Election polls aren’t broken, but they still can’t predict the future

Stickers await residents who vote at the Parks and Recreation Center building on August 14, 2018, in Elkhorn, Wisconsin.

Enlarge / Stickers await residents who vote at the Parks and Recreation Center building on August 14, 2018, in Elkhorn, Wisconsin. (credit: Scott Olson/Getty Images)

In the days before the 2016 US presidential election, nearly every national poll put Hillary Clinton ahead of Donald Trump—up by 3%, on average. FiveThirtyEight’s predictive statistical model—based on data from state and national voter polls—gave Clinton a 71.4% chance of victory. The New York Times’ model put the odds at 85%.

Trump’s subsequent win shocked the nation. Pundits and pollsters wondered: How could the polls have been so wrong?

Read 26 remaining paragraphs | Comments



Source: Ars Technica – Election polls aren’t broken, but they still can’t predict the future