. In 2024 we ironically wore VR Goggles, then before that it was two years of special April Fools’ Day events. 2021 saw us big wheeling, in 2020 we were transported to 1989, and in 2019 we were burning rubber. The year before that it was Paperboy. In 2017 we had big heads, 2016 gave us the old-timey effect, and in 2015 we rode big wheels on Jarvis.

This year Zwift has a new surprise – Scotty the Squirrel in our jersey pockets:

About Scotty

Scotty the Squirrel is Zwift’s official mascot, showing up in game as an actual squirrel but also as various statues, including one with a cone on its head in Glasgow.

Here’s a bit of Zwift trivia: did you know that Scotty is named after Scott Barger, one of Zwift’s four co-founders? (The other three are Jon Mayfield, Eric Min, and Alarik Myrin.) Apparently, Scott carries a bit of infectious energy, and it seemed like the perfect fit…

First Flight of Isar Aerospace’s Spectrum Rocket Lasted Just 40 Seconds

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: The first flight of Isar Aerospace’s Spectrum rocket didn’t last long on Sunday. The booster’s nine engines switched off as the rocket cartwheeled upside-down and fell a short distance from its Arctic launch pad in Norway, punctuating the abbreviated test flight with a spectacular fiery crash into the sea. If officials at Isar Aerospace were able to pick the outcome of their first test flight, it wouldn’t be this. However, the result has precedent. The first launch of SpaceX’s Falcon 1 rocket in 2006 ended in similar fashion. “Today, we know twice as much about our launch system as yesterday before launch,” Daniel Metzler, Isar’s co-founder and CEO, wrote on X early Monday. “Can’t beat flight testing. Ploughing through lots of data now.”

Isar Aerospace, based in Germany, is the first in a crop of new European rocket companies to attempt an orbital launch. If all went according to plan, Isar’s Spectrum rocket would have arced to the north from Andoya Spaceport in Norway and reached a polar orbit. But officials knew there was only a low chance of reaching orbit on the first flight. For this reason, Isar did not fly any customer payloads on the Spectrum rocket, designed to deliver up to 2,200 pounds (1,000 kilograms) of payload mass to low-Earth orbit. […] Isar declared the launch a success in its public statements, but was it? […] Metzler, Isar’s chief executive, was asked last year what he would consider a successful inaugural flight of Spectrum. “For me, the first flight will be a success if we don’t blow up the launch site,” he said at the Handelsblatt innovation conference. “That would probably be the thing that would set us back the most in terms of technology and time.”

This tempering of expectations sounds remarkably similar to statements made by Elon Musk about SpaceX’s first flight of the Starship rocket in 2023. By this measure, Isar officials can be content with Sunday’s result. The company is modeling its test strategy on SpaceX’s iterative development cycle, where engineers test early, make fixes, and fly again. This is in stark contrast to the way Europe has traditionally developed rockets. The alternative to Isar’s approach could be to “spend 15 years researching, doing simulations, and then getting it right the first time,” Metzler said. With the first launch of Spectrum, Isar has tested the rocket. Now, it’s time to make fixes and fly again. That, Isar’s leaders argue, will be the real measure of success. “We’re super happy,” Metzler said in a press call after Sunday’s flight. “It’s a time for people to be proud of, and for Europe, frankly, also to be proud of.” You can watch a replay of the live launch webcast on YouTube.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

‘There is No Vibe Engineering’

Software engineer Sergey Tselovalnikov weighs in on the new hype: The term caught on and Twitter quickly flooded with posts about how AI has radically transformed coding and will soon replace all software engineers. While AI undeniably impacts the way we write code, it hasn’t fundamentally changed our role as engineers. Allow me to explain.

[…] Vibe coding is interacting with the codebase via prompts. As the implementation is hidden from the “vibe coder”, all the engineering concerns will inevitably get ignored. Many of the concerns are hard to express in a prompt, and many of them are hard to verify by only inspecting the final artifact. Historically, all engineering practices have tried to shift all those concerns left — to the earlier stages of development when they’re cheap to address. Yet with vibe coding, they’re shifted very far to the right — when addressing them is expensive.

The question of whether an AI system can perform the complete engineering cycle and build and evolve software the same way a human can remains open. However, there are no signs of it being able to do so at this point, and if it one day happens, it won’t have anything to do with vibe coding — at least the way it’s defined today.

[…] It is possible that there’ll be a future where software is built from vibe-coded blocks, but the work of designing software able to evolve and scale doesn’t go away. That’s not vibe engineering — that’s just engineering, even if the coding part of it will look a bit different.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

AMD’s Latest Wares, NVIDIA RTX 50 & Kernel Changes Excited Linux Users So Far In 2025

As the last planned article of the quarter, here is a look back at the most popular Phoronix content from Q1’2025 with 822 original news articles and 40 featured articles / Linux hardware reviews written by your’s truly. There were interesting hardware launches from Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA this quarter along with a never-ending pace of new open-source software innovations and the unfortunate ongoing drama within the free software community…

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Says Company Will Spin Off Non-Core Units

Intel Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan said the chipmaker will spin off assets that aren’t central to its mission and create new products including custom semiconductors to try to better align itself with customers. From a report: Intel needs to replace the engineering talent it has lost, improve its balance sheet and better attune manufacturing processes to meet the needs of potential customers, Tan said. Speaking at his first public appearance as CEO, at the Intel Vision conference Monday in Las Vegas, Tan didn’t specify what parts of Intel he believes are no longer central to its future.

“We have a lot of hard work ahead,” Tan said, addressing the company’s customers in the audience. “There are areas where we’ve fallen short of your expectations.” The veteran semiconductor executive is trying to restore the fortunes of a company that dominated an industry for decades, but now finds itself chasing rivals in most of the areas that define success in the field. A key question confronting its leadership is whether a turnaround is best served by the company remaining whole or splitting up its key product and manufacturing operations. Tan gave no indication that he will seek to divest either part of Intel. Instead, he highlighted the problems he needs to fix to get both units performing more successfully. Intel’s chips for data center and AI-related work in particular are not good enough, he said. “We fell behind on innovation,” the CEO said. “We have been too slow to adapt and meet your needs.”


Read more of this story at Slashdot.