Why a House-passed online sex trafficking bill could hurt victims

(credit: Mayor McGinn)

In a bipartisan 388 to 25 vote, the House of Representatives approved legislation on Tuesday to make it easier for states to prosecute websites that facilitate prostitution and sex trafficking—including trafficking of underage girls. But critics say that the legislation, known as the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA), could undermine a key legal protection for free speech online.

The House bill modifies Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which provides website operators with broad immunity for hosting third-party content. Digital rights groups argue that Section 230 made today’s innovative and free-wheeling Internet possible because sites don’t have to worry about getting sued if their users post content that violates the law.

“FOSTA would punch a major hole in Section 230, enabling lawsuits and prosecutions against online platforms—including ones that aren’t even aware that sex trafficking is taking place,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote on Tuesday.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments



Source: Ars Technica – Why a House-passed online sex trafficking bill could hurt victims