Skip to primary content

Prime-WoW

My site, my way, no big company can change this

Prime-WoW

Main menu

  • Home
  • Discord
  • Forums
  • Games
    • 7DtD
      • 7DtD Map
      • 7DtD Official Forums
      • 7DtD Wiki
    • Minecraft
      • Survival Map
      • Vanilla Map
      • FTB Map
      • FTB Wiki
      • Download FTB Client
    • NWN
      • NWN Wiki
      • NWN Lexicon
      • NWN Vault
      • NWNX
      • NWN Info
      • Rhun Guide
    • Terraria
      • Terraria Map
    • WoW
      • Prime-WoW Site
      • WoW Armory
  • Unfiltered RSS
    • Bikes
    • Games
      • Kotaku
      • PS4 News
      • VR
    • Nature
      • TreeHugger
      • Survival
    • Technology
      • Hardware
        • Hot Hardware
      • Linux
        • Linux Today
        • LWN.net
        • LXer
        • Phoronix
        • RPi
      • LifeHacker
      • Akihabara News
      • AnandTech
      • Ars Technica
      • Engadget
      • Gear & Gadgets
      • Geekologie
      • Gizmodo
      • [H]ardOCP
      • io9
      • Slashdot
      • TG Daily

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Implicit bias still hinders minority researchers

Posted on June 8, 2016 by Xordac Prime

Implicit biases are unconscious attitudes or stereotypes that affect how we perceive others; they sometimes run contrary to our conscious beliefs. Employers and law enforcement officers have faced criticism about implicit bias in the hiring of new employees and arresting of potential criminals. The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the organization that publishes Science magazine, recently looked into the role of implicit biases in the scientific review processes.

The issue of implicit bias in the peer review process is significant because a strong publication record is critical to success in most science and engineering fields. Bias in the grant review process may determine which scientists are able to continue working in their field. If some groups of people are less likely to publish and get funding, then the professional sphere of science will remain more homogeneous.

This is problematic because diverse groups tend to be more creative and innovative. If the peer review process is preventing science from becoming as diverse, then innovation is likely being held back as well.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments



Source: Ars Technica – Implicit bias still hinders minority researchers

This entry was posted in Ars Technica, Unfiltered RSS and tagged Ars Technica by Xordac Prime. Bookmark the permalink.
Proudly powered by WordPress