Skip to primary content

Prime-WoW

My site, my way, no big company can change this

Prime-WoW

Main menu

  • Home
  • Discord
  • Forums
  • Games
    • 7DtD
      • 7DtD Map
      • 7DtD Official Forums
      • 7DtD Wiki
    • Minecraft
      • Survival Map
      • Vanilla Map
      • FTB Map
      • FTB Wiki
      • Download FTB Client
    • NWN
      • NWN Wiki
      • NWN Lexicon
      • NWN Vault
      • NWNX
      • NWN Info
      • Rhun Guide
    • Terraria
      • Terraria Map
    • WoW
      • Prime-WoW Site
      • WoW Armory
  • Unfiltered RSS
    • Bikes
    • Games
      • Kotaku
      • PS4 News
      • VR
    • Nature
      • TreeHugger
      • Survival
    • Technology
      • Hardware
        • Hot Hardware
      • Linux
        • Linux Today
        • LWN.net
        • LXer
        • Phoronix
        • RPi
      • LifeHacker
      • Akihabara News
      • AnandTech
      • Ars Technica
      • Engadget
      • Gear & Gadgets
      • Geekologie
      • Gizmodo
      • [H]ardOCP
      • io9
      • Slashdot
      • TG Daily

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Could deep boreholes solve our nuclear waste problem?

Posted on February 27, 2023 by Xordac Prime
A diagram of what a waste borehole might look like, with various additional objects included for scale.

Enlarge / An artist’s impression of a deep borehole for nuclear waste disposal by Sandia National Laboratories in 2012. Red lines show the depth of mined repositories: Onkalo is the Finnish one, and WIPP is the US DOE repository for defense waste in New Mexico. (credit: Sandia National Laboratories)

There’s one thing every planned permanent repository for spent nuclear fuel has in common: They’re all underground mines.

Like any mine, a mined repository for nuclear waste is a complex feat of engineering. It must be excavated by blasting or a boring machine, it must keep the tunnels stable using rock supports, and it must have ventilation, seals, and pumps to handle groundwater and make it safe for people and machinery. Unlike a mine, however, a repository must also transport and entomb canisters of radioactive waste, and it must be engineered to exacting standards that ensure the tunnels will keep the canisters safe for many millennia.

There is an alternative idea that dispenses with most of those downsides: disposal in deep boreholes. But can they be both feasible and safe?

Read 55 remaining paragraphs | Comments



Source: Ars Technica – Could deep boreholes solve our nuclear waste problem?

This entry was posted in Ars Technica, Unfiltered RSS and tagged Ars Technica by Xordac Prime. Bookmark the permalink.
Proudly powered by WordPress