{"id":1234351,"date":"2025-02-24T07:34:00","date_gmt":"2025-02-24T12:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.prime-wow.com\/?p=1234351"},"modified":"2025-02-24T07:34:00","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T12:34:00","slug":"should-climate-change-be-acknowledged-in-movies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prime-wow.com\/?p=1234351","title":{"rendered":"Should Climate Change Be Acknowledged In Movies?"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Los Angeles Times publishes a weekly “Boiling Point” newsletter about climate change and energy issues. And this week they examined whether the scientific fact of a change climate is reflected in the mass media:
\nFor the second year running, nonprofit consulting firm Good Energy applied its Climate Reality Check to the actual Oscar-nominated films [which] tests whether a movie and its characters acknowledge global warming… Of last year’s 13 Oscar-nominated films that met Good Energy’s criteria (feature-length movies set in present-day or near-future Earth) three passed the test. This year, there were 10 eligible films. Only “The Wild Robot” passed… <\/p>\n

Maybe a few years from now, studios will release a torrent of movies and shows reflecting the realities of a scary-but-still-salvageable world, helmed by producers and writers jolted into renewed awareness by the infernos. But for now, the picture is bleak. A peer-reviewed study slated for publication this month, led by Rice University English and environmental studies professor Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, analyzes climate change mentions in 250 of the most popular movies of the last decade. The authors found that just 12.8% of the films allude to global warming. Just 3.6% depict or mention the climate crisis in two or more scenes. “A lot of times, it’s really being mentioned in passing,” Schneider-Mayerson said… <\/p>\n

[Good Energy Chief Executive Anna Jane Joyner] pointed to another analysis led by Schneider-Mayerson, which found that movies passing the Climate Reality Check and released in theaters earned 10% more at the box office, on average, than films failing the test. Netflix, meanwhile, says on its website that 80% of its customers “choose to watch at least one story on Netflix that helps them better understand climate issues or highlight hopeful solutions around sustainability….” [Netflix’s “Sustainability Stories” collection includes Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax, Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget, and Waterworld] <\/p>\n

Sponsors are interested in selling audiences on climate-friendly products, too. I was sitting in a movie theater last weekend enjoying “Captain America: Brave New World” \u2014 the latest entry in Disney’s Marvel Cinematic Universe \u2014 when, to my surprise, Sam Wilson (Anthony Mackie) got out of his SUV and pulled his iconic red-white-and-blue shield out of the front trunk. Yes, a front trunk, where an internal combustion engine would normally be. That meant Captain America was driving an electric vehicle, right? Indeed, he was. I did some research after I got home and learned that Wilson was driving a GMC Hummer EV, the result of a paid partnership between Marvel Studios and GMC parent company General Motors.<\/p>\n

Ironically, the movie does not at any point acknowledge global warming, the article points out (adding “Also, SUVs kill more pedestrians and cyclists than smaller cars.”)
\n“But the more movies and TV shows spotlight climate solutions \u2014 electric vehicles, solar panels, induction stoves \u2014 the more likely people are to support those solutions. For Hollywood, that’s a step in the right direction.”<\/p>\n

\n<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Read more of this story<\/a> at Slashdot.<\/p>\n